Large-scale infrastructure program management from owners' perspective

Qian XIONG, Jiantong ZHANG, Liang LIU, Tiejun LIU, Wenzhe TANG

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (1) : 80-91.

PDF(4747 KB)
PDF(4747 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (1) : 80-91. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.22.050
Special Section: Construction Management

Large-scale infrastructure program management from owners' perspective

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Large-scale infrastructure is characterized by vast scale, technical complexity, multiple stakeholders, and high risk. Enhancing the efficiency of program management in the context of large-scale infrastructure is crucial for economic and social development in China. Owners are important in the construction of large-scale infrastructure. However, the existing research lacks a comprehensive understanding of key factors involved in program management from owners' perspective and has not systematically explored the underlying mechanisms. This study aims to establish a management capability index system, particularly for program management in the context of large-scale infrastructure from the owners' perspective, and construct and validate a theoretical model for such management activities. Methods: This study adopted a hybrid approach combining field investigations, surveys, and case studies, focusing on the Shenzhen Bay Super Headquarters Base—a large-scale infrastructure program encompassing 17 projects. During field investigations, qualitative data were gathered based on stakeholders' management needs and challenges associated with large-scale infrastructure program management. Based on an extensive literature review, a questionnaire was designed and distributed to the management and technical personnel operating within the program. This survey generated 407 valid responses, thus providing a robust dataset. The quantitative analysis undertaken employed word frequency and social network analysis to identify primary management demands. Sample mean estimation was employed to gain insights into the current state of program management. Hierarchical cluster analysis was subsequently employed to delineate key owner capabilities critical to effective program management. The proposed theoretical model was tested via partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to validate the relationships among owners' program-management capabilities, external program conditions, partnership, resource allocation, and program performance. The reliability and validity of the model were rigorously tested, and the model's path coefficients, explanatory power, and predictive power were also assessed. Results: Textual analysis results identified a pressing requirement for owners to coordinate the design, procurement, and construction stages of projects to optimize the overall effectiveness of program management. Hierarchy cluster analysis results revealed three key program-management capabilities of owners: construction management, dynamic, and information technology capabilities. The PLS-SEM analysis results validated the proposed model, highlighting the notable positive effects of the owners' program-management capabilities and external program conditions on program performance. Specifically, two important paths were identified: (1) owners' program-management capabilities → partnership → (resource allocation) → program performance and (2) external program conditions → partnership→ (resource allocation) → program performance. Conclusions: The findings of this study offer theoretical insights and practical guidance for enhancing program management in the context of large-scale infrastructure. The findings confirm that the owners are critical stakeholders in managing large-scale infrastructure programs. Comprehensive owners' program-management capabilities can considerably enhance program performance by cultivating partnerships between stakeholders and improving resource allocation. Further, this study highlights the important influence of external program conditions on program outcomes, emphasizing the need for owners to adapt to dynamic external environments. Moreover, practical recommendations are provided for managing large-scale infrastructure programs from owners' perspective, suggesting that owners should systematically identify and address constraints within the program's lifecycle, enhance their dynamic capabilities to effectively adapt to complex external conditions, foster collaborative relationships with diverse stakeholders, and facilitate the integration of advanced information technologies within program management.

Key words

large-scale infrastructure / program management / owner / dynamic capability / partnership / resource allocation

Cite this article

Download Citations
Qian XIONG , Jiantong ZHANG , Liang LIU , et al . Large-scale infrastructure program management from owners' perspective[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(1): 80-91 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.22.050

References

1
HU Y , CHAN A P C , LE Y , et al. Developing a program organization performance index for delivering construction megaprojects in China: Fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2016, 32 (4): 05016007.
2
张尚武, 潘鑫. 新时期我国跨区域重大基础设施规划建设的战略思考[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2021 (2): 38- 44.
ZHANG S W , PAN X . Strategic thinking on the planning and development of large trans-regional in frastructure in the new era[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2021 (2): 38- 44.
3
MARTINSUO M , HOVERFÄLT P . Change program management: Toward a capability for managing value-oriented, integrated multi-project change in its context[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2018, 36 (1): 134- 146.
4
LI Y K , LU Y J , CUI Q B , et al. Organizational behavior in megaprojects: Integrative review and directions for future research[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2019, 35 (4): 04019009.
5
RAWAI N M , FATHI M S , ABEDI M . A review of project and programme management reference models for the construction industry[J]. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013, 2 (4A): 17- 20.
6
HU Y , CHAN A P C , LE Y . Understanding the determinants of program organization for construction megaproject success: Case study of the Shanghai Expo construction[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2014, 31 (5): 05014019.
7
WINCH G , LEIRINGER R . Owner project capabilities for infrastructure development: A review and development of the "strong owner" concept[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2016, 34 (2): 271- 281.
8
MORRIS P , HOUGH G . The anatomy of major projects: A study of the reality of project management[M]. Chichester: Wiley, 1987.
9
WANG S L , TANG W Z , LI Y X . Relationship between owners' capabilities and project performance on development of hydropower projects in China[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013, 139 (9): 1168- 1178.
10
刘扬, 唐文哲, 王运宏, 等. 水利工程业主设计管理能力对设计绩效的影响机理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (2): 242- 254.
LIU Y , TANG W Z , WANG Y H , et al. Influence of clients' design management capability on the design performance of water conservancy projects[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2023, 63 (2): 242- 254.
11
LI Y L , XIANG P C , CHAN P W , et al. Examining owners' and contractors' motivations to participate in collaborative risk management of mega infrastructure projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2024, 42 (5): 102614.
12
MITEREV M , ENGWALL M , JERBRANT A . Exploring program management competences for various program types[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2016, 34 (3): 545- 557.
13
P MI . A guide to the project management body of knowledge and the standard for project management[M]. 7th ed Newtown Square: Project Management Institute, 2021.
14
P MI . The standard for program management[M]. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute, 2017.
15
RIJKE J , VAN HERK S , ZEVENBERGEN C , et al. Adaptive programme management through a balanced performance/strategy oriented focus[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2014, 32 (7): 1197- 1209.
16
YAN H Y , ELZARKA H , GAO C , et al. Critical success criteria for programs in China: Construction companies' perspectives[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2019, 35 (1): 04018048.
17
NIKOLAOS Z . Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition[J]. Perspectives on Politics, 2004, 2 (3): 609- 610.
18
TOOR S R , OGUNLANA S O . Beyond the "iron triangle": Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2010, 28 (3): 228- 236.
19
LIU B S , HUO T F , SHEN Q P , et al. Which owner characteristics are key factors affecting project delivery system decision making? Empirical analysis based on the rough set theory[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2015, 31 (4): 05014018.
20
TEECE D , PETERAF M , LEIH S . Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy[J]. California Management Review, 2016, 58 (4): 13- 35.
21
ZUO J , ZHAO X B , NGUYEN Q B M , et al. Soft skills of construction project management professionals and project success factors: A structural equation model[J]. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2018, 25 (3): 425- 442.
22
LI Q , CHONG H Y , LEE C Y , et al. BIM's formal and informal collaborative networks in traditional procurement: Insights from the construction phase of a hospital case study[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2021, 37 (6): 05021008.
23
ABOU-IBRAHIM H , HAMZEH F . Understanding stakeholders' impact on design workflow dynamics using agent-based modeling[J]. Automation in Construction, 2022, 138, 104254.
24
MUSA M M , AMIRUDIN R B , SOFIELD T , et al. Influence of external environmental factors on the success of public housing projects in developing countries[J]. Construction Economics and Building, 2015, 15 (4): 30- 44.
25
DIYAGAMA D , VICTAR H C , WAIDYASEKARA A S , et al. Managing external stakeholders influences in mega construction projects[J]. International Journal of Construction Management, 2024, 24 (8): 809- 819.
26
娄长圣, 唐文哲, 王腾飞. 水利工程风险管理: 以宁夏水利工程为例[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (2): 233- 241.
LOU C S , TANG W Z , WANG T F . Risk management of water conservancy projects: Taking water conservancy projects in Ningxia as an example[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2023, 63 (2): 233- 241.
27
LOVE P E D , AHIAGA-DAGBUI D D , SMITH S D , et al. Cost profiling of water infrastructure projects[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2018, 24 (4): 04018023.
28
DEL PUERTO C L , SHANE J S . Keys to success in megaproject management in Mexico and the United States: Case study[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2014, 140 (4): B5013001.
29
TANG W Z , DUFFIELD C F , YOUNG D M . Partnering mechanism in construction: An empirical study on the Chinese construction industry[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2006, 132 (3): 217- 229.
30
WANG S L , SHEN W X , TANG W Z , et al. Understanding the social network of stakeholders in hydropower project development: An owners' view[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 132, 326- 334.
31
MOK K Y , SHEN G Q , YANG J . Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2015, 33 (2): 446- 457.
32
SHEN W X , TANG W Z , WANG Y H , et al. Managing interfaces in large-scale projects: The roles of formal governance and partnering[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2021, 147 (7): 04021064.
33
ZHANG X Y , LIU M Q , LE Y , et al. Deconstructing organizational capabilities of megaproject owners: Dimensions and levels[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2023, 149 (7): 04023055.
34
LI Y K , LU Y J , MA L , et al. Evolutionary governance for mega-event projects (Meps): A case study of the World Expo 2010 in China[J]. Project Management Journal, 2018, 49 (1): 57- 78.
35
包琛, 汪云海. 词云可视化综述[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2021, 33 (4): 532- 544.
BAO C , WANG Y H . A survey of word cloud visualization[J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2021, 33 (4): 532- 544.
36
朱庆华, 李亮. 社会网络分析法及其在情报学中的应用[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2008 (2): 179-183, 174..
ZHU Q H , LI L . Social network analysis method & its application in information science[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2008 (2): 179-183, 174..
37
孙义豪, 李秋燕, 丁岩, 等. 基于主成分分析及系统聚类的县域电网综合评价方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2017, 45 (8): 30- 36.
SUN Y H , LI Q Y , DING Y , et al. County power grid evaluation system based on principal component analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2017, 45 (8): 30- 36.
38
公丽艳, 孟宪军, 刘乃侨, 等. 基于主成分与聚类分析的苹果加工品质评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30 (13): 276- 285.
GONG L Y , MENG X J , LIU N Q , et al. Evaluation of apple quality based on principal component and hierarchical cluster analysis[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30 (13): 276- 285.
39
熊谦, 唐文哲, 王忠静. 雄安新区水资源一体化管理要素分析与体系构建[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (2): 255- 263.
XIONG Q , TANG W Z , WANG Z J . Factor analysis and system construction of integrated water resource management in the Xiong'an New Area[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2023, 63 (2): 255- 263.
40
HOYLE R H . Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications[M]. London: Sage Publications, 1995.
41
HAIR J F , RISHER J J , SARSTEDT M , et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM[J]. European Business Review, 2019, 31 (1): 2- 24.
42
HAIR J F , SARSTEDT M , RINGLE C M , et al. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2012, 40 (3): 414- 433.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(4747 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/