不同钻孔组合影响下单轴压缩试验中砂岩的力学性质和破坏特征

王守光, 刘化广, 穆鹏宇, 杨强, 刘耀儒, 刘千惠, 刘驰, 江星宇

清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (10) : 1821-1837.

PDF(28981 KB)
PDF(28981 KB)
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (10) : 1821-1837. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.016
水利水电工程

不同钻孔组合影响下单轴压缩试验中砂岩的力学性质和破坏特征

作者信息 +

Mechanical properties and damage characteristics of sandstone in uniaxial compression tests influenced by different drilling combinations

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

水工隧道施工过程中围岩的高应力场容易引发岩爆现象,对工程安全造成威胁,围岩的钻孔卸压是岩爆主动防治措施中一类较为经济的方法。为研究不同钻孔数量和钻孔深度组合下水工隧洞砂岩力学性质和破坏特征,基于单轴压缩试验机和VIC-3D非接触式全场应变测量系统对8种不同钻孔组合的砂岩进行了单轴压缩试验,分析了8种钻孔组合下砂岩抗压强度、弹性应变能积聚及释放特征,拟合了砂岩剩余体积率与砂岩抗压强度之间的回归关系; 通过数字图像相关法(DIC)和断裂相场模拟分析了8种钻孔组合下砂岩裂纹演化与破坏特征,并基于有限元数值模拟对比分析了直孔和10°斜孔对砂岩应力重分布的影响。结果表明:1) 钻孔半径相同时,钻孔越深砂岩抗压强度越低; 2) 钻孔半径和钻孔深度相同时,随着钻孔数量增加,砂岩抗压强度非持续下降,钻孔布置亦可能影响砂岩抗压强度; 3) 砂岩弹性应变能与抗压强度呈高度正相关,损失能与弹性应变能的比值越接近0,砂岩破坏越剧烈; 4) VIC-3D系统测量和数值模拟结果均证实了单轴压缩下砂岩的蝶形破坏趋势,且非对称结构3个钻孔的方案砂岩抗压强度低,远场应力下降多,破坏时间早,经济可行; 5) 在岩性和钻孔深度相同时,直孔和10°斜孔对砂岩最大主应力重分布的影响相近,但施工时要结合现场实际和需求进行钻孔。研究为水工隧洞钻孔卸压方案的优化设计提供了一定参考。

Abstract

Objective: The construction of hydraulic tunnels in high-stress surrounding rock environments often leads to the occurrence of rock bursts, thereby posing a substantial threat to engineering safety. Among the various active prevention and control measures for rock bursts, drilling pressure relief in surrounding rocks is considered a relatively economical and effective method. By creating drilled holes in the rock mass, stress concentration can be redistributed, thereby reducing the likelihood of sudden failures and improving the overall stability of the tunnel structure. Methods: In order to investigate the mechanical properties and damage characteristics of sandstone in hydraulic tunnels under different combinations of drilling numbers and drilling depths, a series of uniaxial compression tests were conducted. These tests utilized an advanced uniaxial compression testing machine and the VIC-3D noncontact full-field strain measurement system. The experiment involved eight different combinations of drilling holes in the sandstone specimens. This study comprehensively analyzed key parameters such as compressive strength, the accumulation and release characteristics of elastic strain energy, and the residual volume rate of sandstone. A regression analysis was conducted to establish a quantitative relationship between the residual volume rate of sandstone and its compressive strength. In addition, the crack evolution and damage characteristics of sandstone under different drilling hole configurations were studied using digital image correlation (DIC) technology and fracture phase field simulation. Furthermore, numerical simulations based on finite element methods were performed to compare the effects of straight holes and 10° inclined holes on stress redistribution within the rock mass. Results: The experimental and numerical results led to the following key findings: (1) when the radius of the drilled holes remains constant, an increase in the drilling depth leads to a decrease in the compressive strength of sandstone. This finding indicates that deeper drilling can effectively weaken the rock mass and facilitate stress relief. (2) Under the condition of identical hole radius and depth, an increase in the number of drilled holes results in a discontinuous reduction in the compressive strength of sandstone. Moreover, the arrangement of the drilled holes plays a crucial role in determining the overall strength of sandstone. For instance, the specimens with asymmetrical three-borehole configurations exhibited lower compressive strength than those with symmetrical four-borehole configurations. This finding suggests that asymmetrical arrangements can enhance energy dissipation efficiency and reduce the overall stress level within the rock. (3) The elastic strain energy of sandstone exhibits a strong positive correlation with compressive strength. Moreover, as the ratio of loss energy to elastic strain energy approaches zero, the intensity of sandstone destruction considerably increases. This outcome highlights the role of energy release in the failure process of rock materials. (4) DIC strain field analysis and numerical simulations confirm that sandstone under uniaxial compression follows a characteristic butterfly-shaped damage pattern. The three-borehole asymmetric configuration showed lower compressive strength, greater far-field stress reduction, earlier failure onset, and higher economic feasibility for pressure relief applications than the four-borehole symmetric configurations. (5) Under identical rock formation and borehole depth conditions, the impact of straight and 10° inclined boreholes on stress redistribution is found to be similar. However, practical construction decisions should be made, considering site-specific conditions and operational requirements. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights for optimizing the design of borehole pressure relief schemes for hydraulic tunnels. The findings provide a reference for engineers seeking to improve tunnel stability through effective stress redistribution strategies. By systematically evaluating different drilling configurations, this study contributes to the development of more efficient and cost-effective methods for mitigating rock bursts in high-stress environments.

关键词

钻孔卸压 / 砂岩 / 单轴压缩 / 数字图像相关法

Key words

drilling pressure relief / sandstone / uniaxial compression test / digital image correlation method (DIC)

引用本文

导出引用
王守光, 刘化广, 穆鹏宇, . 不同钻孔组合影响下单轴压缩试验中砂岩的力学性质和破坏特征[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 65(10): 1821-1837 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.016
Shouguang WANG, Huaguang LIU, Pengyu MU, et al. Mechanical properties and damage characteristics of sandstone in uniaxial compression tests influenced by different drilling combinations[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(10): 1821-1837 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.016
中图分类号: TV672+.1;U455.6;TD821   

参考文献

1
吴世勇, 王鸽. 锦屏二级水电站深埋长隧洞群的建设和工程中的挑战性问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29 (11): 2161- 2171.
WU S Y , WANG G . Challenge issues in construction and project of large-scale deep-buried tunnel group of Jinping Ⅱ hydropower station[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29 (11): 2161- 2171.
2
何满潮, 谢和平, 彭苏萍, 等. 深部开采岩体力学研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24 (16): 2803- 2813.
HE M C , XIE H P , PENG S P , et al. Study on rock mechanics in deep mining engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24 (16): 2803- 2813.
3
钱七虎. 岩爆、冲击地压的定义、机制、分类及其定量预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35 (1): 1- 6.
QIAN Q H . Definition, mechanism, classification and quantitative forecast model for rockburst and pressure bump[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35 (1): 1- 6.
4
HE M C , REN F Q , LIU D Q . Rockburst mechanism research and its control[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2018, 28 (5): 829- 837.
5
冯夏庭, 肖亚勋, 丰光亮, 等. 岩爆孕育过程研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38 (4): 649- 673.
FENG X T , XIAO Y X , FENG G L , et al. Study on the development process of rockbursts[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38 (4): 649- 673.
6
COOK N G W . The failure of rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1965, 2 (4): 389- 403.
7
赵本钧. 冲击地压及其防治[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1995.
ZHAO B J . Impact ground pressure and its prevention[M]. Beijing: China Coal Industry Publishing House, 1995.
8
马斌文. 钻孔卸压防治冲击地压研究[D]. 北京: 煤炭科学研究总院, 2018.
MA B W. Research of boreholes relief pressure prevention and control rockburst[D]. Beijing: China Coal Research Institute, 2018. (in Chinese)
9
丁可. 深部巷道卸压钻孔围岩强度弱化机理及扩孔卸压方法研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2023.
DING K. Study on the weakening mechanism of surrounding rock strength of pressure relief boreholes in deep roadway and the method of reaming pressure relief[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2023. (in Chinese)
10
刘美山, 吴新霞, 丁秀丽, 等. 弱能量爆破技术在地下隧洞工程岩爆治理中的应用试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32 (增刊2): 3675- 3680.
LIU M S , WU X X , DING X L , et al. Application experiment of weak energy blasting technology at underground tunnel rock burst governance[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32 (S2): 3675- 3680.
11
许文祥, 张浩, 马鑫炎. 掏槽孔爆破作用下隧道掌子面应力传播与衰减规律研究[J]. 市政技术, 2024, 42 (2): 140-146, 154.
XU W X , ZHANG H , MA X Y . Study on stress propagation and attenuation law of tunnel cutting holes under blasting action[J]. Journal of Municipal Technology, 2024, 42 (2): 140-146, 154.
12
郭信山. 煤层超高压定点水力压裂防治冲击地压机理与试验研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2015.
GUO X S. Rockburst prevention mechanism of and experimental research on ultra-high pressure fixed-point hydraulic fracturing in coal seams[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), 2015. (in Chinese)
13
杨月, 潘一山, 罗浩, 等. 大直径煤层钻孔注水压裂防治冲击地压数值模拟[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 33 (4): 451- 455.
YANG Y , PAN Y S , LUO H , et al. Numerical simulation analysis of rockburst prevention by large diameter coal seam boreing water injection and fracturing[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University (Natural Science), 2014, 33 (4): 451- 455.
14
李见波, 陈学习, 王新梅. 煤层注水致工作面前方集中应力前移的机理分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2012, 40 (4): 56-59, 48.
LI J B , CHEN X X , WANG X M . Mechanism analysis on concentrated stress in front of mining face moving forward occurred by water injection in seam[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2012, 40 (4): 56-59, 48.
15
汪珂. 深埋隧道岩爆预测及防治技术现状综述[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41 (2): 212- 224.
WANG K . Overview of state-of-art of rockburst prediction and prevention techniques for deep-buried tunnels[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41 (2): 212- 224.
16
欧阳林, 张如九, 刘耀儒, 等. 深埋隧洞岩爆防控技术及典型工程应用现状综述[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39 (12): 161- 170.
OUYANG L , ZHANG R J , LIU Y R , et al. Review on rockburst prevention techniques and typical applications in deep tunnels[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2022, 39 (12): 161- 170.
17
商嘉胤. 秦岭输水隧洞岩爆塌腔段回填灌浆试验分析[J]. 水利建设与管理, 2023, 43 (8): 24- 29.
SHANG J Y . Experimental analysis of backfill grouting in rock burst cavity sections of Qinling water transfer tunnel[J]. Water Resources Development & Management, 2023, 43 (8): 24- 29.
18
ORTLEPP W D , STACEY T R . Rockburst mechanisms in tunnels and shafts[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1994, 9 (1): 59- 65.
19
徐向东. 隧道岩爆防治作用机理初探[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2008 (10): 36-39, 44.
XU X D . Preliminarily exploration on the function mechanism of prevention and treatment of rockbrust for tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2008 (10): 36-39, 44.
20
袁红辉. 钻孔卸压对煤岩力学性能及破坏特征的影响研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2022.
YUAN H H. Study on the effect of destressing boreholes on mechanical properties and failure characteristics of the coal and rock[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese)
21
贾传洋, 蒋宇静, 张学朋, 等. 大直径钻孔卸压机理室内及数值试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39 (6): 1115- 1122.
JIA C Y , JIANG Y J , ZHANG X P , et al. Laboratory and numerical experiments on pressure relief mechanism of large-diameter boreholes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39 (6): 1115- 1122.
22
HUANG B , GUO W Y , FU Z Y , et al. Experimental investigation of the influence of drilling arrangements on the mechanical behavior of rock models[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2018, 36 (4): 2425- 2436.
23
ZHAO T B , GUO W Y , YU F H , et al. Numerical investigation of influences of drilling arrangements on the mechanical behavior and energy evolution of coal models[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018, 2018, 3817397.
24
盖德成, 李东, 姜福兴, 等. 基于不同强度煤体的合理卸压钻孔间距研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2020, 37 (3): 578-585, 593.
GE D C , LI D , JIANG F X , et al. Reasonable pressure-relief borehole spacing in coal of different strength[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2020, 37 (3): 578-585, 593.
25
LIN P , WONG R H C , TANG C A . Experimental study of coalescence mechanisms and failure under uniaxial compression of granite containing multiple holes[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 77, 313- 327.
26
ZHANG S C , LI Y Y , SHEN B T , et al. Effective evaluation of pressure relief drilling for reducing rock bursts and its application in underground coal mines[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2019, 114, 7- 16.
27
王爱文, 高乾书, 潘一山. 煤层钻孔降倾-控变-耗能防冲机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42 (5): 1230- 1244.
WANG A W , GAO Q S , PAN Y S . Experimental study of rock burst prevention mechanism of bursting liability reduction-deformation control-energy dissipation based on drillhole in coal seam[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42 (5): 1230- 1244.
28
张连生. 承载围岩钻屑试验及钻孔卸压影响因素分析[D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2018.
ZHANG L S. Analysis of physical experiment of drill cuttings and factors affecting coal drilling relief[D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2018. (in Chinese)
29
HE Z C , GONG F Q , WU W X , et al. Experimental investigation of the mechanical behaviors and energy evolution characteristics of red sandstone specimens with holes under uniaxial compression[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2021, 80 (7): 5845- 5865.
30
刘加柱, 高永涛, 周喻, 等. 基于钻孔卸压的硬脆性紫砂岩岩爆局部解危试验研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2023, 43 (7): 79- 87.
LIU J Z , GAO Y T , ZHOU Y , et al. Experimental study on local risk reduction of rockburst in hard brittle purple sandstone based on borehole pressure relief[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2023, 43 (7): 79- 87.
31
金立平, 鲜学福. 煤层冲击倾向性试验研究及模糊综合评判[J]. 重庆大学学报, 1993, 16 (6): 114- 119.
JIN L P , XIAN X F . The study of outburst-proneness of coal seam via experiments and fuzzy comprehensive judgement[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 1993, 16 (6): 114- 119.
32
WANG S G , SHEN J R , MU P Y . Effect of natural crack distributions on coal failure process based on fluorescent epoxy impregnation method and phase-field FEM simulation[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2023, 82 (8): 304.

基金

清华大学水圈科学与水利水电工程全国重点实验室开放研究基金资助课题(sklhse-2023-D-03)
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52204094)
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52374206)

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载。
PDF(28981 KB)

审稿意见

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/