Internal flow characteristics and loss mechanism of water supply component of Pelton turbine
GUO Tao1, GAN Wengang1, WANG Haiyang2, LIU Siyuan1
1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China; 2. Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316021, China
Abstract：[Objective] The distributing pipe in a Pelton turbine serves as a crucial water supply component responsible for regulating flow and inducing diversion. Its special structure, however, can lead to adverse effects such as flow separation and Dean vortices causing hydraulic losses; these losses can vary with changes in the upstream head, further affecting the incoming flow conditions. Traditionally, the pressure drop method has been primarily utilized to assess these losses, yet it fails to pinpoint the exact locations where significant hydraulic losses occur.[Methods] This study investigates the hydraulic and loss characteristics of the distributing pipe. Utilizing the SST(shear stress transport) k-ω turbulence model, we simulate the flow inside the distributing pipe and analyze entropy production distribution based on the entropy production theory. Then, according to the distribution of entropy production rate and flow pattern, the reasons for the hydraulic loss in the main channel and bifurcation 2 were analyzed detailly. Entropy production—indicative of irreversible dissipative effects during fluid flow—effectively highlights high hydraulic loss areas by converting lost mechanical energy into internal energy.[Results] Results show a remarkable increase in total entropy production within the pipe, with values rising from 210.999 to 4 614.980. Specifically, entropy production in the main channel increases from 145.549 to 3 477.351, and in bifurcation 2 from 38.857 to 717.608. Under high-speed flow conditions, the separation between internal and external flows becomes distinct, particularly when fluid navigates bends. The hydraulic loss is dominated by fluctuation entropy production, accounting for >50%. The main flow zone and bifurcation 2 are the primary sites of hydraulic loss, accounting for approximately 90% of the total loss, whereas bifurcations 1 and 3 experience relatively small losses. [Conclusions] Comparative analysis of entropy generation rate contours, streamline plots, and pressure fluctuation curves highlights that high entropy generation areas experience significant pressure pulsations, accompanied by adverse flow phenomena such as Dean vortices and flow separation. At bifurcation 2, high-speed fluid is diverted and squeezed outward, creating a low-pressure vortex on the inner side, inducing significant hydraulic loss. At the bend position, the fluid tends to flow outward, resulting in high external pressure and low internal pressure distribution at the ring pipe and further in high hydraulic loss on the inside. These phenomena create large pressure gradients and significant pressure fluctuations, affecting flow stability. Furthermore, optimization strategies are proposed for the distributing pipe design, including the addition of flow-diversion baffles at bifurcation points to stabilize flow patterns, reduce vortices, and alleviate flow separation by increasing the number of nozzles and reducing curvature. This study employs numerical computation to investigate the mechanisms of hydraulic loss generation within the distributing pipe and meticulously delineates areas of high hydraulic losses, offering hydro turbine developers optimization strategies.
郭涛, 甘文港, 汪海洋, 刘思远. 冲击式水轮机配水环的内流特性及水力损失分析[J]. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 65(5): 921-929.
GUO Tao, GAN Wengang, WANG Haiyang, LIU Siyuan. Internal flow characteristics and loss mechanism of water supply component of Pelton turbine. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2025, 65(5): 921-929.
[1] HERWIG H, KOCK F. Local entropy production in turbulent shear flows:A tool for evaluating heat transfer performance[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2006, 15(2):159-167. [2] HERWIG H, KOCK F. Direct and indirect methods of calculating entropy generation rates in turbulent convective heat transfer problems[J]. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2007, 43(3):207-215. [3] HERWIG H, GLOSS D, WENTERODT T. A new approach to understanding and modelling the influence of wall roughness on friction factors for pipe and channel flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 613:35-53. [4] GONG R Z, WANG H J, CHEN L X, et al. Application of entropy production theory to hydro-turbine hydraulic analysis[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2013, 56(7):1636-1643. [5] LI D Y, WANG H J, QIN Y L, et al. Entropy production analysis of hysteresis characteristic of a pump-turbine model[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 149:175-191. [6] XU L H, GUO T, WANG W Q. Effects of vortex structure on hydraulic loss in a low head Francis turbine under overall operating conditions base on entropy production method[J]. Renewable Energy, 2022, 198:367-379. [7] 曾鸿基,李正贵,李德友,等.水泵水轮机流场脉动与熵产率的关系[J].排灌机械工程学报, 2022, 40(8):777-784. ZENG H J, LI Z G, LI D Y, et al. Relationship between flow pulsation and entropy production rate of pump turbine[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2022, 40(8):777-784.(in Chinese) [8] 王李科,姚亮,冯建军,等.水泵水轮机S特性区能量损失及流动特性研究[J].水利学报, 2024, 55(3):344-354, 366. WANG L K, YAO L, FENG J J, et al. Energy loss and flow characteristics analysis of a model pump turbine in the S-shape region[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2024, 55(3):344-354, 366.(in Chinese) [9] 卢金玲,王李科,廖伟丽,等.基于熵产理论的水轮机尾水管涡带研究[J].水利学报, 2019, 50(2):233-241. LU J L, WANG L K, LIAO W L, et al. Entropy production analysis for vortex rope of a turbine model[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2019, 50(2):233-241.(in Chinese) [10] YU Z F, WANG W Q, YAN Y, et al. Energy loss evaluation in a Francis turbine under overall operating conditions using entropy production method[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 169:982-999. [11] YU Z F, YAN Y, WANG W Q, et al. Entropy production analysis for vortex rope of a Francis turbine using hybrid RANS/LES method[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 127:105494. [12] WANG H B, ZHOU D Q, YU A, et al. Analysis of cavitation-induced unsteady flow conditions in Francis turbines under high-load conditions[J]. Processes, 2023, 12(1):72. [13] 徐广文,陈创新,朱俊昌,等.大型水斗式水轮机配水环管水力性能数值模拟[J].水利水电科技进展, 2008, 28(4):30-31, 36. XU G W, CHEN C X, ZHU J C, et al. Numerical simulation of hydraulic properties of water distribution pipe in large-scale Pelton turbine[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2008, 28(4):30-31, 36.(in Chinese) [14] SEMLITSCH B. Effect of inflow disturbances in Pelton turbine distributor lines on the water jet quality[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2024, 174:104786. [15] ZENG C J, XIAO Y X, XU W, et al. Numerical analysis of Pelton nozzle jet flow behavior considering elbow pipe[J]. IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, 2016, 49(2):022005. [16] CHEN X Q, GUO Y X, ZHU G J. The influence of different runner widths on the performance of micro Pelton turbine[J]. Journal of Physics:Conference Series, 2023, 2528:012004. [17] 孙启轩,谭磊.冲击式水轮机水斗设计方法及性能优化[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(5):852-859. SUN Q X, TAN L. Bucket design method and performance optimization of a Pelton turbine[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2024, 64(5):852-859.(in Chinese) [18] ZHAO H R, XU B, TANG P, et al. Generation mechanism and control method of countertorque in the bucket of a Pelton turbine[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(10):105133. [19] BEJAN A. Entropy generation minimization:the method of thermodynamic optimization of finite-size systems and finite-time processes[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 1996. [20] 肖业祥,郑爱玲,韩凤琴,等. CFD法研究多喷嘴冲击式水轮机的射流干涉[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35(3):66-70. XIAO Y X, ZHENG A L, HAN F Q, et al. CFD-based investigation into jet interference in multi-nozzle Pelton turbines[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2007, 35(3):66-70.(in Chinese) [21] SCHMANDT B, HERWIG H. Internal flow losses:A fresh look at old concepts[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133(5):051201.
2025, Vol. 65 
