Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2017, Vol. 57 Issue (6): 661-666    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.036
  建设管理 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
收费公路PPP项目最低收入担保机制设计
刘婷, 王守清, 冯珂
清华大学 建设管理系, 清华大学恒隆房地产研究中心, 北京 100084
Minimum revenue guarantee mechanism design for toll road PPP projects
LIU Ting, WANG Shouqing, FENG Ke
Hang Lung Center for Real Estate, Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
全文: PDF(1163 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 该文研究收费公路政府与社会资本合作(public-private partnerships,PPP)项目中最低收入担保机制的设计原则和方法,以改善收入风险的分担。基于文献综述提出了最低收入担保机制设计的5个原则,建立符合以上原则的随机模型以求解最低收入担保机制的收入下限和上限,利用案例展示了所提出方法的应用,并通过数值模拟验证了该方法的有效性。研究表明:根据目标资本结构来确定最低收入担保水平,有助于大幅减小项目公司的破产风险;根据目标投资回报结合竞标的方式来确定超额收入阈值,从而实现超额收入分享,能有效避免企业通过PPP项目获得超额回报。该方法使得最低收入担保与超额收入分享机制对PPP项目财务状况的改善和为政府带来的或有债务可以测算,能为项目方案评审、财务测算和财政承受能力评估等提供量化依据,并改善政府对PPP项目的支付预算管理。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘婷
王守清
冯珂
关键词 政府与社会资本合作(PPP)最低收入担保超额收入分享或有债务财政承受能力评价    
Abstract:This article describes the principles and methodology used to design the minimum revenue guarantee (MRG) mechanism to improve revenue risk allocation for toll road PPP projects. A literature review shows five critical principles for MRG design which are used in a stochastic model to find the optimal upper and lower revenue thresholds. A case study shows the application and effectiveness of this methodology. This research shows that a minimum revenue threshold determined by the target capital structure significantly reduces the bankruptcy probability of the project company. A maximum revenue threshold jointly determined by a target rate of investment return and a bidding process will prevent the private sector from obtaining excessive profits from the PPP project. These method and models will help with quantitative evaluations of the impacts of an MRG on a PPP project's financial status and the government's contingent liabilities to further improve project evaluations and fiscal sustainability assessments as well as budgeting for PPPs.
Key wordspublic-private partnerships (PPP)    minimum revenue guarantee (MRG)    excess revenue sharing (ERS)    contingent liability    fiscal sustainability assessment
收稿日期: 2016-05-10      出版日期: 2017-06-15
ZTFLH:  F407.9  
通讯作者: 王守清,教授。E-mail:sqwang@tsinghua.edu.cn     E-mail: sqwang@tsinghua.edu.cn
引用本文:   
刘婷, 王守清, 冯珂. 收费公路PPP项目最低收入担保机制设计[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(6): 661-666.
LIU Ting, WANG Shouqing, FENG Ke. Minimum revenue guarantee mechanism design for toll road PPP projects. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2017, 57(6): 661-666.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.036  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2017/V57/I6/661
  图1 本项目NPV 的概率分布
  图2 最低收益担保加超额收益分享机制对项目NPV 的改进
  图3 政府因担保而产生的支出/收入现值的概率分布
[1] Guasch J L, Laffont J J, Straub S. Renegotiation of Concession Contracts in Latin America[M]. Washington, DC:World Bank Publication, 2003.
[2] Harris C, Hodges J, Schur M. Infrastructure projects:A review of canceled private projects. (2003-01-31). http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXT_FINANCIAL_S-ECTOR/Resources/282884-1303327122200/252Harri.pdf.
[3] Flyvbjerg B, Skamris H M K, Buhl S L. How (in) accurate are demand forecasts in public works projects? The case of transportation[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2005, 71(2):131-146.
[4] Chiara N, Garvin M J, Vecer J. Valuing simple multiple-exercise real options in infrastructure projects[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2007, 13(2):97-104.
[5] Cruz C O, Marques R C. Flexible contracts to cope with uncertainty in public-private partnerships[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2013, 31(3):473-483.
[6] 叶苏东. BOT项目主要风险的管理研究[J]. 项目管理技术, 2008(8):26-31.YE Sudong. Research on major risk management for BOT projects[J]. Project Management Techonology, 2008(8):26-31. (in Chinese)
[7] Quiggin J. Public-private partnerships:Options for improved risk allocation[J]. Australian Economic Review, 2005, 38(4):445-450.
[8] Xu Y, Yeung J F, Jiang S. Determining appropriate government guarantees for concession contract:Lessons learned from 10 PPP projects in China[J]. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 2014, 18(4):356-367.
[9] Myers S C. Finance theory and financial strategy[J]. Interfaces, 1984, 14(1):126-137.
[10] Trigeorgis L, Mason S P. Valuing managerial flexibility[J]. Midland Corporate Finance Journal, 1987, 5(1):14-21.
[11] Martins J, Marques R C, Cruz C O. Real options in infrastructure:Revisiting the literature[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2013, 21(1), 04014026.
[12] 季闯, 袁竞峰, 李启明. 基础设施PPP项目实物期权界定与分析[J]. 工程管理学, 2011, 25(4):393-398.JI Chuang, YUAN Jingfeng, LI Qiming. Definition and analysis of real option in Public Private Partnership projects[J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2011, 25(4):393-398. (in Chinese).
[13] Huang Y L, Chou S P. Valuation of the minimum revenue guarantee and the option to abandon in BOT infrastructure projects[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2006, 24(4):379-389.
[14] Cheah C Y, Liu J. Valuing governmental support in infrastructure projects as real options using Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2006, 24(5):545-554.
[15] 高峰, 郭菊娥, 王乐, 等. 基于上升敲出期权的基础设施项目政府担保价值研究[J]. 软科学, 2007(4):51-55.GAO Feng, GUO Ju'e, WANG Le, et al. Research on government guarantees value in infrastructure projects based on the up-and-out options[J]. Soft Science, 2007(4):51-55. (in Chinese)
[16] 张国兴, 郭菊娥, 龚利. 基础设施项目政府担保价值研究[J].统计与决策, 2007(5):51-52.ZHANG Guoxing, GUO Ju'e, GONG Li. Research on government guarantees value in infrastructure projects[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2007(5):51-52. (in Chinese)
[17] Brandao L E, Saraiva E. The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure projects[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2008, 26(11):1171-1180.
[18] Galera A L, Soliño A S. A real options approach for the valuation of highway concessions[J]. Transportation Science, 2010, 44(3):416-427.
[19] Jun J. Appraisal of combined agreements in BOT project finance:Focused on minimum revenue guarantee and revenue cap agreements[J]. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 2010, 14(2):139-155.
[20] Ashuri B, Kashani H, Molenaar KR, et al. Risk-neutral pricing approach for evaluating BOT highway projects with government minimum revenue guarantee options[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2011, 138(4):545-557.
[21] Iyer K C, Sagheer M. A real options based traffic risk mitigation model for build-operate-transfer highway projects in India[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2011, 29(8):771-779.
[22] Fisher G, Babbar S. Private Financing of Toll Roads[M]. Washington DC:World Bank, 1996.
[23] Shan L, Garvin M J, Kumar R. Collar options to manage revenue risks in real toll public-private partnership transportation projects[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2010, 28(10):1057-1069.
[24] Sun Y, Zhang L. Balancing public and private stakeholder interests in BOT concessions:Minimum revenue guarantee and royalty scheme applied to a water treatment project in China[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2014, 141(2):04014070.
[25] Ashuri B, Kashani H, Molenaar K R, et al. A valuation model for choosing the optimal minimum revenue guarantee (MRG) in a highway project:A real-option approach[C]//In Construction Research Congress 2010:Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice. Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2010:8-11.
[26] Carbonara N, Costantino N, Pellegrino R. Revenue guarantee in public-private partnerships:A fair risk allocation model[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2014, 32(4):403-415.
[27] Vassallo J, Soliño A. Minimum income guarantee in transportation infrastructure concessions in Chile[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006(1960):15-22.
[28] Nombela G, Rus G D. Auctions for infrastructure concessions with demand uncertainty and unknown costs. (2016-05-31). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12023/1/MPRA_paper_12023.pdf.
[1] 张亚坤, 张旭腾, 唐文哲. 工程建设企业创新的影响机理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(2): 235-242.
[2] 陈文超, 强茂山, 夏冰清, 郑腾飞. 基于动态收益的水电开发利益分配模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(7): 732-737.
[3] 雷振, 唐文哲, 孙洪昕, 尤日淳. 基于水电工程企业的组织网络协作与组织能力的交互关系研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(7): 738-746.
[4] 沈文欣, 唐文哲, 张清振, 王姝力. 基于伙伴关系的国际EPC项目接口管理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(6): 644-650.
[5] 郑航, 陈奔, 林木. 基于集市型水权交易模型的报价行为[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(4): 351-356.
[6] 冯珂, 王守清, 薛彦广. 基于多方满意的PPP项目股权配置优化研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(4): 376-381.
[7] 薛彦广, 邓晓梅, 冯珂. 面向最终用户的建筑市场逆向多属性电子招投标博弈分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(8): 836-843.
[8] 王姝力, 唐文哲, 沈文欣, 雷振. 水电开发利益相关方合作管理研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(5): 558-564.
[9] 唐文哲, 王腾飞, 孙洪昕, 漆大山. 国际EPC水电项目设计激励机理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(4): 354-359.
[10] 王腾飞, 唐文哲, 漆大山, 杜蕾. 基于伙伴关系的国际EPC水电项目设计管理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(4): 360-364,372.
[11] 强茂山, 汪洁. 基于生活水平的水库移民补偿标准及计算方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(12): 1303-1308.
[12] 林正航, 强茂山, 袁尚南. 大型国际工程承包商核心能力模型评价[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(12): 1309-1314,1323.
[13] 江汉臣, 林鹏, 强茂山. 基于实时定位系统的监理人员管理和评价[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(9): 950-956,963.
[14] 陈文超, 强茂山, 夏冰清, 郑腾飞. 水库移民营生资本与可持续发展模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(9): 945-949.
[15] 袁尚南, 强茂山, 温祺, 江汉臣. 基于模糊层次分析法的建设项目组织效能评价模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(6): 616-623.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn