Monte Carlo simulation of propylene/propane adsorption thermodynamics on molecular sieves
ZHAO Li1,2,3, HE Chang1,2,3, SHU Yidan1,2,3, CHEN Qinglin1,2,3, ZHANG Bingjian1,2,3
1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; 2. Guangdong Engineering Centre for Petrochemical Energy Conservation, Guangzhou 519028, China; 3. The Key Laboratory of Low-carbon Chemistry & Energy Conservation of Guangdong Province, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Abstract:The separation of propylene (C3H6) and propane (C3H8) is crucial in the chemical industry. Compared with the existing distillation technology, adsorption separation technology saves a remarkable amount of energy and has recently attracted much attention. Furthermore, molecular sieves with uniform channels are promising for separating olefin and alkane mixtures. Thus, considering the convenience, separation speed, and reliability, molecular simulations can provide microscopic information that is difficult to obtain using conventional experiments and play a key role in adsorption material screening. This study systematically studied the adsorption of C3H6 and C3H8 and their binary mixtures using DD3R, ITQ-32, Si-CHA, Si-SAS, ITQ-12, and ITQ-3 molecular sieves to discover potential adsorbents for separating C3H6/C3H8binary mixtures. In this study, COMPASS, CVFF, and universal force fields are selected to optimize C3H6 and C3H8, respectively; furthermore, the accuracy of the force fields is verified using the charge distribution. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations are used to simulate the adsorption of C3H6 and C3H8 on six molecular sieves with 8-ring channels. The GCMC simulations are run for 1.1×107 cycles, with 1×106 cycles for equilibration and the remaining cycles for ensemble average. To explore the adsorption properties of C3H6 and C3H8, their adsorption capacities and isosteric adsorption heats on six molecular sieves are simulated at 300 K and 101 kPa, respectively. Since an adsorption isotherm can reflect the adsorbate-adsorbent interaction, the adsorption isotherm of C3H6 and C3H8on six molecular sieves at 300 K and 1-101 kPa are simulated. Moreover, the Langmuir, Freundlich, Dubbinin-Radushkevich(D-R), and Temkin models are used to fit the adsorption isotherms and explore the adsorption mechanism. The adsorption isotherms of C3H6 and C3H8 on Si-SAS at 250, 270, 290, 300, 310, and 330 K are simulated to examine the temperature effect. The adsorption capacities and isosteric adsorption heat of C3H6/C3H8 binary mixtures at 300 K and 101 kPa are simulated, and the selectivity is determined to find excellent adsorbents to separate these mixtures. The relationships between equilibrium selectivity and the difference in isosteric adsorption heat ΔQst, as well as the adsorption capacity of C3H6 and total pore volume, are further investigated. The simulation results revealed that:(1) the adsorption capacities of C3H6 and C3H8 on Si-CHA and Si-SAS molecular sieves were high. (2) Type-Ⅰ D-R adsorption isotherms were regressed well for the adsorption of C3H6 and C3H8 at 300 K. The adsorption capacity of the Si-SAS molecular sieve for C3H6 decreased with increasing temperature. (3) Si-SAS had an adsorption capacity of 2.26 mmol/g for C3H6 in binary mixtures, and the selectivity was 3.94, thus making it the best adsorbent for separating the mixture. (4) A positive correlation was observed between the equilibrium selectivity and ΔQst as well as the adsorption capacity of C3H6 and total pore volume. A systematic study on the adsorption of C3H6 and C3H8 at six molecular sieves provides a reference for selecting candidate adsorbents for separating C3H6/C3H8 mixtures, thus greatly expediting the search for optimal adsorbents. The positive correlation between selectivity and ΔQst, as well as the adsorption capacity of C3H6 and total pore volume, provides a theoretical basis for designing and developing excellent adsorbents for C3H6/C3H8 separation.
赵丽, 何畅, 舒逸聃, 陈清林, 张冰剑. 丙烯/丙烷在分子筛上吸附热力学的Monte Carlo模拟[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63(5): 714-722.
ZHAO Li, HE Chang, SHU Yidan, CHEN Qinglin, ZHANG Bingjian. Monte Carlo simulation of propylene/propane adsorption thermodynamics on molecular sieves. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2023, 63(5): 714-722.
[1] PLAZA M G, FERREIRA A F P, SANTOS J C, et al. Propane/propylene separation by adsorption using shaped copper trimesate MOF[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2012, 157:101-111. [2] BAO Z B, ALNEMRAT S, YU L, et al. Adsorption of ethane, ethylene, propane, and propylene on a magnesium-based metal-organic framework[J]. Langmuir, 2011, 27(22):13554-13562. [3] 肖永厚, 周梦雪, 白腾飞, 等. 丙烯在X型分子筛上吸附热力学的Monte Carlo模拟[J]. 石油化工, 2018, 47(5):420-425. XIAO Y H, ZHOU M X, BAI T F, et al. Monte Carlo simulation for thermodynamics of propylene adsorption on X-type molecular sieves[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 2018, 47(5):420-425. (in Chinese) [4] LEE M J, HAMID M R A, LEE J, et al. Ultrathin zeolitic-imidazolate framework ZIF-8membranes on polymeric hollow fibers for propylene/propane separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 559:28-34. [5] SAKAI M, SASAKI Y, TOMONO T, et al. Olefin selective Ag-exchanged X-type zeolite membrane forpropylene/propane and ethylene/ethane separation[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(4):4145-4151. [6] NARIN G, MARTINS V F D, CAMPO M, et al. Light olefins/paraffins separation with 13X zeolite binderless beads[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2014, 133:452-475. [7] WU Y Q, WECKHUYSEN B M. Separation and purification of hydrocarbons with porous materials[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60(35):18930-18949. [8] LI K H, OLSON D H, SEIDEL J, et al. Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks for kinetic separation of propane and propene[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009, 131(30):10368-10369. [9] ZHOU S, WEI Y Y, LI L B, et al. Paralyzed membrane:Current-driven synthesis of a metal-organic framework with sharpened propene/propane separation[J]. Science Advances, 2018, 4(10):eaau1393. [10] LI L B, DUAN Y F, LIAO S W, et al. Adsorption and separation of propane/propylene on various ZIF-8 polymorphs:Insights from GCMC simulations and the ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST)[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 386:123945. [11] HE C H, WANG Y, CHEN Y, et al. Modification of the pore environment in UiO-type metal-organic framework toward boosting the separation of propane/propylene[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 403:126428. [12] YANG S Q, SUN F Z, KRISHNA R, et al. Propane-trapping ultramicroporous metal-organic framework in the low-pressure area toward the purification of propylene[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021, 13(30):35990-35996. [13] KIM J, LIN L C, MARTIN R L, et al. Large-scale computational screening of zeolites for ethane/ethene separation[J]. Langmuir, 2012, 28(32):11914-11919. [14] QIAO Z W, XU Q S, CHEETHAM A K, et al. High-throughput computational screening of metal-organic frameworks for thiol capture[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(40):22208-22215. [15] QIAO Z W, XU Q S, JIANG J W. Computational screening of hydrophobic metal-organic frameworks for the separation of H2S and CO2 from natural gas[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(39):18898-18905. [16] TANG H J, JIANG J W. In silico screening and design strategies of ethane-selective metal-organic frameworks for ethane/ethylene separation[J]. AIChE Journal, 2021, 67(3):e17025. [17] YEO B C, KIM D, KIM H, et al. High-throughput screening to investigate the relationship between the selectivity and working capacity of porous materials forpropylene/propane adsorptive separation[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120(42):24224-24230. [18] MAGHSOUDI H, ABDI H, AIDANI A. Temperature-and pressure-dependent adsorption equilibria and diffusivities of propylene and propane in pure-silica Si-CHA zeolite[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(4):1682-1692. [19] KHALIGHI M, CHEN Y F, FAROOQ S, et al. Propylene/propane separation using SiCHA[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(10):3877-3892. [20] OLSON D H, YANG X B, CAMBLOR M A. ITQ-12:A zeolite having temperature dependent adsorption selectivity and potential for propene separation[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108(30):11044-11048. [21] PALOMINO M, CANTÍN A, CORMA A, et al. Pure silica ITQ-32[JP+7]zeolite allows separation of linear olefins from paraffins[J]. Chemical Communications, 2007(12):1233-1235. [22] 肖永厚, 陶伟川, 刘苏, 等. 丙烯在离子交换NaX分子筛上的吸附热力学研究[J]. 石油化工, 2010, 39(S1):154-156. XIAO Y H, TAO W C, LIU S, et al. Adsorption thermodynamics of propylene on ion exchange NaX molecular sieves.[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 2010, 39(S1):154-156. (in Chinese) [23] JORGENSEN W L, MAXWELL D S, TIRADO-RIVES J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1996, 118(45):11225-11236. [24] PHAM T D, LOBO R F. Adsorption equilibria of CO2 and small hydrocarbons in AEI-, CHA-, STT-, and RRO-typesiliceous zeolites[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2016, 236:100-108. [25] ZHU W, KAPTEIJN F, MOULIJN J A. Shape selectivity in the adsorption of propane/propene on the all-silica DD3R[J]. Chemical Communications, 1999(24):2453-2454. [26] LIU B, SMIT B, REY F, et al. A new united atom force field for adsorption of alkenes in zeolites[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2008, 112(7):2492-2498. [27] GUTIÉRREZ-SEVILLANO J J, DUBBELDAM D, REY F, et al. Analysis of the ITQ-12 zeolite performance inpropane-propylene separations using a combination of experiments and molecular simulations[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2010, 114(35):14907-14914. [28] OLSON D H, CAMBLOR M A, VILLAESCUSA L A, et al. Light hydrocarbon sorption properties of pure silica Si-CHA and ITQ-3 and high silica ZSM-58[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2004, 67(1):27-33. [29] MAGHSOUDI H. Equilibrium adsorption analysis of microporous adsorbents in propene/propane binary mixture separation[J]. Adsorption, 2015, 21(6):547-556.