Abstract：[Objective] The management of waterworks should be integrated from a holistic view. Existing studies mostly focus on a single perspective, and there is a lack of systematic research on how to realize integrated management of waterworks at the basin, region, and project levels through stakeholder cooperation. Based on the value co-creation theory, we establish a conceptual model for the integrated management of waterworks from different spatial scales and explain why and how the relevant government departements adopt measures to achieve integrated management of waterworks. [Methods] We considered the Xiong'an New Area in China as an example and adopted a single-case method to explore the law behind the phenomenon. Following the data collection method of triangulation verification, multiple methods were used to collect both quantitative and qualitative data, including questionnaires, interviews, direct observation, and internal and external document review, such as official reports, archives, policy documents, and media reports. The Likert-5 score method was used to design the questionnaire, and 87 questionnaires were collected to evaluate the management needs of waterworks. SPSS 24.0 software was applied to perform the sample mean estimation and calculate the Cronbach's α for the reliability test to analyze quantitative data in this study. For qualitative data, we adopted the grounded theory to perform open coding, principal coding, and selective coding successively to extract the required information. Furthermore, we established a model for the integrated management of waterworks and demonstrated the urgent needs for waterworks integration in terms of policies, management, and markets. [Results] All ratings of waterworks management needs are greater than 4, indicating that the Xiong'an New Area has urgent management needs in flood control and drainage, ecological protection, and utilization of water resources. Through independent qualitative data analysis and coding by two researchers, 3 core categories, 12 main categories, and 24 subcategories are clustered according to the grounded theory and the core contents related to the research topic are extracted, including the integrated management needs of waterworks, the value co-creation process, and the integrated management of waterworks. The results show that the integrated management of waterworks requires the water management department to take the lead and coordinate with other government departments, water users, and project participants to jointly create value with the support of information technology to achieve multiple management objectives. [Conclusions] This study reveals the value co-creation process of all stakeholders in the integrated management of waterworks and makes suggestions for the government to manage waterworks, including (1) establishing a unified water management department to take responsibility for the entire management process of waterworks, (2) cooperating with other government departments to establish a coordinated operation mechanism combining drainage basins and regions for waterworks, (3) monitoring water demand and interactive feedback with water users as well as implementing dynamic water supply for production, domestic, and ecological use, (4) developing a unified operation management system to improve the operation efficiency, and (5) effectively supervising the project participants of waterworks and integrating the planning, design, construction, and operation of waterworks to promote the optimal allocation of industrial chain resources. The findings of this study provide references for government water management departments to coordinate stakeholders for the integrated management of waterworks.
刘扬, 唐文哲, 王忠静. 价值共创视角下水务工程一体化管理——基于雄安新区的案例研究[J]. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 63(2): 272-282.
LIU Yang, TANG Wenzhe, WANG Zhongjing. Integrated management of waterworks through value co-creation:A case study of the Xiong'an New Area. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2023, 63(2): 272-282.
[1] 黄山. 水务工程管理体制改革的思考[J]. 北京水务, 2009(S1): 23-25. HUANG S. Thoughts on the reform of the water works management system[J]. Beijing Water, 2009(S1): 23-25. (in Chinese) [2] 梁慧稳. 流域水务一体化管理下水权配置与定价[J]. 东北水利水电, 2002, 20(5): 1-4. LIANG H W. Disposing water right and fixing price under integration management of water affair in river basin[J]. Water Resources & Hydropower of Northeast China, 2002, 20(5): 1-4. (in Chinese) [3] 刘梅, 闫健卓, 于涌川. 北京“智慧水务”框架下的数据资源体系研究[J]. 水利信息化, 2014(4): 5-10. LIU M, YAN J Z, YU Y C. Research on data resources system under Beijing “smart water” framework[J]. Water Resources Informatization, 2014(4): 5-10. (in Chinese) [4] 沈大军, 姜素梅. 城乡水务一体化管理的制度分析[J]. 水利学报, 2005, 36(9): 1143-1146. SHEN D J, JIANG S M. An institutional analysis of the integrated management of urban and rural water affairs[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2005, 36(9): 1143-1146. (in Chinese) [5] 张钡. 城乡水务一体化管理研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2004. ZHANG B. Research on the integrated management of water related affairs in town and country[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2004. (in Chinese) [6] 杨明祥, 蒋云钟, 田雨, 等. 智慧水务建设需求探析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 54(1): 133-136, 144. YANG M X, JIANG Y Z, TIAN Y, et al. Demand analysis of smart water resource[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2014, 54(1): 133-136, 144. (in Chinese) [7] 叶朝俐. 西安市水务管理信息系统的研究与开发[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2007. YE Z L. Research and development of Xi'an City water affair management information system[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Technology, 2007. (in Chinese) [8] 吴昊, 夏中华. 基于云服务平台的天津水务信息化顶层设计[J]. 水利信息化, 2018(5): 18-23, 43. WU H, XIA Z H. Top-level design about water resources informatization of Tianjin based on cloud service platform[J]. Water Resources Informatization, 2018(5): 18-23, 43. (in Chinese) [9] 王晓辉. 信息化思维下深圳市智慧水务建设思考[J]. 水利信息化, 2019(4): 68-72. WANG X H. Thoughts on intelligent water affairs construction under informatization thinking in Shenzhen City[J]. Water Resources Informatization, 2019(4): 68-72. (in Chinese) [10] 张传雷, 吴冰, 宋军. 水务工程项目设计采购施工总承包管理模式探讨[J]. 水利技术监督, 2016, 24(6): 60-61, 88. ZHANG C L, WU B, SONG J. Discussion on the general contract management mode of design, procurement and construction of water works project[J]. Technical Supervision in Water Resources, 2016, 24(6): 60-61, 88. (in Chinese) [11] ERIKSSON P E, LEIRINGER R, SZENTES H. The role of co-creation in enhancing explorative and exploitative learning in project-based settings[J]. Project Management Journal, 2017, 48(4): 22-38. [12] PAYNE A F, STORBACKA K, FROW P. Managing the co-creation of value[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2008, 36(1): 83-96. [13] PRAHALAD C K, RAMASWAMY V. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2004, 18(3): 5-14. [14] VARGO S L, LUSCH R F. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2004, 68(1): 1-17. [15] VARGO S L, MAGLIO P P, AKAKA M A. On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective[J]. European Management Journal, 2008, 26(3): 145-152. [16] PINHO N, BEIRÃO G, PATRÍCIO L, et al. Understanding value co-creation in complex services with many actors[J]. Journal of Service Management, 2014, 25(4): 470-493. [17] VARGO S L, LUSCH R F. Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2016, 44(1): 5-23. [18] 王琳, 陈志军. 价值共创如何影响创新型企业的即兴能力: 基于资源依赖理论的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(11): 96-110, 131. WANG L, CHEN Z J. How does value co-creation affect the improvisational capabilities of innovative enterprise: A case study based on resource dependence theory[J]. Management World, 2020, 36(11): 96-110, 131. (in Chinese) [19] 黄江明, 李亮, 王伟. 案例研究: 从好的故事到好的理论: 中国企业管理案例与理论构建研究论坛(2010)综述[J]. 管理世界, 2011(2): 118-126. HUANG J M, LI L, WANG W. Case studies: From good stories to good theories: A review of the Chinese business management case and theory building research forum (2010)[J]. Management World, 2011(2): 118-126. (in Chinese) [20] EISENHARDT K M, GRAEBNER M E. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1): 25-32. [21] 井润田, 孙璇. 实证主义vs. 诠释主义: 两种经典案例研究范式的比较与启示[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3): 198-216. JING R T, SUN X. Positivism vs. interpretivism: Comparison of two classic case research paradigms and their inspirations[J]. Management World, 2021, 37(3): 198-216. (in Chinese) [22] 王振波. 国内案例研究方法的图景概况与审思评判[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2022, 15(3): 335-346. WANG Z B. An overview and critique of the domestic case study methods[J]. Journal of Management Case Studies, 2022, 15(3): 335-346. (in Chinese) [23] 周文辉, 林华, 陈晓红. 价值共创视角下的创新瓶颈突破案例研究[J]. 管理学报, 2016, 13(6): 863-870. ZHOU W H, LIN H, CHEN X H. A case study on eliminating bottlenecks to innovation through value co-creation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2016, 13(6): 863-870. (in Chinese) [24] 刘小平, 邓文香. 虚拟CSR共创、 消费者互动与共创绩效:基于扎根理论的单案例研究[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2019, 12(5): 509-520. LIU X P, DENG W X. Virtual CSR co-creation, consumer interaction and performance co-creation: A single case study based on grounded theory[J]. Journal of Management Case Studies, 2019, 12(5): 509-520. (in Chinese)
2023, Vol. 63 
