海上风电吸力桶基础地震分析

杨春宝; 张建民; 王睿

doi:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.063

PDF(1588 KB)

清华大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (11) : 1207-1211. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.063

土木工程

海上风电吸力桶基础地震分析

杨春宝^1,2, 张建民^1,2, 王睿^1,2

作者信息 +

Seismic analysis of a suction caisson foundation for offshore wind turbines

YANG Chunbao^1,2, ZHANG Jianmin^1,2, WANG Rui^1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为进行海上风电吸力桶基础地震安全评估，选取欧洲北海砂质海床中典型的吸力桶基础，基于三维砂土液化大变形统一本构模型，通过OpenSees有限元开源平台进行三维动力计算，分析了吸力桶基础的地震变形和倾覆转角。吸力桶基础的地震变形具体如下：基础产生一定的水平位移震荡，最终累积发展为大变形；桶基发生严重的不均匀沉降，桶基后部出现一定程度的上移；倾覆转角不断增加，最终达0.8°以上，远超过规范规定的安全稳定运营值，后期无法运营；基础转动中心在地震过程中不断调整；地震中海床孔压上升，桶基内出现一定的负孔压，可以提高抗倾覆承载力，地震结束时负压区消散。海床液化深度约3 m，桶基前部产生刺入海床破坏。海床地震液化加剧了吸力桶基础的变形和倾覆，严重影响着海上风机的安全运营。

Abstract

The stability of suction caisson foundations during earthquakes is evaluated for a typical suction caisson foundation of an offshore wind turbine located in a sandy seabed in the North Sea. The analysis was a unified plasticity model for the large post-liquefaction shear deformation of the sand and a three-dimensional dynamic finite element analysis to predict the seismic deformation and overturning probability during an earthquake. The analysis shows that the foundation experiences horizontal oscillations that lead to large deformations. The caisson slants with the rear moving up. The overturning probability keeps increasing and the angle eventually reaches more than 0.8°, which exceeds the safety limit. The rotation center constantly changes and the seabed pore pressure increases. Negative pore pressures can develop inside the caisson which enhance the overturning probability, but then dissipate. The seabed liquefaction depth is about 3 m, so the front of the caisson pierces into the seabed. Consequently, seabed liquefaction aggravates the deformation and overturning probability which affects the system operation.

导出引用

杨春宝, 张建民, 王睿. 海上风电吸力桶基础地震分析[J]. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）. 2017, 57(11): 1207-1211 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.063

YANG Chunbao, ZHANG Jianmin, WANG Rui. Seismic analysis of a suction caisson foundation for offshore wind turbines[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2017, 57(11): 1207-1211 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.26.063

中图分类号： TU475+.1

参考文献

[1] 封宇, 何焱, 朱启昊, 等. 近海及海上风资源时空特性研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(5):522-529.FENG Yu, HE Yan, ZHU Qihao, et al. Temporal and spatial characteristics of offshore wind resources[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2016, 56(5):522-529. (in Chinese)[2] Byrne B W. Investigations of Suction Caissons in Dense Sand[D]. London:University of Oxford, 2000.[3] 朱斌, 应盼盼, 邢月龙. 软土中吸力式桶形基础倾覆承载性能离心模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(1):247-252.ZHU Bin, YING Panpan, XING Yuelong. Centrifuge model test on suction caisson foundation in soft clay subjected to lateral loads[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(1):247-252. (in Chinese)[4] 刘梅梅, 练继建, 杨敏, 等. 宽浅式筒型基础竖向承载力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(2):379-384.LIU Meimei, LIAN Jijian, YANG Min, et al. Vertical bearing capacity of wide-shallow bucket foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(2):379-384. (in Chinese)[5] WU Ke, LUAN Maotian, FAN Qinglai,et al. Failure envelopes of bucket foundation subjected to combined loads[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(2):574-580.[6] Houlsby G T, Kelly R B, Huxtable J, et al. Field trials of suction caissons in sand for offshore wind turbine foundations[J]. Geotechnique, 2006, 56(1):3-10.[7] 张建红, 林小静, 鲁晓兵. 水平荷载作用下张力腿平台吸力式基础的物理模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(1):77-81.ZHANG Jianhong, LIN Xiaojing, LU Xiaobing. Physical modelling of suction foundations of TLPs under horizontal loads[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(1):77-81. (in Chinese)[8] 王建华, 杨海明. 软土中桶型基础水平循环承载力的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(10):2607-2612.WANG Jianhua, YANG Haiming. Model tests on horizontal cyclic bearing capacity of bucket foundations in soft clays[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(10):2607-2612. (in Chinese)[9] Villalobos F A, Byron B W, Houlsby G T. Model testing of suction caissons in clay subjected to vertical loading[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2010, 32:414-424.[10] Houlsby G T, Ibsen L B, Byrne B W. Suction caissons for wind turbines[C]//Proceedings of International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics. London:Taylor and Francis, 2005:75-94.[11] Tempel J V D. Design of Support Structures for Offshore Wind Turbines[D]. Delft:Delft University of Technology, 2006.[12] Seed H B. Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1979, 105(GT2):201-255.[13] ZHANG Jianmin. Cyclic Critical Stress State Theory of Sand with Its Application to Geotechnical Problems[D]. Tokyo:Tokyo Institute of Technology, 1997.[14] WANG Rui, ZHANG Jianmin, WANG Gang. A unified plasticity model for large post-liquefaction shear deformation of sand[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 59:54-66.[15] 朱斌, 应盼盼, 郭俊科, 等. 海上风电机组吸力式桶形基础承载力分析与设计[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(1):443-450.ZHU Bin, YING Panpan, GUO Junke, et al. Analysis and design of bearing capacity of suction caisson foundations of offshore wind turbines[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(1):443-450. (in Chinese)[16] WANG Xuefei, ZENG Xiangwu, YU Hao, et al. Centrifuge modeling of offshore wind turbine with bucket foundation under earthquake loading[C]//The International Foundations Congress and Equipment Expo. San Antonio, TX, USA:ASCE, 2015:1741-1750.

PDF(1588 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航

收稿日期	出版日期
2017-03-31	2017-11-15
发布日期
2017-11-15

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Key words

引用本文

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

参考文献

访问统计

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Key words

引用本文

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

参考文献

访问统计