PDF(16098 KB)
PDF(16098 KB)
PDF(16098 KB)
消防救援飞地概念及识别方法
Concept and identification methods of fire rescue enclaves
科学高效地配置和调度消防救援资源是公共安全领域的重大需求。现有研究较少考虑实时路况对救援车辆行驶路线选择及行驶时间的影响, 且忽视了消防救援可覆盖范围的非连续分布特征。该研究发现了消防救援可覆盖范围非连续分布而导致的“救援飞地”现象, 并将其定义为“不与消防站直接毗连但依然在该消防站有效救援范围内的片区”, 进而开发了基于实时路况的精准识别救援飞地及其面积的算法。为验证该算法的可行性, 以CS-XX城市消防站为例, 抓取了3 818个兴趣点作为救援需求点, 并设置了49个评估时刻, 获取了187 082条有效数据, 进而计算出CS-XX消防站的实际可覆盖面积和救援飞地面积。结果表明该文提出的算法可有效识别救援飞地:CS-XX消防站的可覆盖面积受交通路况影响, 范围在1.83~4.57 km2之间; 该站可通过临近的过河桥梁覆盖对岸的部分区域, 形成了救援飞地; 救援飞地位置超出了传统面积确定法的7.00 km2圆形区域范围, 且其面积最大时可达到CS-XX消防站可覆盖面积的27.53%。建议将救援飞地作为消防救援责任辖区, 进而提高既有消防救援资源的利用效率。
Objective: The efficient allocation and dispatch of fire rescue resources are crucial to urban public safety. Traditional approaches assume continuous spatial distribution of fire service coverage areas and give less consideration to the impact of real-time traffic conditions on rescue route selection and response times. This study aims to introduce and define the concept of "rescue enclaves"—areas that, although not directly adjacent to fire stations, can be effectively covered by them—and proposes a method to identify and calculate these spatially discontinuous coverage areas. Methods: This study proposed a method for identifying and calculating spatially discontinuous coverage areas by mapping points to grids. Using this method: (1) fire truck travel times were calculated using real-time traffic data, (2) geographic coordinates were converted to universal transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates, (3) the region was divided into fine grids, (4) grid coverage status was determined, (5) transition grids were processed through neighborhood analysis, and (6) rescue enclaves were identified using a breadth-first search (BFS) algorithm. The CS-XX urban fire station in a Chinese city was selected as a case study to validate the method. In this case study, 3 818 points of interest were identified as rescue demand points across 49 evaluation periods in one day, generating 187 082 valid data samples. A target response time of 4 min was established, and an 80% reduction coefficient was applied to convert regular vehicle travel times to fire truck travel times. Results: The rescue enclave areas were successfully identified and calculated using the proposed method, through which the following key findings were revealed: (1) the dynamic coverage area of CS-XX was observed to vary from 1.83 to 4.57 km2, with the minimum fire service coverage of 1.83 km2 being recorded during the morning peak at 8:00, (2) the calculated coverage area trends were found to be consistent with the percentage of demand points accessible within 4 min, whereby the reliability of the method was validated, (3) critical rescue enclaves were identified near CS-XX, with enclave areas ranging from 0.25 to 1.12 km2, accounting for 12.20%-27.53% of the total coverage area, (4) the rescue enclaves were observed to occasionally extend beyond the traditional coverage of 7.00 km2 prescribed by standard area determination methods, and (5) coverage areas and rescue enclave areas were demonstrated to synchronously vary with traffic conditions, with traffic congestion leading to a significant reduction in their sizes. Conclusions: The proposed conceptualization of rescue enclaves is elucidated in this study, and their substantial manifestation within fire service coverage areas is substantiated through rigorous analysis. The rescue enclaves are systematically identified and quantified via an algorithmically driven methodological framework, and it is ascertained that such enclaves may comprise up to 27.53% of the coverage area of a fire station. If rescue enclaves are integrated into fire rescue jurisdiction planning protocols, they can substantially optimize resource allocation efficacy. While real-time traffic conditions and different flow efficiencies across heterogeneous route typologies are identified as the primary determinants of enclave formation, subsequent investigations are warranted to elucidate the precise mechanistic underpinnings and contributory factors governing rescue enclave emergence as well as to establish quantitative metrics for rescue passage efficiency across diverse route configurations.
fire rescue / rescue enclave / real-time traffic conditions / fire rescue jurisdiction
| 1 |
刘伟军, 李颖, 刘顶立, 等. 基于网络开放数据的区域消防救援总体有效覆盖率评估[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24 (2): 666- 674.
|
| 2 |
贺胜, 疏学明, 胡俊, 等. 基于消防大数据的电气火灾风险预测预警方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64 (3): 478- 491.
|
| 3 |
姚乐乐, 张杰. 城市建筑火灾防控的重要性及应急疏散探究: 评《城市建筑火灾防控理论与方法》[J]. 现代城市研究, 2024, 39 (3): 136.
|
| 4 |
黄佐春, 刘亮. 国家消防救援局: 2024年全国火灾主要有五个特点[EB/OL]. 央视网, 2025-01-24[2025-02-06]. https://news.cctv.com/2025/01/24/ARTIzxLWxFYy5ewOGCrrZPKV250124.shtml.
HUANG Z C, LIU L. National fire and rescue administration: Five main characteristics of national fire incidents in 2024[R]. CCTV News, 2025-01-24[2025-02-06]. https://news.cctv.com/2025/01/24/ARTIzxLWxFYy5ewOGCrrZPKV250124.shtml. (in Chinese)
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
周添, 姜洪, 刘顶立, 等. 基于区域视角的特长公路隧道消防救援可达性评价[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2024, 43 (9): 1322- 1328.
|
| 7 |
黄遥, 熊柳源, 刘顶立, 等. 顾及动态交通路况的高速公路消防救援可达性评估[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24 (9): 3573- 3580.
|
| 8 |
范晓亮, 彭朝鹏, 郑传潘, 等. 面向大规模交通网络的时空关联挖掘方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (9): 1317- 1325.
|
| 9 |
BISPO R, VIEIRA F G, YOKOCHI C, et al. Using spatial point process models, clustering and space partitioning to reconfigure fire stations layout[J/OL]. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-023-00455-z.
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
张经度, 李成悦. 顾及可达性的惠州市消防站选址优化研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2023, 42 (9): 1309- 1314.
|
| 12 |
曹跃, 李敬, 顾彧, 等. 基于拉格朗日松弛框架的消防站点选址优化方法[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2023, 42 (8): 1141- 1146.
|
| 13 |
吴国豪, 陈跃红, 史春伟, 等. 等时圈模型支持下消防站空间可达性分析: 以南京市为例[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2023, 39 (2): 17- 24.
|
| 14 |
姚永锋, 贾洪琛, 张琰, 等. 城市区域消防资源优化布局研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2023, 42 (2): 258- 262.
|
| 15 |
晏明海, 王伟, 郭凯, 等. 基于多目标层次覆盖的消防救援站布防技术[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2024, 43 (8): 1174- 1180.
|
| 16 |
张俊, 霍非舟, 张钦钦, 等. 考虑火灾风险与多级覆盖的城市消防站选址优化[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2024, 20 (8): 143- 149.
|
| 17 |
林俊雄, 江心, 朱建国, 等. GIS模型在城市消防站布局规划的应用研究[J]. 城市规划, 2018, 42 (5): 63- 68.
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
赵元新, 李虹, 宋亚婷, 等. 基于GIS网络分析的城市消防站布局与改进研究: 以武汉市为例[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2024, 14 (4): 83- 88.
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
霍非舟, 董格力, 李墨潇, 等. 考虑需求等级与距离损失联动消防站选址研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32 (3): 183- 193.
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
付元坤, 张钰. 城区段高速公路市政化改造总体设计理念研究[J]. 中外公路, 2024, 44 (5): 259- 268.
|
| 30 |
刘顶立, 李颖, 徐志胜, 等. 车道车型分布差异对隧道疏散时间的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64 (6): 1007- 1015.
|
| 31 |
付秀琪, 黄金辉. 多种软件在南半球进行UTM投影的效果分析: 以肯尼亚某测区为例[J]. 勘察科学技术, 2020 (3): 14-17, 27.
|
| 32 |
田逢时, 孙占辉, 郑昕, 等. 城市消防警情的空间异质性及影响因素[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (6): 888- 899.
|
| 33 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |