高压氢气射流火焰的数值模拟

巴清心; 赵明斌; 赵泽滢; 黄腾; 王建强; 李雪芳; 肖国萍

doi:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.26.022

PDF(11109 KB)

清华大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (2) : 303-311. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.26.022

能源与动力工程

高压氢气射流火焰的数值模拟

巴清心¹, 赵明斌¹, 赵泽滢¹, 黄腾¹, 王建强², 李雪芳¹, 肖国萍²

作者信息 +

Modeling of high pressure hydrogen jet fires

BA Qingxin¹, ZHAO Mingbin¹, ZHAO Zeying¹, HUANG Teng¹, WANG Jianqiang², LI Xuefang¹, XIAO Guoping²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

高压氢气泄漏并发生点火是氢火灾事故的核心场景，也是氢安全研究的基本内容。该文对高压氢气泄漏后立即点火、延迟点火以及有防护墙存在时的延时点火3种场景进行了数值模拟仿真，分析了点火时间、防护墙对温度和超压的影响。结果表明：氢气泄漏后在喷口处立即点燃会形成射流火焰，该过程不会产生明显的超压；泄漏一段时间后再进行点火，将由点火中心产生压力波并向外传播，并随着与点火中心距离的增大，最大超压降低，燃烧稳定后形成的射流火焰与立即点火时基本一致；防护墙有效削弱了压力波及火焰向墙后方的传播，墙后方的超压及温度明显降低。因此，合理设置防护墙可以缩小危险范围，缩短安全距离。

Abstract

Unintended high pressure hydrogen releases and ignition are key scenarios in hydrogen accidents, so they are basic topics of hydrogen safety research. This study modeled three hydrogen fire scenarios including immediate ignition, delayed ignition, and delayed ignition with a barrier wall. The analyses predicted the temperature and pressure distributions for each scenario. The results show that immediate ignition of the released hydrogen resulted in a steady jet fire without significant overpressure. Delayed ignition caused a pressure wave at the ignition location that spread outward. The jet fire for delayed ignition was similar as that for immediate ignition after the fire stabilized. The overpressure decreased with distance from the ignition location. The barrier wall weakened the spread of the pressure waves and the flames with significantly lower overpressures and temperatures behind the wall. Therefore, barrier walls should be used to reduce hazardous areas and shorten separation distances.

导出引用

巴清心, 赵明斌, 赵泽滢, 黄腾, 王建强, 李雪芳, 肖国萍. 高压氢气射流火焰的数值模拟[J]. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）. 2022, 62(2): 303-311 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.26.022

BA Qingxin, ZHAO Mingbin, ZHAO Zeying, HUANG Teng, WANG Jianqiang, LI Xuefang, XIAO Guoping. Modeling of high pressure hydrogen jet fires[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2022, 62(2): 303-311 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.26.022

参考文献

[1] APAK S, ATAY E, TUNCER G. Renewable hydrogen energy and energy efficiency in Turkey in the 21st century[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(4):2446-2452.
[2] BARBIR F. Transition to renewable energy systems with hydrogen as an energy carrier[J]. Energy, 2009, 34(3):308-312.
[3] PANWAR N L, KAUSHIK S C, KOTHARI S. Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection:A review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(3):1513-1524.
[4] CHANG L, NI W D, LI Z, et al. Selection of best hydrogen transport mode in the hydrogen supply chain[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2009, 49(2):257-260. (in Chinese)常乐, 倪维斗, 李政, 等. 氢能供应链中最佳运氢方式的选择[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 49(2):257-260.
[5] SCHEFER R W, HOUF W G, BOURNE B, et al. Spatial and radiative properties of an open-flame hydrogen plume[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31(10):1332-1340.
[6] MOGI T, HORIGUCHI S. Experimental study on the hazards of high-pressure hydrogen jet diffusion flames[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(1):45-51.
[7] BRENNAN S L, MAKAROV D V, MOLKOV V. LES of high pressure hydrogen jet fire[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(3):353-359.
[8] FU J J, WANG C J, QIN J, et al. Large eddy simulation of hydrogen jet fire[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2013, 19(5):473-477. (in Chinese)付佳佳, 王昌建, 秦俊, 等. 氢气喷射火的大涡模拟[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2013, 19(5):473-477.
[9] FU J J. Large eddy simulation of hydrogen jet fire based on OpenFOAM platform[D]. Hefei:University of Science and Technology of China, 2013. (in Chinese)付佳佳. 基于OpenFOAM平台下氢气喷射火的大涡模拟[D]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学, 2013.
[10] SHIRVILL L C, ROBERTS T A. Designing for safe operations:Understanding the hazards posed by high-pressure leaks from hydrogen refueling systems[C]//USA National Hydrogen Association Annual Hydrogen Conference. Long Beach, USA, 2006.
[11] SCHEFER, R W, GROETHE, M, HOUF, W G, et al. Experimental evaluation of barrier walls for risk reduction of unintended hydrogen releases[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34(3):1590-1606.
[12] TANAKA T, AZUMA T, EVANS J A, et al. Experimental study on hydrogen explosions in a full-scale hydrogen filling station model[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(13):2162-2170.
[13] DIOP S, AGRAWAL A, SCHEFER R. A parametric study of jet-wall interactions for compressed hydrogen gas leak scenarios[C]//47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Orlando, USA:AIAA, 2009.
[14] LI X F, HE J, CHRISTOPHER D M, et al, Validation of flow partitioning model for high pressure hydrogen jets through small orifices[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2018, 58(12):1095-1100. (in Chinese)李雪芳, 何倩, 柯道友, 等. 高压氢气小孔泄漏射流分层流动模型与验证[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2018, 58(12):1095-1100.
[15] THRING M, NEWBY M. Combustion length of enclosed turbulent jet flames[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1953, 4(1):789-796.
[16] BIRCH A, BROWN D, DODSON M, et al. The structure and concentration decay of high pressure jets of natural gas[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1984, 36(5-6):249-261.
[17] BIRCH A, HUGHES D, SWAFFIELD F. Velocity decay of high pressure jets[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1987, 52(1-3):161-171.
[18] EWAN B, MOODIE K. Structure and velocity measurements in underexpanded jets[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1986, 45(5-6):275-288.
[19] YUCEIL K B, OTUGEN M V. Scaling parameters for underexpanded supersonic jets[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14(12):4206-4215.
[20] PAPANIKOLAOU E, BARALDI D, KUZNETSOV M, et al. Evaluation of notional nozzle approaches for CFD simulations of free-shear under-expanded hydrogen jets[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(23):18563-18574.
[21] MAKAROV D, MOLFEOU V. Plane hydrogen jets[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(19):8068-8083.
[22] LI Z Y, PAN X M, LUO Y Y, et al. Comparison of determination approaches of safety distances for hydrogen infrastructure[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2013(8):1492-1498. (in Chinese)李志勇, 潘相敏, 罗义英, 等. 氢能基础设施安全距离确定方法的比较与分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2013(8):1492-1498.

基金

国家自然科学基金资助项目（51706125）；中科院青年创新促进会项目（2018298）

PDF(11109 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航

收稿日期	出版日期
2021-01-27	2022-02-15
发布日期
2022-01-22

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Key words

引用本文

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

参考文献

基金

访问统计

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Key words

引用本文

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

参考文献

基金

访问统计