Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2016, Vol. 56 Issue (4): 354-359    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2016.24.003
  水利水电工程 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
国际EPC水电项目设计激励机理
唐文哲, 王腾飞, 孙洪昕, 漆大山
清华大学 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室, 项目管理与建设技术研究所, 北京100084
Game analysis of design incentives for delivering international hydropower EPC projects
TANG Wenzhe, WANG Tengfei, SUN Hongxin, QI Dashan
Institution of Project Management and Construction Technology, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
全文: PDF(987 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 提高中国水电施工企业作为国际设计-采购-施工(EPC)项目总承包商的设计管理能力有助于指导中国企业开拓国际水电市场。该文基于博弈理论,构建了总承包商与设计方之间的单期-多期激励模型,根据双方努力水平与收益矩阵变化,演绎了双方之间激励作用机理。基于7个国际水电EPC项目案例,对模型分析进行了实证检验。结果表明:1)设置激励机制有利于促进总承包商和设计方提高努力水平,优化设计,进而提升双方收益;2)单期激励对设计优化有促进作用,但设计方存在"机会主义"动机,激励效果不稳定;3)多期激励基于长期合作共赢理念,可维护总承包商和设计方之间合作关系的稳定性,激励效果更为明显;4)总承包商在EPC项目设计管理中应择优选择设计方、加强设计评审,并同设计方建立长期合作伙伴关系。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
唐文哲
王腾飞
孙洪昕
漆大山
关键词 设计-采购-施工(EPC)项目水电项目设计管理激励机制博弈    
Abstract:China's hydropower construction companies need to strengthen their design management for international EPC (engineering-procurement-construction) project delivery. Gaming theory was used to develop single-period and multi-period incentive models to investigate the incentive mechanisms between contractors and designers. The models were used to analyze 7 international EPC projects. The results show that:1) Design incentives promote optimum designs which add value to the project and benefit both contractors and designers. 2) Single-period incentives can lead to opportunistic behaviour, which may reduce the effectiveness of the design incentives. 3) The introduction of strategic benefits in multi-period incentives effectively strengthens the stability of long-term cooperation and maximize the benefits to contractors and designers in the long run. 4) EPC contractors should establish partnering relationships with qualified designers based on incentive evaluations.
Key wordsengineering-procurement-construction (EPC) projects    hydropower engineering    design management    incentive mechanism    game theory
收稿日期: 2015-01-22      出版日期: 2016-05-09
ZTFLH:  F407.9  
引用本文:   
唐文哲, 王腾飞, 孙洪昕, 漆大山. 国际EPC水电项目设计激励机理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(4): 354-359.
TANG Wenzhe, WANG Tengfei, SUN Hongxin, QI Dashan. Game analysis of design incentives for delivering international hydropower EPC projects. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2016, 56(4): 354-359.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2016.24.003  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2016/V56/I4/354
  表1 总承包商和设计方的博弈努力水平矩阵
  表2 总承包商和设计方的博弈收益矩阵
[1] Galloway P. Design-build/EPC contractor's heightened risk-Changes in a changing world[J]. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 2005, 1(1):7-15.
[2] Spady J E. Applying the design/build project delivery method to shore protection and other costal works projects[C]//Orville T M, ed. Coastal Engineering Practice. San Diego, USA:American Society of Civil Engineers, 2011:807-819.
[3] Love P, Lopez R, Kim, J T, et al. Influence of organizational and project practices on design error costs[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2014, 28(2):303-310.
[4] 孙滨斌. 国际EPC项目总承包商的设计管理[J]. 项目管理技术, 2010, 8(9):35-38.SUN Dinbin. Design management in international EPC projects[J]. Project Management Technology, 2010, 8(9):35-38.
[5] 马铁山, 那炎. 我国海外EPC项目设计管理的问题和对策[J]. 建筑技术, 2013, 44(3):258-260.MA Tieshan, NA Yan. Problems in design management of oversea EPC project and countermeasures[J]. Architecture Technology, 2013, 44(3):258-260.
[6] Lopez R, Love P, Edwards D, et al. Design error classification, causation, and prevention in construction engineering[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2010, 24(4):399-408
[7] Chan E, Chan A, Yu A. Design management in design and build projects:The new role of the contractor[C]//Iris D T, ed. Construction Research Congress. San Diego, USA:American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005:1-11.
[8] Andersen P H, Cook C, Marceau J. Dynamic innovation strategies and stable networks in the construction industry:Implanting solar energy projects in the Sydney Olympic Village[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2004, 57(4):351-60.
[9] 翁东风, 何洲汀. 基于多维决策变量的工程项目最优激励契约设计[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(11):139-143.WENG Dongfeng, HE Zhouting. Design of optimal incentive contract of construction projects based on multi-dimensional variables[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(11):139-143. (in Chinese)
[10] Oyedele L O. Analysis of architects' demotivating factors in design firms[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2013, 31(3):342-354.
[11] Rose T, Manley K. Motivation toward financial incentive goals on construction projects[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2011, 64(7):765-773.
[12] 严玲, 赵华. 基于项目治理的代建人激励机制研究框架[J], 科技进步与对策, 2009, 26(21):13-17.YAN Ling, ZHAO Hua. Research frame for incentive mechanism of the construction agent in government investment project:from the Perspective of project governance[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2009, 26(21):13-17. (in Chinese)
[13] 韩青苗, 刘长滨, 张洋, 等.非对称信息下既有建筑节能改造经济激励合约设计[J]. 土木工程学报, 2009, 42(8):129-133. HAN Qingmiao, LIU Changbin, ZHANG Yang, et al. Economic incentive contract design with a symmetric information in building energy efficiency retrofit[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2009, 42(8):129-133. (in Chinese)
[14] Meng X, Gallagher B. The impact of incentive mechanisms on project performance[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2012, 30(3):352-362.
[15] TANG Wenzhe, QIANG Maoshan, Duffield C F, et al. Incentives in the Chinese construction industry[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2008, 134(7):457-467.
[1] 王腾飞, 唐文哲, 漆大山, 杜蕾. 基于伙伴关系的国际EPC水电项目设计管理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(4): 360-364,372.
[2] 王灿, 金朱钢, 蔡闻佳. 基于效用理论的气候谈判博弈策略模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(9): 1017-1022.
[3] 窦一凡, 朱岩. 基于纵向差异化的双边软件平台竞争[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(6): 705-708.
[4] 丁荣涛. 基于合作博弈的港口物流链云服务组织方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 54(3): 366-372.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn