Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2022, Vol. 62 Issue (7): 1142-1150    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.26.042
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
突发事件下城市群内旅客城际出行方式选择行为
原雅丽1, 杨小宝1, 李虹慧2, 四兵锋1
1. 北京交通大学 综合交通运输大数据应用技术交通运输行业重点实验室, 北京 100044;
2. 交通运输部路网监测与应急处置中心, 北京 100029
Intercity travel mode choice behavior of travelers in large urban regions during emergencies
YUAN Yali1, YANG Xiaobao1, LI Honghui2, SI Bingfeng1
1. MOT Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China;
2. Highway Monitoring & Response Center, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100029, China
全文: PDF(1759 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 以城市群内旅客城际出行为研究对象,分析心理潜变量、城市群属性和突发事件等因素对城际出行方式选择行为的影响。基于京津冀旅客城市群内部城际出行问卷调查数据,构建突发事件下考虑心理潜变量的综合选择(integrated choice and latent variable,ICLV)模型进行实证分析。结果表明:考虑便捷性和乘车体验潜变量的混合选择模型对居民城际出行行为的拟合优度更高;城市群属性方面,起讫点城市类型、出行距离和起讫点间铁路车次数量对出行方式选择有显著影响;突发事件方面,雾霾天气下选择铁路出行的概率提高25.69%,雨天选择小汽车出行的概率提高31.63%,雪天选择小汽车出行的概率相对降低,发生阻断事件时选择小汽车出行的概率升高。研究结果有助于深入理解城市群内城际出行方式选择行为,为突发事件下城际出行需求的差异化出行诱导和需求管控提供科学依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
原雅丽
杨小宝
李虹慧
四兵锋
关键词 城市群出行方式选择综合选择模型城际出行潜变量突发事件    
Abstract:This study analyzed the influence of psychological latent variables, urban agglomeration, emergencies and other factors on intercity travel mode choices in large cities. Data from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban region was used to estimate an integrated choice and latent variable (ICLV) model for the empirical analysis. The results show that the goodness-of-fit of the ICLV model, which included convenience and ride experience, is better than that of the traditional discrete choice model. Origin and destination, travel distance and frequency of train services all significantly impact the choice of travel mode. The probability of train use in hazy weather increased by 25.69%, the probability of car use in rainy weather increased by 31.63%, the probability of car use in snowy weather decreased, and the probability of car use when the trains were blocked increased. These results are helpful for understanding intercity travel mode choices and provide a scientific basis for predicting travel volume and demand control for intercity travel during emergencies.
Key wordsurban agglomeration    travel mode choice    integrated choice model    intercity travel    latent variable    emergencies
收稿日期: 2021-08-06      出版日期: 2022-06-16
基金资助:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2021YJS091);国家自然科学基金资助项目(91746201,71621001)
通讯作者: 杨小宝,教授,E-mail:yangxb@bjtu.edu.cn      E-mail: yangxb@bjtu.edu.cn
作者简介: 原雅丽(1995—),女,博士研究生。
引用本文:   
原雅丽, 杨小宝, 李虹慧, 四兵锋. 突发事件下城市群内旅客城际出行方式选择行为[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(7): 1142-1150.
YUAN Yali, YANG Xiaobao, LI Honghui, SI Bingfeng. Intercity travel mode choice behavior of travelers in large urban regions during emergencies. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2022, 62(7): 1142-1150.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.26.042  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2022/V62/I7/1142
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
[1] 陈坚, 晏启鹏, 杨飞, 等. 出行方式选择行为的SEM-Logit整合模型[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(2):51-57, 65. CHEN J, YAN Q P, YANG F, et al. SEM-Logit integration model of travel mode choice behaviors[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 41(2):51-57, 65. (in Chinese)
[2] 朱海燕, 关宏志, 韩艳, 等. 心理因素影响下游客节假日错峰旅游出行行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(5):225-230, 250. ZHU H Y, GUAN H Z, HAN Y, et al. Holiday tourists' staggered shifts behavior considering affection of psychological factors[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(5):225-230, 250. (in Chinese)
[3] KIM J, RASOULI S, TIMMERMANS H J P. The effects of activity-travel context and individual attitudes on car-sharing decisions under travel time uncertainty:A hybrid choice modeling approach[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2017, 56:189-202.
[4] NAYUM A, NORDFJRN T. Predictors of public transport use among university students during the winter:A MIMIC modelling approach[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2021, 22:236-243.
[5] 李军, 贾顺平, 钱剑培, 等. 习惯影响下城际出行方式选择意向形成机理[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(2):7-12, 39. LI J, JIA S P, QIAN J P, et al. Intention formation mechanism in the intercity travel mode choice influenced by the habit[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(2):7-12, 39. (in Chinese)
[6] 叶玉玲, 韩明初, 陈俊晶. 基于出行链的城际旅客出行方式选择行为[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(9):1234-1240. YE Y L, HAN M C, CHEN J J. Intercity passenger travel mode choice behavior based on trip chain[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2018, 46(9):1234-1240. (in Chinese)
[7] BORHAN M N, IBRAHIM A N H, MISKEEN M A A. Extending the theory of planned behaviour to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya:Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external influence[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2019, 130:373-384.
[8] HESS S, SPITZ G, BRADLEY M, et al. Analysis of mode choice for intercity travel:Application of a hybrid choice model to two distinct US corridors[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2018, 116:547-567.
[9] LI B B, YAO E J, YAMAMOTO T, et al. Exploring behavioral heterogeneities of metro passenger's travel plan choice under unplanned service disruption with uncertainty[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2020, 141:294-306.
[10] 薄坤, 滕靖, 俞洁, 等. 暴雨内涝下公交乘客的出行选择行为[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(6):795-801. BO K, TENG J, YU J, et al. Travel choice behavior of transit passengers in the storm weather with road waterlogging[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2019, 47(6):795-801. (in Chinese)
[11] ABAD R P B, FILLONE A M. Changes in travel behavior during flood events in relation to transport modes:The case of Metro Manila, Philippines[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2020, 48:1592-1604.
[12] 韩志玲, 陈艳艳, 李佳贤, 等. 阻断事件影响下城际出行行为[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2019, 45(5):459-469. HAN Z L, CHEN Y Y, LI J X, et al. Intercity travel behavior under the influence of blocking events[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2019, 45(5):459-469. (in Chinese)
[13] ZANNI A M, GOULDEN M, RYLEY T, et al. Improving scenario methods in infrastructure planning:A case study of long distance travel and mobility in the UK under extreme weather uncertainty and a changing climate[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2017, 115:180-197.
[14] 张晨阳. 考虑潜在变量的西安居民短距离出行方式选择研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2019. ZHANG C Y. Research on short-distance travel mode choice behavior of Xi'an residents considering potential variables[D]. Xi'an:Chang'an University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[15] BÖCKER L, DIJST M, FABER J. Weather, transport mode choices and emotional travel experiences[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2016, 94:360-373.
[16] 胡骥, 姚鸣, 刘艳, 等. 基于SEM-MNL模型的运输通道出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2017, 34(4):80-85. HU J, YAO M, LIU Y, et al. Research on the travel choice behaviors of transportation corridor based on SEM-MNL model[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2017, 34(4):80-85. (in Chinese)
[17] 胡骥, 刘艳, 张艳, 等. 基于SEM的运输通道出行方式选择决策机理研究[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2015, 13(3):7-15. HU J, LIU Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Decision-making mechanism of mode choice in transportation corridor based on SEM[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2015, 13(3):7-15. (in Chinese)
[18] PAULSSEN M, TEMME D, VIJ A, et al. Values, attitudes and travel behavior:A hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice[J]. Transportation, 2014, 41(4):873-888.
[19] JOHANSSON M V, HELDT T, JOHANSSON P. The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2006, 40(6):507-52
[1] 萧星宇, 梅诗雨, 刘瑞琪, 王阔, 邓青, 黄丽达, 于峰. 新冠疫情对京津冀城市群城市发展的影响——以北京、天津、石家庄三大城市为例[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63(6): 994-1002.
[2] 陈若宇, 周江评. 基于位置服务大数据的粤港澳大湾区通勤标度特征分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(7): 1195-1202.
[3] 李自圆, 孙昊, 李林波. 基于手机信令数据的长三角全域城际出行网络分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(7): 1203-1211.
[4] 杨星琪, 黄海军. 治理“大城市病”的城市群税收政策[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(7): 1212-1219.
[5] 马书红, 武亚俊, 陈西芳. 城市群多模式交通网络结构韧性分析——以关中平原城市群为例[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(7): 1228-1235.
[6] 马壮林, 高阳, 胡大伟, 王晋, 马飞, 熊英. 城市群绿色交通水平测度与时空演化特征实证研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(7): 1236-1250.
[7] 郇宁, 姚恩建. 城际组合出行行为建模及应用研究进展[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(7): 1112-1120.
[8] 景云, 李凯旋, 王旋, 郭思冶, 范骁. 高速铁路成网条件下跨城市群客流输送模式[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(7): 1151-1162.
[9] 钱静, 刘奕. 突发事件分析的EOC概念模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(2): 259-265.
[10] 孙潇潇,黄弘,李瑞奇. 基于多智能体的突发事件下城市应急管理机制仿真[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 61(1): 70-76.
[11] 黄超, 黄全义, 申世飞, 疏学明. 突发事件案例表示方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 54(2): 149-152.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn