Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2019, Vol. 59 Issue (8): 619-627    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2019.22.018
  水利水电工程 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
有限土体土压力和边坡安全系数分析
介玉新
清华大学 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室, 北京 100084
Analyses on finite earth pressure and slope safety factors
JIE Yuxin
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
全文: PDF(1483 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 结合岩土工程近年来的发展,该文针对有限土体土压力、边坡安全系数及临界滑动面的计算方法中存在的问题进行分析探讨,发现现有的计算有限土体土压力的方法存在缺陷,由此计算的土压力会随着土体宽度的减小而趋近于0,违背土力学常识。有限土体土压力应当采用Rankine土压力理论进行计算。采用基于强度储备定义的安全系数,可以无须区分“抗滑力”和“滑动力”。对于给定滑动面,取滑动面上土体的抗剪强度来计算安全系数是由抗剪强度的定义本身所决定的,但土体并不一定能够调整到“最大抗滑能力”。最小安全系数对应的临界滑动面不一定是最先发生滑动的破坏面。该研究对理解相关概念、提高岩土力学的认知水平具有一定意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
介玉新
关键词 有限土体土压力边坡安全系数滑动面    
Abstract:This paper analyzes recent geotechnical engineering studies such as the finite earth pressures, slope safety factors and critical slip surfaces. However, current methods for calculating the finite earth pressure are not appropriate since they predict that the earth pressure decreases to zero as the soil mass width decreases, which violates the soil mechanics laws. The Rankine earth pressure theory can still be used to calculate the finite earth pressure. The slope safety factor is defined according to the strength reserve with no need to distinguish between the "anti-sliding force" and the "sliding force". The shear strength definition shows that the soil shear strength should be used to calculate the safety factor for a given soil slope slip surface. However, a slope cannot necessarily be adjusted to develop its "maximum anti-sliding ability". Furthermore, the critical slip surface corresponding to the minimum safety factor may not be the first surface to slide. Thus, this investigation helps discriminate the key concepts for understanding geotechnical mechanics.
Key wordsfinite soil mass    earth pressure    slope safety factor    slip surface
收稿日期: 2018-12-06      出版日期: 2019-08-05
基金资助:国家“十三五”重点研发计划(2017YFC0404803);国家自然科学基金项目(41790434)
引用本文:   
介玉新. 有限土体土压力和边坡安全系数分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59(8): 619-627.
JIE Yuxin. Analyses on finite earth pressure and slope safety factors. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2019, 59(8): 619-627.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2019.22.018  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2019/V59/I8/619
  图1 有限土体土压力问题示意
  图2 Rankine主动极限平衡状态示意
  图3 土压力计算简图
  图4 土压力等量置换简图
  图5 考虑侧壁摩擦力的土压力等量置换
  图6 挡土结构受力简图
  图7 大坝心墙的浸润线 [17]
  图8 蠕变和固结作用引起的孔压变化 [18]
  图9 土的应力应变示意
  图10 静定结构示例
  图11 分层边坡示例
  图12 滑动面变化的影响示例
[1] 高印立. 有限土体土压力的计算探讨[J]. 建筑科学, 2000, 16(5):53-56. GAO Y L. The calculation of finite earth pressure[J]. Building Science, 2000, 16(5):53-56. (in Chinese)
[2] 宁源, 马石城. 有限黏性土体主动土压力计算分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2017, 47(S1):1161-1165. NING Y, MA S C. Calclulation of active earth pressure for limited cohesive soil[J]. Building Structure, 2017, 47(S1):1161-1165. (in Chinese)
[3] 戴夏斌. 墙后有限宽度无粘性土主动土压力试验及数值模拟[D]. 长沙:湖南大学, 2016. DAI X B. Experimental study of active earth pressure of cohesionless soil with limited width behind the retaining wall and numerical simulation[D]. Changsha:Hunan University, 2016. (in Chinese)
[4] 马继才. 有限土体土压力理论在兰州地铁1号线工程中的应用研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2015, 59(9):98-103. MA J C. Application study on the theory of earth pressure for limited soil in Lanzhou Metro Line 1[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2015, 59(9):98-103. (in Chinese)
[5] 廖俊展, 苗峰. 基于上限分析法的有限宽度土体土压力计算[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(S2):577-581. LIAO J Z, MIAO F. Computation of earth pressure for limited width soil by upper limit method[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016, 12(S2):577-581. (in Chinese)
[6] 费彩会, 朱建明, 林庆涛. 临近地下室外墙的挡土墙主动土压力研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(4):1009-1015. FEI C H, ZHU J M, LIN Q T. Research on active earth pressure behind retaining wall adjacent to basements exterior wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2017, 13(4):1009-1015. (in Chinese)
[7] 王磊. 有限土体土压力理论在异型深基坑工程中的应用研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2017, 61(5):119-125. WANG L. Application study of the theory of limited soil earth pressure in deep foundation pit of special shape[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2017, 61(5):119-125. (in Chinese)
[8] 张怀文, 吉晓朋, 车东. 临近建筑物有限宽度土体深基坑支护设计与施工[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2008, 22(6):312-315, 323. ZHANG H W, JI X P, CHE D. Design and construction of retaining structures for deep foundation pit to protect limited width soil[J]. Geotechnical Engineering Technique, 2008, 22(6):312-315, 323. (in Chinese)
[9] 岳树桥, 左人宇, 陆钊. 相邻基坑有限宽度土条主动土压力的计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(7):2063-2069. YUE S Q, ZUO R Y, LU Z. A method for calculating active earth pressure of soil piece with a finite width between adjacent foundation pits[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(7):2063-2069. (in Chinese)
[10] 陈仲颐, 周景星, 王洪瑾. 土力学[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 1994. CHEN Z Y, ZHOU J X, WANG H J. Soil mechanics[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 1994. (in Chinese)
[11] 刘定华, 郝际平. 钢筋混凝土筒仓仓壁侧压力的研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 1995, 16(5):57-63. LIU D H, HAO J P. Research on lateral pressure upon wall of reinforced concrete silo[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 1995, 16(5):57-63. (in Chinese)
[12] 韩阳, 李东桥, 陈家豪, 等. 筒仓静态储粮的边界压力及仓壁摩擦力试验研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(13):296-302. HAN Y, LI D Q, CHEN J H, et al. Experimental study on boundary pressure and wall friction under static grain storage in silo[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(13):296-302. (in Chinese)
[13] 殷宗泽. 土工原理[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2007. YIN Z Z. Principle of soil mechanics[M]. Beijing:China Water & Power Press, 2007. (in Chinese)
[14] 李广信. 高等土力学[M]. 2版. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2016. LI G X. Advanced soil mechanics[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2016. (in Chinese)
[15] 介玉新, 郭政豪. 基于加速度计算边坡的安全系数[J]. 水力发电学报, 2018, 37(9):74-83. JIE Y X, GUO Z H. Acceleration-based approach to calculation of safety factors of slopes[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2018, 37(9):74-83. (in Chinese)
[16] 介玉新, 李伟瀚, 张彬. 用加速度方法计算隧洞的安全系数[J]. 水力发电学报, 2018, 37(8):103-110. JIE Y X, LI W H, ZHANG B. Acceleration-based safety factor calculation of tunnel[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2018, 37(8):103-110. (in Chinese)
[17] JIE Y X, WEN Y F, DENG G, et al. Impact of soil deformation on phreatic line in earth-fill dams[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2012, 46:44-50.
[18] 介玉新, 周诗博, 陈杰, 等. 差分法计算一维固结的若干问题探讨[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2015, 11(S1):48-52.JIE Y X, ZHOU S B, CHEN J, et al. Discussion on difference method for calculation of one-dimensional consolidation[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2015, 11(S1):48-52. (in Chinese)
[19] 介玉新, 柏永亮, 余卓憬, 等. 边坡的潜在滑动面分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 2015, 23(S1):242-246. JIE Y X, BAI Y L, YU Z J, et al. Analysis on potential sliding surface of slopes[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2015, 23(S1):242-246. (in Chinese)
[20] 介玉新, 柏永亮, 张彬. 基于加速度的边坡和挡土墙稳定性分析[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2015, 37(6):120-126. JIE Y X, BAI Y L, ZHANG B. Stability analysis of slopes and retaining walls based on acceleration[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2015, 37(6):120-126. (in Chinese)
[21] 介玉新, 柏永亮, 张彬. 边坡潜在滑动面的包络线分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2016, 35(3):28-35. JIE Y X, BAI Y L, ZHANG B. Analysis on envelopes for potential slip surfaces of slopes[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2016, 35(3):28-35. (in Chinese)
[22] 介玉新, 李伟瀚, 张彬. 用加速度方法分析隧洞的稳定性[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(4):301-306. JIE Y X, LI W H, ZHANG B. Stability analysis of tunnel using the acceleration method[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2018, 46(4):301-306. (in Chinese)
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn