COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
|
|
|
|
|
Sensitive information management system for un-trusted system platforms |
XIE Xuezhi, WANG Yuping, TAN Jianfeng, CHEN Qigeng |
Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
|
|
Abstract The threats of backdoors and vulnerabilities in general-purpose operating systems complicate protection of sensitive information. This paper describes a sensitive memory management system(SMM) which protects sensitive information memory and prevents attackers from obtaining sensitive information by compromising the operating system kernel. Virtualization is used to set up different shadow page tables for the user-mode and the kernel-mode of the protected process and then controls access to the sensitive information so that only the proper applications can access the information and not the operating systems kernel. Tests show that the memory is protected with finer granularity and lower overhead than previous methods.
|
Keywords
sensitive information protection
data confidentiality
virtualization
shadow paging
|
|
Issue Date: 15 November 2015
|
|
|
[1] 李洋. Linux安全策略与实例[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社, 2009.LI Yang. Linux Security Policy and Example[M]. Beijing:China Machine Press, 2009.(in Chinese)
[2] Pfleeger C P. Security in Computing.[M]. 4th ED. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA:Prentice Hall, 2006.
[3] 范九伦, 刘宏月. 密码学基础[M]. 西安:西安电子科技大学出版社, 2008.FAN Jiulun, LIU Hongyue.Foundations of Cryptography[M]. Xi'an:Xidian University Press, 2008.(in Chinese)
[4] Sabelfeld A, Myers A C. Language-based information-flow security[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2003, 21(1):5-19.
[5] Xu W, Bhatkar S, Sekar R. Taint-enhanced policy enforcement:a practical approach to defeat a wide range of attacks[C]//15th USENIX Security Symposium. Vancouver, Canada:USENIX Association, 2006, 9.
[6] Zeldovich N, Boyd-Wickizer S, Kohler E, et al. Making information flow explicit in histar[C]//Proceedings of the Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. Seattle, WA, USA:USENIX Association, 2006:263-278.
[7] Efstathopoulos P, Krohn M, VanDeBogart S, et al. Labels and event processes in the asbestos operating system[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. Brighton, UK:ACM, 2005:17-30.
[8] Yang J, Shin K G. Using hypervisor to provide data secrecy for user applications on a per-page basis[C]//Proceedings of the fourth ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS International Conference on Virtual Execution Environments. Seattle, WA, USA:ACM, 2008:71-80.
[9] Chen X, Garfinkel T, Lewis E C, et al. Overshadow:A virtualization-based approach to retrofitting protection in commodity operating systems[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. Seattle, WA, USA:ACM, 2008:2-13.
[10] Dalton M, Kannan H, Kozyrakis C. Raksha:A flexible information flow architecture for software security[C]//Proceedings of the 34th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture. San Diego, CA, USA:ACM, 2007:482-493.
[11] Chen Y Y, Jamkhedkar P A, Lee R B. A software-hardware architecture for self-protecting data[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. Raleigh, NC, USA:ACM, 2012:14-27.
[12] Champagne D, Lee R B. Scalable architectural support for trusted software[C]//Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture. Bangalore, India:IEEE Press, 2010:31-42.
[13] McCune J M, Li Y, Qu N, et al. TrustVisor:Efficient TCB reduction and attestation[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Security and Privacy. Oakland, CA, USA:IEEE Press, 2010:143-158.
[14] Bae C S, Lange J R, Dinda P A. Enhancing virtualized application performance through dynamic adaptive paging mode selection[C]//Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Autonomic Computing. Karlsruhe, Germany:ACM, 2011:255-264. |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|