Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  百年期刊
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)    2014, Vol. 54 Issue (3) : 394-401     DOI:
Orginal Article |
High IPO price of stocks in small- and medium-sized board and second board market
Le LI1(),Huiying LUO2,Zhishu YANG1
1. Department of Finance, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2. Anbang Insurance Company Limited, Beijing 100022, China
Download: PDF(1095 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

In China, one of the main purposes of the reform in October 2010 is to reduce the price earnings ratio of initial public offerings (IPO) in small- and medium-sized board and second board market according to totally market-oriented rules, however the effect is not obvious. Focusing on this problem, the authors found that the IPO price earnings ratio stays high while relative inquiries tend to be rationalized after the reform. Therefore, two models were developed i.e., the return analysis model of participation in IPO allocation and the simulation analysis model of relationship between the over-subscription rate and IPO price earnings ratio. Analyses show that the regulation reasons resulting in the high IPO price lie in the insufficiency of inquiry restrictions and the deficiency of pricing restrictions on the basis of the two models. Reform methods are elaborated to strengthen inquiry restrictions by increasing inquiry institutions' cost of quoting high price and pricing ones by increasing managing underwriters' risks resulting from the high IPO price earnings ratio.

Keywords initial public offerings      high price earnings ratio      inquiry      pricing     
ZTFLH:     
Fund: 
Issue Date: 15 March 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Le LI
Huiying LUO
Zhishu YANG
Cite this article:   
Le LI,Huiying LUO,Zhishu YANG. High IPO price of stocks in small- and medium-sized board and second board market[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2014, 54(3): 394-401.
URL:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/     OR     http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/Y2014/V54/I3/394
研究时间段 研究样本 平均IPO
市盈率
市盈率差异
显著性检验P值
询价对象平均
超额认购倍数
超额认购倍数差异
显著性检验P
2009年6月—2010年8月 002275~002408 51.26 0.90 139.01 <0.01
2010年11月—2011年10月 002507~002604 51.22 20.51
  
研究时间段 研究样本 平均IPO
市盈率
市盈率差异
显著性检验P
询价对象平均
超额认购倍数
超额认购倍数差异
显著性检验P
2009年10月—2010年8月 300001~300079 67.35 0.10 76.62 <0.01
2010年11月—2011年10月 300143~300246 61.48 21.34
  
  
  
参与配
售收益
率/%
比较
基准
比较基
准收益
率/%
相对比较
基准超额
收益率/%
超额收益
显著性检
验P值
2.74 上证
指数
-3.27 6.01 <0.01
深成
指数
-3.71 6.45 <0.01
沪深300
指数
-3.76 6.50 <0.01
中小板
指数
-7.98 10.73 <0.01
创业板
指数
-10.82 13.56 <0.01
  
参与配
售收益
率/%
比较
基准
比较基
准收益
率/%
相对比较
基准超额
收益率/%
超额收益
显著性检
验P值
1.46 上证
指数
-2.57 4.04 <0.01
深成
指数
-2.80 4.26 <0.01
沪深300
指数
-2.98 4.45 <0.01
中小板
指数
-7.33 8.79 <0.01
创业板
指数
-11.25 12.72 <0.01
  
统计项目 数值/%
最高收益率 151.16
最低收益率 -29.53
收益超过50%的概率 8.33
收益低于-50%的概率 0
收益超过30%的概率 17.71
收益低于-30%的概率 0
收益超过20%的概率 28.13
收益低于-20%的概率 7.29
  
统计项目 数值/%
最高收益率 164.75
最低收益率 -33.85
收益超过50%的概率 11.54
收益低于-50%的概率 0
收益超过30%的概率 23.08
收益低于-30%的概率 1.92
收益超过20%的概率 27.88
收益低于-20%的概率 9.62
  
  
  
[1] Ibbotson R G, Sindelar J L, Ritter J R. The market's problems with the pricing of initial public offerings[J]. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1994, 7(1): 66-74.
[2] Tim J,Alexander L. Going Public: The Theory and Evidence on How Companies Raise Equity Finance [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
[3] Baron D P. A model of the demand for investment banking advising and distribution services for new issues[J].Journal of Finance, 1982, 37(4): 955-976.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1982.tb03591.x
[4] Kevin R. Why new issues are underpriced[J]. Jour nal of Financial Economics, l986, 15(1-2): 187-212.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90054-1
[5] Benveniste L M, Spindt P A. How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1989, 24(2): 343-361.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90051-2
[6] Welch I. Seasoned offerings, imitation costs and the underpricings of initial public offerings[J].Journal of Finance, 1989, 44(2): 421-449.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb05064.x
[7] Carter R, Manaster S. Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation[J].Journal of Finance, 1990, 45(4): 1045-1067.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb02426_1.x
[8] Aggarwal R, Rivoli P. Fads in the initial public offering market[J]. Financial Management, 1990, 19(4): 45-57.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3665609
[9] Ruud J S. Underwriter price support and the IPO underpricing puzzle[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 34(2): 135-151.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90015-4
[10] Lowry M, Schwert G W. Is the IPO pricing process efficient?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004, 71(1): 3-26.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00205-8
[11] Dumev A, Morck R, Yeung B. Value-enchancing capital budgeting and firm specific stock return variation[J]. Journal of Finance, 2004, 59(1): 65-105.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00627.x
[12] Ritter J. Investment banking and securities issuance[M]//Handbook of the Economics of Finance. Boston: Elsevier/North-Holland, 2003: 255-306.
[13] 郁韡君. 我国IPO询价制度实施效果研究[J].证券市场导报, 2005, 25(9): 23-28. YU Huajun. Study on effects of IPOinquiry mechanism in China[J]. Market Herald, 2005, 25(9): 23-28. (in Chinese)
[14] 苟思. 我国IPO发售机制研究 [D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2006. GOU Si. Study on Chinesemechanism for IPO pricing and distributing [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2006. (in Chinese)
[15] 王海峰, 何军光, 张宗益. 询价制与承销风险实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2006, 28(5): 61-69. WANG Haifeng, HE Junguang, ZHANG Zongyi. Empirical study on underwriting risks under inquiry mechanism[J]. Financial Research, 2006, 28(5): 61-69. (in Chinese)
[16] 刘冰. 我国IPO询价制的机制设计与效率研究 [D]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学, 2009. LIU Bing. Research on mechanism design and efficiency of IPO inquiry mechanism in China [D]. Beijing: University of International Business and Economics, 2009. (in Chinese)
[17] 刘珏善. 我国IPO市场的询价发行机制研究 [D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2009. LIU Yushan. Study of bookbuilding mechanism in Chinese IPO market [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2009. (in Chinese)
[18] 黄淑妍. IPO重启后对新股抑价率影响的实证分析[J]. 管理观察, 2010, 30(35): 186-187. HUANG Shuyan. Empirical study on influence factors of IPO underpricing rate after the last restart of IPO[J]. Management Observer, 2010, 30(35): 186-187. (in Chinese)
[19] 毛文. 我国新股发行询价制与IPO破发的关系研究[J]. 企业家天地, 2011, 27(6): 67-69. MAO Wen. Study on relationship between book-building mechanism and IPO fall in China[J]. World of Enterpreneurs, 2011, 27(6): 67-69. (in Chinese)
[20] 周冠年, 孙寅. 新股发行高PE: “创投”推波助澜?[J]. 中国经贸, 2010, 15(22): 114-116. ZHOU Guannian, SUN Yin. High PE of IPO: Aggravated by venture investment?[J]. China Business Update, 2010, 15(22): 114-116. (in Chinese)
[21] 魏建, 马富强. 新股发行制度改革前后定价效率的实证分析[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2011, 28(3): 94-100. WEI Jian, MA Fuqiang. Empirical analysis of pricing efficiency before and after the reform of IPO system[J]. Review of Economics and Management, 2011, 28(3): 94-100. (in Chinese)
[22] 蒲勇进. 论我国新股发行定价之艰难改革[J]. 科技智囊, 2011, 17(3): 72-74. PU Yongjin. Rough reform process of IPO pricing mechanism in China[J]. Think Tank of Science & Technology, 2011, 28(3): 94-100. (in Chinese)
[23] 许景源. 论新股发行体制二次改革带来的影响[J]. 金融经济, 2011, 34(1): 5-6. XU Jingyuan. Analysis on effects of the secondstage reform of IPO mechanism[J]. Finance & Economy, 2011, 34(1): 5-6. (in Chinese)
[24] 吴大群. 第二轮股改能给股民带来什么[J]. 金融经济, 2010, 33(10): 10-11. WU Daqun. What can the second stage reform of IPO bring investors[J]. Finance & Economy, 2010, 33(10): 10-11. (in Chinese)
[25] 王良. 从“涪陵榨菜”IPO看“新股发行第二轮改革”[J]. 中国市场, 2011, 18(5): 55-56. WANG Liang. Evaluation of the second stage reform of IPO by the IPO process of “Fuling preserved vegetable”[J]. Chinese Market, 2011, 18(5): 55-56. (in Chinese)
[1] WANG Yue, YAO Enjian, HAO He. Low-carbon-oriented pricing strategy of multi-mode transportation service[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2023, 63(11): 1741-1749.
[2] SU Hui, TAN Qi, ZHAO Yi, XU Ke. Pricing strategy and revenue allocation between service providers in mobile sponsored markets[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2018, 58(1): 8-13.
[3] WANG Yintian, MOON Jiyoung. Influence of the downward revision clause on Chinese convertible bond pricing[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2018, 58(1): 108-112.
[4] LONG Dawei, HUANG Hongxuan, WANG Mengyue, YANG Yongsen. Transaction prices of overseas mergers and acquisitions with a redemption provision[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2016, 56(8): 851-859.
[5] Yao LU, Minfeng YUAN. IPOoverpricing and IPO pricing efficiency: An analysis on shareholders' characteristics[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2014, 54(3): 381-393.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd