Calculation method for stormwater network design flow based on kinematic wave simulation
WU Shan1, ZHAO Yujie1, WANG Hao1, WANG Qiang2, LIU Zilong2
1. Faculty of Urban Construction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. Beijing Municipal Institute of City Planning & Design, Beijing 100045, China
摘要雨水管网中管段的设计流量计算一般以恒定均匀流理论为基础,由于偏离了雨水管网实际流态,当应用于较大规模管网时,产生的误差会逐步累积。因此,该文提出一种基于运动波模拟的雨水管网设计流量计算方法,在地表产汇流阶段,基于管网设计参数等价原则,采用径流系数与φ指数法结合的方式进行产流计算,并与等流时线法耦合,完成产汇流阶段设计条件的等价设置;采用暴雨洪水管理模型(storm water management model,SWMM)运动波模块,计算管段汇流过程,并基于GDAL (geospatial data abstraction library)开发技术,实现雨水管网设计流程。对某区雨水管网进行实例验证,结果表明：与恒定均匀流计算相比,采用运动波模拟法得到的雨水管段集水时间短、设计流量大,且随汇水时间和汇水面积的增长,2种方法的流量计算差值呈递增趋势;在超标降雨情景下,运动波模拟法设计的方案具有更好的防涝性能,提高了管网的可靠性。
Abstract：[Objective] The pipe section collection time is typically based on the theory of steady full pipe uniform flow when using the reasoning formula method to calculate the design flow of a storm pipe network, but the actual water flow in the storm pipe is non-steady, causing errors in the calculation of the design flow that, when applied to a larger scale pipe network, gradually reduce the calculation accuracy. In this context, the paper suggests a design flow computation method for storm pipe networks based on kinematic wave simulation. [Methods] In this paper, the design flow of pipe sections is solved using kinematic waves under the condition of ensuring the equivalent setup of model parameters and storm pipe network starting design parameters. This paper combines the Horton infiltration model and the φ index method to calculate infiltration intensity in the surface rainwater runoff stage. The runoff generation is calculated with the objective of achieving equivalence of the volumetric runoff coefficient and discharge runoff coefficient. Taking surface catchment time and linear confluence curve type as input, and coupling with the isochrones model, the equivalence setting of design conditions and stormwater outlet inflow process line calculation are completed. In the pipe section confluence process, the pipe section flow process line is calculated by inputting the corresponding stormwater inlet inflow process line into the node inflow mode and computing the pipe section confluence process using the stormwater management kinematic wave model. The stormwater inlet inflow process line of the designed pipe section and the upstream pipe section flow process line connected with it are superimposed to complete the calculation of the pipe section design flow process line. Combined with the hydraulic design of the stormwater pipe section, the whole storm pipe network design is realized based on the geospatial data abstraction library development technology process. [Results] The results of a storm pipe network example in a particular area (with a total size of 4.506 km2) showed that: (1) When compared to the reasoning formula method, the stormwater pipe section created using the kinematic wave simulation approach had a quick catchment time and a greater design flow rate. (2) The flow calculation difference between the two approaches increased over time as catchment time and catchment area increased, reaching a maximum increase of 39.45%. (3) Under the 10-year rainfall scenario, the design storm pipe network obtained by the two calculation methods of equivalent design conditions reduced the number of overflow nodes, total overflow volume, and length of pipe section overload by 8.57%, 28.57%, and 38.48%, respectively, compared to the reasoning formula method. [Conclusions] By comparing the differences in the design results obtained by the two calculation methods for different catchment times and catchment areas, it can be seen that for large projects, it is advisable to use the kinematic wave simulation method to calculate the design flow of the storm pipe network. In a simulated analysis with a 10-year exceedance of rainfall, the storm pipe network designed by the kinematic wave simulation method has better flood prevention performance.
[1] 周玉文,赵洪宾.排水管网理论与计算[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2000. ZHOU Y W, ZHAO H B. Theories and calculations of urban drainage network[M]. Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press, 2000.(in Chinese) [2] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.室外排水设计标准:GB 50014-2021[S].北京:中国计划出版社, 2021. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Standard for design of outdoor wastewater engineering:GB 50014-2021[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2021.(in Chinese) [3] 娄富豪.模型技术在排水防涝双排水系统设计计算中的应用研究[D].北京:北京工业大学, 2017. LOU F H. Application of model technology in design and calculation of dual drainage system[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Technology, 2017.(in Chinese) [4] SHAO Z Y, ZHANG X Y, LI S, et al. A novel SWMM based algorithm application to storm sewer network design[J]. Water, 2017, 9(10):747. [5] GUO Y, WALTERS G A, KHU S T, et al. A novel cellular automata based approach to storm sewer design[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2007, 39(3):345-364. [6] ZAHERI M M, GHANBARI R, AFSHAR M H. A two-phase simulation-optimization cellular automata method for sewer network design optimization[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2020, 52(4):620-636. [7] 徐得潜,李星.雨水管网多目标优化设计研究[J].中国给水排水, 2018, 34(7):133-138. XU D Q, LI X. Multi-objective optimization design of rainwater pipe network[J]. China Water&Wastewater, 2018, 34(7):133-138.(in Chinese) [8] 王赫婧.城市雨水管网多目标优化设计研究[D].天津:天津大学, 2012. WANG H J. The multi-objective optimization design research of city stormwater network[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University, 2012.(in Chinese) [9] 付积皓.城市雨洪排水系统多目标优化设计研究[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2019. FU J H. Multi-objective optimization design in urban stormwater drainage system[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2019.(in Chinese) [10] LIN R Z, ZHENG F F, SAVIC D, et al. Improving the effectiveness of multiobjective optimization design of urban drainage systems[J]. Water Resources Research, 2020, 56(7):e2019WR026656. [11] 方定懿,廖子元,艾静,等.雨水管网设计中推理公式法的适应性研究[J].给水排水, 2018, 54(5):104-108. FANG D Y, LIAO Z Y, AI J, et al. Research on the adapt ability of reasoning formula method in the design of storm drainage networks[J]. Water&Wastewater Engineering, 2018, 54(5):104-108.(in Chinese) [12] 王浩坦,薛齐.雨水管网设计中数学模型法与推理公式法的对比[J].中国给水排水, 2019, 35(5):110-113. WANG H T, XUE Q. Comparison of mathematical model method and rational method in design of stormwater pipe network[J]. China Water&Wastewater, 2019, 35(5):110-113.(in Chinese) [13] 邓培德.再论城市雨水道设计中数学模型法的应用[J].给水排水, 2015, 51(7):42-46. DENG P D. Re-discussing the application of mathematical model method in urban storm water pipe design[J]. Water&Wastewater Engineering, 2015, 51(7):42-46.(in Chinese) [14] 王磊.基于模型的城市排水管网积水灾害评价与防治研究[D].北京:北京工业大学, 2010. WANG L. The research on urban drainage network inundation evalution and control based on modeling technology[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Technology, 2010.(in Chinese) [15] GIRONÁS J, ROESNER L A, ROSSMAN L A, et al. A new applications manual for the storm water management model (SWMM)[J]. Environmental Modelling&Software, 2010, 25(6):813-814. [16] 邓培德.论城市雨水道设计中数学模型法的应用[J].给水排水, 2015, 51(1):108-112. DENG P D. On the application of mathematical model method in urban storm water pipe design[J]. Water&Wastewater Engineering, 2015, 51(1):108-112.(in Chinese) [17] 邓培德.城市雨水道设计洪峰径流系数法研究及数学模型法探讨[J].给水排水, 2014, 50(5):108-112. DENG P D. Study on the flood-peak runoff coefficient method of urban storm water pipe design and mathematic model[J]. Water&Wastewater Engineering, 2014, 50(5):108-112.(in Chinese) [18] 温会.城市内涝积水量计算模型研究与应用[D].太原:太原理工大学, 2015. WEN H. Research and application on calculation model of urban water logging water accumulation[D]. Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Technology, 2015.(in Chinese) [19] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑与小区雨水控制及利用工程技术规范:GB 50400-2016[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2017. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Technical code for rainwater management and utilization of building and sub-district:GB 50400-2016[S]. Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press, 2017.(in Chinese) [20] 夏军,张印,梁昌梅,等.城市雨洪模型研究综述[J].武汉大学学报(工学版), 2018, 51(2):95-105. XIA J, ZHANG Y, LIANG C M, et al. Review on urban storm water models[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2018, 51(2):95-105.(in Chinese) [21] 刘兴坡,王天宇,张倩,等. EPA SWMM和Mike Urban等流时线模型比较研究[J].中国给水排水, 2017, 33(24):30-35. LIU X P, WANG T Y, ZHANG Q, et al. Comparison of EPA SWMM and Mike Urban isochrones model[J]. China Water&Wastewater, 2017, 33(24):30-35.(in Chinese) [22] 崔虎平,江南.基于OGR的通用地理数据格式转换研究[J].测绘通报, 2012(S1):579-581. CUI H P, JIANG N. Research on the transformation of general geographic data format based on OGR[J]. Surveying and Mapping Bulletin, 2012(S1):579-581.(in Chinese) [23] 北京市规划和国土资源管理委员会,北京市质量技术监督局.城镇雨水系统规划设计暴雨径流计算标准:DB11/T 969-2016[S].北京:北京市地方标准, 2016. Beijing Municipal Commission of Planning and Natural Resources, Beijing Municipal Administration of Quality and Technology Supervision. Standard of rainstorm runoff calculation for urban storm drainage system planning and design:DB11/T 969-2016[S]. Beijing:Beijing Local Standard, 2016.(in Chinese) [24] 王瑞雯.城市雨水管渠系统计算方法及优化设计研究[D].合肥:合肥工业大学, 2018. WANG R W. Research on calculation method and optimization design of urban storm sewer system[D]. Hefei:Hefei University of Technology, 2018.(in Chinese)
2023, Vol. 63 
