Method of stress reaction induction in disaster scenarios based on virtual reality
WANG Shuyi1, MAO Liangliang1, WU Xinyang2, TIAN Chengcheng2, LIU Yi1
1. Institute of Public Safety Research, Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. Weiyang College, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract：[Objective] As natural disasters have major impacts on urban security, research on the behavior of individuals in disaster scenarios is crucial to support emergency decision-making. However, disaster occurrence is highly uncertain, making it difficult to collect data in disaster scenarios.[Methods] This paper proposes a stress induction method for disaster scenarios that can be conducted in a laboratory, that is, to induce the stress reaction of individuals who are facing disasters by using virtual reality (VR) videos with disaster scenarios. This study also tested the effectiveness of the method through two experiments. The first experiment comprised the baseline, stress, and recovery periods, representing before, during, and after watching the VR videos. Questionnaires and physiological data, such as photoplethysmography (PPG) and electrodermal activity (EDA), of 180 participants were collected. The second experiment was a simulated driving experiment with 75 participants. This experiment was conducted in two sessions, which were separated by at least one week to avoid memory interference. In the first session, we collected car-following data on a highway. In the second session, participants drove in the same traffic scenario as in the first session after watching the VR video.[Results] The results of the first experiment indicated significant differences in the physical and psychological indicators among the baseline, stress, and recovery periods. The positive affect and negative affect scale (PANAS) data demonstrated that the VR video stimulated evident scared, nervous, and jittery emotions, which were consistent with negative compound emotions in disaster scenarios. Meanwhile, interested and attentive emotions did not change significantly, indicating that the participants were in good condition during the experiment. In addition, more than 80% of the participants reported that the VR video induced a high excitation level. Nearly 90% of them did not feel dizzy while watching the video. Furthermore, pulse rate variability indicators, such as standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN), low frequency (LF), and EDA, were significantly higher in the stress period than in the baseline period. Changes in physiological indicators indicated that the participants were sympathetically excited and got stressed after watching the VR video. However, some physiological indicators had a high standard deviation due to individual variability. Therefore, VR videos used as stressors should be standardized. In general, the second driving simulation experiment showed a significant increase in acceleration and a significant decrease in headway after watching the VR video compared to when the video was not watched. This demonstrated that their driving style might become more aggressive after watching the VR video. This result is consistent with the findings of previous studies on driving characteristics in normal and emergency situations. In fact, the changing pattern of driving behavior in two sessions showed individual variability, which required further study.[Conclusions] Results of the two experiments indicate that VR videos can induce stress reactions in disaster scenarios, which is demonstrated in physical, psychological, and behavioral aspects. This paper provides a research method for investigating human behavior characteristics in disaster scenarios.
王树祎, 毛亮亮, 吴新阳, 田诚成, 刘奕. 基于虚拟现实的灾害场景应激反应诱发方法[J]. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 63(6): 960-967.
WANG Shuyi, MAO Liangliang, WU Xinyang, TIAN Chengcheng, LIU Yi. Method of stress reaction induction in disaster scenarios based on virtual reality. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2023, 63(6): 960-967.
[1] HELBING D, FARKAS I, VICSEK T. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic[J]. Nature, 2000, 407(6803):487-490. [2] 马庆国,王小毅.非常规突发事件中影响当事人状态的要素分析与数理描述[J].管理工程学报, 2009, 23(3):126-130. MA Q G, WANG X Y. The mathematic description of the individual and crowd behavior under unconventional emergency[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2009, 23(3):126-130.(in Chinese) [3] DE KLOET E R. Stress in the brain[J]. European Journal of Pharmacology, 2000, 405(1-3):187-198. [4] 罗跃嘉,林婉君,吴健辉,等.应激的认知神经科学研究[J].生理科学进展, 2013, 44(5):345-353. LUO Y J, LIN W J, WU J H, et al. Cognitive neuroscience of stress[J]. Progress in Physiological Sciences, 2013, 44(5):345-353.(in Chinese) [5] KEITEL A, RINGLEB M, SCHWARTGES I, et al. Endocrine and psychological stress responses in a simulated emergency situation[J]. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2011, 36(1):98-108. [6] JARCZEWSKI J, FURGAŁA A, WINIARSKA A, et al. Cardiovascular response to different types of acute stress stimulations[J]. Folia Medica Cracoviensia, 2019, 59(4):95-110. [7] NOWACKI J, HEEKEREN H R, DEUTER C E, et al. Decision making in response to physiological and combined physiological and psychosocial stress[J]. Behavioral Neuroscience, 2019, 133(1):59-67. [8] DEDOVIC K, RENWICK R, KHALILI MAHANI N, et al. The Montreal imaging stress task:Using functional imaging to investigate the effects of perceiving and processing psychosocial stress in the human brain[J]. Journal of Psychiatry&Neuroscience, 2005, 30(5):319-325. [9] PABST S, BRAND M, WOLF O T. Stress and decision making:A few minutes make all the difference[J]. Behavioural Brain Research, 2013, 250:39-45. [10] JENDERNY S. The relation between conscientiousness and skin conductance in the sing-a-song stress test (SSST)[D]. Enschede:University of Twente, 2015. [11] 王晓静.突发事件情境下的情绪反应及情绪调节策略对决策的影响[D].北京:清华大学, 2012. WANG X J. The impact of emotion reaction and emotion regulation strategy on decision making in emergency situation[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2012.(in Chinese) [12] 邢邗,张琳,刘奕.利他情境对驾驶个体跟驰行为的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 58(11):1000-1005. XING H, ZHANG L, LIU Y. Effect of altruistic scenarios for individual car-following behavior[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2018, 58(11):1000-1005.(in Chinese) [13] 林晓飞.地铁乘客火灾应激反应及干预研究[D].北京:北京交通大学, 2020. LIN X F. Research on stress response and intervention method of passengers in subway fire[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2020.(in Chinese) [14] ZHU Y Q, LI N. Virtual and augmented reality technologies for emergency management in the built environments:A state-of-the-art review[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 2021, 2(1):1-10. [15] 陈羿江.不同应激条件和呼吸生物反馈训练对健康人生理指标的影响[D].南京:南京师范大学, 2008. CHEN Y J. The impact of stress and respiration biofeedback training on physiological parameters[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Normal University, 2008.(in Chinese) [16] KRETZSCHMAR A, GIGNAC G E. At what sample size do latent variable correlations stabilize?[J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 2019, 80:17-22. [17] FAUL F, ERDFELDER E, LANG A G, et al. G*Power 3:A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2007, 39(2):175-191. [18] 邱林,郑雪,王雁飞.积极情感消极情感量表(PANAS)的修订[J].应用心理学, 2008, 14(3):249-254, 268. QIU L, ZHENG X, WANG Y F. Revision of the positive affect and negative affect scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 14(3):249-254, 268.(in Chinese) [19] 管仲尧,项天,方东平,等.改进的建筑工人疲劳与不安全行为实验测量方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 61(10):1186-1194. GUAN Z Y, XIANG T, FANG D P, et al. Improved experimental measurement method of construction worker fatigue and unsafe behavior[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2021, 61(10):1186-1194.(in Chinese) [20] MEJÍA-MEJÍA E, ALLEN J, BUDIDHA K, et al. Photoplethysmography signal processing and synthesis[M]//ALLEN J, KYRIACOU P. Photoplethysmography:Technology, signal analysis and applications. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 2022:69-146. [21] WANG H M, YANG L, LIANG X Y. A novel approach for extracting pulse rate, respiratory rate and heart rate from photoplethysmogram[J]. Journal of Measurement Science and Instrumentation, 2021, 12(2):188-194. [22] HART J. Association between heart rate variability and manual pulse rate[J]. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 2013, 57(3):243-250. [23] SCHÄFER A, VAGEDES J. How accurate is pulse rate variability as an estimate of heart rate variability?A review on studies comparing photoplethysmographic technology with an electrocardiogram[J]. International Journal of Cardiology, 2013, 166(1):15-29. [24] VAN DOOREN M, DE VRIES J J G, JANSSEN J H. Emotional sweating across the body:Comparing 16 different skin conductance measurement locations[J]. Physiology&Behavior, 2012, 106(2):298-304. [25] NI X Y, HUANG H, LI R Q, et al. Synergistic influence of rainstorm and waterlogging on drivers' driving behavior:An experimental study based on high-fidelity driving simulator[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(14):8517. [26] 张文彩,阎克乐,路运青,等.不同心理刺激诱发的交感和副交感神经活动的比较[J].心理学报, 2007, 39(2):285-291. ZHANG W C, YAN K L, LU Y Q, et al. The effect of different psychological stressors on responses of sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2007, 39(2):285-291.(in Chinese) [27] XU Z, YANG, ZHAO X H, et al. Differences in driving characteristics between normal and emergency situations and model of car-following behavior[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2012, 138(11):1303-1313.
2023, Vol. 63 
