井点降水法处理可液化地基的振动台试验

陈宇龙; 张科

doi:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2018.25.001

PDF(4334 KB)

清华大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (2) : 192-197. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2018.25.001

水利水电工程

井点降水法处理可液化地基的振动台试验

陈宇龙¹, 张科²

作者信息 +

Shaking table tests on the mitigation of liquefiable ground effects by well-point dewatering

CHEN Yulong¹, ZHANG Ke²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

减饱和法是近年来提出的一种可液化地基处理方法，其基本原理是通过工程措施减小饱和砂土地基中的饱和度，将饱和砂土地基变成不饱和砂土地基，从而提高地基的抗液化强度，减轻地震时产生的液化震害。该文利用井点降水法，在砂土地基中布置排水管，考虑排水管的竖向布置、水平布置、倾斜布置以及联合布置，对井点降水法的抗液化效果进行了振动台模型试验。实验结果表明：排水管水平布置产生的超孔隙水压最小，抗液化效果最好；竖直布置次之；倾斜布置抗液化效果最不明显。在实际应用过程中，可以定期进行地基土体的排水作业，从而提高可液化地基的抗液化能力。

Abstract

The liquefaction resistance of saturated, sandy foundations can be improved by reducing the saturation. The well-point dewatering method was used to lower the saturation of the subsoil using vertical, horizontal, inclined and combined drainage pipes arrangements. The horizontal arrangement gave the best liquefaction resistance with the lowest induced excess pore pressure during the shaking. In engineering practice, the dewatering method can be used at regular intervals to reduce the liquefaction possibility.

导出引用

陈宇龙, 张科. 井点降水法处理可液化地基的振动台试验[J]. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）. 2018, 58(2): 192-197 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2018.25.001

CHEN Yulong, ZHANG Ke. Shaking table tests on the mitigation of liquefiable ground effects by well-point dewatering[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2018, 58(2): 192-197 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2018.25.001

中图分类号： TU433

参考文献

[1] 陈宇龙, 张宇宁. 非塑性细粒对饱和砂土液化特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(2):507-516. CHEN Y L, ZHANG Y N. Experimental study of effects of non-plastic fines on liquefaction properties of saturated sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(2):507-516.(in Chinese)[2] MARASINI N P, OKAMURA M. Numerical simulation of centrifuge tests to evaluate the performance of desaturation by air injection on liquefiable foundation soil of light structures[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2015, 55(6):1388-1399.[3] OKAMURA M, SOGA Y. Effects of pore fluid compressibility on liquefaction resistance of partially saturated sand[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2006, 46(5):695-700.[4] UNNO T, KAZAMA M, UZUOKA R, et al. Liquefaction of unsaturated sand considering the pore air pressure and volume compressibility of the soil particle skeleton[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2008, 48(1):87-99.[5] YOSHIMI Y, TANAKA K, TOKIMATSU K. Liquefaction resistance of partially saturated sand[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1989, 29(3):157-162.[6] XIA H, HU T. Effects of saturation and back pressure on sand liquefaction[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1991, 117(9):1347-1362.[7] OKAMURA M, TAKEBAYASHI M, NISHIDA K, et al. In-situ desaturation test by air injection and its evaluation through field monitoring and multiphase flow simulation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2011, 137(7):643-652.[8] ESELLER-BAYAT E, YEGIAN M K, ALSHAWABKEH A, et al. Liquefaction response of partially saturated sands. I:Experimental results[J]. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(6):863-871.[9] HE J, CHU J, IVANOV V. Mitigation of liquefaction of saturated sand using biogas[J]. Geotechnique, 2013, 63(4):267-275.[10] YEGIAN M K, ESELLER-BAYAT E, ALSHAWABKEH A, et al. Induced-partial saturation for liquefaction mitigation:Experimental investigation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(4):372-380.[11] KURIKI A, TAMURA S, ZHOU Y, et al. Centrifuge model test of liquefaction countermeasure for existing houses[C]//Proceedings of the 47th Conference of Japanese Geotechnical Society. Hachinohe, Japan:The Japanese Geotechnical Society, 2012:1497-1498.[12] YAN X, YUAN J, YU H, et al. Multi-point shaking table test design for long tunnels under non-uniform seismic loading[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 59(10):114-126.[13] XU H, LI T, XIA L, et al. Shaking table tests on seismic measures of a model mountain tunnel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 60(11):197-209.[14] MOGHADAM M R, BAZIAR M H. Seismic ground motion amplification pattern induced by a subway tunnel:Shaking table testing and numerical simulation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 83(4):81-97.[15] HAMAYOON K, MORIKAWA Y, OKA R, et al. 3D dynamic finite element analyses and 1g shaking table tests on seismic performance of existing group-pile foundation in partially improved grounds under dry condition[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 90(11):196-210.[16] LIU J, LIU F, KONG X, et al. Large-scale shaking table model tests on seismically induced failure of concrete-faced rockfill dams[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 82(3):11-23.[17] BAO X, MORIKAWA Y, KONDO Y, et al. Shaking table test on reinforcement effect of partial ground improvement for group-pile foundation and its numerical simulation[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2012, 52(6):1043-1061.

PDF(4334 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航

收稿日期	出版日期
2017-07-13	2018-02-15
发布日期
2018-02-15

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Key words

引用本文

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

参考文献

访问统计

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Key words

引用本文

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

参考文献

访问统计