PDF(2079 KB)
Risk management of clean energy projects from the dual perspectives of digitalization and partnering
Changsheng LOU, Hua MAO, Honglin XIE, Wenzhe TANG
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (1) : 92-103.
PDF(2079 KB)
PDF(2079 KB)
Risk management of clean energy projects from the dual perspectives of digitalization and partnering
Objective: In the past years, the Chinese government has promoted the implementation of clean energy projects to accelerate the transition to green and low-carbon energy in accordance with its "Dual Carbon" target. Clean energy projects involve complex technical, socioeconomic, and environmental risks that cover all stages of engineering, procurement, construction, and operation. Thus, enhancing risk management is essential for effectively mitigating various risks and improving project performance. Studies on the risk management of clean energy projects often focus on specific perspectives and lack systematic investigations of related management issues of clean energy projects. Given the importance of stakeholder collaboration and the application of digital technology in risk management for clean energy projects, this study constructs and empirically validates a conceptual risk management model from the dual perspectives of digitalization and partnering. Methods: A mixed-method design was adopted, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to conduct an empirical investigation. To collect quantitative data, a risk management survey questionnaire for clean energy projects was designed based on a literature review and expert interviews and distributed to management and technical personnel from various clean energy projects. Qualitative data were then gathered through expert interviews, field studies, and the collection of project materials, including digital management materials, engineering contracts, risk management cases, and risk management documents. This study also employed structural equation modeling to verify the relationships between variables in the risk management impact relationship model, including knowledge management, project digitization, partnering, participant capability, project performance, and risk management. The questionnaire survey results were analyzed to assess the current state of various management factors, thus providing insights into clean energy project management and identifying key risk management factors. Results: The results obtained after validating the conceptual risk management impact relationship model reveal that project digitization can directly influence risk management and can also indirectly enhance risk management by promoting knowledge management and improving participant capability. Furthermore, partnering can improve risk management by strengthening enterprise capabilities and facilitating knowledge management. Finally, risk management has a significant positive effect on project performance. Conclusions: This study proposes and validates a risk management impact relationship model for clean energy projects and reveals the mechanisms influencing risk management from the perspectives of digitization and partnering. The findings indicate that project digitization, partnering, knowledge management, participant capability, and risk management collectively have a significant impact on project performance. Furthermore, this study establishes a measurement indicator system for factors related to clean energy project risk management, facilitating systematic analysis of the current status, obstacles, and causes of these factors. The outcomes of our industry survey also reveal key aspects that should be prioritized in current risk management efforts. From our findings, several risk management strategies for clean energy projects are proposed, including the establishment of a systematic risk management system to strengthen comprehensive risk management, acceleration of the digital transformation of projects to enhance intelligent risk management, improvement of the partnering among project participants to promote collaborative risk management, implementation of a comprehensive knowledge management system to create a learning organization, and enhancement of participant capability to continuously improve project risk management.
risk management / clean energy project / knowledge management / digital management / partnering
| 1 |
苑全治. 气候变化下中国陆地生态系统的脆弱性研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2011.
YUAN Q Z. Study on the vulnerability of China's terrestrial ecosystems under climate change[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2011. (in Chinese)
|
| 2 |
舒印彪, 张丽英, 张运洲, 等. 我国电力碳达峰、碳中和路径研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2021, 23 (6): 1- 14.
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
唐文哲, 强茂山, 陆佑楣, 等. 基于伙伴关系的项目风险管理研究[J]. 水力发电, 2006, 32 (7): 1- 4.
|
| 14 |
张亚莉, 杨乃定. 知识管理视角下的项目风险管理过程与集成[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2006, 11 (6): 110- 113.
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
MAQSOOD T. The role of knowledge management in supporting innovation and learning in construction [M/OL]. Melbourne: RMIT University, 2006[2024-07-30]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267719340_The_Role_of_Knowledge_Management_in_Supporting_Innovation_and_Learning_in_Construction.
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
韩春民, 李占巧, 解汉瑞. 建设单位在工程项目中的风险管理[J]. 建筑经济, 2006 (10): 28- 30.
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
楼海军, 王亦斌. 基于风险数据库的工程项目风险管理研究[J]. 当代经济, 2010 (21): 120- 123.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
程少川, 詹欣. 以个人知识管理为基础的学科交叉创新环境构建问题研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2009, 27 (3): 407- 410.
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
张国兴, 王宇, 许彬, 等. BIM技术在公路隧道工程施工进度风险管理中的应用[J]. 河北建筑工程学院学报, 2023, 41 (1): 188-191, 219.
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
毛斯丽, 肖明, 李格. 供应链关系与企业数字化转型: 基于动机与能力双重视角的分析[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2024, 45 (2): 98- 124.
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |