Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2018, Vol. 58 Issue (3): 317-323    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2018.25.012
  经济与公共管理 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于集成交付理念的建设项目激励模型
苏贵良1, 邓晓梅1, 冯珂1,2, 薛彦广1
1. 清华大学 工程管理研究所, 北京 100084;
2. 清华大学 恒隆房地产研究中心, 北京 100084
Incentive mechanism for construction projects based on the IPD philosophy
SU Guiliang1, DENG Xiaomei1, FENG Ke1,2, XUE Yanguang1
1. Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. Hang Lung Center for Real Estate, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
全文: PDF(0 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为研究在集成交付理念下,项目特征、参与人特征、激励结构等因素对项目激励效果的影响规律,该文基于已有文献构建了多方激励模型。并结合文献和案例,运用博弈仿真方法分析研究项目优化潜力、项目目标设定、激励结构、参与人努力成本等因素对项目激励效果的影响。研究结果表明:所构建模型较为可行,项目优化潜力、项目目标以及团队努力成本等因素对项目的激励效果有重要影响;适当的参与人努力成本差异有利于项目成功;收益分配应避免过于悬殊,按照参与人努力成本差异进行分配的方式并不是最好的激励。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
苏贵良
邓晓梅
冯珂
薛彦广
关键词 集成交付模式激励模型多方博弈演化分析    
Abstract:A multi-party incentive model shows how the project characteristics, participant characteristics and incentive structure promote a project. The real effect of the participant cost, project optimization and incentive structure are illustrated through game simulations. The results show that the importance of the incentive model. High level of optimization potential, low team costs and the team members' cost variance contribute to the project success. The target cost setting, goal achievement compensation, and income distribution are critical project incentives.
Key wordsintegrated project delivery (IPD)    incentive mechanism    multi game model    game simulation
收稿日期: 2017-07-06      出版日期: 2018-03-14
ZTFLH:  F284  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51578300)
通讯作者: 邓晓梅,副教授,E-mail:dengxm@tsinghua.edu.cn   
作者简介: 苏贵良(1986-),男,博士研究生。
引用本文:   
苏贵良, 邓晓梅, 冯珂, 薛彦广. 基于集成交付理念的建设项目激励模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 58(3): 317-323.
SU Guiliang, DENG Xiaomei, FENG Ke, XUE Yanguang. Incentive mechanism for construction projects based on the IPD philosophy. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2018, 58(3): 317-323.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2018.25.012  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2018/V58/I3/317
  图1 基于全过程服务的IPDGish项目组织结构
  表1 模型主要参数及含义
  图2 项目激励执行结果类型
  图3 目标成本设定、团队成本水平和项目可优化程度对团队努力水平和收益的影响
  图4 多参数单方向变动对参与人收益和努力水平的影响
  图5 分配方式和成本比例交互变动分析
[1] LEVITT R E. CEM research for the next 50 years maximizing economic environmental and societal value of the built environment[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2007, 133(9):619-628.
[2] 邓晓梅, 姜涌, 廖彬超, 等. 首席监造人制:建筑师负责制的中国化[J]. 中国勘察设计, 2016(4):56-63. DENG X M, JIANG Y, LIAO B C, et al. Chief supervisor of construction:The sinicization of architect responsibility system[J]. China Exploration & Design, 2016(4):56-63.(in Chinese).
[3] ASHCRAFT H W. Integrated project delivery:Optimizing project performance[EB/OL]. (2014-05). https://net-work.aia.org/home.
[4] WOOYONG J, BALLARD G, YONG-WOO K, et al. Understanding of target value design for integrated project delivery with the context of game theory[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 Construction Research Congress. West Lafayette, IN, USA:American Society of Civil Engineers, 2012:556-563.
[5] NANDA U, RYBKOWSKI Z K, PATI S, et al. A value analysis of lean processes in target value design and integrated project delivery:Stakeholder perception[J]. Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 2017, 10(3):99-115.
[6] 何清华, 刘晴. 集成项目交付(IPD)典型模式合同治理研究[J]. 建设监理, 2016(2):20-22, 54.HE Q H, LIU Q. Typical contract structure of integrated project delivery (IPD)[J]. Project Management, 2016(2):20-22, 54.(in Chinese)
[7] 马智亮, 马健坤. 消除建筑工程设计变更的定量激励机制[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(8):1280-1285.MA Z L, MA J K. A quantitative incentive mechanism to eliminate change orders in construction projects[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2016, 44(8):1280-1285.(in Chinese).
[8] MATTHEWS O, HOWELL G A. Integrated project delivery an example of relational contracting[J]. Lean Construction Journal, 2005, 2(1):46-61.
[9] LIU M, BATES A J. Compensation structure and contingency allocation in integrated project delivery[C]//120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Atlanta, GA, USA:American Society for Engineering Education, 2013:6695.
[10] 李真, 孟庆峰, 盛昭瀚, 等. 工程质量优化的承包商群体激励效率演化分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012(3):112-121.LI Z, MENG Q F, SHENG Z H, et al. Evolution analysis of incentive efficiency of contractor group for engineering quality optimization[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012(3):112-121.(in Chinese).
[11] KENT D C, BECERIK-GERBER B. Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010, 136(8):815-825.
[12] AIA. Document C191TM-2009:Standard form multi-party agreement for integrated project delivery[EB/OL]. (2009-03). http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/do-cuments/pdf/aiab081563.pdf.
[13] AIA. Integrated project delivery:A guide[EB/OL]. (2012-11). http://www.aiacc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/IPDeliveryGuide_final_revised.pdf.
[14] ASMAR M E, HANNA A S, LOH W Y. Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013, 139(11):04013012.
[15] IPDA. Motivation and means:How and why IPD and lean lead to success[EB/OL]. (2016-11). http://www.ipda.ca/research-performance/case-studies/.
[16] AIA. IPD case studies[EB/OL]. (2012-3). http://rp.design.umn.edu/resources/documents/IPD-Case-Study-Mat-rix-2012_corrected02.pdf.
[17] PEPPER A, GOSLING T, GORE J. Fairness, envy, guilt and greed:Building equity considerations into agency theory[J]. Human Relations, 2015, 68(8):1291-1314.
[18] 唐文哲, 王腾飞, 孙洪昕, 等. 国际EPC水电项目设计激励机理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(4):354-359.TANG W Z, WANG T F, SUN H X, et al. Game analysis of design incentives for delivering international hydropower EPC projects[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2016, 56(4):354-359.(in Chinese)
[19] HANNA A S. Benchmark performance metrics for integrated project delivery[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2016, 142(9):04016040.
[1] 唐文哲, 雷振, 王姝力, 谢坤, 张清振. 国际工程EPC项目采购集成管理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(8): 838-844.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn