Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2020, Vol. 60 Issue (5): 440-448    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2020.22.006
  水利水电工程 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
黄河中游日和年输沙率流量关系空间变化及影响因素
王冰洁1, 李二辉1, 王彦君1, 张世彦2, 傅旭东1
1. 清华大学 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室, 北京 100084;
2. 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所, 陆地水循环及地表过程院重点实验室, 北京 100101
Spatial variations and the factors influencing daily and annual sediment rating curves in the middle Yellow River basin
WANG Bingjie1, LI Erhui1, WANG Yanjun1, ZHANG Shiyan2, FU Xudong1
1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
全文: PDF(9450 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 黄河中游是黄河流域的主要产沙区,准确表达不同时间尺度的水沙输移规律是预测未来流域产沙的关键之一。该文旨在研究黄河中游不同地貌类型区日和年时间尺度输沙率与流量之间的关系及影响因素。结果表明:黄河中游72个水文站点日尺度和其中58个水文站点年尺度的输沙率与流量之间呈显著的幂函数关系;黄土区日和年尺度幂函数关系中系数和指数偏大,土石山区较小;年尺度的系数大于日尺度,年尺度的指数总体小于日尺度;相关性分析及逐步多元回归分析结果显示,各类型区水沙关系的控制因子有所差异。砒砂岩和风沙区在年尺度下指数的控制因子为流量历时和气温,系数的控制因子为流量峰度;黄土区日和年尺度系数的主控因子为控制面积,指数受流量历时和地形的显著影响;土石山区日和年尺度系数受植被覆盖的显著影响;黄河中游植被覆盖对日和年尺度系数的影响存在阈值。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王冰洁
李二辉
王彦君
张世彦
傅旭东
关键词 输沙率-流量关系黄河中游时间尺度流域特性植被    
Abstract:The middle Yellow River basin is known for its extremely high rates of erosion that account for most of the sediment yield in the Yellow River. A suspended sediment rating curve (SRC) describes the relationship between the water discharge and the suspended sediment discharge in a river. Accurately modeling of the SRC at different timescales is important for improving sediment yield prediction in the middle Yellow River basin. The purpose of this study is to examine how various parameters characterizing the daily and annual SRC are related to the river basin characteristics and climate factors. The results show that daily SRC from 72 hydrologic gauging stations and annual SRC from 58 hydrologic gauging stations in the middle Yellow River basin can be fitted by a power function. The annual function coefficient is larger than the daily coefficient while the power exponent is smaller than the daily exponent with both the daily and annual coefficients and exponents in the loess regions being larger than in the rocky mountainous regions. A correlation and a stepwise multiple regression analysis show that the key factors controlling the daily and annual SRC fitting parameters differ with different landform types. In the soft sandstone and aeolian area, the annual exponent is affected by the flow duration and the temperature, and the controlling factor for the annual coefficient is the peak flow anomaly. In the loess area, the main factor controlling the coefficient is the gauging area, while the exponents for both timescales are significantly affected by the flow duration and the terrain. The daily and annual coefficients in the rocky mountainous regions are strongly affected by the vegetation coverage while the coefficients for both timescales have threshold values related to the vegetation coverage in the middle Yellow River basin.
Key wordssediment rating curve    middle Yellow River basin    timescale    watershed characteristics    vegetation
收稿日期: 2019-09-10      出版日期: 2020-04-26
基金资助:傅旭东,教授,E-mail:xdfu@tsinghua.edu.cn
引用本文:   
王冰洁, 李二辉, 王彦君, 张世彦, 傅旭东. 黄河中游日和年输沙率流量关系空间变化及影响因素[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 60(5): 440-448.
WANG Bingjie, LI Erhui, WANG Yanjun, ZHANG Shiyan, FU Xudong. Spatial variations and the factors influencing daily and annual sediment rating curves in the middle Yellow River basin. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2020, 60(5): 440-448.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2020.22.006  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2020/V60/I5/440
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
[1] 胡春宏, 张晓明. 论黄河水沙变化趋势预测研究的若干问题[J]. 水利学报, 2018, 49(9):1028-1039.HU C H, ZHANG X M. Several key questions in the researches of runoff and sediment changes and trend predictions in the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2018, 49(9):1028-1039. (in Chinese)
[2] 高鹏, 穆兴民, 王飞, 等. 黄河中游河口镇-花园口区间水沙变化及其对人类活动的响应[J]. 泥沙研究, 2013(5):75-80.GAO P, MU X M, WANG F, et al. Analysis of impact of human activities on stream flow and sediment discharge from Hekouzhen to Huayuankou in middle reaches of Yellow River[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2013(5):75-80. (in Chinese)
[3] 王随继, 李玲, 颜明. 气候和人类活动对黄河中游区间产流量变化的贡献率[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(3):395-402.WANG S J, LI L, YAN M. The contributions of climate change and human activities to the runoff yield changes in the middle Yellow River basin[J]. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(3):395-402. (in Chinese)
[4] WANG S, FU B J, PIAO S L, et al. Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2016, 9(1):38-41.
[5] SYVITSKI J P, MOREHEAD M D, BAHR D B, et al. Estimating fluvial sediment transport:The rating parameters[J]. Water Resources Research, 2000, 36(9):2747-2760.
[6] FAN X L, SHI C X, ZHOU Y Y, et al. Sediment rating curves in the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia reaches of the upper Yellow River and their implications[J]. Quaternary International, 2012, 282:152-162.
[7] HOROWITZ A J. An evaluation of sediment rating curves for estimating suspended sediment concentrations for subsequent flux calculations[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2003, 17(17):3387-3409.
[8] ZHANG S Y, CHEN D, LI F X, et al. Evaluating spatial variation of suspended sediment rating curves in the middle Yellow River basin, China[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2018, 32(11):1616-1624.
[9] ASSELMAN N E M. Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2000, 234(3-4):228-248.
[10] BUSSI G, DADSON S J, BOWES M J, et al. Seasonal and interannual changes in sediment transport identified through sediment rating curves[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2016, 7, 22(2):06016016.
[11] HU B, WANG H, YANG Z, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of sediment rating curves in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin and their implications[J]. Quaternary International, 2011, 230(1-2):34-43.
[12] JUNG D, PAIK K, KIM J H. Relationship between downstream hydraulic geometry and suspended sediment concentration characteristics[J]. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 2013, 7(4):243-252.
[13] SADEGHI S H R, MIZUYAMA T, MIYATA S, et al. Development, evaluation and interpretation of sediment rating curves for a Japanese small mountainous reforested watershed[J]. Geoderma, 2008, 144(1-2):198-211.
[14] WANG J, ISHIDAIRA H, SUN W C, et al. Development and interpretation of new sediment rating curve considering the effect of vegetation cover for Asian basins[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2013, 2013:154375.
[15] WARRICK J A, RUBIN D M. Suspended-sediment rating curve response to urbanization and wildfire, Santa Ana River, California[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface, 2007, 112(F2):F02018.
[16] YANG G F, CHEN Z Y, YU F L, et al. Sediment rating parameters and their implications:Yangtze River, China[J]. Geomorphology, 2007, 85(3-4):166-175.
[17] ZHAO G J, YUE X L, TIAN P, et al. Comparison of the suspended sediment dynamics in two Loess Plateau catchments, China[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2017, 28(4):1398-1411.
[18] GAO Z L, FU Y L, LI Y H, et al. Trends of streamflow, sediment load and their dynamic relation for the catchments in the middle reaches of the Yellow River over the past five decades[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2012, 16(9):3219-3231.
[19] 王霞, 夏自强, 李捷, 等. 黄河中游降水量特征及变化趋势分析[J]. 人民黄河, 2009, 31(4):48-49, 52.WANG X, XIA Z Q, LI J, et al. Analysis on characteristic of precipitation and variation tendency of the middle Yellow River[J]. Yellow River, 2009, 31(4):48-49, 52. (in Chinese)
[20] 许炯心. 黄河中游支流悬移质粒度与含沙量、流量间的复杂关系[J]. 地理研究, 2003, 22(1):39-48.XU J X. Complicated relationships between suspended sediment grain size, water discharge and sediment concentration in tributaries of middle Yellow River[J]. Geographical Research, 2003, 22(1):39-48. (in Chinese)
[21] 代子俊, 赵霞, 李冠稳, 等. 基于GIMMS NDVI 3g.v1的近34年青海省植被生长季NDVI时空变化特征[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(4):713-725.DAI Z J, ZHAO X, LI G W, et al. Spatial-temporal variations in NDVI in vegetation-growing season in Qinghai based on GIMMS NDVI 3g.v1 in past 34 years[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(4):713-725. (in Chinese)
[22] 许炯心. 黄河河流地貌过程[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2012.XU J X. Landform process of the Yellow River basin[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2012. (in Chinese)
[23] ZHENG M G. A spatially invariant sediment rating curve and its temporal change following watershed management in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 630:1453-1463.
[24] VAUGHAN A A, BELMONT P, HAWKINS C P, et al. Near-channel versus watershed controls on sediment rating curves[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Earth Surface, 2017, 122(10):1901-1923.
[1] 王晨沣, 傅旭东, 张玍, 龚正, 覃超. 黄土高原植被作用下黄河数字流域模型坡面侵蚀模块改进[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(12): 1953-1963.
[2] 李二辉, 王冰洁, 傅旭东. 面向逐日产沙模拟的SWAT模型封闭与检验[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59(12): 975-980.
[3] 石睿杰, 唐莉华, 高广东, 杨大文, 徐翔宇. 长江流域鱼类多样性与流域特性关系分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 58(7): 650-657.
[4] 莫康乐, 丛振涛. 考虑植被对降雨变化响应的流域水量平衡[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(8): 851-856.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn