Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  百年期刊
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)    2015, Vol. 55 Issue (6) : 705-708     DOI:
ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT |
Vertical differentiation and platform competition in two-sided markets
DOU Yifan1,2, ZHU Yan1
1. Research Center for Contemporary Management, Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Download: PDF(1020 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Software platforms such as Apple iOS and Google Android differ from the traditional platforms in terms of their revenue resources from the commission of the third-party software sales. However, the literature has paid little attention to the role of the third-party software providers in the platform competition. This paper employs a stylized game-theoretical model to analyze the platform competition between two vertically-differentiated software platforms in the presence of third-party software providers. The analysis uses both sequential game equilibrium and third-party software provider's profit maximization. The results suggest that: 1) the software market extends the market coverage of inferior platforms, 2) superior platforms may also benefit from quality improvements in inferior platform, and 3) some conditions can result in the inferior platform employing a zero-price strategy.
Keywords two-sided market      information goods      sequential game equilibrium     
ZTFLH:  F272.3  
Issue Date: 15 June 2015
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
DOU Yifan
ZHU Yan
Cite this article:   
DOU Yifan,ZHU Yan. Vertical differentiation and platform competition in two-sided markets[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2015, 55(6): 705-708.
URL:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/     OR     http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/EN/Y2015/V55/I6/705
   
   
   
[1] Rochet J C, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets [J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003, 1(4): 990-1029.
[2] Rysman M. The economics of two-sided markets [J]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2009, 23(3): 125-143.
[3] Bradley T. Android dominates market share, but Apple makes all the money[Z/OL]. (2013-11-15), http://www.forbes.com/sites/tonybradley/2013/11/15/android-dominates-market-share-but-apple-makes-all-the-money
url: http://www.forbes.com/sites/tonybradley/2013/11/15/android-dominates-market-share-but-apple-makes-all-the-money
[4] Choi, J P. Tying in two-sided markets with multi-homing [J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2010, 58(3): 607-626.
[5] Shaked A, Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1982, 49(1): 3-13.
[6] Apple Inc. iOS developer program[Z/OL]. (2014-09-01), https://developer.apple.com/programs/ios/distribute.html
[7] Hagiu A, Spulber D. First-party content and coordination in two-Sided markets [J]. Management Science, 2013, 59(4): 933-949.
[8] Maskin E, Riley J. Monopoly with incomplete information [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1984, 15(2): 171-196.
[9] Anderson Jr, E G, Parker G G, Tan B. Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities [J]. Information Systems Research, 2014, 25(1): 152-172.
[10] Zhu F, Iansiti M. Entry into platform-based markets [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(1): 88-106.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd