Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2019, Vol. 59 Issue (12): 981-989    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2019.26.015
  水利水电工程 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
西北典型节水灌溉技术综合性能的层次分析与模糊综合评价
蒋光昱1, 王忠静1,2,3, 索滢1
1. 清华大学 水利水电工程系, 北京 100084;
2. 清华大学 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室, 北京 100084;
3. 省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室, 西宁 810016
Hierarchical analysis and fuzzy evaluation of comprehensive performance of typical water-saving irrigation techniques in Northwest China
JIANG Guangyu1, WANG Zhongjing1,2,3, SUO Ying1
1. Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
全文: PDF(910 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 中国西北地区幅员辽阔但水资源短缺,生态环境脆弱,节水灌溉发展迅速。合理评价节水灌溉技术的综合性能对其可持续发展十分必要。该文综合考虑西北地区生态环境脆弱性、经济发展水平、气候地理特性、灌溉发展趋势和劳动力成本等因素,提出节水灌溉技术在西北干旱半干旱地区的综合性能的评价指标体系,以生态性、经济性、适应性、精量性和智能性为准则层,共23个评价指标,通过层次分析法和模糊综合评价法确定评价指标的权重和等级阈值,并对滴灌、喷灌和小畦灌3种典型节水灌溉技术的综合性能进行了评价。结果表明:节水灌溉技术综合性能的优先序为经济性、适应性、生态性、智能性、精量性,各准则层权重最大的指标分别为亩均工程投资、水量适应性、地下水超采抑制程度、省工率和灌溉水利用系数;滴灌、喷灌和小畦灌在西北地区的综合性能评级分别为优异、一般、一般。该评价方法和结果可为当地节水灌溉技术的合理评价与选择应用提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
蒋光昱
王忠静
索滢
关键词 节水灌溉综合性能评价中国西北地区层次分析法模糊综合评价法    
Abstract:Northwest China is a vast territory with scarce water resources and a fragile ecological environment system. Various water-saving irrigation techniques have been developed that need to be evaluated to facilitate sustainable development. This study presents an evaluation index system for water-saving irrigation techniques in the arid and semi-arid regions of Northwest China that incorporates the ecological vulnerability, economic development, climatic and geographical characteristics, irrigation development trends and labor costs. The model has 23 indicators in total with ecology, economics, adaptability, accuracy and intelligence level as the criterion layer. The analytic hierarchy process and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method were combined to determine the weights for the evaluation indicators and evaluation thresholds. The model was then used to evaluate three typical water-saving irrigation techniques, drip irrigation, sprinkler irrigation and small-scale border irrigation. The results show that the economics is the most important followed by the adaptability, ecology, intelligence level and accuracy. The most significant indicators in each of the five criterion layers are the investment per mu, water quantity adaptability, inhibition of groundwater over-exploitation, labor-saving and irrigation water use efficiency. Drip irrigation system is shown to be excellent system for Northwest China, while sprinkler irrigation and small-scale border irrigation systems have average usefulness in Northwest China. The methodology and results can be used for water-saving irrigation technique selection.
Key wordswater-saving irrigation    system evaluation    Northwest China    analytic hierarchy process    fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
收稿日期: 2019-02-16      出版日期: 2019-12-19
基金资助:王忠静,教授,E-mail:zj.wang@tsinghua.edu.cn
引用本文:   
蒋光昱, 王忠静, 索滢. 西北典型节水灌溉技术综合性能的层次分析与模糊综合评价[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59(12): 981-989.
JIANG Guangyu, WANG Zhongjing, SUO Ying. Hierarchical analysis and fuzzy evaluation of comprehensive performance of typical water-saving irrigation techniques in Northwest China. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2019, 59(12): 981-989.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2019.26.015  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2019/V59/I12/981
  表1 西北地区节水灌溉技术综合性能评价指标体系
  表2 “1—9”标度方法
  表3 平均一致性指标值
  表4 节水灌溉技术综合性能评价准则层权重
  表5 节水灌溉技术综合性能评价指标层权重
  表6 节水灌溉技术综合性能评价指标的模糊综合评价阈值
  表7 3 种节水灌溉技术综合性能的定量指标数值
  表8 3 种节水灌溉技术的模糊综合评价结果
  表9 滴灌综合性能评价指标的隶属度矩阵
  表10 喷灌综合性能评价指标的隶属度矩阵
  表11 小畦灌综合性能评价指标的隶属度矩阵
  表12 滴灌各评价指标所属等级情况
  表13 喷灌各评价指标所属等级情况
  表14 小畦灌各评价指标所属等级情况
  
[1] ZERIHUN D, WANG Z, RIMAL S, et al. Analysis of surface irrigation performance terms and indices[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 1997, 34(1):25-46.
[2] 林性粹, 王智, 李授农. 农田灌水质量指标的分析与评价[J]. 水利学报, 1996(11):73-77. LIN X C, WANG Z, LI S N. Analysis and evaluation of irrigation quality criterion[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1996(11):73-77. (in Chinese)
[3] 王景雷, 吴景社, 齐学斌, 等. 节水灌溉评价研究进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2002, 13(4):521-525. WANG J L, WU J S, QI X B, et al. Advances in water saving irrigation evaluation[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2002, 13(4):521-525. (in Chinese)
[4] 彭世彰, 徐俊增, 丁加丽, 等. 节水灌溉与控制排水理论及其农田生态效应研究[J]. 水利学报, 2007, 38(S1):504-510.PENG S Z, XU J Z, DING J L, et al. Theory of water-saving irrigation and controlled drainage and the impact on farmland ecological environment[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007, 38(S1):504-510. (in Chinese)
[5] 吴景社. 区域节水灌溉综合效应评价方法与应用研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2003. WU J S. Evaluation of comprehensive effects of water-saving irrigation on a regional scale:Methods and applications[D]. Yangling:Northwest A&F University, 2003. (in Chinese)
[6] 郭宗楼. 农业水利工程项目环境影响评价方法研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2000, 16(5):16-19. GUO Z L. Methods for environmental impact assessment of agricultural water conservancy projects[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2000, 16(5):16-19. (in Chinese)
[7] 郭宗楼, 雷声隆, 刘肇祎. 灌排工程项目环境影响评价[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 1999(5):7-10. GUO Z L, LEI S L, LIU Z Y. Environmental impact assessment on irrigation and drainage projects[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 1999(5):7-10. (in Chinese)
[8] 卫三平, 王力, 吴发启. 土壤干化的水文生态效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(5):123-127. WEI S P, WANG L, WU F Q. Hydro-ecological effect of soil desiccation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21(5):123-127. (in Chinese)
[9] 王力, 邵明安, 侯庆春. 土壤干层量化指标初探[J]. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14(4):87-90. WANG L, SHAO M A, HOU Q C. Preliminary research on measured indexes of dried soil layer[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 14(4):87-90. (in Chinese)
[10] 索滢, 王忠静. 典型节水灌溉技术综合性能评价研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(11):113-120. SUO Y, WANG Z J. Systematically evaluating the performance of typical water-saving irrigation techniques[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2018, 37(11):113-120. (in Chinese)
[11] 中华人民共和国水利部. 节水灌溉工程技术标准:GB/T 50363-2018[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2018. Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. Technical standard for water-saving irrigation project:GB/T 50363-2018[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2018. (in Chinese)
[12] SUN H Y, WANG S F, HAO X M. An improved analytic hierarchy process method for the evaluation of agricultural water management in irrigation districts of North China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 179:324-337.
[13] 尚忠林, 刘国辉, 丁少林, 等. 贺兰山东麓滴灌区节水综合效益评价研究[J]. 东北水利水电, 2016, 34(4):57-60. SHANG Z L, LIU G H, DING S L, et al. Evaluation study on the comprehensive benefit of saving-water in drip irrigation district of the east foothill of Helanshan mountain[J]. Water Resources & Hydropower of Northeast China, 2016, 34(4):57-60. (in Chinese)
[14] 中华人民共和国水利部. 地面灌溉工程技术管理规程:SL 558-2011[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2011. Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. Code of practice for technical management of surface irrigation project:SL 558-2011[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
[15] 雷波, 刘钰, 杜丽娟, 等. 灌区节水改造环境效应综合评价研究初探[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2011, 30(3):100-103. LEI B, LIU Y, DU L J, et al. Primary research on integrated evaluation of environment impacts by water-saving improvement in irrigation districts[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2011, 30(3):100-103. (in Chinese)
[16] 王立洪, 管瑶. 节水灌溉技术[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2011. WANG L H, GUAN Y. Water-saving irrigation technology[M]. Beijing:China Water & Power Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
[17] 中华人民共和国水利部. 微灌工程技术规范:GB/T 50485-2009[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2009. Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. Technical code for microirrigation engineering:GB/T 50485-2009[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2009. (in Chinese)
[18] 佟长福, 郭克贞, 赵淑银, 等. 基于层次分析法的牧区节水灌溉示范工程生态效益评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2008, 26(2):139-143. TONG C F, GUO K Z, ZHAO S Y, et al. Evaluation of ecological benefits of water-saving irrigation demonstration project in pastoral area based on AHP[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2008, 26(2):139-143. (in Chinese)
[19] 张会敏, 李占斌, 姚文艺, 等. 灌区续建配套与节水改造效果多层次多目标模糊评价[J]. 水利学报, 2008, 39(2):212-217. ZHANG H M, LI Z B, YAO W Y, et al. Multi-hierarchy and multi-objective fuzzy method for evaluation of water saving reform and irrigation district reconstruction effect[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 39(2):212-217. (in Chinese)
[20] 中华人民共和国水利部. 喷灌工程技术规范:GB/T 50085-2007[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2007. Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. Technical code for sprinkler engineering:GB/T 50085-2007[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2007. (in Chinese)
[21] 于纪玉. 节水灌溉技术[M]. 郑州:黄河水利出版社, 2007. YU J Y. Water-saving irrigation technology[M]. Zhengzhou:The Yellow River Water Conservancy Press, 2007. (in Chinese)
[22] 罗金耀, 李道西. 节水灌溉多层次灰色关联综合评价模型研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2003, 22(5):38-41. LUO J Y, LI D X. Study on grey multi-hierarchal synthetic evaluation model for water saving irrigation[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2003, 22(5):38-41. (in Chinese)
[23] 徐福留, 卢小燕, 周家贵, 等. 大型水利工程环境影响评价指标体系及模糊综合评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2001, 21(4):10-14. XU F L, LU X Y, ZHOU J G, et al. Indicators and fuzzy cluster method for comprehensive environmental impact assessment of large-scale water conservancy engineering[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, 21(4):10-14. (in Chinese)
[24] 路振广, 曹祥华. 节水灌溉工程综合评价指标体系与定性指标量化方法[J]. 灌溉排水, 2001, 20(1):55-59, 77. LU Z G, CAO X H. Index system and quantifying method of qualitative index for comprehensive evaluation of water-saving irrigation project[J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2001, 20(1):55-59, 77. (in Chinese)
[25] 秦为耀, 丁必然, 曾建军, 等. 节水灌溉技术[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2000. QIN W Y, DING B R, ZENG J J, et al. Water-saving irrigation technology[M]. Beijing:China Water & Power Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[26] 罗金耀, 陈大雕, 郭元裕. 节水灌溉综合评价理论及模型应用研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 1998(5):1-5. LUO J Y, CHEN D D, GUO Y Y. A study of application of the theory and the model of comprehensive evaluation in water saving irrigation[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 1998(5):1-5. (in Chinese)
[27] 沈秀英. 一种节水省工的灌溉方法——滴灌[J]. 生物学通报, 1981(3):18. SHEN X Y. A water-saving and labor-saving irrigation method-drip irrigation[J]. Bulletin of Biology, 1981(3):18. (in Chinese)
[28] OKADA H, STYLES S W, GRISMER M E. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to irrigation project improvement:Part II. How professionals evaluate an irrigation project for its improvement[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2008, 95(3):205-210.
[29] 邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(7):93-100. DENG X, LI J M, ZENG H J, et al. Research on computation methods of AHP weight vector and its applications[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2012, 42(7):93-100. (in Chinese)
[30] 吴书悦, 杨雨曦, 彭宜蔷, 等. 区域用水总量控制模糊综合评价研究[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2014, 12(4):92-97. WU S Y, YANG Y X, PENG Y Q, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of regional total water consumption control[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2014, 12(4):92-97. (in Chinese)
[31] 梁志刚, 邵建文, 孙东伟. 基于模糊综合评价的区域节水灌溉研究[J]. 水利科技与经济, 2011, 17(5):55-57, 60. LIANG Z G, SHAO J W, SUN D W. Research of area water-saving irrigation based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 2011, 17(5):55-57, 60. (in Chinese)
[32] 黄汉球. 模糊综合评分模型及其在水利水电工程环境影响评价中的应用[J]. 红水河, 2008, 27(4):66-68, 71. HUANG H Q. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model and its application to environmental impact assessment of water conservancy and hydropower project[J]. Hongshui River, 2008, 27(4):66-68, 71. (in Chinese)
[33] 冯俊杰, 贾艳辉, 张红霞, 等. 抗旱用轻型滴灌系统的投资与效益分析[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(7):76-82. FENG J J, JIA Y H, ZHANG H X, et al. Financial analysis of the light drip irrigation system for emergence use in drought fighting[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2018, 37(7):76-82. (in Chinese)
[34] 刘恩民, 刘晓云, 刘传收, 等. 低压管道输水小畦灌的优势与发展前景[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2003, 22(3):37-40. LIU E M, LIU X Y, LIU C S, et al. Advantages and development prospect of small border irrigation with low pressure pipelin[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2003, 22(3):37-40. (in Chinese)
[1] 刘康, 刘昭伟, 陈永灿, 马芳平, 王皓冉, 黄会宝, 谢辉. 引水隧洞结构安全风险评价的动态Bayes网络模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63(7): 1041-1049.
[2] 魏奕新, 韩一蕾, 卢滇楠, 邱彤. 基于理论可行性的生物合成路径评估方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63(5): 697-703.
[3] 陈道想, 林鹏, 丁鹏, 李果, 陈涛, 余卓憬. 基于群层次分析法的振冲碎石桩填料方法比选[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(12): 1915-1921.
[4] 陈涛, 陈智超. 基于证据推理法的城镇综合承灾能力网格化评价方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 58(6): 570-575.
[5] 徐君锋, 王嘉捷, 朱克雷, 张普含, 马宇飞. 基于AHP的安卓应用安全信用指数度量方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 58(2): 131-136.
[6] 杨萍, 彭羽, 刘雪华, 孟鸿雁, 王斌. 基于生态评估的新疆玛纳斯县域发展适宜性分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(8): 865-870.
[7] 卢兆麟, 李升波, Schroeder Felix, 周吉晨, 成波. 结合自然语言处理与改进层次分析法的乘用车驾驶舒适性评价[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(2): 137-143.
[8] 吕艳丽, 李元龙, 向爽, 夏春和. 基于服务相关性的应用层安全事件危害评估方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(1): 35-41.
[9] 袁尚南, 强茂山, 温祺, 江汉臣. 基于模糊层次分析法的建设项目组织效能评价模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(6): 616-623.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn