水库移民问题的本质是利益分配问题，需要通过水电开发利益重分配加以解决。该文通过引入动态收益率评判指标，建立了水电开发利益分配数学模型，给出了实现目标收益率情况下移民补偿和水电上网电价的试算求解法以及不同边界条件下模型的拓展形式；应用建立的模型，对中国西南地区某大型水电项目进行了案例分析。研究结果表明：当前水库移民是各主要参与方中收益率最低的一方，开发企业和电网企业收益率处于居中位置，而地方投资企业收益率最高；该大型水电项目蕴含着巨大的水能资源经济租空间，完全具备调节移民补偿和水电电价的能力，证明了模型及结果的合理性。该文建立的利益分配模型丰富了移民补偿理论，成果和结论对移民工作和政策制定有指导意义。
Abstract
Rebuilding the benefit-sharing mechanism is the key to solving problems related tore settling hydropower exploitation. A dynamic rate is used as the evaluation index in the mathematical model for the resettlement compensation and hydroelectricity price for different boundary conditions. The model is applied to the hydropower project in Southwest China as a case study. The results show that migrants get the lowest return among the various stakeholders, hydropower corporations and grid corporations get a moderate level of return, and local investment corporations get the best return. The large economic returns in large hydropower projects allow adjustments of the migrants' compensation as well as the hydroelectricity price so this model are useful in practical projects. This model can be used to improve migrant compensation with the conclusions providing guidance and hydropower resettlement policy.
关键词
水电开发项目 /
水库移民 /
利益分配 /
动态收益
Key words
hydropower project /
hydropower resettlement /
benefit-sharing /
dynamic rate
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 樊启祥. 水电项目开发利益共享模型研究 [D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2010. FAN Qixiang. Research on the Benefit Sharing Model of Hydropower Project Development [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2010. (in Chinese) [2] Wang P, Wolf S A, Lassoie J P, et al. Compensation policy for displacement caused by dam construction in China: An institutional analysis [J]. Geoforum, 2013, 48: 1-9. [3] Tullos D. Assessing the influence of environmental impact assessments on science and policy: An analysis of the Three Gorges Project [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 903(SI): S208-S223. [4] Cernea M. The risks and reconstruction model for resettling displaced populations [J]. World Development, 1997, 25(10): 1569-1587. [5] Shanahan M. Large dams: Sharing the water, and the benefits [J]. International Water Power and Dam Construction, 2012, 64(7): 30-31. [6] Singer J, Watanabe T. Reducing reservoir impacts and improving outcomes for dam-forced resettlement: Experiences in central Vietnam [J]. Lakes & Reservoirs Research and Management, 2014, 19(3): 225-235. [7] Milewski J, Egre D, Roguet V. Dams and Benefit Sharing-Prepared for Thematic Review I [R]. Edinburgh, UK: ⅡED, 1999. [8] Skinner J, Niasse M, Haas L, et al. Sharing the Benefits of Large Dams in West Africa [R]. Edinburgh, UK: ⅡED, 2009. [9] 朱文龙, 施国庆. 移民系统分享工程效益机理与方法探讨[J]. 水利经济, 1995(1): 58-61.ZHU Wenlong, SHI Guoqing. The research on the mechanisms and methods of resettlement system sharing project profits [J]. Journal of Economics of Water Resources, 1995(1): 58-61. (in Chinese) [10] 贾若祥. 西部地区水电资源开发利用的利益分配机制研究[J]. 中国能源, 2007, 29(6): 5-11.JIA Ruoxiang. Study on profit allocation mechanism of hydropower development in the western China [J]. Energy of China, 2007, 29(6): 5-11. (in Chinese) [11] 汪恕诚. 水权转换是水资源优化配置的重要手段 [J]. 水利规划与设计, 2004(3): 1-3.WANG Shucheng. Transfer of water right is an important means for optimization of allocation of water resources [J]. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2004(3): 1-3. (in Chinese) [12] 汪洁. 基于成本-收益理论的水库移民补偿模型研究 [D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2014.WANG Jie. Research on the Reservoir Resettlement Compensation Model Based on the Cost and Benefit Theory [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2014. (in Chinese) [13] 樊启祥, 陆佑楣, 强茂山, 等. 可持续发展视角的中国水电开发水库移民安置方式研究 [J]. 水力发电学报, 2015, 34(1): 237-244.FAN Qixiang, LU Youmei, QIANG Maoshan, et al. Study on China hydropower reservoir resettlement in the view of sustainable development [J]. Journal of Hydropower Engineering, 2015, 34(1): 237-244. (in Chinese)
PDF(937 KB)
