新疆绿洲棉田盐分及作物生长对灌溉方式的响应

胡宏昌; 张治; 田富强; 杨鹏举; 倪广恒; 姚新华

doi:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2016.24.006

PDF(1550 KB)

清华大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (4) : 373-380. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2016.24.006

水利水电工程

新疆绿洲棉田盐分及作物生长对灌溉方式的响应

胡宏昌¹, 张治¹, 田富强¹, 杨鹏举¹, 倪广恒¹, 姚新华²

作者信息 +

Response of soil salinity and crop growth to irrigation methods in Xinjiang

HU Hongchang¹, ZHANG Zhi¹, TIAN Fuqiang¹, YANG Pengju¹, NI Guangheng¹, YAO Xinhua²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

干旱地区的水资源短缺使得膜下滴灌逐渐取代大水漫灌,在新疆及中国北方地区得到大面积推广应用。为研究灌溉方式转变后的土壤盐分动态及对作物生长和产量的影响,于2011年和2012年开展了棉田膜下滴灌和漫灌对比实验。基于6900个土壤样本的水、盐结果及相关的作物观测数据,结果表明:膜下滴灌下,50 cm土壤深度内盐分在出苗期和灌溉期升高约25%,呈现出累积趋势;而漫灌条件下,灌溉期盐分得到充分淋洗,降低明显;滴灌盐分的入渗深度约为50 cm,而漫灌则达到150 cm以上。作为对土壤水盐分布改变的响应,膜下滴灌根系更为发达,滴灌条件下棉花根系总量是漫灌条件下的1.6倍;膜下滴灌和漫灌的水分利用效率(WUE)分别是0.68 kg/m³和0.22 kg/m³。膜下滴灌实现了良好的经济和环境效益,但在长期应用条件下需注意防治淋洗水量不足引发的盐碱化风险。

Abstract

Mulched drip irrigation has gradually replaced flood irrigation and is now widely used in Xinjiang. This study explores the effects of the irrigation methods on the soil salt dynamics and the crop growth using experiments conducted from 2011 to 2012 in a cotton field with mulched drip and flood irrigation systems. The 6 900 samples was observed. The results show that the salinity increased during the growth period by 25% within the top 50 cm of the soil depth with mulched drip irrigation. With flood irrigation, the soil salinity markably decreased due to the large amount of irrigation water. The salt leaching depth was 50 cm for drip irrigation, but more than 150 cm for flood irrigation. The root density with drip irrigation was 1.6 times that of flood irrigation. The water use efficiency was 0.68 kg/m³ with mulched drip irrigation and 0.22 kg/m³ with flood irrigation. Thus, the mulched drip irrigation significantly enhances the water use efficiency; however, the salinization risk induced by the lack of leaching water must also be addressed.

导出引用

胡宏昌, 张治, 田富强, 杨鹏举, 倪广恒, 姚新华. 新疆绿洲棉田盐分及作物生长对灌溉方式的响应[J]. 清华大学学报（自然科学版）. 2016, 56(4): 373-380 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2016.24.006

HU Hongchang, ZHANG Zhi, TIAN Fuqiang, YANG Pengju, NI Guangheng, YAO Xinhua. Response of soil salinity and crop growth to irrigation methods in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2016, 56(4): 373-380 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2016.24.006

中图分类号： TV93

参考文献

[1] 雷志栋, 胡和平, 杨诗秀, 等. 塔里木盆地绿洲耗水分析[J]. 水利学报, 2006, 37(12):1470-1475.LEI Zhidong, HU Heping, YANG Shixiu, et al. Analysis on water consumption in oases of the Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37(12):1470-1475.(in Chinese)
[2] 王少丽, 杨继富, 李杰, 等. 新疆盐渍化灌区水盐平衡现状及对策[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2006(4):12-15.WANG Shaoli, YANG Jifu, LI Jie, et al. Status and countermeasure study on water-salt balance of irrigation district with salinization in Xinjiang Province[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2006(4):12-15. (in Chinese)
[3] 戴婷婷, 张展羽, 邵光成. 膜下滴灌技术及其发展趋势分析[J]. 节水灌溉, 2007(2):43-44.DAI Tingting, ZHANG Zhanyu, SHAO Guangcheng. The technology of mulched drip irrigation and developing trend[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2007(2):43-44. (in Chinese)
[4] 马英杰, 何继武, 洪明, 等. 新疆膜下滴灌技术发展过程及趋势分析[J]. 节水灌溉, 2010(12):87-89.MA Yingjie, HE Jiwu, HONG Ming, et al. The analysis of process and trend of mulched drip irrigation in Xinjiang[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2010(12):87-89. (in Chinese)
[5] 王全九, 王文焰, 吕殿青, 等. 膜下滴灌盐碱地水盐运移特征研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2000, 16(4):54-57.WANG Quanjiu, WANG Wenyan, LU Dianqing, et al. Water and salt transport features for salt-effected soil through drip irrigation under film[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2000, 16(4):54-57. (in Chinese)
[6] HU Hongchang, TIAN Fuqiang, HU Heping. Soil particle size distribution and its relationship with soil water and salt under mulched drip irrigation in Xinjiang Province of China[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(6):1568-1574.
[7] ZHANG Zhi, HU Hongchang, TIAN Fuqiang, et al. Soil salt distribution under mulched drip irrigation in an arid area of northwestern China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2014, 104:23-33.
[8] Skaggs T H, van Genuchten M T, Shouse P J, et al. Macroscopic approaches to root water uptake as a function of water and salinity stress[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 86(1-2):140-149.
[9] Ibragimov N, Evett S R, Esanbekov Y, et al. Water use efficiency of irrigated cotton in Uzbekistan under drip and furrow irrigation[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2007, 90(1-2):112-120.
[10] Rajak D, Manjunatha M V, Rajkumar G R, et al. Comparative effects of drip and furrow irrigation on the yield and water productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in a saline and waterlogged vertisol[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 83(1-2):30-36.
[11] Cetin O, Bilgel L. Effects of different irrigation methods on shedding and yield of cotton[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2002, 54(1):1-15.
[12] 余根坚, 黄介生, 高占义. 基于HYDRUS模型不同灌水模式下土壤水盐运移模拟[J]. 水利学报, 2013, 44(7):826-834.YU Genjian, HUANG Jiesheng, GAO Zhanyi. Study on water and salt transportation of different irrigation modes by the simulation of HYDRUS model[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2013, 44(7):826-834. (in Chinese)
[13] Scanlon B R, Gates J B, Reedy R C, et al. Effects of irrigated agroecosystems:2. Quanlity of soil water and groundwater in the southern High Plains, Texas[J]. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(9):1-14.
[14] CHEN Weiping, HOU Zhennan, WU Laosheng, et al. Evaluating salinity distribution in soil irrigated with saline water in arid regions of northwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(12):2001-2008.
[15] WANG Ruoshui, KANG Yaohu, WAN Shuqin, et al. Salt distribution and the growth of cotton under different drip irrigation regimes in a saline area[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 100(1):58-69.
[16] ZHENG Zhong, ZHANG Fengrong, MA Fuyu, et al. Spatio-temporal changes in soil salinity in a drip-irrigated field[J]. Geoderma, 2009, 149(3-4):243-248.
[17] KANG Yaohu, CHEN Ming, WAN Shuqin. Effects of drip irrigation with saline water on waxy maize (Zea mays L. var. ceratina Kulesh) in North China Plain[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(9):1303-1309.
[18] 刘新永, 田长彦. 棉花膜下滴灌盐分动态及平衡研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(6):84-87.LIU Xinyong, TIAN Changyan. Study on dynamic and balance of salt for cotton under plastic mulch in south Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2005, 19(6):84-87. (in Chinese)
[19] 杨鹏年, 董新光, 魏光辉, 等. 干旱区膜下滴灌下土壤积盐特征研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(2):360-363.YANG Pengnian, DONG Xinguang, WEI Guanghui, et al. Characteristics of salt deposition under drip irrigation beneath plastic film in arid area[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011, 42(2):360-363. (in Chinese)
[20] TANG Lisong, LI Yan, ZHANG Jianhua. Partial rootzone irrigation increases water use efficiency, maintains yield and enhances economic profit of cotton in arid area[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(10):1527-1533.
[21] 高龙, 田富强, 倪广恒, 等. 膜下滴灌棉田土壤水盐分布特征及灌溉制度试验研究[J]. 水利学报, 2010, 41(12):1483-1490. GAO Long, TIAN Fuqiang, NI Guangheng, et al. Experimental study on soil water-salt movement and irrigation scheduling for cotton under mulched drip irrigation condition[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 41(12):1483-1490. (in Chinese)
[22] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56[R]. Rome, Italy:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998.
[23] Richards L A. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils[R]. Washington DC, USA:United States Salinity Laboratory, 1954.
[24] DOU Chaoyin, KANG Yaohu, WAN Shuqin, et al. Soil salinity changes under cropping with Lycium barbarum L. and irrigation with saline-sodic water[J]. Pedosphere, 2011, 21(4):539-548.
[25] 张蔚榛, 张瑜芳. 对灌区水盐平衡和控制土壤盐渍化的一些认识[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2003(8):13-18.ZHANG Weizhen, ZHANG Yufang. Knowledge of water-and-salt balance and control of soil saline-and-water-logging in irrigation district[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2003(8):13-18. (in Chinese)
[26] 王允喜, 李明思, 蓝明菊. 膜下滴灌土壤湿润区对田间棉花根系分布及植株生长的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(8):31-38.WANG Yunxi, LI Mingsi, LAN Mingju. Effect of soil wetting pattern on cotton-root distribution and plant growth under plastic mulched drip irrigation in field[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(8):31-38. (in Chinese)
[27] 蔡焕杰, 邵光成, 张振华. 荒漠气候区膜下滴灌棉花需水量和灌溉制度的试验研究[J]. 水利学报, 2002(11):119-123. CAI Huanjie, SHAO Guangcheng, ZHANG Zhenhua. Water demand and irrigation scheduling of drip irrigation for cotton under plastic mulch[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002(11):119-123. (in Chinese)
[28] ZHANG Zhi, TIAN Fuqiang, HU Hongchang, et al. A comparison of methods for determining field evapotranspiration:Photosynthesis system, sap flow, and eddy covariance[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2014, 108:1053-1072.
[29] Dagdelen N, Basal H, Yilmaz E, et al. Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2009, 96(1):111-120.
[30] HU Xiaotang, CHEN Hu, WANG Jing, et al. Effects of soil water content on cotton root growth and distribution under mulched drip irrigation[J]. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2009, 8(6):709-716.