Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  百年期刊
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)    2022, Vol. 62 Issue (12) : 2053-2060     DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.25.008
COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS |
Semantic and syntactic processing of Chinese [S+V+O] simple sentence structures—ERPs evidence
YANG Siqin, JIANG Minghu
Lab of Computational Linguistics, School of Humanities, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Download: PDF(3653 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Syntax-first models and semantic priority are two opposing views in sentence processing theory. This study took N400 and P600 effects as the main analysis objects to explore the cognitive processing mechanism of Chinese sentences with semantic violations, with syntax violations and with both semantic and syntax violations of the "subject (noun) + predicate (verb) + object (noun)" structure without modifiers (referred to as Chinese [S+V+O] simple sentence structure) in the brain. The results of figures showed that semantic violation sentences, syntactic violation sentences, and combined violation sentences all triggered the N400 effect between 300 and 400 ms. Among them, the N400 amplitude of the semantic violation sentence and the syntactic violation sentence were similar, but the N400 amplitude for sentences with both semantic and syntax violations were more negative than the N400 amplitude with only one semantic and sytax violation. Only the semantical violations produced the P600 tendency. The research results indicated that Chinese sentences with the [S+V+O] simple structure might not fit with syntax-first model. The results also showed that the brain response to this sentence structure differs from the EEG amplitude caused by the "ba" sentence and the "bei" sentence. Thus, this research concludes that sentence processing in brain might differ for language types and language structures.
Keywords sentence      semantics      syntax      N400      P600      event-related brain potentials (ERPs)     
Issue Date: 10 November 2022
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
YANG Siqin
JIANG Minghu
Cite this article:   
YANG Siqin,JIANG Minghu. Semantic and syntactic processing of Chinese [S+V+O] simple sentence structures—ERPs evidence[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2022, 62(12): 2053-2060.
URL:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.25.008     OR     http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/Y2022/V62/I12/2053
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
[1] HUANG S J, SU T, HUANG M, et al. Mechanism of linguistic information integration in sentence comprehension[J]. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 2020(1): 34-40. (in Chinese) 黄邵娟, 苏涛, 黄敏, 等. 句子理解中语言信息的整合加工机制[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2020(1): 34-40.
[2] FERREIRA F, CLIFTON JR C. The independence of syntactic processing[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1986, 25(3): 348-368.
[3] FRIEDERICI A D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2002, 6(2): 78-84.
[4] FRIEDERICI A D. The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function[J]. Physiological Reviews, 2011, 91(4): 1357-1392.
[5] MACDONALD M C, PEARLMUTTER N J, SEIDENBERG M S. Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution[J]. Psychological Review, 1994, 101(4): 676-703.
[6] TRUESWELL J C, TANENHAUS M K, GARNSEY S M. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1994, 33(3): 285-318.
[7] YU J, ZHANG Y X. When Chinese semantics meets failed syntax[J]. Neuroreport, 2008, 19(7): 745-749.
[8] ZHANG Y X, YU J, BOLAND J E. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010, 36(3): 765-781.
[9] ZHANG Y X, LI P, PIAO Q H, et al. Syntax does not necessarily precede semantics in sentence processing: ERP evidence from Chinese[J]. Brain and Language, 2013, 126(1): 8-19.
[10] ZENG T, LI Y X, WU M J. Syntactic and semantic processing of passive BEI sentences in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from event-related potentials[J]. Neuroreport, 2020, 31(13): 979-984.
[11] YANG S Q, JIANG M H. Chinese-English bilinguals' ERP activating effect for English during the mother tongue semantic processing[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2016, 30(6): 117-125. (in Chinese) 杨思琴, 江铭虎. 双语者加工汉语母语语义时对英语的ERP激活效应的研究[J]. 中文信息学报, 2016, 30(6): 117-125.
[12] RABOVSKY M. Change in a probabilistic representation of meaning can account for N400 effects on articles: A neural network model[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2020, 143: 107466.
[13] YANG S Q, XU W Y, JIANG M H, et al. The difference of cognitive processing between phonetic puns and semantic puns in Chinese: An ERP evidence [J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2020, 34(1): 1-9. (in Chinese) 杨思琴, 徐文玉, 江铭虎, 等. 汉语谐音与语义双关语的认知神经加工差异——ERP证据[J]. 中文信息学报, 2020, 34(1): 1-9.
[14] BROUWER H, CROCKER M W. On the proper treatment of the N400 and P600 in language comprehension[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8: 1327.
[15] YAO D F, JIANG M H, ABULIZI A, et al. Effects of Chinese sign language modality on processing sentences[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2016, 56(9): 942-948. (in Chinese) 姚登峰, 江铭虎, 阿布都克力木·阿布力孜. 中国手语模态对句子加工的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(9): 942-948.
[16] HUANG Y L, JIANG M H, GUO Q, et al. N400 amplitude does not recover from disappearance after repetitions despite reinitiated semantic integration difficulty[J]. Neuroreport, 2018, 29(16): 1341-1348.
[17] HUANG Y L, JIANG M H, GUO Q, et al. Dissociation of the confounding influences of expectancy and integrative difficulty residing in anomalous sentences in event-related potential studies[J]. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2019(147): e59436. DOI:doi: 10.3791/59436.
[18] ZHANG Q, YANG Y M. Object preference in the processing of relative clause in Chinese: ERP evidence[J]. Linguistic Sciences, 2010, 9(4): 337-353. (in Chinese) 张强, 杨亦鸣. 汉语宾语关系从句加工优势——来自神经电生理学研究的证据[J]. 语言科学, 2010, 9(4): 337-353.
[19] SU P, JIANG M H, BAI C. An ERP study on cognitive neural mechanisms of Chinese DE phrases [J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2018, 32(1): 9-17. (in Chinese) 苏裴, 江铭虎, 白晨. 汉语"的"字短语认知神经机制的ERP研究[J]. 中文信息学报, 2018, 32(1): 9-17.
[20] YE Z, LUO Y J, FRIEDERICI A D, et al. Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials[J]. Brain Research, 2006, 1071(1): 186-196.
[21] WANG X Y, ZHONG Y P, FAN W, et al. The timing of interaction between syntax and semantic in the Chinese sentence processing: Evidence from ERP research [J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2013, 36(4): 827-831. (in Chinese) 王小艳, 钟毅平, 范伟, 等. 汉语句子加工中句法与语义交互作用的时间进程: 来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理科学, 2013, 36(4): 827-831.
[22] YE Z, ZHAN W D, ZHOU X L. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: An ERP study[J]. Brain Research, 2007, 1142: 135-145.
[23] WANG S P, MO D Y, XIANG M, et al. The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in reading Chinese: Evidence from ERPs[J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2013, 28(4): 577-596.
[24] ABULIZI A, JIANG M H, YAO D F, et al. Neurocognitive mechanism for morphological complex word processing[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2017, 57(4): 393-398. (in Chinese) 阿布都克力木·阿布力孜, 江铭虎, 姚登峰, 等. 形态复杂词加工的认知神经机制[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(4): 393-398.
[25] ZHOU X L, JIANG X M, YE Z, et al. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: An ERP study[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2010, 48(6): 1551-1562.
[26] CHAO Y R. A grammar of spoken Chinese[M]. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1968.
[27] SUN C F, GIVóN T. On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications[J]. Language, 1985, 61(2): 329-351.
[28] ZANG C L, LU Z J, ZHANG Z C. The role of semantic and syntactic information in parafoveal processing during reading[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 11-19. (in Chinese) 臧传丽, 鹿子佳, 张志超. 语义和句法信息在副中央凹加工中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 11-19.
[29] FRIEDERICI A D, STEINHAUER K, FRISCH S. Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information[J]. Memory & Cognition, 1999, 27(3): 438-453.
[30] HAHNE A, FRIEDERICI A D. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs[J]. Cognitive Brain Research, 2002, 13(3): 339-356.
[1] ZHANG Yang, JIANG Minghu. Authorship identification method based on the embedding of the syntax tree node[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2023, 63(9): 1390-1398.
[2] HUANG Yonghao, YANG Xinmiao, YUE Jintao. Urban street bicycle flow analysis based on multi-scale geographically weighted regression model[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2022, 62(7): 1132-1141.
[3] XIA Wuji, HUAQUE Cairang. Dependency tree based Tibetan semantic dependency analysis[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2019, 59(9): 750-756.
[4] QIAN Yili, ZHANG Ermeng. Identification of prosodic phrases based on syntax dependency and conditional random fields[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2019, 59(7): 530-536.
[5] LÜ Xueqiang, ZHANG Xuejing, ZHOU Qiang. Psychological distance prediction in dialogue discourse[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2018, 58(4): 362-367.
[6] YAN Jianen, ZHANG Zhaoxin, XU Haiyan, ZHANG Hongli. Detection of IRC Botnet C&C channels using the instruction syntax[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2017, 57(9): 914-920.
[7] Abdusalam Dawut, Hussein Yusuf, Askar Hamdulla. Emotion recognition from Uyghur sentences based on combinations of class discrimination words and a sentiment dictionary[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2017, 57(2): 197-201.
[8] Hankiz Yilahun, Gulmire Imam, Maynur Ablitip, Guljamal Mamateli, Askar Hamdulla. Undulating scale of intonations of exclamatory Uyghur sentences[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2017, 57(12): 1254-1258.
[9] YAO Dengfeng, JIANG Minghu, ABUDOUKELIMU Abulizi. Effects of Chinese sign language modality on processing sentences[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2016, 56(9): 942-948.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd