Coefficient of restitution of granular material at the seeper condition

doi:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2018.25.041

Download: PDF(1884 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract The motion of a rockfall is strongly dependent on the coefficient of restitution. This study investigates the coefficient of restitution in the presence of seeper. The coefficient of restitution was measured for various rockfall and seeper fall heights. The influences of the seeper depth and the fall height of the glass beads acting as the rockfall on the coefficient of restitution were investigated during normal impact on a flat steel wall with a seeper layer using free-fall experiments with a high-speed camera used to capture the collision mechanics. A collision model was then developed for the glass beads and the seeper on the rigid wall. The model took into account the viscous, surface tension, capillary, contact, drag, buoyancy and gravitational forces acting on the bead. The results show that the seeper significantly reduces the coefficient of restitution. Deeper seeper layers then dissipate more energy during the collisions that gives smaller coefficients of restitution. The coefficient of restitution increased with increasing bead fall height with part of the energy transferred from the glass bead to the seeper.

Keywords rockfalls coefficient of restitution seeper

Issue Date: 21 November 2018

	Service

	E-mail this article
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

	CHEN Yulong
	ZHANG Ke

Cite this article:

CHEN Yulong,ZHANG Ke. Coefficient of restitution of granular material at the seeper condition[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2018, 58(11): 986-991.

URL:

http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2018.25.041 OR http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/Y2018/V58/I11/986

[1] RITCHIE A M. Evaluation of rockfall and its control[J]. Highway Research Record, 1963(17):13-28.
[2] KIRKBY M J, STATHAM I. Surface stone movement and scree formation[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1975, 83(3):349-362.
[3] 陈宇龙. 滚石运动过程中关键参数的影响分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(S2):191-196. CHEN Y L. Influence of key factors on trajectories of rockfalls[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(S2):191-196. (in Chinese)
[4] ASTERIOU P, TSIAMBAOS G. Empirical model for predicting rockfall trajectory direction[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2016, 49(3):927-941.
[5] AZZONI A, DE FREITAS M H. Experimentally gained parameters, decisive for rock fall analysis[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1995, 28(2):111-124.
[6] DAY R W. Case studies of rockfall in soft versus hard rock[J]. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, 1997, 3(1):133-140.
[7] CHAU K T, WONG R H C, WU J J. Coefficient of restitution and rotational motions of rockfall impacts[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2002, 39(1):69-77.
[8] PATEL A, BARTAKE P P, SINGH D N. An empirical relationship for determining shear wave velocity in granular materials accounting for grain morphology[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2009, 32(1):1-10.
[9] YANG J, GU X Q. Shear stiffness of granular material at small strains:Does it depend on grain size?[J]. Géotechnique, 2013, 63(2):165-179.
[10] KOKUSHO T, YOSHIDA Y. SPT N-value and S-wave velocity for gravelly soils with different grain size distribution[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1997, 37(4):105-113.
[11] TOKER N K, GERMAINE J T, CULLIGAN P J. Effective stress and shear strength of moist uniform spheres[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2014, 13(5):1-13.
[12] ORR F M, SCRIVEN L E, RIVAS A P. Pendular rings between solids:Meniscus properties and capillary force[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 67(4):723-742.
[13] SCHUBERT H. Capillary forces-modeling and application in particulate technology[J]. Powder Technology, 1984, 37(1):105-116.
[14] SIMONS S J R, PEPIN X, ROSSETTI D. Predicting granule behaviour through micro-mechanistic investigations[J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2003, 72(1-4):463-475.
[15] WILLETT C D, ADAMS M J, JOHNSON S A, et al. Effects of wetting hysteresis on pendular liquid bridges between rigid spheres[J]. Powder Technology, 2003, 130(1-3):63-69.
[16] WHYMAN G, BORMASHENKO E, STEIN T. The rigorous derivation of Young, Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel equations and the analysis of the contact angle hysteresis phenomenon[J]. Chemical Physics Letters, 2008, 450(4-6):355-359.
[17] BUSSCHER H J, VAN PELT A W J, DE BOER P, et al. The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured contact angles of liquids[J]. Colloids and Surfaces, 1984, 9(4):319-331.
[18] 陈宇龙, 内村太郎. 粒径对土持水性能的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(7):1474-1482. CHEN Y L, UCHIMURA T. Influence of particle size on water retention of soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(7):1474-1482. (in Chinese)
[19] PALZER S, HIEBL C, SOMMER K, et al. Einfluss der rauhigkeit einer feststoffoberfläche auf den kontaktwinkel[J]. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 2001, 73(8):1032-1038.
[20] HERTZ H. Ueber die Berührung fester elastischer Kö rper[J]. Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 1881(92):156-171.
[21] TSUJI Y, TANAKA T, ISHIDA T. Lagrangian numerical simulation of plug flow of cohesionless particles in a horizontal pipe[J]. Powder Technology, 1992, 71(3):239-250.
[22] LIAN G P, XU Y, HUANG W B, et al. On the squeeze flow of a power-law fluid between rigid spheres[J]. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 100(1-3):151-164.