Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2016, Vol. 56 Issue (8): 865-870    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2016.25.029
  环境科学与工程 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于生态评估的新疆玛纳斯县域发展适宜性分析
杨萍1, 彭羽2, 刘雪华1, 孟鸿雁3, 王斌3
1. 清华大学 环境学院, 生态学教研所, 北京 100084;
2. 中央民族大学 生命与环境科学学院, 北京 100081;
3. 中国城市规划设计研究院 风景园林规划研究所, 北京 100044
Urban development suitability evaluations based on ecological assessments-A case study of Manasi County, Xinjiang Province
YANG Ping1, PENG Yu2, LIU Xuehua1, MENG Hongyan3, WANG Bin3
1. Institute of Ecology, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China;
3. Institute of Landscape Architecture Planning, Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Beijing 100044, China
全文: PDF(1898 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 生态评估可以确定生态保护的重点区域,为城市规划提供科学参考。该文以新疆玛纳斯县为研究区域,首先根据专家知识和层次分析法,建立了生态敏感性和生态风险评价指标体系,然后在ArcGIS 9.3软件平台进行生态敏感性和生态风险综合评估,最后根据生态评估结果进行了县域发展适宜性分析,并划分了禁建区、限建区和适建区。结果表明:应用专家知识、层次分析法和GIS(geographical information system)进行生态评估,具有可操作性和结果的可靠性;高敏感区、较高敏感区、中度敏感区、低度敏感区和非敏感区分别占研究区域总面积的41.31%、16.17%、16.44%、7.07%和19.01%;高生态风险区主要分布于塔西河乡南部、清水河乡中部和南部,以及广东地乡北部,较高风险区分布于塔西河中下游沿岸、玛纳斯河下游沿岸,其他地区生态风险等级较低;县域发展适宜性较高的区域主要位于玛纳斯镇大部分地区,兰州湾镇及147团场西部地区,北五岔北部,新湖农场,148团场、149团场、150团场东部地区,不适宜发展区域主要位于北部沙漠、南部山区、玛纳斯河和塔西河沿线及湿地区域。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨萍
彭羽
刘雪华
孟鸿雁
王斌
关键词 生态评估地理信息系统层次分析法适宜性分析玛纳斯县    
Abstract:Ecological assessments are used to identify important areas for ecological protection and to provide scientific support for urban planning. This study took Manasi County, Xinjiang Province, as a case study and constructed an ecological sensitivity and ecological risk criteria system based on expert knowledge and an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. The ecological sensitivity and risk assessment was used to evaluate the urban development suitability and to divide the whole area into prohibited construction, restricted construction and appropriate building zones. The process shows that the integrated expert knowledge, AHP data, and GIS data provides an effective ecological assessment method. The Manasi County has 41.31% extremely sensitive areas, 16.17% highly sensitive areas, 16.44% moderately sensitive areas, 7.07% low sensitive areas, and 19.01% non-sensitive areas. The extremely high ecological risk areas are mainly in the southern part of Taxi River County, the middle and southern part of Qingshui River County, and the northern part of Guangdongdi County. The high risk areas are mainly in the upstream and midstream regions of the Manasi and Taxi Rivers. The areas suitable for development are mainly in the towns of Manasi, Lanzhouwan, the western part of the 147 Production and Construction Corps, the northern part of Beiwucha, the western part of Xinhu farm, and the 148, 149 and 150 Production and Construction Corps areas, the low suitability for development areas are mainly in the desert, mountains, and wetlands.
Key wordsecological assessment    geographical information system (GIS)    analytical hierarchy process (AHP)    suitability evaluation    Manasi County
收稿日期: 2013-09-23      出版日期: 2016-08-15
ZTFLH:  X321  
通讯作者: 刘雪华,副教授,E-mail:xuehua-hjx@tsinghua.edu.cn     E-mail: xuehua-hjx@tsinghua.edu.cn
引用本文:   
杨萍, 彭羽, 刘雪华, 孟鸿雁, 王斌. 基于生态评估的新疆玛纳斯县域发展适宜性分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(8): 865-870.
YANG Ping, PENG Yu, LIU Xuehua, MENG Hongyan, WANG Bin. Urban development suitability evaluations based on ecological assessments-A case study of Manasi County, Xinjiang Province. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2016, 56(8): 865-870.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2016.25.029  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2016/V56/I8/865
  图1 玛纳斯县在新疆的地理位置及下辖区域
  表1 数据内容和来源
  表2 玛纳斯县域生态系统敏感性评价指标
  表3 玛纳斯县域生态风险评价指标
  图2 生态敏感性分析
  图3 生态风险分析
  图4 县域发展适宜性分析
  图5 县域建设分区
[1] 兰竹虹,陈桂珠.南中国海地区主要生态系统的退化现状与保育对策[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(10):1978-1982.LAN Zhuhong,CHEN Guizhu.Degradation of main ecosystems in South China Sea and corresponding conservation countermeasure[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2006,17(10):1978-1982.(in Chinese)
[2] 郑昭佩,邢子金,李艳娟.北大沙河流域生态系统退化现状及其恢复对策[J].资源环境与发展,2009,3:15-17.ZHENG Shaopei,XING Zijin,LI Yanjuan.Degradation of ecosystems in Beidasha River Basin and restoration strategies[J].Resources,Environment and Development,2009,3:15-17.(in Chinese)
[3] 戚登臣,陈文业,张继强,等.敦煌西湖湿地生态系统现状、退化原因及综合修复对策[J].草业学报,2010,19(4):194-203.QI Dengchen,CHEN Wenye,ZHANG Jiqiang,et al.Status,degraded causes and comprehensive treatment of Dunhuang Xihu wetland ecosystem[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2010,19(4):194-203.(in Chinese)
[4] 张治华,徐建华,韩贵锋.生态敏感区划分指标体系研究——以北部湾(广西)经济区为例[J].中国东西部合作研究,2007,4:89-96.ZHANG Zhihua,XU Jianhua,HAN Guifeng.Research on the ecological sensitivity zone classification criteria system——A case study of Beibuwan economic zone[J].The Working Papers of RCEWCC,2007,4:89-96.(in Chinese)
[5] Suffling R.An index of ecological sensitivity to disturbance,based on ecosystem age,and related to landscape diversity[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1980,10(3):253-262.
[6] LIU Xuehua,SUN Yan.Evaluating and structuring indicators for wetland assessment[J].Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering in China,2010,4(2):221-227.
[7] 李文华.生态系统服务功能价值评估的理论、方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.LI Wenhua.Theory,Methodology and Application of the Value Assessment of Ecosystems Service Function[M].Beijing:Publication House of Renmin University of China,2008.(in Chinese)
[8] 彭羽,刘雪华,张爽,等.基于综合生态损失度的顺义区生态风险评价.清华大学学报(自然科学版),2008,48(3):366-369.PENG Yu,LIU Xuehua,ZHANG Shuang,et al.Ecological risk assessment of the Shunyi District,Beijing based on an analysis of the integrated ecological loss[J].Journal of Tsinghua University (Sci&Tech),2008,48(3):366-369.(in Chinese)
[9] Bonan G B,Shugart H H,Urban D L.The sensitivity of some high-latitude boreal forest to climatic parameters[J].Climatic Change,1990,16(1):9-29.
[10] Eggermont H,Verschuren D,Audenaert L,et al.Limnological and ecological sensitivity of Rwenzori mountain lakes to climate warming[J].Hydrobiologia,2010,648(1):123-142.
[11] 房庆方,杨细平,蔡瀛.区域协调和可持续发展——珠江三角洲经济区城市群规划及其实施[J].城市规划,1997,22(1):7-10.FANG Qingfang,YANG Xiping,CAI Ying.Regional coordination and sustainable development——City group planning and implementation of the Pearl River Delta Economic Zone[J].Urban Planning,1997,22(1):7-10.(in Chinese)
[12] 贾良清,欧阳志云,赵同谦,等.安徽省生态功能区划研究[J].生态学报,2005,25(2):254-260.JIA Liangqing,OUYANG Zhiyun,ZHAO Tongqian,et al.The ecological function regionalization of Anhui province[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(2):254-260.(in Chinese)
[13] 高会军,李小强,张峰.青海湖地区生态环境动态变化遥感监测[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2005,16(3):100-103.GAO Huijun,LI Xiaoqiang,ZHANG Feng.Remote sensing monitory study on the dynamic change of ecological environment in Qinghai Lake area during 25 years[J].The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2005,16(3):100-103.(in Chinese)
[14] 康相武,吴绍洪,刘雪华.浑善达克沙地土地沙漠化时空演变规律研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(1):1-6.KANG Xiangwu,WU Shaohong,LIU Xuehua.Research on spatio-temporal change of sandy desertification in Hunshandake[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,23(1):1-6.(in Chinese)
[15] 贺秋华,陈浒,屠玉麟.基于模糊综合评判的黔中地区生态环境敏感性研究[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2004,22(4):27-30.HE Qiuhua,CHEN Hu,TU Yulin.A study based on fuzzy synthetical judgement for the ecological environmental sensitivity in central Guizhou province[J].Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Sciences),2004,22(4):27-30.(in Chinese)
[16] 孙国军.BP人工神经网络在生态环境脆弱性评价方面的应用——以乌拉特前旗为例.西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,48(5):105-108.SUN Guojun.Study on the evaluation of eco-environmental vulnerability by BP artificial neural network:A case study of Wulate County[J].Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science),2012,48(5):105-108.(in Chinese)
[17] 王庆英.新疆玛纳斯河流域生态环境研究初探[J].内蒙古水利,2011,133(3):6-7.WANG Qingying.Preliminary research on the ecological environments of Manasi River Basin,Xinjiang Province[J].Neimenggu Water Engineering,2011,133(3):6-7.(in Chinese)
[18] 冯异星,罗格平,周德成,等.近50 a土地利用变化对干旱区典型流域景观格局的影响——以新疆玛纳斯和流域为例.生态学报,2010,30(16):4295-4305.FENG Yixing,LUO Geping,ZHOU Decheng,et al.Effects of land use change on landscape pattern of a typical arid watershed in the recent 50 years:A case study on Manas River Watershed in Xinjiang[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010,30(16):4295-4305.(in Chinese)
[19] 王月健,徐海量,王成.过去30 a玛纳斯河流域生态安全格局与农业生产力演变[J].生态学报,2011,31(9):2539-2549.WANG Yuejian,XU Hailiang,WANG Cheng.The evolution between ecological security pattern and agricultural productive force in Manasi River Basin for the past 30 years[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(9):2539-2549.(in Chinese)
[1] 刘康, 刘昭伟, 陈永灿, 马芳平, 王皓冉, 黄会宝, 谢辉. 引水隧洞结构安全风险评价的动态Bayes网络模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63(7): 1041-1049.
[2] 魏奕新, 韩一蕾, 卢滇楠, 邱彤. 基于理论可行性的生物合成路径评估方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63(5): 697-703.
[3] 吕伟, 李承旭, 马亚萍. 基于GIS位置分配的城市应急避难场所责任区划分[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(6): 1102-1109.
[4] 陈道想, 林鹏, 丁鹏, 李果, 陈涛, 余卓憬. 基于群层次分析法的振冲碎石桩填料方法比选[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(12): 1915-1921.
[5] 蒋光昱, 王忠静, 索滢. 西北典型节水灌溉技术综合性能的层次分析与模糊综合评价[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59(12): 981-989.
[6] 陈涛, 陈智超. 基于证据推理法的城镇综合承灾能力网格化评价方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 58(6): 570-575.
[7] 徐君锋, 王嘉捷, 朱克雷, 张普含, 马宇飞. 基于AHP的安卓应用安全信用指数度量方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 58(2): 131-136.
[8] 卢兆麟, 李升波, Schroeder Felix, 周吉晨, 成波. 结合自然语言处理与改进层次分析法的乘用车驾驶舒适性评价[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(2): 137-143.
[9] 吕艳丽, 李元龙, 向爽, 夏春和. 基于服务相关性的应用层安全事件危害评估方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(1): 35-41.
[10] 李媛媛, 陈建国, 张小乐, 袁宏永. 基于建筑结构破坏的地震伤亡评估方法及应用[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(7): 803-807,814.
[11] 袁尚南, 强茂山, 温祺, 江汉臣. 基于模糊层次分析法的建设项目组织效能评价模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(6): 616-623.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn