Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  百年期刊
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)    2017, Vol. 57 Issue (9) : 952-957     DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.046
ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING |
Localization method for postoperative electrodes based on an artifacts template
LI Bo1,2, JIANG Changqing1, ZHANG Feng1, LI Luming1,3, MA Yu4
1. National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. Unit 62191 of the People's Liberation Army, Weinan 714100, China;
3. Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing 100093, China;
4. Department of Neurosurgery, Yuquan Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100039, China
Download: PDF(3198 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  The therapeutic benefits are strongly related to the location accuracy of the deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes in the target. The postoperative electrode positions cannot be accurately located because of their artifacts. An electrode position estimation method was developed using the artifacts to judge the electrode position relative to the target nucleus to improve the therapeutic effect and the electrode positioning and to help neurosurgeons prepare appropriate surgery plans. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data for artifact locations in a phantom and in 10 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients using a correlation coefficient show that this method can accurately measure the electrode position with a predictable error.
Keywords artifact      deep brain stimulation      electrode localization     
ZTFLH:  R445.2  
Issue Date: 15 September 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Bo
JIANG Changqing
ZHANG Feng
LI Luming
MA Yu
Cite this article:   
LI Bo,JIANG Changqing,ZHANG Feng, et al. Localization method for postoperative electrodes based on an artifacts template[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2017, 57(9): 952-957.
URL:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.046     OR     http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/Y2017/V57/I9/952
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
[1] Benabid A L, Chabardes S, Mitrofanis J, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of Parkinson's disease[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8(1):67-81.
[2] Counelis G J, Simuni T, Forman M S, et al. Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for advanced PD:Correlation of intraoperative MER and postoperative MRI with neuropathological findings[J]. Movement Disorders, 2003, 18(9):1062-1065.
[3] Sch necker T, Gruber D, Kivi A, et al. Postoperative MRI localisation of electrodes and clinical efficacy of pallidal deep brain stimulation in cervical dystonia[J]. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2015, 86(8):833-839.
url: http://dx.doi.org/al of Neurology Neurosurgery
[4] Pinsker M O, Volkmann J, Falk D, et al. Electrode implantation for deep brain stimulation in dystonia:A fast spin-echo inversion-recovery sequence technique for direct stereotactic targeting of the GPI[J]. Zentralbl Neurochir, 2008, 69(2):71-75.
[5] Horn A, Kühn A A. Lead-DBS:A toolbox for deep brain stimulation electrode localizations and visualizations[J]. Neuroimage, 2015, 107:127-135.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.002
[6] Costa L F, Appenzeller S, Yasuda C L, et al. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2009, 14(6):278-82.
[7] Balac S, Caloz G, Cathelineau G, et al. Integral method for numerical simulation of MRI artifacts induced by metallic implants[J]. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2001, 45(4):724-727.
[8] JIANG Changqing, LI Luming, HAO Hongwei. Carbon nanotube yarns for deep brain stimulation electrode[J]. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2011, 19(6):612-616.
[9] JIANG Changqing, HAO Hongwei, LI Luming. Artifact properties of carbon nanotube yarn electrode in magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Neural Eng, 2013, 10(2), 026013.
[10] Schenck J F. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging:MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds[J]. Medical physics, 1996, 23(6):815-850.
[11] Leclet H. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine after surgery with or without implant[J]. European Spine Journal, 1994, 3(5):240-245.
[12] Balac S, Caloz G. Induced magnetic field computations using a boundary integral formulation[J]. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2002, 41(3):345-367.
[13] Sthphane B, Gabriel C. Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging:Calculation of the magnetic field disturbances[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1996, 32(3):1645-1648.
[14] Ericssont A, Hemmingssont A, Jung B, et al. Calculation of MRI artifacts caused by static field disturbances[J]. Phys Med Biol, 1988, 33(10):1103-1112.
[15] Jackson J D. Classical Electrodynamics[M]. Third Edition. New York:Wiley, 1998.
[16] Port J D, Pomper M G. Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images[J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2000, 24(6):958-964.
[17] Starr P A. Placement of deep brain stimulators into the subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus internus:Technical approach[J]. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2002, 79:118-145.
[1] CHENG Li, LIU Fan, GAO Lilei, LIU Hui, LIU Yaqiang. Artifacts correction algorithm for iodine-131 SPECT planar imaging[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2023, 63(5): 802-810.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd