Preparation method and key parameters of a environmentally safe foam for liquid fire suppression
ZHAO Jinlong1,2, LI Haoyuan1, ZHANG Qingyuan1, YANG Junhui1, TIAN Chang1, SHU Xueming3
1. School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 2. National Academy of Safety Science and Engineering, Beijing 100029, China; 3. Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract:[Objective] Liquid fuel fires are commonly extinguished using foam; however, conventional foam formulations include perfluorooctane sulfonate, which does not degrade easily, causing environmental pollution and posing a threat to human health. Furthermore, traditional foams exhibit poor thermal stability and are prone to reignition after extinguishing. Thus, developing a foam that is both safe and environmentally friendly while exhibiting strong resistance to reignition is urgently needed. However, most of the current research is limited to laboratory parameter measurements and mainly focuses on the development of new foams for solid fires, such as coal fires, which have considerable differences in fire suppression mechanisms and foam performance requirements from liquid fires. At present, research on highly stable and environmentally friendly foam formulations specifically designed for liquid fires is limited. This study aims to replace hazardous fluorocarbon surfactants with safe and biodegradable hydrocarbon surfactants and incorporate natural hydrophilic polymer guar gum to develop an environmentally friendly polysaccharide foam suitable for liquid fires. Analysis of the foaming and stability performance of the developed foam is conducted, and the concentrations and ratios of foaming agents and stabilizers are determined. Finally, the fire suppression performance of the developed foam is compared with that of the fluoroprotein foam (FFFP). [Methods] The foam expansion ratio and half-life were estimated, and the comprehensive values were computed to determine the optimal laboratory foam formulation with high comprehensive parameters. However, the direct estimation of the fire suppression time of the foam during liquid fire extinguishment was difficult as it was influenced by various factors such as foaming performance, stability, and flowability. Thus, a 0.8 m-diameter scaled-down oil pan was constructed, and the laboratory foam formulation with higher comprehensive parameters was further tested for its fire suppression performance and compared with the commercial FFFP. After complete extinguishment, a 5-minute cooling period was implemented, followed by an evaluation of the foam's resistance to reignition using a burn-back tank. [Results] The findings revealed that: (1) The foam presented the highest comprehensive value of 133.4 at an mass ratio of AEG and APG-0810 of 2∶8, with a mass fraction of 0.5%. The foam expansion ratio was 14.5, and the half-life was 10.8 min. (2) When the concentration of guar gum was 0.4%, the comprehensive value of the foam stabilized and exhibited the best fire suppression performance. The 90% control time was approximately 52 s, and the extinguishment time was 82 s. Comparing the control and extinguishment times of the developed foam with those of FFFP, the new formulation showed reductions of 16.1% and 10.9%, respectively. (3) At a guar gum concentration of 0.4%, the developed foam exhibited the best resistance to reignition. The 25%, 90%, and complete reignition times compared to FFFP were extended by 96.5%, 114.1% and 113.7%, respectively. [Conclusions] By replacing hazardous fluorocarbon surfactants with biodegradable hydrocarbon surfactants (APG-0810 and AEG) and introducing the natural hydrophilic polymer guar gum, the developed foam has improved viscous and water-retention properties, leading to a substantially improvement in its resistance to reignition. This study offers a reference for developing new reignition-resistant foam formulations specifically designed for liquid fires.
赵金龙, 李浩源, 张清元, 杨钧晖, 田畅, 疏学明. 用于液体火灾的环保泡沫制备方法与关键参数[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(3): 502-508.
ZHAO Jinlong, LI Haoyuan, ZHANG Qingyuan, YANG Junhui, TIAN Chang, SHU Xueming. Preparation method and key parameters of a environmentally safe foam for liquid fire suppression. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2024, 64(3): 502-508.
[1]韩文艳, 杨娜, 熊永兰. 科技大国能源消费结构演变及影响因素研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43(1):199-205. HAN W Y, YANY N, XIONG Y L. A study on the evolution and influencing factors of energy consumption structure in major scientific and technological power[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2023, 43(1):199-205. (in Chinese) [2]ZHAO J L, ZHU H Q, ZHANG J P, et al. Experimental study on the spread and burning behaviors of continuously discharge spill fires under different slopes[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 392:122352. [3]田逢时, 薛冉, 郑昕, 等. 超大型油罐火灾分区灭火方案及实验验证[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(1):13-20. TIAN F S, XUE R, ZHENG X, et al. Partitioned fire control of very large oil tank fires[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62(1):13-20. (in Chinese) [4]LOU M W, JIA H Y, LIN Z, et al. Study on fire extinguishing performance of different foam extinguishing agents in diesel pool fire[J]. Results in Engineering, 2023, 17:100874. [5]MAGRABI S A, DLUGOGORSKI B Z, JAMESON G J. A comparative study of drainage characteristics in AFFF and FFFP compressed-air fire-fighting foams[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2002, 37(1):21-52. [6]ROTANDER A, TOMS L M L, AYLWARD L, et al. Elevated levels of PFOS and PFHxS in firefighters exposed to aqueous film forming foam (AFFF)[J]. Environment International, 2015, 82:28-34. [7]XU Z S, GUO X, YAN L, et al. Fire-extinguishing performance and mechanism of aqueous film-forming foam in diesel pool fire[J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2020, 17:100578. [8]ZHANG Q L, WANG L, Bi Y X, et al. Experimental investigation of foam spread and extinguishment of the large-scale methanol pool fire[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 287:87-92. [9]曹海珍, 王尚彬, 欧红香, 等. 疏水改性纳米二氧化硅对无氟泡沫灭火剂性能影响[J/OL]. 化工进展. (2023-07-19)[2023-07-25]. https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0881. CAO H Z, WANG S B, OU H X, et al. Effect of hydrophobic ally modified silica on the performance of fluorinefree foam extinguishing agent[J/OL]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress. (2023-07-19)[2023-07-25]. https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0881. (in Chinese) [10]HAN C, NIE S B, LIU Z G, et al. A novel biomass sodium alginate gel foam to inhibit the spontaneous combustion of coal[J]. Fuel, 2022, 314:122779. [11]FAN X K, GUAN X Q, ZHANG M, et al. Aqueous foam synergistically stabilized by the composite of lignin nanoparticles and surfactant[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2022, 643:128727. [12]XI X, SHI Q L. Study of the preparation and extinguishment characteristic of the novel high-water-retaining foam for controlling spontaneous combustion of coal[J]. Fuel, 2021, 288:119354. [13]XI Z L, LI D, FENG Z Y. Characteristics of polymorphic foam for inhibiting spontaneous coal combustion[J]. Fuel, 2017, 206:334-341. [14]QIN B T, LU Y, LI Y, et al. Aqueous three-phase foam supported by fly ash for coal spontaneous combustion prevention and control[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2014, 25(5):1527-1533. [15]TIAN C, ZHAO J L, YANG J H, et al. Preparation and characterization of fire-extinguishing efficiency of novel gel-protein foam for liquid pool fires[J]. Energy, 2023, 263:125949. [16]CHEN T, FU X C, BAO Z M, et al. Experimental study on the extinguishing efficiency of compressed air foam sprinkler system on oil pool fire[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2018, 211:94-103. [17]田逢时, 董欣欣, 疏学明, 等. 蛭石粉末及离子溶液改性后膨胀率和灭火有效性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3):1761-1768. TIAN F S, DONG X X, SHU X M, et al. Experimental study on expansion rate and fire extinguishing effectiveness after modification of vermiculite powder and ionic solution[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(3):1761-1768. (in Chinese) [18]YU X Y, JIANG N, MIAO X Y, et al. Comparative studies on foam stability, oil-film interaction and fire extinguishing performance for fluorine-free and fluorinated foams[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 133:201-215. [19]GARRETT P R, GRATTON P L. Dynamic surface tensions, foam and the transition from micellar solution to lamellar phase dispersion[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1995, 103(1-2):127-145. [20]王俊宏, 孙永强, 周婧洁, 等. 非离子聚合物增稠剂的性能研究[J/OL]. 应用化工. (2023-07-17)[2023-07-23]. https://doi.org/10.16581/j.cnki.issn1671-3206.20230714.013. WANG J H, SUN Y Q, ZHOU J J, et al. Properties of nonionic polymer thickeners[J/OL]. Applied Chemical Industry. (2023-07-17)[2023-07-23]. https://doi.org/10.16581/j.cnki.issn1671-3206.20230714.013. (in Chinese) [21]SHI Q L, QIN B T, HAO Y H, et al. Experimental investigation of the flow and extinguishment characteristics of gel-stabilized foam used to control coal fire[J]. Energy, 2022, 247:123484. [22]LIU J H, LI D X, WANG Z, et al. A state-of-the-art research progress and prospect of liquid fuel spill fires[J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2021, 28:101421.