Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2024, Vol. 64 Issue (3): 502-508    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2023.26.052
  公共安全科学与技术 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
用于液体火灾的环保泡沫制备方法与关键参数
赵金龙1,2, 李浩源1, 张清元1, 杨钧晖1, 田畅1, 疏学明3
1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 应急管理与安全工程学院, 北京 100083;
2. 应急管理部国家安全工程与科学研究院, 北京 100029;
3. 清华大学 工程物理系, 北京 100084
Preparation method and key parameters of a environmentally safe foam for liquid fire suppression
ZHAO Jinlong1,2, LI Haoyuan1, ZHANG Qingyuan1, YANG Junhui1, TIAN Chang1, SHU Xueming3
1. School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
2. National Academy of Safety Science and Engineering, Beijing 100029, China;
3. Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
全文: PDF(7471 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 当发生液体火灾时,常使用泡沫快速扑灭。但传统泡沫存在较多缺陷,如泡沫所含成分全氟辛烷磺酰基化合物(PFOS)难以降解,长期积累会造成环境污染;热稳定性差,灭火后液体火灾易发生复燃。该文通过添加瓜尔豆胶制备了一种适用于液体火灾的环保型多糖聚合物泡沫,分析了该环保型多糖聚合物泡沫的发泡性能和稳定性能,明确了发泡剂、稳泡剂的浓度和配比,并与氟蛋白泡沫灭火性能进行了对比。结果表明:当脂肪醇聚氧乙烯醚葡糖苷(AEG)和椰油基糖苷(APG-0810)这2种环保型表面活性剂的质量比为2∶8且质量分数均为0.5%时,泡沫综合值最佳。随后分别添加质量分数为0.3%、0.4%和0.5%的瓜尔豆胶,发现质量分数为0.4%时,泡沫的灭火效果最好,灭火时间为82 s,比氟蛋白泡沫灭火时间缩短10 s。使用该环保型多糖聚合物泡沫灭火后,25%复燃和90%复燃的对应时间分别为501和638 s,比氟蛋白泡沫延长了96.5%和114.1%,表明该环保型多糖聚合物泡沫具有良好的抗复燃性。该成果可为针对液体火灾的抗复燃泡沫配方研发提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵金龙
李浩源
张清元
杨钧晖
田畅
疏学明
关键词 液体火灾瓜尔豆胶环保泡沫灭火时间复燃时间    
Abstract:[Objective] Liquid fuel fires are commonly extinguished using foam; however, conventional foam formulations include perfluorooctane sulfonate, which does not degrade easily, causing environmental pollution and posing a threat to human health. Furthermore, traditional foams exhibit poor thermal stability and are prone to reignition after extinguishing. Thus, developing a foam that is both safe and environmentally friendly while exhibiting strong resistance to reignition is urgently needed. However, most of the current research is limited to laboratory parameter measurements and mainly focuses on the development of new foams for solid fires, such as coal fires, which have considerable differences in fire suppression mechanisms and foam performance requirements from liquid fires. At present, research on highly stable and environmentally friendly foam formulations specifically designed for liquid fires is limited. This study aims to replace hazardous fluorocarbon surfactants with safe and biodegradable hydrocarbon surfactants and incorporate natural hydrophilic polymer guar gum to develop an environmentally friendly polysaccharide foam suitable for liquid fires. Analysis of the foaming and stability performance of the developed foam is conducted, and the concentrations and ratios of foaming agents and stabilizers are determined. Finally, the fire suppression performance of the developed foam is compared with that of the fluoroprotein foam (FFFP). [Methods] The foam expansion ratio and half-life were estimated, and the comprehensive values were computed to determine the optimal laboratory foam formulation with high comprehensive parameters. However, the direct estimation of the fire suppression time of the foam during liquid fire extinguishment was difficult as it was influenced by various factors such as foaming performance, stability, and flowability. Thus, a 0.8 m-diameter scaled-down oil pan was constructed, and the laboratory foam formulation with higher comprehensive parameters was further tested for its fire suppression performance and compared with the commercial FFFP. After complete extinguishment, a 5-minute cooling period was implemented, followed by an evaluation of the foam's resistance to reignition using a burn-back tank. [Results] The findings revealed that: (1) The foam presented the highest comprehensive value of 133.4 at an mass ratio of AEG and APG-0810 of 2∶8, with a mass fraction of 0.5%. The foam expansion ratio was 14.5, and the half-life was 10.8 min. (2) When the concentration of guar gum was 0.4%, the comprehensive value of the foam stabilized and exhibited the best fire suppression performance. The 90% control time was approximately 52 s, and the extinguishment time was 82 s. Comparing the control and extinguishment times of the developed foam with those of FFFP, the new formulation showed reductions of 16.1% and 10.9%, respectively. (3) At a guar gum concentration of 0.4%, the developed foam exhibited the best resistance to reignition. The 25%, 90%, and complete reignition times compared to FFFP were extended by 96.5%, 114.1% and 113.7%, respectively. [Conclusions] By replacing hazardous fluorocarbon surfactants with biodegradable hydrocarbon surfactants (APG-0810 and AEG) and introducing the natural hydrophilic polymer guar gum, the developed foam has improved viscous and water-retention properties, leading to a substantially improvement in its resistance to reignition. This study offers a reference for developing new reignition-resistant foam formulations specifically designed for liquid fires.
Key wordsliquid fire    guar gum    environmentally friendly foam    extinguishing time    reignition time
收稿日期: 2023-07-26      出版日期: 2024-03-06
基金资助:“十四五”重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3004902);应急管理部消防救援局重点研发项目(2022XFZD04);中央高校基本科研业务费(2023JCCXAQ05)
通讯作者: 疏学明,副研究员,E-mail:shuxm@tsinghua.edu.cn     E-mail: shuxm@tsinghua.edu.cn
作者简介: 赵金龙(1988—),男,副教授。
引用本文:   
赵金龙, 李浩源, 张清元, 杨钧晖, 田畅, 疏学明. 用于液体火灾的环保泡沫制备方法与关键参数[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(3): 502-508.
ZHAO Jinlong, LI Haoyuan, ZHANG Qingyuan, YANG Junhui, TIAN Chang, SHU Xueming. Preparation method and key parameters of a environmentally safe foam for liquid fire suppression. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2024, 64(3): 502-508.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2023.26.052  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2024/V64/I3/502
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
[1]韩文艳, 杨娜, 熊永兰. 科技大国能源消费结构演变及影响因素研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43(1):199-205. HAN W Y, YANY N, XIONG Y L. A study on the evolution and influencing factors of energy consumption structure in major scientific and technological power[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2023, 43(1):199-205. (in Chinese)
[2]ZHAO J L, ZHU H Q, ZHANG J P, et al. Experimental study on the spread and burning behaviors of continuously discharge spill fires under different slopes[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 392:122352.
[3]田逢时, 薛冉, 郑昕, 等. 超大型油罐火灾分区灭火方案及实验验证[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(1):13-20. TIAN F S, XUE R, ZHENG X, et al. Partitioned fire control of very large oil tank fires[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62(1):13-20. (in Chinese)
[4]LOU M W, JIA H Y, LIN Z, et al. Study on fire extinguishing performance of different foam extinguishing agents in diesel pool fire[J]. Results in Engineering, 2023, 17:100874.
[5]MAGRABI S A, DLUGOGORSKI B Z, JAMESON G J. A comparative study of drainage characteristics in AFFF and FFFP compressed-air fire-fighting foams[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2002, 37(1):21-52.
[6]ROTANDER A, TOMS L M L, AYLWARD L, et al. Elevated levels of PFOS and PFHxS in firefighters exposed to aqueous film forming foam (AFFF)[J]. Environment International, 2015, 82:28-34.
[7]XU Z S, GUO X, YAN L, et al. Fire-extinguishing performance and mechanism of aqueous film-forming foam in diesel pool fire[J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2020, 17:100578.
[8]ZHANG Q L, WANG L, Bi Y X, et al. Experimental investigation of foam spread and extinguishment of the large-scale methanol pool fire[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 287:87-92.
[9]曹海珍, 王尚彬, 欧红香, 等. 疏水改性纳米二氧化硅对无氟泡沫灭火剂性能影响[J/OL]. 化工进展. (2023-07-19)[2023-07-25]. https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0881. CAO H Z, WANG S B, OU H X, et al. Effect of hydrophobic ally modified silica on the performance of fluorinefree foam extinguishing agent[J/OL]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress. (2023-07-19)[2023-07-25]. https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0881. (in Chinese)
[10]HAN C, NIE S B, LIU Z G, et al. A novel biomass sodium alginate gel foam to inhibit the spontaneous combustion of coal[J]. Fuel, 2022, 314:122779.
[11]FAN X K, GUAN X Q, ZHANG M, et al. Aqueous foam synergistically stabilized by the composite of lignin nanoparticles and surfactant[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2022, 643:128727.
[12]XI X, SHI Q L. Study of the preparation and extinguishment characteristic of the novel high-water-retaining foam for controlling spontaneous combustion of coal[J]. Fuel, 2021, 288:119354.
[13]XI Z L, LI D, FENG Z Y. Characteristics of polymorphic foam for inhibiting spontaneous coal combustion[J]. Fuel, 2017, 206:334-341.
[14]QIN B T, LU Y, LI Y, et al. Aqueous three-phase foam supported by fly ash for coal spontaneous combustion prevention and control[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2014, 25(5):1527-1533.
[15]TIAN C, ZHAO J L, YANG J H, et al. Preparation and characterization of fire-extinguishing efficiency of novel gel-protein foam for liquid pool fires[J]. Energy, 2023, 263:125949.
[16]CHEN T, FU X C, BAO Z M, et al. Experimental study on the extinguishing efficiency of compressed air foam sprinkler system on oil pool fire[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2018, 211:94-103.
[17]田逢时, 董欣欣, 疏学明, 等. 蛭石粉末及离子溶液改性后膨胀率和灭火有效性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3):1761-1768. TIAN F S, DONG X X, SHU X M, et al. Experimental study on expansion rate and fire extinguishing effectiveness after modification of vermiculite powder and ionic solution[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(3):1761-1768. (in Chinese)
[18]YU X Y, JIANG N, MIAO X Y, et al. Comparative studies on foam stability, oil-film interaction and fire extinguishing performance for fluorine-free and fluorinated foams[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 133:201-215.
[19]GARRETT P R, GRATTON P L. Dynamic surface tensions, foam and the transition from micellar solution to lamellar phase dispersion[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1995, 103(1-2):127-145.
[20]王俊宏, 孙永强, 周婧洁, 等. 非离子聚合物增稠剂的性能研究[J/OL]. 应用化工. (2023-07-17)[2023-07-23]. https://doi.org/10.16581/j.cnki.issn1671-3206.20230714.013. WANG J H, SUN Y Q, ZHOU J J, et al. Properties of nonionic polymer thickeners[J/OL]. Applied Chemical Industry. (2023-07-17)[2023-07-23]. https://doi.org/10.16581/j.cnki.issn1671-3206.20230714.013. (in Chinese)
[21]SHI Q L, QIN B T, HAO Y H, et al. Experimental investigation of the flow and extinguishment characteristics of gel-stabilized foam used to control coal fire[J]. Energy, 2022, 247:123484.
[22]LIU J H, LI D X, WANG Z, et al. A state-of-the-art research progress and prospect of liquid fuel spill fires[J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2021, 28:101421.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn