PDF(28981 KB)
不同钻孔组合影响下单轴压缩试验中砂岩的力学性质和破坏特征
王守光, 刘化广, 穆鹏宇, 杨强, 刘耀儒, 刘千惠, 刘驰, 江星宇
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (10) : 1821-1837.
PDF(28981 KB)
PDF(28981 KB)
不同钻孔组合影响下单轴压缩试验中砂岩的力学性质和破坏特征
Mechanical properties and damage characteristics of sandstone in uniaxial compression tests influenced by different drilling combinations
水工隧道施工过程中围岩的高应力场容易引发岩爆现象,对工程安全造成威胁,围岩的钻孔卸压是岩爆主动防治措施中一类较为经济的方法。为研究不同钻孔数量和钻孔深度组合下水工隧洞砂岩力学性质和破坏特征,基于单轴压缩试验机和VIC-3D非接触式全场应变测量系统对8种不同钻孔组合的砂岩进行了单轴压缩试验,分析了8种钻孔组合下砂岩抗压强度、弹性应变能积聚及释放特征,拟合了砂岩剩余体积率与砂岩抗压强度之间的回归关系; 通过数字图像相关法(DIC)和断裂相场模拟分析了8种钻孔组合下砂岩裂纹演化与破坏特征,并基于有限元数值模拟对比分析了直孔和10°斜孔对砂岩应力重分布的影响。结果表明:1) 钻孔半径相同时,钻孔越深砂岩抗压强度越低; 2) 钻孔半径和钻孔深度相同时,随着钻孔数量增加,砂岩抗压强度非持续下降,钻孔布置亦可能影响砂岩抗压强度; 3) 砂岩弹性应变能与抗压强度呈高度正相关,损失能与弹性应变能的比值越接近0,砂岩破坏越剧烈; 4) VIC-3D系统测量和数值模拟结果均证实了单轴压缩下砂岩的蝶形破坏趋势,且非对称结构3个钻孔的方案砂岩抗压强度低,远场应力下降多,破坏时间早,经济可行; 5) 在岩性和钻孔深度相同时,直孔和10°斜孔对砂岩最大主应力重分布的影响相近,但施工时要结合现场实际和需求进行钻孔。研究为水工隧洞钻孔卸压方案的优化设计提供了一定参考。
Objective: The construction of hydraulic tunnels in high-stress surrounding rock environments often leads to the occurrence of rock bursts, thereby posing a substantial threat to engineering safety. Among the various active prevention and control measures for rock bursts, drilling pressure relief in surrounding rocks is considered a relatively economical and effective method. By creating drilled holes in the rock mass, stress concentration can be redistributed, thereby reducing the likelihood of sudden failures and improving the overall stability of the tunnel structure. Methods: In order to investigate the mechanical properties and damage characteristics of sandstone in hydraulic tunnels under different combinations of drilling numbers and drilling depths, a series of uniaxial compression tests were conducted. These tests utilized an advanced uniaxial compression testing machine and the VIC-3D noncontact full-field strain measurement system. The experiment involved eight different combinations of drilling holes in the sandstone specimens. This study comprehensively analyzed key parameters such as compressive strength, the accumulation and release characteristics of elastic strain energy, and the residual volume rate of sandstone. A regression analysis was conducted to establish a quantitative relationship between the residual volume rate of sandstone and its compressive strength. In addition, the crack evolution and damage characteristics of sandstone under different drilling hole configurations were studied using digital image correlation (DIC) technology and fracture phase field simulation. Furthermore, numerical simulations based on finite element methods were performed to compare the effects of straight holes and 10° inclined holes on stress redistribution within the rock mass. Results: The experimental and numerical results led to the following key findings: (1) when the radius of the drilled holes remains constant, an increase in the drilling depth leads to a decrease in the compressive strength of sandstone. This finding indicates that deeper drilling can effectively weaken the rock mass and facilitate stress relief. (2) Under the condition of identical hole radius and depth, an increase in the number of drilled holes results in a discontinuous reduction in the compressive strength of sandstone. Moreover, the arrangement of the drilled holes plays a crucial role in determining the overall strength of sandstone. For instance, the specimens with asymmetrical three-borehole configurations exhibited lower compressive strength than those with symmetrical four-borehole configurations. This finding suggests that asymmetrical arrangements can enhance energy dissipation efficiency and reduce the overall stress level within the rock. (3) The elastic strain energy of sandstone exhibits a strong positive correlation with compressive strength. Moreover, as the ratio of loss energy to elastic strain energy approaches zero, the intensity of sandstone destruction considerably increases. This outcome highlights the role of energy release in the failure process of rock materials. (4) DIC strain field analysis and numerical simulations confirm that sandstone under uniaxial compression follows a characteristic butterfly-shaped damage pattern. The three-borehole asymmetric configuration showed lower compressive strength, greater far-field stress reduction, earlier failure onset, and higher economic feasibility for pressure relief applications than the four-borehole symmetric configurations. (5) Under identical rock formation and borehole depth conditions, the impact of straight and 10° inclined boreholes on stress redistribution is found to be similar. However, practical construction decisions should be made, considering site-specific conditions and operational requirements. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights for optimizing the design of borehole pressure relief schemes for hydraulic tunnels. The findings provide a reference for engineers seeking to improve tunnel stability through effective stress redistribution strategies. By systematically evaluating different drilling configurations, this study contributes to the development of more efficient and cost-effective methods for mitigating rock bursts in high-stress environments.
drilling pressure relief / sandstone / uniaxial compression test / digital image correlation method (DIC)
| 1 |
吴世勇, 王鸽. 锦屏二级水电站深埋长隧洞群的建设和工程中的挑战性问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29 (11): 2161- 2171.
|
| 2 |
何满潮, 谢和平, 彭苏萍, 等. 深部开采岩体力学研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24 (16): 2803- 2813.
|
| 3 |
钱七虎. 岩爆、冲击地压的定义、机制、分类及其定量预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35 (1): 1- 6.
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
冯夏庭, 肖亚勋, 丰光亮, 等. 岩爆孕育过程研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38 (4): 649- 673.
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
赵本钧. 冲击地压及其防治[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1995.
|
| 8 |
马斌文. 钻孔卸压防治冲击地压研究[D]. 北京: 煤炭科学研究总院, 2018.
MA B W. Research of boreholes relief pressure prevention and control rockburst[D]. Beijing: China Coal Research Institute, 2018. (in Chinese)
|
| 9 |
丁可. 深部巷道卸压钻孔围岩强度弱化机理及扩孔卸压方法研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2023.
DING K. Study on the weakening mechanism of surrounding rock strength of pressure relief boreholes in deep roadway and the method of reaming pressure relief[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2023. (in Chinese)
|
| 10 |
刘美山, 吴新霞, 丁秀丽, 等. 弱能量爆破技术在地下隧洞工程岩爆治理中的应用试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32 (增刊2): 3675- 3680.
|
| 11 |
许文祥, 张浩, 马鑫炎. 掏槽孔爆破作用下隧道掌子面应力传播与衰减规律研究[J]. 市政技术, 2024, 42 (2): 140-146, 154.
|
| 12 |
郭信山. 煤层超高压定点水力压裂防治冲击地压机理与试验研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2015.
GUO X S. Rockburst prevention mechanism of and experimental research on ultra-high pressure fixed-point hydraulic fracturing in coal seams[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), 2015. (in Chinese)
|
| 13 |
杨月, 潘一山, 罗浩, 等. 大直径煤层钻孔注水压裂防治冲击地压数值模拟[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 33 (4): 451- 455.
|
| 14 |
李见波, 陈学习, 王新梅. 煤层注水致工作面前方集中应力前移的机理分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2012, 40 (4): 56-59, 48.
|
| 15 |
汪珂. 深埋隧道岩爆预测及防治技术现状综述[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41 (2): 212- 224.
|
| 16 |
欧阳林, 张如九, 刘耀儒, 等. 深埋隧洞岩爆防控技术及典型工程应用现状综述[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39 (12): 161- 170.
|
| 17 |
商嘉胤. 秦岭输水隧洞岩爆塌腔段回填灌浆试验分析[J]. 水利建设与管理, 2023, 43 (8): 24- 29.
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
徐向东. 隧道岩爆防治作用机理初探[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2008 (10): 36-39, 44.
|
| 20 |
袁红辉. 钻孔卸压对煤岩力学性能及破坏特征的影响研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2022.
YUAN H H. Study on the effect of destressing boreholes on mechanical properties and failure characteristics of the coal and rock[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese)
|
| 21 |
贾传洋, 蒋宇静, 张学朋, 等. 大直径钻孔卸压机理室内及数值试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39 (6): 1115- 1122.
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
盖德成, 李东, 姜福兴, 等. 基于不同强度煤体的合理卸压钻孔间距研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37 (3): 578-585, 593.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
王爱文, 高乾书, 潘一山. 煤层钻孔降倾-控变-耗能防冲机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42 (5): 1230- 1244.
|
| 28 |
张连生. 承载围岩钻屑试验及钻孔卸压影响因素分析[D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2018.
ZHANG L S. Analysis of physical experiment of drill cuttings and factors affecting coal drilling relief[D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2018. (in Chinese)
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
刘加柱, 高永涛, 周喻, 等. 基于钻孔卸压的硬脆性紫砂岩岩爆局部解危试验研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2023, 43 (7): 79- 87.
|
| 31 |
金立平, 鲜学福. 煤层冲击倾向性试验研究及模糊综合评判[J]. 重庆大学学报, 1993, 16 (6): 114- 119.
|
| 32 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |