Performance analysis of star topology wireless sensor networks based on IEEE 802.15.4

Download: PDF(1115 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract Performance analyzes are difficult in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). This study analyzes the performance of a star topology WSN based on the IEEE 802.15.4 standard. The probability of data collision is analyzed for the hidden terminal problem caused by channel fading. Then, the model is used to derive the packet reception rate (PRR), the average delay and the average energy consumption. Simulation results are within 5% of the theoretical results which validate the correctness and accuracy of the theoretical expressions.

Keywords wireless sensor networks channel fading hidden terminal performance analysis

ZTFLH:

TP393.1

Issue Date: 15 May 2015

	Service

	E-mail this article
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

	CAI Jie
	GU Ming

Cite this article:

CAI Jie,GU Ming. Performance analysis of star topology wireless sensor networks based on IEEE 802.15.4[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2015, 55(5): 565-571.

URL:

http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/ OR http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/Y2015/V55/I5/565

[1]	Anastasi G, Conti M, Di Francesco M. A comprehensive analysis of the mac unreliability problem in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless sensor networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2011, 7(1): 52-65.
[2]	Kohvakka M, Kuorilehto M, Häannikäainen M, et al. Performance analysis of IEEE 802.15.4 and zigbee for large-scale wireless sensor network applications [C]//Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international workshop on Performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc, sensor and ubiquitous networks. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2006. 48-57.
[3]	Lee J S. Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 for low-rate wireless personal area networks [J]. IEEE transactions on Consumer electronics, 2006, 52(3): 742-749.
[4]	Chen F, Wang N, German R, et al. Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 LR-WPAN for industrial applications [C]//Wireless on Demand Network Systems and Services, the 5th Annual Conference on. Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany: IEEE, 2008. 89-96.
[5]	Buratti C, Verdone R. Performance analysis of IEEE 802.15.4 non beacon-enabled mode [J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2009, 58(7): 3480-3493.
[6]	Buratti C. Performance analysis of IEEE 802.15.4 beacon-enabled mode [J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2010, 59(4): 2031-2045.
[7]	Huang Y K, Pang A C, Hung H N. A comprehensive analysis of low-power operation for beacon-enabled IEEE 802.15.4 wireless networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2009, 8(11): 5601-5611.
[8]	Park P, Di Marco P, Soldati P, et al. A generalized markov chain model for effective analysis of slotted IEEE 802.15.4 [C]//Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems, 2009. IEEE 6th International Conference on. Macau, China: IEEE, 2009. 130-139.
[9]	Tao Z, Panwar S, Gu D, et al. Performance analysis and a proposed improvement for the IEEE 802.15.4 contention access period [C]//Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. Las Vegas, NV, USA: IEEE, 2006, 4: 1811-1818.
[10]	Pollin S, Ergen M, Ergen S, et al. Performance analysis of slotted carrier sense IEEE 802.15.4 medium access layer [J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2008, 7(9): 3359-3371.
[11]	Borgo M, Zanella A, Bisaglia P, et al. Analysis of the hidden terminal effect in multi-rate IEEE 802.11b networks [C]//Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications. Abano Terme, Italy: WPMC, 2004, 3: 6-10.
[12]	Ware C, Wysocki T, Chicharo J. Hidden terminal jamming problems in ieee 802.11 mobile ad hoc networks [C]//2001 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Helsinki, Finland: IEEE, 2001, 1: 261-265.
[13]	Khurana S, Kahol A, Jayasumana A P. Effect of hidden terminals on the performance of IEEE 802.11 mac protocol [C]///Local Computer Networks, the 23rd Annual Conference on. Lowell, MA, USA: IEEE, 1998: 12-20.