PDF(7166 KB)
PDF(7166 KB)
PDF(7166 KB)
考虑驾驶员差异的自动驾驶车辆换道规划方法
Lane-changing planning method for autonomous vehicles considering variability among drivers
当前自动驾驶技术在决策和规划层面较少考虑驾驶员之间的个体差异, 这在实际道路交通中是一个显著的缺陷。该文针对常见的换道驾驶场景, 提出了一种考虑驾驶员差异的自动驾驶车辆换道规划方法。首先, 基于自然驾驶实验数据, 采用统计学的样本检验方法分析了换道场景下不同驾驶员在各项关键变量指标上的差异, 并提取出最能体现驾驶员个性化风格的特征指标。之后, 根据换道场景的特性, 构建了人工势场模型, 并利用这些个性化指标对模型参数进行差异化标定。采用二次方程和线性平滑方法对原始路径点进行拟合与平滑, 实现了个性化的换道路径规划。最后, 鉴于不同驾驶员在车速控制上的差异, 提出了一种基于五次多项式的换道车速规划策略。仿真实验结果显示, 该规划方法能够生成满足驾驶员个性化需求的路径和车速, 有助于推动自动驾驶技术的进一步发展。
Objective: In the context of the swift progression of autonomous driving technology, the widespread reliance of current systems on uniform behavioral models for decision-making and path planning is a crucial concern. This generalized approach often disregards variations in driving behavior among different drivers, making it challenging to achieve driving behavior that aligns with drivers' expectations in complex and dynamic traffic scenarios. Consequently, a decrease in comfort and trust is observed in autonomous vehicles. This study focuses on lane changing, a common yet critical driving maneuver, aiming to optimize planning strategies by incorporating drivers' characteristics to match individual driving styles. Methods: This study comprehensively analyzes data derived from naturalistic driving experiments. Kalman filtering is used to detect and eliminate anomalies in raw data, thereby reducing noise interference. The integration of temporal constraints into the fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm ensures the preservation of chronological order in the clustered data, which is essential for analyzing sequential events such as lane change maneuvers. Lane changing requires lateral and longitudinal vehicle control with distinct operational characteristics across different phases of the maneuver. By clustering the entire lane-changing process data into three major categories, C1, C2, and C3, representing the preparation, execution, and completion stages of lane changing, respectively, this study aims to analyze disparities in driver behavior during these distinct phases. According to the characteristics of lane-changing scenarios, relevant variables are selected for in-depth examination. Independent sample t-tests are then conducted among different drivers for each variable, and variables with a high proportion of insignificant t-values are eliminated. This process helps identify personalized indicators that reflect driver-specific traits during lane changing. Subsequently, an artificial potential field (APF) model is established for the lane-changing scenario. The APF method uses virtual attractive and repulsive forces to guide the vehicle toward a path of decreasing potential energy, effectively avoiding obstacles while moving toward the target position. Variations in the APF parameters lead to different planning paths. By leveraging the extracted personalized indicator, the APF model for lane changing is customized, yielding paths that align with individual driving styles. Another pivotal consideration is the planning of lane-changing speeds. Given the notable variations in the speed preferences of drivers, this study proposes a lane-changing speed planning algorithm based on a quintic polynomial function. This ensures that the mean duration of acceleration and the maximum acceleration limit during the execution phase align with each driver's speed control habits and that a smooth velocity profile is maintained throughout the lane-changing maneuver. Conclusions: This study proposes a lane-changing planning method for autonomous vehicles that considers driver differences. The simulation results confirm that the proposed personalized lane-changing planning approach not only produces paths that align with individual driving styles but also regulates lane-changing velocities in accordance with each driver's operational habits. By quantifying behavioral variations, developing personalized APF models, and implementing customized speed planning strategies, this study exemplifies how to tackle individualization challenges in autonomous driving. This study represents a step forward in advancing autonomous vehicle technology toward a human-centric and intelligent future.
autonomous driving / path planning / speed planning / driving styles
| 1 |
高在峰, 李文敏, 梁佳文, 等. 自动驾驶车中的人机信任[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(12): 2172- 2183.
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
NATARAJAN M, AKASH K, MISU T. Toward adaptive driving styles for automated driving with users'trust and preferences[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Sapporo, Japan: ACM/IEEE, 2022: 940-944.
|
| 4 |
赵蕾蕾, 李翀, 季林红, 等. 基于虚拟现实的自动驾驶模式中晕动受试者的脑电特征[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 60(12): 993- 998.
|
| 5 |
朱冰, 贾士政, 赵健, 等. 自动驾驶车辆决策与规划研究综述[J]. 中国公路学报, 2024, 37(1): 215- 240.
|
| 6 |
刘通, 付锐, 马勇, 等. 考虑驾驶人风格的跟车预警规则研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(2): 170- 180.
|
| 7 |
胡春燕, 曲大义, 赵梓旭, 等. 考虑前车驾驶风格的改进自适应巡航控制跟驰模型及仿真[J]. 济南大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 37(3): 331- 338.
|
| 8 |
OZKAN M F, MA Y. Personalized adaptive cruise control and impacts on mixed traffic[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 American Control Conference (ACC). New Orleans, LA, USA: IEEE, 2021: 412-417.
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
吕凯光, 李旋, 韩天园, 等. 基于驾驶风格识别的AEB控制策略[J]. 汽车技术, 2021(5): 16- 21.
|
| 11 |
黄晶, 蓟仲勋, 彭晓燕, 等. 考虑驾驶人风格的换道轨迹规划与控制[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(6): 226-239, 247.
|
| 12 |
张新锋, 汪亚君, 张浩杰, 等. 考虑驾驶风格的高速行驶工况自动换道决策规划研究. 汽车技术. (2024-01-19). https://doi.org/10.19620/j.cnki.1000-3703.20230357.
ZHANG X F, WANG Y J, ZHANG H J, et al. Research on high-speed automatic lane change decision-making and planning considering driving style. Automobile Technology. (2024-01-19). https://doi.org/10.19620/j.cnki.1000-3703.20230357. (in Chinese)
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
方鸣. 考虑个性化驾驶员的信号口车速引导研究[J]. 建模与仿真, 2023, 12(3): 3162- 3173.
|
| 18 |
陈峥, 张玉果, 沈世全, 等. 城市郊区道路跟车条件下智能网联汽车速度规划[J]. 中国公路学报, 2023, 36(6): 298- 310.
|
| 19 |
刘平, 李振鹏, 蒋平, 等. 一种新的V2I下车速规划与模型预测控制方法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 41(7): 27- 33.
|
| 20 |
ISHIBASHI M, OKUWA M, DOIS, et al. Indices for characterizing driving style and their relevance to car following behavior[C]//Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference 2007. Takamatsu, Japan: IEEE, 2007: 1132-1137.
|
| 21 |
侯海晶, 金立生, 关志伟, 等. 驾驶风格对驾驶行为的影响[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(4): 18- 27.
|
| 22 |
李浩然. 智能汽车个性化驾驶行为决策与运动控制方法研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2021.
LI H R. Personalized driving decision-making and motion control[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)
|
| 23 |
LI H R, LU Y P, ZHENG H T, et al. Analysis of naturalistic driving behavior for personalized autonomous vehicle[C]//Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). Bilbao, Spain: IEEE, 2023: 2106-2111.
|
| 24 |
柏海舰, 申剑峰, 卫立阳. 无人车"三阶段"换道轨迹规划过程分析[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 42(5): 577-584, 676.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |