基于伪影模板的术后电极定位方法

李波; 姜长青; 张锋; 李路明; 马羽

doi:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.046

PDF(3198 KB)

清华大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (9) : 952-957. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.046

电子工程

基于伪影模板的术后电极定位方法

李波^1,2, 姜长青¹, 张锋¹, 李路明^1,3, 马羽⁴

作者信息 +

Localization method for postoperative electrodes based on an artifacts template

LI Bo^1,2, JIANG Changqing¹, ZHANG Feng¹, LI Luming^1,3, MA Yu⁴

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

术后电极位置及轨迹信息是脑深部刺激临床疗效评估的有效工具，但是核磁图像中电极伪影严重地影响了术后电极位置的准确估计。该文提出基于核磁图像电极伪影估计术后电极位置的方法，进而确定电极与靶点核团之间的位置关系，有助于明确治疗疗效与电极定位之间的联系，更好地指导外科医生规划最佳植入通路和程控。进行了电极伪影体模实验和分析了10名帕金森病患者脑部核磁图像，结果表明：该方法可以测量电极在丘脑底核中的位置，并具有较小测量误差。

Abstract

The therapeutic benefits are strongly related to the location accuracy of the deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes in the target. The postoperative electrode positions cannot be accurately located because of their artifacts. An electrode position estimation method was developed using the artifacts to judge the electrode position relative to the target nucleus to improve the therapeutic effect and the electrode positioning and to help neurosurgeons prepare appropriate surgery plans. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data for artifact locations in a phantom and in 10 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients using a correlation coefficient show that this method can accurately measure the electrode position with a predictable error.

导出引用

李波, 姜长青, 张锋, 李路明, 马羽. 基于伪影模板的术后电极定位方法[J]. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）. 2017, 57(9): 952-957 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.046

LI Bo, JIANG Changqing, ZHANG Feng, LI Luming, MA Yu. Localization method for postoperative electrodes based on an artifacts template[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2017, 57(9): 952-957 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.046

中图分类号： R445.2

参考文献

[1] Benabid A L, Chabardes S, Mitrofanis J, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of Parkinson's disease[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8(1):67-81. [2] Counelis G J, Simuni T, Forman M S, et al. Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for advanced PD:Correlation of intraoperative MER and postoperative MRI with neuropathological findings[J]. Movement Disorders, 2003, 18(9):1062-1065. [3] Sch necker T, Gruber D, Kivi A, et al. Postoperative MRI localisation of electrodes and clinical efficacy of pallidal deep brain stimulation in cervical dystonia[J]. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2015, 86(8):833-839. [4] Pinsker M O, Volkmann J, Falk D, et al. Electrode implantation for deep brain stimulation in dystonia:A fast spin-echo inversion-recovery sequence technique for direct stereotactic targeting of the GPI[J]. Zentralbl Neurochir, 2008, 69(2):71-75. [5] Horn A, Kühn A A. Lead-DBS:A toolbox for deep brain stimulation electrode localizations and visualizations[J]. Neuroimage, 2015, 107:127-135. [6] Costa L F, Appenzeller S, Yasuda C L, et al. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2009, 14(6):278-82. [7] Balac S, Caloz G, Cathelineau G, et al. Integral method for numerical simulation of MRI artifacts induced by metallic implants[J]. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2001, 45(4):724-727. [8] JIANG Changqing, LI Luming, HAO Hongwei. Carbon nanotube yarns for deep brain stimulation electrode[J]. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2011, 19(6):612-616. [9] JIANG Changqing, HAO Hongwei, LI Luming. Artifact properties of carbon nanotube yarn electrode in magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Neural Eng, 2013, 10(2), 026013. [10] Schenck J F. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging:MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds[J]. Medical physics, 1996, 23(6):815-850. [11] Leclet H. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine after surgery with or without implant[J]. European Spine Journal, 1994, 3(5):240-245. [12] Balac S, Caloz G. Induced magnetic field computations using a boundary integral formulation[J]. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2002, 41(3):345-367. [13] Sthphane B, Gabriel C. Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging:Calculation of the magnetic field disturbances[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1996, 32(3):1645-1648. [14] Ericssont A, Hemmingssont A, Jung B, et al. Calculation of MRI artifacts caused by static field disturbances[J]. Phys Med Biol, 1988, 33(10):1103-1112. [15] Jackson J D. Classical Electrodynamics[M]. Third Edition. New York:Wiley, 1998. [16] Port J D, Pomper M G. Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images[J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2000, 24(6):958-964. [17] Starr P A. Placement of deep brain stimulators into the subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus internus:Technical approach[J]. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2002, 79:118-145.

PDF(3198 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航

收稿日期	出版日期
2017-02-23	2017-09-15
发布日期
2017-09-15

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Key words

引用本文

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

参考文献

访问统计

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Key words

引用本文

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

参考文献

访问统计