Evaluation parameters and methods for optimal mooring system of submerged floating tunnel
PAN Wenbo1, ZHANG Rui2, WANG Heng1, XIE Mingxiao1, YANG Zhiwen1
1. National Engineering Research Center of Port Hydraulic Construction Technology, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering of Ministry of Transport, Tianjin 300456, China; 2. CCCC Third Harbor Consultants Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200032, China
Abstract：[Objective] Previous studies on the optimal mooring system of a submerged floating tunnel (SFT) have mostly focused on numerical methods, with a limited number of experimental studies conducted under regular waves. The primary evaluation factors used for identifying the advantages and disadvantages of different mooring systems have been the maximum motion response and mooring tension in the time domain. To evaluate the optimal mooring system of SFT more effectively and comprehensively, this study introduces several new evaluation parameters alongside the maximum motion response and mooring tension.[Methods] Physical modeling tests were conducted under regular and irregular waves, focusing on the effect of different mooring systems on the hydrodynamic characteristics of the SFT. Based on the time history of motion responses and mooring tensions obtained from the tests, the advantages and disadvantages of different mooring systems were comprehensively examined based on three evaluation factors: the maximum motion response and its spectral area, the maximum mooring tension and its distribution uniformity, and the frequency of cables reaching a relaxed condition during wave actions.[Results] Results revealed the following: (1) The diagonal-cable systems CM3 (four diagonal cables at either end of the SFT) showed better performance than those of the “diagonal cable + vertical cable” system CM1 (two diagonal cables and one vertical cable at either end of the SFT) and CM2 (two diagonal cables and two vertical cables at either end of the SFT). (2) The natural periods of three mooring systems were observed to follow the order of CM1 > CM2 > CM3. In the mooring system CM3, the natural periods of surge and heave were only approximately 50% of the mooring system CM1. Meanwhile, the natural period of pitch was significantly reduced to approximately 25% of the mooring system CM1. In addition, the natural period of pitch was significantly shorter than those of surge and heave, indicating that the mooring system CM3 had a strong constraint effect on pitch. (3) The 0th-order moments (spectral areas) of the dynamic response reflect the overall degree of the motion response. The 0th-order moments of the motion response and mooring tension under three mooring systems followed the order of CM1 > CM2 > CM3. In the mooring system CM3, the spectral areas of surge, heave, and pitch of the SFT were significantly lower than those in the other two mooring systems, and the difference was particularly significant under large waves. (4) The uniformity of mooring tensions is crucial for determining an optimal mooring system. For the three mooring systems, the ratios of the maximum mooring tensions of all cables at either end of the SFT were as follows: CM2 1.0-1.36, CM2 1.0-1.37, and CM3 1.0-1.12. The distribution uniformity of the mooring tensions of all cables in the mooring system CM3 was better than those in the other two mooring systems. (5) The cables in the mooring system CM2 attained a relaxed or nearly relaxed state most frequently, while the mooring system CM3 exhibited the lowest number of such instances.[Conclusions] Compared to the maximum motion response and mooring tension, analyzing the maximum motion response and its spectral area, the maximum mooring tension and its distribution uniformity, and the frequency of cables reaching a relaxed condition provides a more effective and comprehensive method for evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the mooring system of SFT. These evaluation parameters and methods are crucial for guiding project design.
潘文博, 张蕊, 王恒, 解鸣晓, 阳志文. 悬浮隧道最优系泊方式评估参数及方法[J]. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 65(5): 970-982.
PAN Wenbo, ZHANG Rui, WANG Heng, XIE Mingxiao, YANG Zhiwen. Evaluation parameters and methods for optimal mooring system of submerged floating tunnel. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2025, 65(5): 970-982.
[1] 孙胜男.悬浮隧道动力响应分析[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2008. SUN S N. Dynamic response analysis of submerged floating tunnel[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2008.(in Chinese) [2] 晁春峰.悬浮隧道流固耦合动力响应分析及试验研究[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2013. CHAO C F. Dynamic response analysis and experiment of submerged floating tunnel based on fluid-structure interaction[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2013.(in Chinese) [3] 王广地.波流作用下悬浮隧道结构响应的数值分析及试验研究[D].成都:西南交通大学, 2008. WANG G D. Numerical analysis and experiment research of submerged floating tunnel subjected to wave and current effects[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008.(in Chinese) [4] SEO S I, MUN H S, LEE J H, et al. Simplified analysis for estimation of the behavior of a submerged floating tunnel in waves and experimental verification[J]. Marine Structures, 2015, 44:142-158. [5] CIFUENTES C, KIM S, KIM M H, et al. Numerical simulation of the coupled dynamic response of a submerged floating tunnel with mooring lines in regular waves[J]. Ocean Systems Engineering, 2015, 5(2):109-123. [6] JEONG K, MIN S, JANG M, et al. Feasibility study of submerged floating tunnels with vertical and inclined combined tethers[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 265:441-459. [7] LEE J, JIN C, KIM M. Dynamic response analysis of submerged floating tunnels by wave and seismic excitations[J]. Ocean Systems Engineering, 2017, 7(1):1-19. [8] MUHAMMAD N, ULLAH Z, CHOI D H. Performance evaluation of submerged floating tunnel subjected to hydrodynamic and seismic excitations[J]. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7(11):1122. [9] JIN C, KIM M. Dynamic and structural responses of a submerged floating tunnel under extreme wave conditions[J]. Ocean Systems Engineering, 2017, 7(4):413-433. [10] OH S H, PARK W S. Regular wave experiments for twin circular submerged floating tunnel tethered to sea bottom[C]//International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Trondheim, Norway:American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017:V07BT06A007. [11] WON D, SEO J, KIM S. Dynamic response of submerged floating tunnels with dual sections under irregular waves[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 241:110025. [12] WU Z W, CHENG Z Y, GARG A, et al. Investigating anti-vibration performance of a novel three-tube submerged floating tunnel reinforced with FRP rigid truss[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 269:113447. [13] 中华人民共和国交通运输部.水运工程模拟试验技术规范:JTS/T 231-2021[S].北京:人民交通出版社, 2021. Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China. Technical code of modelling test for port and waterway engineering:JTS/T 231-2021[S]. Beijing:China Communications Press, 2021.(in Chinese)
2025, Vol. 65 
