Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2024, Vol. 64 Issue (2): 181-188    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2023.22.053
  建设管理 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
上市房企购地行为与企业资本市场表现
陈子潇, 梁尧, 刘洪玉
清华大学 建设管理系, 北京 100084
Land-buying behaviors of listed real estate firms and their capital market performance
CHEN Zixiao, LIANG Yao, LIU Hongyu
Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
全文: PDF(1158 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 研究上市房企购地行为与其资本市场表现的关系,有助于上市房企进行市值管理以及资本市场投资者评价、选择上市企业。该文以中国A股上市房企为研究对象,通过回归分析研究房企在2009—2021年间购地数和进入城市数等购地行为对企业投资价值和风险的影响。研究结果表明:整个研究期间,上市房企投资价值与进入城市数之间存在倒U形关系,一定范围内企业投资价值随着进入城市数的增多而提高;在2017年以来的市场下行期,进入城市数对房企投资价值的提高效果降低,同时对房企风险的提高效果增大,表明资本市场对房企区域扩张型购地的反应发生了变化;购地数对房企资本市场表现的影响不及进入城市数显著;非国有、小型或上市时长较短房企的资本市场表现受其购地行为的影响更显著。建议房企关注资本市场的反馈并及时调整购地策略;资本市场投资者关注区域深耕型房企;政府要重视市场结构变化,从关注房企投资需求向关注最终空间使用需求的方向转变。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈子潇
梁尧
刘洪玉
关键词 上市房企购地行为资本市场表现企业投资价值企业风险    
Abstract:[Objective] High-quality development and exploration of a new development model for the real estate industry has recently attracted considerable attention. Scale expansion and relevant land-buying are essential components of the development model. Much of the literature investigating land-buying behaviors of real estate firms has focused on the number of lands bought rather than the number of cities entered, which is also an important aspect. Besides buying lands, listed real estate firms must concern the market value management related to financing and investors' valuation. Therefore, this paper investigates the relationship between the land-buying behaviors of listed real estate firms and their capital market performance. Investors can build more efficient stock portfolios and real estate firms can improve land-buying strategies based on the results. [Methods] We employed regression analysis to estimate the influence of land-buying behaviors on the capital market performance of A-listed real estate firms. The data was primarily obtained from the CREIS and CSMAR databases, spanning from 2009 to 2021 and involving 87 firms. The model included the number of lands bought, cities entered, and other aspects of land-buying behaviors. Capital market performance was divided into two aspects:firm investment value and firm risk, which are represented using Tobin's Q and Beta coefficients, respectively. The model also controlled firm and manager characteristics, financial ratios, and market environment and employed the two-way fixed effect ordinary least squares (OLS) method. The heterogeneity effect on ownership, firm scale, and year of listing was explored using a regression on the subsample, while robustness testing was conducted by handling extreme values. Finally, we discussed a potential channel through which land-buying behaviors affected the capital market performance. [Results] The results show an inverted U-shaped relation between the firm investment value and number of cities entered; furthermore, the investment value increases when more cities are entered within a certain range throughout the study period. In the market downturn period, i.e., since 2017, the lifting effect due to entering more cities on the firm investment value has decreased, while that on firm risk has increased. Comparatively, the effect of the number of lands bought on capital market performance is not as important as that of the number of cities entered. The capital market performance of non-state-owned, smaller, or shorter-listed real estate firms is more affected by their land-buying behaviors. The impact of land-buying behaviors on capital market performance passes through the land-buying expense and sale revenue ratio channel. [Conclusions] The findings indicate a change in the reaction of the capital market to the regional expansion of land-buying. We recommend that real estate firms respond to feedback from the capital market and adjust their land-buying strategies in time, especially when selecting and entering more cities. Furthermore, investors should pay attention to region-focused real estate firms. The findings also suggest that the government should be cautious about structural changes in the real estate market, and a shift from focusing on the investment demand of real estate firms to focusing on the end-use demand of space is required to coordinate and guide the further improvement of the development model.
Key wordslisted real estate firms    land-buying behavior    capital market performance    firm investment value    firm risk
收稿日期: 2023-08-11      出版日期: 2023-12-28
ZTFLH:  F293.35  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目(72274102)
通讯作者: 刘洪玉,教授,E-mail:liuhy@tsinghua.edu.cn     E-mail: liuhy@tsinghua.edu.cn
作者简介: 陈子潇(2000-),男,博士研究生。
引用本文:   
陈子潇, 梁尧, 刘洪玉. 上市房企购地行为与企业资本市场表现[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(2): 181-188.
CHEN Zixiao, LIANG Yao, LIU Hongyu. Land-buying behaviors of listed real estate firms and their capital market performance. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2024, 64(2): 181-188.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2023.22.053  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2024/V64/I2/181
  
  
  
  
  
  
[1] YU S J, ZHANG L, ZENG Y N, et al. Dual influences of regulatory polices on real estate enterprises' investment:Based on the perspective of supply-side reform in China [J]. Finance Research Letters, 2017, 23:50-57.
[2] PELLEGRINI C B, CINCINELLI P, MEOLI M, et al. The contribution of (shadow) banks and real estate to systemic risk in China [J]. Journal of Financial Stability, 2022, 60:101018.
[3] BAO H J, CHONG A Y L, WANG H D, et al. Quantitative decision making in land banking:A Monte Carlo simulation for China's real estate developers [J]. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 2012, 16(4):355-369.
[4] 吴璟, 王璞. 中国上市房地产开发企业跨区域扩张的城市选择规律研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2017, 31(1):140-145. WU J, WANG P. City selection strategy in the cross-region expansion of Chinese listed real estate developers [J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2017, 31(1):140-145. (in Chinese)
[5] LIAO Y W, WANG Y M, WANG Y S, et al. Understanding the dynamics between organizational IT investment strategy and market performance:A system dynamics approach [J]. Computers in Industry, 2015, 71:46-57.
[6] 梁若冰, 张东荣, 方心, 等. 限购政策是否降低了上市房地产企业价值?——基于强度双重差分法的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 494(8):42-60. LIANG R B, ZHANG D R, FANG X, et al. Do purchase restriction policies reduce the corporate value of listed real estate companies? [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2021, 494(8):42-60. (in Chinese)
[7] 武志勇, 董立群. 高管背景特征对房地产企业经营绩效影响研究:基于生命周期视角[J]. 财会通讯, 2017(19):31-35. WU Z Y, DONG L Q. The influence of top management background characteristics on the real estate enterprises' operating performance in the perspective of life cycle [J]. Financial and Accounting Communication, 2017(19):31-35. (in Chinese)
[8] 景辛辛, 杨福明. 多元化战略变革是促进还是抑制了企业绩效?——基于我国上市房地产企业的实证分析[J]. 中国流通经济, 2018, 32(9):65-73. JING X X, YANG F M. Does the diversified strategic change promote or restrain enterprises' performance?-The empirical analysis based on China's listed real estate enterprises [J]. China Business and Market, 2018, 32(9):65-73. (in Chinese)
[9] CEN W, DOUKAS J A. CEO personal investment decisions and firm risk [J]. European Financial Management, 2017, 23(5):920-950.
[10] 林朝颖, 余向群, 杨广青. 货币政策、过度投资与房地产企业风险承担[J]. 技术经济, 2015, 34(8):116-122. LIN C Y, YU X Q, YANG G Q. Monetary policy, overinvestment and risk-taking of real estate companies [J]. Technology Economics, 2015, 34(8):116-122. (in Chinese)
[11] 张红, 高帅, 李维娜. 中国房地产上市公司多元化与企业绩效关系[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(9):977-983. ZHANG H, GAO S, LI W N. Relationship between diversification and performance of Chinese real estate listed companies [J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2015, 55(9):977-983. (in Chinese)
[12] 赵伟, 尹礼汇. 增加土地储备能提升房地产开发企业的绩效吗?——基于114家房地产上市公司面板数据的实证分析[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2019, 35(2):56-68. ZHAO W, YIN L H. Can land reserve improve performance of the real estate enterprises?-An empirical analysis based on panel data of 114 real estate listed companies [J]. Review of Economy and Management, 2019, 35(2):56-68. (in Chinese)
[13] HAYTER R. The dynamics of industrial location:The factory, the firm and the production system [M]. London:John Wiley & Son, 1997.
[14] 张可云, 裴相烨. 大城市制造业企业空间扩张模式及其对企业效率的影响:以北京市上市企业为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(10):1613-1625. ZHANG K Y, PEI X Y. Spatial expansion mode of manufacturing firms in big cities and its impact on firm efficiency:A case study of Beijing listed firms [J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(10):1613-1625. (in Chinese)
[15] 刁新军, 杨德礼, 任雅威. 基于扩展Hotelling模型的企业竞争策略研究[J]. 管理学报, 2009, 6(7):867-872. DIAO X J, YANG D L, REN Y W. Extended Hotelling model-based firms' competitive strategies [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2009, 6(7):867-872. (in Chinese)
[16] MARKOWITZ H M. Foundations of portfolio theory [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1991, 46(2):469-477.
[17] 刘洪玉, 任荣荣. 开发商的土地储备与竞买行为解析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2008, 22(12):11-16. LIU H Y, REN R R. Research on the behavior of land reserve and land biding of developers [J]. China Land Science, 2008, 22(12):11-16. (in Chinese)
[18] 李嘉, 董亚宁, 贺灿飞. 越负债, 越投资?——住房金融化下的房企负债-投资行为与空间分异[J]. 经济管理, 2020, 42(8):171-189. LI J, DONG Y N, HE C F. More debts, more investment? The behaviors of real estate developers and spatial differentiation from housing financialization perspectives [J]. Business and Management Journal, 2020, 42(8):171-189. (in Chinese)
[19] BHARADWAJ A S, BHARADWAJ S G, KONSYNSKI B R. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q [J]. Management Science, 1999, 45(7):1008-1024.
[20] 毛丰付, 倪鹏飞, 卞加俊. 金融约束与房地产市场发展:基于房企"股地互动"视角的研究[J]. 财贸经济, 2014(3):124-134. MAO F F, NI P F, BIAN J J. Financial constraints and real estate market development:A stock-land interaction perspective [J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2014(3):124-134. (in Chinese)
[21] 陈英楠, 莫东翠, 唐思华, 等. 测量中国房地产政策不确定性研究[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2022, 22(2):405-424. CHEN Y N, MO D C, TANG S H, et al. Measuring real estate policy uncertainty [J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2022, 22(2):405-424. (in Chinese)
[1] 张红, 张洋, 李维娜, 徐照. 基于数理模型的二手房买卖经纪模式仿真比较[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(4): 399-405.
[2] 樊颖, 张红, 杨赞. 基于小波分析的北京市住宅市场景气循环周期[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(9): 984-990.
[3] 李真, 刘洪玉. 写字楼市场租金与空置率互动关系——以北京和首尔为例[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(6): 647-652.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn