Anomaly gamma spectra detection based on principal component analysis and the Mahalanobis distance

ZHAO Ri, LIU Liye, LI Junli

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2017, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (8) : 826-831.

PDF(1195 KB)
PDF(1195 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2017, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (8) : 826-831. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.22.045
ENGINEERING PHYSICS

Anomaly gamma spectra detection based on principal component analysis and the Mahalanobis distance

  • {{article.zuoZhe_EN}}
Author information +
History +

Abstract

A principal component analysis (PCA) and Mahalanobis distance (MD) based anomaly gamma spectra detection method is developed to improve the reliability of radiation scanning of goods and human bodies. This method first extracts all the principal components (PCs) of large numbers of benign gamma spectra by PCA and selects several largest PCs to form a subspace. The algorithm then projects the benign, unknown gamma spectra to this subspace, calculates their MDs, and completes the anomaly detection by comparing these MDs. Monte Carlo simulations and actual tests show that the method is reliable and effective when the subspace has more than 99% of the original information.

Key words

gamma spectra / anomaly detection / artificial intelligence / principal component analysis / Mahalanobis distance

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHAO Ri, LIU Liye, LI Junli. Anomaly gamma spectra detection based on principal component analysis and the Mahalanobis distance[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2017, 57(8): 826-831 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2017.22.045

References

[1] Canberra Industries. Genie 2000 Customization Tools Manual[R]. Meriden, CT:Canberra Industries, 2006:300-310. [2] Advanced Measurement Technology. GammaVision V6 Users Manual[R]. Oak Ridge, TN:Advanced Measurement Technology, 2006:180-185. [3] Boardman D, Reinhard M, Flynn A. Principal component analysis of gamma-ray spectra for radiation portal monitors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2012, 59(1):154-161. [4] Runkle R, Tardiff F, Anderson K, et al. Analysis of spectroscopic radiation portal monitor data using principal components analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2006, 53(3):1418-1425. [5] Dragovic S, Onjia A. Classification of soil samples according to their geographic origin using gamma-ray spectrometry and principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2006, 89:150-158. [6] Heggemanna T, Welpa G, Amelung W, et al. Proximal gamma-ray spectrometry for site-independent in situ prediction of soil texture on ten heterogeneous fields in Germany using support vector machines[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2017, 168:99-109. [7] Varley A, Tyler A, Smith L, et al. Mapping the spatial distribution and activity of <sup>226</sup>Ra at legacy sites through machine learning interpretation of gamma-ray spectrometry data[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 545:654-661. [8] Wang C L, Funk L, Riedel R, et al. Improved neutron-gamma discrimination for a <sup>3</sup>He neutron detector using subspace learning method[J]. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 2017, 853:27-35. [9] Hata H, Yokoyama K, Ishimori Y, et al. Application of support vector machine to rapid classification of uranium waste drums using low-resolution γ-ray spectra[J]. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 2015, 104:143-146. [10] 杨杨. 基于模糊聚类的地层岩性测井识别研究与配套软件研制[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2014.YANG Yang. Research and Development of Formation Lithology Logging Identification and Matching Software Based on Fuzzy Clustering[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2014. (in Chinese) [11] 周志华. 机器学习[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2016.ZHOU Zhihua. Machine Learning[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2016. (in Chinese) [12] Han J, Kamber M, Pei J. Data Mining:Concepts Techniques[M]. Singapore:Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd, 2012.
PDF(1195 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/