Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2019, Vol. 59 Issue (5): 409-416    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2018.25.057
  土木工程 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
众包在城市规划中的应用与展望
万耀璘1, 徐晴雯1, 廖彬超1, 李潇潇2
1. 清华大学 土木水利学院, 建设管理系, 北京 100084;
2. 中国路桥工程有限责任公司, 北京 100010
Application and prospect of crowdsourcing in urban planning
WAN Yaolin1, XU Qingwen1, LIAO Pin-chao1, LI Xiaoxiao2
1. Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. China Road and Bridge Corporation, Beijing 100010, China
全文: PDF(1140 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 合理的城市规划需要公众的参与。众包作为一种新兴的数据获取与分析方式,可以有效地促进公众参与,使城市规划更加科学合理。该文首先从城市规划对公众参与的要求出发,介绍了众包应用的必要性。其次,通过案例总结城市规划中亟需众包应用的环节,并且回顾了现有的众包技术:数据收集、清洗与分析。再次,针对现有的城市规划过程,指出未来可以应用众包的前景:1)与移动终端实时互动发挥数据清洗功能,以便基于更高质量的数据辅助城市规划; 2)以众包数据分析功能集成多元异构的数据,汲取公众反馈作为决策的基础。最后,该文指出政府需要进一步确定基于众包的决策范围与过程,以进一步发挥众包在城市规划中的效用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
万耀璘
徐晴雯
廖彬超
李潇潇
关键词 城市规划众包公众参与    
Abstract:Reasonable urban planning requires public participation. Crowdsourcing is an emerging data acquisition and information evaluation method that encourages public participation and makes urban planning more scientific. This article articulates the necessity of utilizing crowdsourcing for urban planning. Then, this study identifies the crowdsourcing phases for urban planning by summarizing several cases and reviewing existing crowdsourcing techniques for data collection, cleaning and analysis. This study then summarizes future research directions for crowdsourcing such as 1) data cleaning techniques need to be further developed for instant feedback to mobile terminals to provide high quality data for urban planning and 2) methods for integrating multisource data to extract feedback from the public as the basis for decision making. Lastly, this study shows that to effectively utilize crowdsourcing, governments should carefully define the study scope and process when implementing crowdsourcing.
Key wordsurban planning    crowdsourcing    public participation
收稿日期: 2018-07-05      出版日期: 2019-05-14
基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51878382)
通讯作者: 廖彬超,副教授,E-mail:pinchao@tsinghua.edu.cn     E-mail: pinchao@tsinghua.edu.cn
引用本文:   
万耀璘, 徐晴雯, 廖彬超, 李潇潇. 众包在城市规划中的应用与展望[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59(5): 409-416.
WAN Yaolin, XU Qingwen, LIAO Pin-chao, LI Xiaoxiao. Application and prospect of crowdsourcing in urban planning. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2019, 59(5): 409-416.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2018.25.057  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2019/V59/I5/409
  图1 众包概念示意图
  表1 众包技术在城市规划项目中的应用案例
  图2 众包在城市规划中的应用概念框架
  图3 基于便携设备收集城市规划基础数据的众包模式
  图4 以多元异构数据作为城市规划参考的众包模式
[1] 谭纵波. 城市规划[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2005. TAN Z B. Introduction to urban planning and design[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2005. (in Chinese)
[2] 美国城市设计协会. 城市设计技术与方法[M]. 杨俊宴, 译. 武汉:华中科技大学出版社, 2016. American Urban Design Association. The urban design handbook:Techniques and working methods[M]. YANG J Y, trans. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science & Technology Press, 2016. (in Chinese)
[3] 张荣天, 焦华富. 中国新型城镇化研究综述与展望[J]. 世界地理研究, 2016, 25(1):59-66. ZHANG R T, JIAO H F. A review on new urbanization research in China[J]. World Regional Studies, 2016, 25(1):59-66. (in Chinese)
[4] 顾朝林, 吴莉娅. 中国城市化研究主要成果综述[J]. 城市问题, 2008(12):2-12. GU C L, WU L Y. Review on major studies on urbanization in China[J]. Urban Problems, 2008(12):2-12. (in Chinese)
[5] 何燕, 周靖祥. 城市化与城镇化之辩:构建区域联动发展研究新框架[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 19(4):1-12. HE Y, ZHOU J X. Debate on urbanization:Construct a new framework for the study of the regional linkage development[J]. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 2013, 19(4):1-12. (in Chinese)
[6] ARNSTEIN S R. A ladder of citizen participation[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35(4):216-244.
[7] 武磊, 党安荣. 公众参与城市规划的技术方法[J]. 北京规划建设, 2005(6):20-22. WU L, DANG A R. The techniques and methods of public participation in urban planning[J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2005(6):20-22. (in Chinese)
[8] 王鹏, 袁晓辉, 李苗裔. 面向城市规划编制的大数据类型及应用方式研究[J]. 规划师, 2014, 30(8):25-31. WANG P, YUAN X H, LI M Y. Big data type and application for urban planning compilation[J]. Planners, 2014, 30(8):25-31. (in Chinese)
[9] 莫文竞, 夏南凯. 基于参与主体成熟度的城市规划公众参与方式选择[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2012(4):79-85. MO W J, XIA N K. Planning participation approaches and public political maturity[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2012(4):79-85. (in Chinese)
[10] HOWE J. Crowdsourcing:A definition[Z/OL]. (2006-06-02). http://crowdsourcing.typepad.com/cs/2006/06/crowdsourcing_a.html.
[11] ESTELLÉS-AROLAS E, GONZÁLEZ-LADRÓN-DE-GUEVARA F. Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2012, 38(2):189-200.
[12] 茅明睿, 储妍, 程辉, 等. 规划云平台:"互联网+"规划公众参与的实践[C]//2015中国城市规划年会论文集. 贵阳, 2015. MAO M R, CHU Y, CHENG H, et al. Cloud platform of urban planning:The practice of "Internet +" in planning public participation[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Annual National Planning Conference. Guiyang, 2015.
[13] 张利斌, 钟复平, 涂慧. 众包问题研究综述[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2012, 29(6):154-160. ZHANG L B, ZHONG F P, TU H. A research review on crowdsourcing[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2012, 29(6):154-160. (in Chinese)
[14] ZHAO Y X, ZHU Q H. Evaluation on crowdsourcing research:Current status and future direction[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2014, 16(3):417-434.
[15] Nexthamburg. Vber Nexthamburg[Z/OL].[2018-07-05]. http://www.nexthamburg.de/about-nexthamburg.
[16] 李哲. 探索历史街区风貌保护新模式[J]. 瞭望, 2014(50):56-57. LI Z. Exploring a new model for protecting historical block[J]. Outlook Weekly, 2014(50):56-57. (in Chinese)
[17] 熊伟, 周勃. "众规武汉"开放平台的建设与思考[J]. 北京规划建设, 2016(1):100-102. XIONG W, ZHOU B. The development and thought of the open platform "Zhonggui Wuhan"[J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2016(1):100-102. (in Chinese)
[18] 成都公众管理平台. 众智规划身边绿地——市规划局启动中心城区小游园、微绿地规划公众参与活动[Z/OL].[2018-07-05]. http://www.cdgh.gov.cn/qwfb/gzdt/5533.htm. Chengdu Planning and Management Bureau. Public participation in green space planning:The Planning and Management Bureau started the public participation activities of small parks and green space planning in city center[Z/OL].[2018-07-05]. http://www.cdgh.gov.cn/qwfb/gzdt/5533.html. (in Chinese)
[19] Foursquare. About us[Z/OL].[2018-06-30]. https://foursquare.com/about.
[20] Ushahidi. About Ushahidi[Z/OL].[2018-06-30]. http://ushahidi.com/about.
[21] City of Dallas Urban Forest Advisory Committee. Citizen forester program[Z/OL].[2018-06-30]. http://dallastrees.org/?page_id=91.
[22] 清华控股. 2017年共享单车与城市发展白皮书[Z/OL]. (2017-04-13)[2018-07-05]. http://www.thholding.com.cn/News/show/contentid/1532.html. Tsinghua Holdings. White paper on bicycle-sharing and the development of city in 2017[Z/OL]. (2017-04-13)[2018-07-05]. http://www.thholding.com.cn/News/show/contentid/1532.html. (in Chinese)
[23] SELTZER E, MAHMOUDI D. Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing:Challenges and opportunities for planning[J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 2013, 28(1):3-18.
[24] HERNÁNDEZ M A, STOLFO S J. Real-world data is dirty:Data cleansing and the merge/purge problem[J]. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1998, 2(1):9-37.
[25] LEITĀO L, CALADO P, WEIS M. Structure-based inference of xml similarity for fuzzy duplicate detection[C]//Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Lisbon, Portugal:ACM, 2007:293-302.
[26] FAN W F, GEERTS F, TANG N, et al. Inferring data currency and consistency for conflict resolution[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering. Brisbane, Australia:IEEE, 2013:470-481.
[27] ZHANG C J, CHEN L, TONG Y X, et al. Cleaning uncertain data with a noisy crowd[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 31st International Conference on Data Engineering. Seoul, Republic of Korea:IEEE, 2015:6-17.
[28] VUKOVIC M, DAS R. Decision making in enterprise crowdsourcing services[M]//BASU S, PAUTASSO C, ZHANG L, et al. Service-oriented computing. Berlin, Germany:Springer, 2013:624-638.
[29] ALONSO O, MIZZARO S. Can we get rid of TREC assessors? Using mechanical turk for relevance assessment[C]//Proceedings of the SIGIR Workshop on the Future of IR Evaluation. New York, USA:ACM, 2009.
[30] SNOW R, O'CONNOR B, JURAFSKY D, et al. Cheap and fast:But is it good?:Evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Honolulu, USA:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008:254-263.
[31] HSUEH P Y, MELVILLE P, SINDHWANI V. Data quality from crowdsourcing:A study of annotation selection criteria[C]//Proceedings of the NAACL HLT Workshop on Active Learning for Natural Language Processing. Boulder, USA:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010:27-35.
[32] 刘颖, 刘咏梅. 基于2-TUPLE MADM的众包平台辅助决策设计框架[J]. 系统工程, 2015, 33(11):153-158. LIU Y, LIU Y M. Crowdsourcing platform aided decision-making designing framework based on 2-tuple MADM[J]. Systems Engineering, 2015, 33(11):153-158. (in Chinese)
[33] BLOHM I, RIEDL C, LEIMEISTER J M, et al. Idea evaluation mechanisms for collective intelligence in open innovation communities:Do traders outperform raters?[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. Shanghai, China:AAIS, 2011.
[34] BURNAP A, REN Y, GERTH R, et al. When crowdsourcing fails:A study of expertise on crowdsourced design evaluation[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2015, 137(3):031101.
[35] 彭震伟, 张磊. 新世纪我国城市规划决策机制的思考[J]. 规划师, 2001, 17(4):27-30. PENG Z W, ZHANG L. On the decision-making mechanism of urban planning in china in the new century[J]. Planners, 2001, 17(4):27-30. (in Chinese)
[1] 张桦, 沈菲, 蒋世豪, 张灵均, 徐宏. 集成加权软投票的众包真值推理方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(2): 347-354.
[2] 崔俊云, 陈迪, 袁野, 马玉亮, 王国仁. 空间众包中在线路径规划算法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 60(8): 672-682.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn