Simulation and parameter design of laser survey in underground energy storage caverns
LÜ Xiaoning1, LIU Xiaoli1,2, DUAN Yunling1, TANG Zhili1
1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. Sanjiangyuan Collaborative Innovation Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract：Laser survey parameters are difficult to select due to the effects of different factors on the laser measurements. The characteristics of laser survey parameters are used here to define a design criterion and a design model for the laser survey parameters. The storage cavern dimensions and application-dependent parameters were used on a laser survey simulation of an underground storage cavern based on the design model to identify the design parameters for an in-situ laser survey of an underground storage cavern. The results show that the laser survey simulation and parameter design are an efficient tool for studying the survey parameters to optimize the various tasks in the planning stage.
Soudarissanane S, Lindenbergh R, Menenti M, et al. Scanning geometry: Influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points [J]. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2011, 66(4): 389-399.
[2]
Kukko A, Hyyppa J. Small-footprint laser scanning simulator for system validation, error assessment, and algorithm development [J]. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 2009, 75(9): 1177-1189.
[3]
Pesci A, Teza G, Bonali E. Terrestrial laser scanner resolution: Numerical simulations and experiments on spatial sampling optimization [J]. Remote Sensing, 2011, 3(1): 167-184.
[4]
Arguelles-Fraga R, Ordonez C, Garcia-Cortes S, et al. Measurement planning for circular cross-section tunnels using terrestrial laser scanning [J]. Automat Constr, 2013, 31(3): 1-9.
[5]
Roca-Pardinas J, Arguelles-Fraga R, de Asis Lopez F, et al. Analysis of the influence of range and angle of incidence of terrestrial laser scanning measurements on tunnel inspection [J]. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech, 2014, 43(7): 133-139.
[6]
Buckley S J, Howell J A, Enge H D, et al. Terrestrial laser scanning in geology: Data acquisition, processing and accuracy considerations [J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 2008, 165(3): 625-638.
[7]
Gikas V. Three-dimensional laser scanning for geometry documentation and construction management of highway tunnels during excavation [J]. Sensors, 2012, 12(8): 11249-11270.
[8]
Lichti D D, Jamtsho S. Angular resolution of terrestrial laser scanners [J]. The Photogrammetric Record, 2006, 21(114): 141-160.
[9]
MacEachren A M, Davidson J V. Sampling and isometric mapping of continuous geographic surfaces [J]. The American Cartographer, 1987, 14(4): 299-320.
[10]
Lichti D D. Error modelling, calibration and analysis of an AM-CW terrestrial laser scanner system [J]. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2007, 61(5): 307-324.
[11]
Delaloye D, Diederichs M S, Walton G, et al. Sensitivity testing of the newly developed elliptical fitting method for the measurement of convergence in tunnels and shafts [J]. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2015, 48(2): 651-667.
[12]
Zhao J, Choa V, Broms B B. Construction and utilization of rock caverns in Singapore Part B: Development costs and utilization [J]. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech, 1996, 11(1): 73-79.
[13]
Lee C I, Song J J. Rock engineering in underground energy storage in Korea [J]. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech, 2003, 18(5): 467-483.
[14]
何世德. 三心拱弧与椭圆弧[J]. 河北煤炭, 1987(4): 15-18.HE Shide. Three-centered circular arch and elliptical arch [J]. Hebei Coal, 1987(4): 15-18. (in Chinese)
2017, Vol. 57 
