Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2017, Vol. 57 Issue (7): 732-737    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.25.030
  水利水电工程 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于动态收益的水电开发利益分配模型
陈文超1, 强茂山1, 夏冰清1, 郑腾飞2
1. 清华大学 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室, 项目管理与建设技术研究所, 北京 100084;
2. 中国长江三峡集团 三峡国际能源投资集团有限公司, 北京 100033
Benefit-sharing in hydropower projects: A mathematical model based on dynamic rate
CHEN Wenchao1, QIANG Maoshan1, XIA Bingqing1, ZHENG Tengfei2
1. Project Management and Technology Institute, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. China Three Gorges International Corporation, China Three Gorges Corporation, Beijing 100033, China
全文: PDF(937 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 水库移民问题的本质是利益分配问题,需要通过水电开发利益重分配加以解决。该文通过引入动态收益率评判指标,建立了水电开发利益分配数学模型,给出了实现目标收益率情况下移民补偿和水电上网电价的试算求解法以及不同边界条件下模型的拓展形式;应用建立的模型,对中国西南地区某大型水电项目进行了案例分析。研究结果表明:当前水库移民是各主要参与方中收益率最低的一方,开发企业和电网企业收益率处于居中位置,而地方投资企业收益率最高;该大型水电项目蕴含着巨大的水能资源经济租空间,完全具备调节移民补偿和水电电价的能力,证明了模型及结果的合理性。该文建立的利益分配模型丰富了移民补偿理论,成果和结论对移民工作和政策制定有指导意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈文超
强茂山
夏冰清
郑腾飞
关键词 水电开发项目水库移民利益分配动态收益    
Abstract:Rebuilding the benefit-sharing mechanism is the key to solving problems related tore settling hydropower exploitation. A dynamic rate is used as the evaluation index in the mathematical model for the resettlement compensation and hydroelectricity price for different boundary conditions. The model is applied to the hydropower project in Southwest China as a case study. The results show that migrants get the lowest return among the various stakeholders, hydropower corporations and grid corporations get a moderate level of return, and local investment corporations get the best return. The large economic returns in large hydropower projects allow adjustments of the migrants' compensation as well as the hydroelectricity price so this model are useful in practical projects. This model can be used to improve migrant compensation with the conclusions providing guidance and hydropower resettlement policy.
Key wordshydropower project    hydropower resettlement    benefit-sharing    dynamic rate
收稿日期: 2016-06-07      出版日期: 2017-07-15
ZTFLH:  TV9  
  F407.9  
通讯作者: 强茂山,教授,E-mail:qiangms@tsinghua.edu.cn     E-mail: qiangms@tsinghua.edu.cn
引用本文:   
陈文超, 强茂山, 夏冰清, 郑腾飞. 基于动态收益的水电开发利益分配模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(7): 732-737.
CHEN Wenchao, QIANG Maoshan, XIA Bingqing, ZHENG Tengfei. Benefit-sharing in hydropower projects: A mathematical model based on dynamic rate. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2017, 57(7): 732-737.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.25.030  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2017/V57/I7/732
  表1 主要参与方收益率现状
  表2 基准方案:调平后的各方收益率
  表3 拓展方案:不同边界条件下移民补偿和上网电价的变动
[1] 樊启祥. 水电项目开发利益共享模型研究 [D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2010. FAN Qixiang. Research on the Benefit Sharing Model of Hydropower Project Development [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2010. (in Chinese)
[2] Wang P, Wolf S A, Lassoie J P, et al. Compensation policy for displacement caused by dam construction in China: An institutional analysis [J]. Geoforum, 2013, 48: 1-9.
[3] Tullos D. Assessing the influence of environmental impact assessments on science and policy: An analysis of the Three Gorges Project [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 903(SI): S208-S223.
[4] Cernea M. The risks and reconstruction model for resettling displaced populations [J]. World Development, 1997, 25(10): 1569-1587.
[5] Shanahan M. Large dams: Sharing the water, and the benefits [J]. International Water Power and Dam Construction, 2012, 64(7): 30-31.
[6] Singer J, Watanabe T. Reducing reservoir impacts and improving outcomes for dam-forced resettlement: Experiences in central Vietnam [J]. Lakes & Reservoirs Research and Management, 2014, 19(3): 225-235.
[7] Milewski J, Egre D, Roguet V. Dams and Benefit Sharing-Prepared for Thematic Review I [R]. Edinburgh, UK: ⅡED, 1999.
[8] Skinner J, Niasse M, Haas L, et al. Sharing the Benefits of Large Dams in West Africa [R]. Edinburgh, UK: ⅡED, 2009.
[9] 朱文龙, 施国庆. 移民系统分享工程效益机理与方法探讨[J]. 水利经济, 1995(1): 58-61.ZHU Wenlong, SHI Guoqing. The research on the mechanisms and methods of resettlement system sharing project profits [J]. Journal of Economics of Water Resources, 1995(1): 58-61. (in Chinese)
[10] 贾若祥. 西部地区水电资源开发利用的利益分配机制研究[J]. 中国能源, 2007, 29(6): 5-11.JIA Ruoxiang. Study on profit allocation mechanism of hydropower development in the western China [J]. Energy of China, 2007, 29(6): 5-11. (in Chinese)
[11] 汪恕诚. 水权转换是水资源优化配置的重要手段 [J]. 水利规划与设计, 2004(3): 1-3.WANG Shucheng. Transfer of water right is an important means for optimization of allocation of water resources [J]. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2004(3): 1-3. (in Chinese)
[12] 汪洁. 基于成本-收益理论的水库移民补偿模型研究 [D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2014.WANG Jie. Research on the Reservoir Resettlement Compensation Model Based on the Cost and Benefit Theory [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[13] 樊启祥, 陆佑楣, 强茂山, 等. 可持续发展视角的中国水电开发水库移民安置方式研究 [J]. 水力发电学报, 2015, 34(1): 237-244.FAN Qixiang, LU Youmei, QIANG Maoshan, et al. Study on China hydropower reservoir resettlement in the view of sustainable development [J]. Journal of Hydropower Engineering, 2015, 34(1): 237-244. (in Chinese)
[1] 陈文超, 强茂山, 夏冰清, 郑腾飞. 水库移民营生资本与可持续发展模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(9): 945-949.
[2] 强茂山, 汪洁. 基于生活水平的水库移民补偿标准及计算方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(12): 1303-1308.
[3] 陈文超,强茂山,王佳宁,郑腾飞. 水库移民管理者的认知对移民满意度的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(1): 46-49.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn