Defense of P2P live video systems facing Eclipse-delay attack

doi:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2016.23.008

Download: PDF(1275 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract P2P live video systems are widely used in today's Internet. Compared with eMule/BitTorrent and other traditional P2P file-sharing systems, a P2P live video system has higher requirements on real-time data, which becomes vulnerable weakness. Delay attack, with strong concealment, is potentially lethal for large P2P video broadcasting systems. Theoretical security threats of popular P2P live video systems were analyzed to propose three types of delay attack based on Eclipse attack, No-Offer attack, Delay-Chunk attack, and No-Chunk attack, with a high-availability defense strategy against delay attack being developed. Experiments were made on PlanetLab based on PeerStreamer, which proves the impact of delay attack and the effectiveness of the developed defense strategy.

Keywords Eclipse attack P2P live video system delay attack

ZTFLH:

TP309

Issue Date: 15 January 2016

	Service

	E-mail this article
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

	HAN Xinhui
	LI Chen
	XIAO Xiangquan
	LIU Bingshuang
	YE Jiayi

Cite this article:

HAN Xinhui,LI Chen,XIAO Xiangquan, et al. Defense of P2P live video systems facing Eclipse-delay attack[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2016, 56(1): 58-65.

URL:

http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2016.23.008 OR http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/Y2016/V56/I1/58

[1] Deshpande H, Bawa M, Garcia-Molina H. Streaming live media over a peer-to-peer network [R]. 2001.
[2] Jannotti J, Gifford D K, Johnson K L, et al. Overcast: Reliable multicasting with on overlay network [C]//Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Symposium on Operating System Design & Implementation—Volume 4. Berkeley: USENIX Association, 2000: 14-14.
[3] Rejaie R, Ortega A. PALS: Peer-to-peer adaptive layered streaming [C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video. New York: ACM, 2003: 153-161.
[4] Tran D A, Hua K A, Do T. Zigzag: An efficient peer-to-peer scheme for media streaming [C]//INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications. Piscataway: IEEE Societies, 2003, 2: 1283-1292.
[5] Castro M, Druschel P, Kermarrec A M, et al. SplitStream: High-bandwidth multicast in cooperative environments [J]. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 2003, 37(5): 298-313.
[6] Horvath A, Telek M, Rossi D, et al. Dissecting pplive, sopcast, tvants [J]. submitted to ACM Conext, 2008.
[7] Vu L, Gupta I, Liang J, et al. Mapping the PPLive network: Studying the impacts of media streaming on P2P overlays [Z]. 2006.
[8] Jia J, Li C, Chen C. Characterizing PPStream across internet [C]//Network and Parallel Computing Workshops, IFIP International Conference on. Piscataway: IEEE, 2007: 413-418.
[9] Su X, Chang L. A measurement study of PPStream [C]//Communications and Networking in China, Third International Conference on. Piscataway: IEEE, 2008: 1162-1166.
[10] Douceur J R. The sybil attack [M]//Peer-to-Peer Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002: 251-260.
[11] Singh A. Eclipse attacks on overlay networks: Threats and defenses [C]//IEEE INFOCOM. Piscataway: IEEE, 2006.
[12] 邹维, 张缘, 张建宇, 等. DHT 网络 eclipse 攻击 [J]. 清华大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 51(10): 1306-1311.ZOU Wei, ZHANG Yuan, ZHANG Jianyu, et al. Survey of eclipse attacks on DHT networks [J]. J Tsinghua Univ: Sci & Technol, 2011, 51(10): 1306-1311. (in Chinese)
[13] Liang J, Kumar R, Xi Y, et al. Pollution in P2P file sharing systems [C]//INFOCOM 2005. 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Piscataway: IEEE, 2005, 2: 1174-1185.
[14] Adar E, Huberman B A. Free riding on Gnutella[J/OL]. First Monday, 2000, 5(10): http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/792/701<%3B/Hu96.
[15] Feldman M, Papadimitriou C, Chuang J, et al. Free-riding and whitewashing in peer-to-peer systems [J]. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, 2006, 24(5): 1010-1019.
[16] Seedorf J. Security issues for p2p-based voice-and video-streaming applications [M]//iNetSec 2009–Open Research Problems in Network Security. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009: 95-110.
[17] Dhungel P, Hei X, Ross K W, et al. The pollution attack in P2P live video streaming: Measurement results and defenses [C]//Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Streaming and IP-TV. New York: ACM, 2007: 323-328.
[18] Meier R, Wattenhofer R. ALPS: Authenticating live peer-to-peer live streams [C]//Reliable Distributed Systems, IEEE Symposium on. Piscataway: IEEE, 2008: 45-52.
[19] Borges A, Almeida J, Campos S. Fighting pollution in p2p live streaming systems [C]//Multimedia and Expo, IEEE International Conference on. Piscataway: IEEE, 2008: 481-484.
[20] Yang S, Jin H, Li B, et al. The content pollution in peer-to-peer live streaming systems: Analysis and implications [C]//Parallel Processing, 37th International Conference on. Piscataway: IEEE, 2008: 652-659.
[21] Yang S, Jin H, Li B, et al. A modeling framework of content pollution in Peer-to-Peer video streaming systems [J]. Computer Networks, 2009, 53(15): 2703-2715.
[22] Li Y, Lui J. Stochastic analysis of a randomized detection algorithm for pollution attack in P2P live streaming systems [J]. Performance Evaluation, 2010, 67(11): 1273-1288.
[23] Li D, Wu J, Cui Y. Defending against buffer map cheating in DONet-like P2P streaming [J]. Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on, 2009, 11(3): 535-542.
[24] Gheorghe G, Cigno R L, Montresor A. Security and privacy issues in P2P streaming systems: A survey [J]. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 2011, 4(2): 75-91.
[25] Conrotto E, Leonardi E. NAPA-WINE Project[EB/OL]. (2014). http://www.napa-wine.eu.
[26] Kamvar S D, Schlosser M T, Garcia-Molina H. The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks [C]//Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: ACM, 2003: 640-651.
[27] Xiong L, Liu L. Peertrust: Supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities [J]. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2004, 16(7): 843-857.
[28] Damiani E, di Vimercati D C, Paraboschi S, et al. A reputation-based approach for choosing reliable resources in peer-to-peer networks [C]//Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York: ACM, 2002: 207-216. null