Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2020, Vol. 60 Issue (12): 999-1006    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2020.25.025
  机械工程 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
经颅直流电刺激对注意力广度的影响
王建凯1,吴方芳1,狄雅政1,2,3,张洁1,4,李翀1,季林红1,*()
1. 清华大学 摩擦学国家重点实验室, 智能与生物机械分室, 北京 100084
2. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京 100101
3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
4. 烟台大学 机电汽车工程学院, 烟台 264005
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on visual attention span
Chien-kai WANG1,Fangfang WU1,Yazheng DI1,2,3,Jie ZHANG1,4,Chong LI1,Linhong JI1,*()
1. Division of Intelligent and Biomechanical System, State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2. Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4. School of Electromechanical and Automotive Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
全文: PDF(2754 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

该文探讨经颅直流电刺激(transcranial direct-current stimulation,tDCS)是否能提升注意力广度,并通过脑电(electroencephalogram,EEG)分析探讨其中的机理。实验招募7名健康被试,每名被试完成3次实验,每次实验接受不同的tDCS刺激方案并完成注意力广度任务。3种tDCS刺激方案分别为:对背外侧前额叶皮层进行阳极tDCS、阴极tDCS以及假刺激。结果显示:相较于假刺激组,阳极tDCS组被试的注意力广度有显著地提升(p=0.034 7),而阴极tDCS组则有显著降低(p=0.029 4)。脑电分析显示:在字符串长度为3~5的难度下,阳极tDCS组被试的刺激前Alpha波功率(prestimulus Alpha power)有显著地降低,阴极tDCS组无此现象。本研究验证了tDCS提升注意力广度的有效性,以及分析了其如何影响脑电。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王建凯
吴方芳
狄雅政
张洁
李翀
季林红
关键词 经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)注意力广度脑电(EEG)刺激前Alpha波功率    
Abstract

This study investigated whether transcranial direct current stimulation can increase the visual attention span and the controlling mechanism for this effect through EEG (electroencephalogram) analyses. Seven healthy subjects participated in three experiments on three different days for comparison. Two stimulation protocols, anodal and cathodal stimulation, were performed on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with sham stimulations used in control tests. The visual attention span of the anodal stimulation group was significantly improved compared with the control (p=0.034 7), while that of the cathodal stimulation group was significantly reduced (p=0.029 4). The EEG records showed that the prestimulus alpha power was significantly reduced in the anodal stimulation group with difficulty string lengths of 3~5. The result indicated that transcranial direct current stimulation can modulate the prestimulus Alpha power which influences the visual attention span.

Key wordstranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)    visual attention span    EEG    prestimulus Alpha power
收稿日期: 2019-10-22      出版日期: 2020-10-14
通讯作者: 季林红     E-mail: jilh@tsinghua.edu.cn
引用本文:   
王建凯,吴方芳,狄雅政,张洁,李翀,季林红. 经颅直流电刺激对注意力广度的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 60(12): 999-1006.
Chien-kai WANG,Fangfang WU,Yazheng DI,Jie ZHANG,Chong LI,Linhong JI. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on visual attention span. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2020, 60(12): 999-1006.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2020.25.025  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2020/V60/I12/999
  国际10—20系统32导联电极分布位置示意图
  实验范试流程图(其中加粗的时间段为后续分析脑电参数使用的时间窗)
  注意力广度计算方法示意图(图中点为所有人的平均数据)
10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2020.25.025.T001

3组刺激条件下的准确率和反应时间

N 准确率 反应时间/ms
假刺激 阳极刺激 阴极刺激 假刺激 阳极刺激 阴极刺激
3 0.99 (0.02) 0.99 (0.02) 0.97 (0.03) 599.08 (119.56) 572.77 (139.50) 566.14 (84.67)
4 0.96 (0.04) 0.97 (0.03) 0.94 (0.07) 664.18 (122.74) 594.07 (131.40) 640.50 (115.39)
5 0.93 (0.06) 0.94 (0.04) 0.91 (0.07) 772.43 (151.18) 751.83 (211.18) 806.48 (163.80)
6 0.87 (0.08) 0.90 (0.08) 0.85 (0.10) 862.81 (145.31) 852.96 (137.53) 924.70 (230.25)
7 0.75 (0.08) 0.79 (0.09) 0.78 (0.08) 1 035.11 (236.80) 1 017.52 (121.38) 1 159.66 (219.19)
8 0.74 (0.07) 0.74 (0.14) 0.67 (0.10) 1 006.47 (184.43) 1 004.97 (174.64) 1 144.89 (225.25)
9 0.60 (0.08) 0.67 (0.10) 0.56 (0.13) 1 200.65 (352.93) 1 178.46 (249.86) 1 260.57 (259.23)

  注:N的数值为字符串的长度。

  
3组刺激条件下的准确率和反应时间
  阳极、阴极刺激后的注意力广度相较假刺激控制组下的注意力广度变化量分布图
  刺激前Alpha波功率强度脑地形图
  不同电刺激条件下的刺激前Alpha波功率随难度变化
  不同难度阴极与阳极刺激条件下刺激前Alpha波功率显著降低位置分布
1 NITSCHE M A , PAULUS W . Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation[J]. The Journal of Physiology, 2000. 527 (3): 633- 639.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
2 NITSCHE M A , LIEBETANZ D , ANTAL A , et al. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation-technical, safety and functional aspects[J]. Supplements to Clinical Neurophysiology, 2003. 56, 255- 276.
doi: 10.1016/S1567-424X(09)70230-2
3 FREGNI F , BOGGIO P S , NITSCHE M , et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory[J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2005. 166 (1): 23- 30.
4 OHN S H , PARK C I , YOO W K , et al. Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory[J]. Neuroreport, 2008. 19 (1): 43- 47.
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f2adfd
5 BOGGIO P S , FERRUCCI R , RIGONATTI S P , et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease[J]. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 2006. 249 (1): 31- 38.
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.062
6 BOGGIO P S , KHOURY L P , MARTINS D C S , et al. Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease[J]. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2009. 80 (4): 444- 447.
7 GLADWIN T E , DEN UYL T E , FREGNI F F , et al. Enhancement of selective attention by tDCS:Interaction with interference in a Sternberg task[J]. Neuroscience Letters, 2012. 512 (1): 33- 37.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.01.056
8 MOOS K , VOSSEL S , WEIDNER R , et al. Enhanced visual selection after 2 mA cathodal tDCS of right intraparietal sulcus in healthy subjects[J]. Klinische Neurophysiologie, 2012. 43, P142.
9 STONE D B , TESCHE C D . Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates shifts in global/local attention[J]. Neuroreport, 2009. 20 (12): 1115- 1119.
10 SPARING R , THIMM M , HESSE M D , et al. Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation[J]. Brain, 2009. 132 (11): 3011- 3020.
doi: 10.1093/brain/awp154
11 COFFMAN B A , TRUMBO M C , CLARK V P . Enhancement of object detection with transcranial direct current stimulation is associated with increased attention[J]. BMC Neuroscience, 2012. 13, 108.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-13-108
12 KANG E K , BAEK M J , KIM S Y , et al. Non-invasive cortical stimulation improves post-stroke attention decline[J]. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 2009. 27 (6): 647- 652.
doi: 10.3233/RNN-2009-0514
13 NELSON J T , MCKINLEY R A , GOLOB E J , et al. Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)[J]. Neuroimage, 2014. 853 (Pt): 909- 917.
15 BOSSE M L , TAINTURIER M J , VALDOIS S . Developmental dyslexia:The visual attention span deficit hypothesis[J]. Cognition, 2007. 104 (2): 198- 230.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.009
16 PRADO C , DUBOIS M , VALDOIS S . The eye movements of dyslexic children during reading and visual search:Impact of the visual attention span[J]. Vision Research, 2007. 47 (19): 2521- 2530.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.001
17 LOBIER M , ZOUBRINETZKY R , VALDOIS S . The visual attention span deficit in dyslexia is visual and not verbal[J]. Cortex, 2012. 48 (6): 768- 773.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.09.003
18 HORVATH J C , FORTE J D , CARTER O . Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects:A systematic review[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2015. 66, 213- 236.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.021
19 WESTWOOD S J , ROMANI C . Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulation of picture naming and word reading:A meta-analysis of single session tDCS applied to healthy participants[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2017. 104, 234- 249.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.031
20 ALONZO A , BRASSIL J , TAYLOR J L , et al. Daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) leads to greater increases in cortical excitability than second daily transcranial direct current stimulation[J]. Brain Stimulation, 2012. 5 (3): 208- 213.
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.04.006
21 PAYNE L , GUILLORY S , SEKULER R . Attention-modulated alpha-band oscillations protect against intrusion of irrelevant information[J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2013. 25 (9): 1463- 1476.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00395
22 SAUSENG P , KLIMESCH W , STADLER W , et al. A shift of visual spatial attention is selectively associated with human EEG alpha activity[J]. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2005. 22 (11): 2917- 2926.
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04482.x
23 KLIMESCH W , SAUSENG P , HANSLMAYR S . EEG alpha oscillations:The inhibition-timing hypothesis[J]. Brain Research Reviews, 2007. 53 (1): 63- 88.
24 BABILONI C , VECCHIO F , BULTRINI A , et al. Pre-and poststimulus alpha rhythms are related to conscious visual perception:A high-resolution EEG study[J]. Cerebral Cortex, 2006. 16 (12): 1690- 1700.
25 ERGENOGLU T , DEMIRALP T , BAYRAKTAROGLU Z , et al. Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans[J]. Cognitive Brain Research, 2004. 20 (3): 376- 383.
doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.009
26 ROHENKOHL G , NOBRE A C . Alpha oscillations related to anticipatory attention follow temporal expectations[J]. Journal of Neuroscience, 2011. 31 (40): 14076- 14084.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3387-11.2011
27 RAJAGOVINDAN R , DING M Z . From prestimulus alpha oscillation to visual-evoked response:An inverted-U function and its attentional modulation[J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2011. 23 (6): 1379- 1394.
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21478
28 HANSLMAYR S , ASLAN A , STAUDIGL T , et al. Prestimulus oscillations predict visual perception performance between and within subjects[J]. Neuroimage, 2007. 37 (4): 1465- 1473.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.011
29 HSU T Y , TSENG P , LIANG W K , et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex changes prestimulus alpha oscillation in visual short-term memory task[J]. Neuroimage, 2014. 98, 306- 313.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.069
30 NITSCHE M A , PAULUS W . Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans[J]. Neurology, 2001. 57 (10): 1899- 1901.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.57.10.1899
31 GANDIGA P C , HUMMEL F C , COHEN L G . Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS):A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation[J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2006. 117 (4): 845- 850.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003
32 FRIES P , WOMELSDORF T , OOSTENVELD R , et al. The effects of visual stimulation and selective visual attention on rhythmic neuronal synchronization in macaque area V4[J]. Journal of Neuroscience, 2008. 28 (18): 4823- 4835.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4499-07.2008
33 JENSEN O , MAZAHERI A . Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity:Gating by inhibition[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2010. 4, 186.
34 GALLICCHIO G , FINKENZELLER T , SATTLECKER G , et al. Shooting under cardiovascular load:Electroencephalographic activity in preparation for biathlon shooting[J]. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2016. 109, 92- 99.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.004
35 UTZ K S , DIMOVA V , OPPENL?NDER K , et al. Electrified minds:Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology-A review of current data and future implications[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2010. 48 (10): 2789- 2810.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.002
36 MINIUSSI C , BRIGNANI D , PELLICCIARI M C . Combining transcranial electrical stimulation with electroencephalography:A multimodal approach[J]. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 2012. 43 (3): 184- 191.
doi: 10.1177/1550059412444976
37 BERRYHILL M E , WENCIL E B , BRANCH COSLETT H , et al. A selective working memory impairment after transcranial direct current stimulation to the right parietal lobe[J]. Neuroscience Letters, 2010. 479 (3): 312- 316.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.087
[1] 张守胜, 庄滕飞, 方星星, 朱华, 唐玮. 条形状精细纹理的触觉感知深度识别阈值[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(1): 135-145.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn