Research on the combustion rate of typical civil aircraft cabin interior wall materials at low ambient pressures

Xuhong JIA, Xiaoyu ZHANG, Shangpei DAI, Wei TIAN, Sijie DING, Jing TANG, Xinhua ZHU

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (4) : 795-804.

PDF(9202 KB)
PDF(9202 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (4) : 795-804. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.27.022
Fire in Aircraft

Research on the combustion rate of typical civil aircraft cabin interior wall materials at low ambient pressures

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: In aviation transportation, which is characterized by low-pressure environments, aircraft fires pose an unpredictable threat. The interior wall materials of civil transport aircraft are predominantly composed of composite materials. The Federal Aviation Administration of the United States and the Civil Aviation Administration of China require experimental validation of their fire-resistant properties. This study aims to address the current research gap by investigating the development patterns of aircraft fires under low-pressure conditions. Specifically, this study examines the combustion rates of interior wall materials in civil aircraft in multiple-pressure environments. The goal is to detect and prevent aircraft fires under low-pressure conditions at the earliest opportunity. Methods: This study investigates the sandwich structure panel material (Panel A) and the laminated panel material (Panel B) used in Airbus aircraft. Panel A comprises the upper and lower layers of resin-based substrates, an aramid honeycomb core intermediate layer, and an adhesive. Panel B is composed of resin-based glass fiber-reinforced laminate. The study is conducted using a low-pressure combustion chamber research facility in Guanghan, Sichuan (96 kPa), and Kangding, Sichuan (61 kPa). Combustion rates and flame phenomena of cabin wall panel materials are examined at 40, 50, 61, 70, 80, and 96 kPa pressure levels. A combustion rate model is applied to adjust the effect of pressure on the combustion rate of cabin wall panel materials. The heat release of the cabin wall panel materials is determined using a cone calorimeter, which enables the assessment of heat release in various pressure environments. Finally, following relevant regulations and standards, a fire penetration resistance test apparatus is constructed to investigate the fire penetration resistance characteristics of cabin wall panel materials under different pressure conditions. Results: The relationship between the combustion rate and pressure for glass fiber/phenolic resin sandwich panels and glass fiber/phenolic resin laminated panels is approximately and, respectively. According to the fire-base dimensions, the combustion rate-pressure models are and, respectively. The peak heat release rates of aircraft interior wall panels in low-pressure environments are lower than those in atmospheric-pressure environments. When the air pressure drops from 96 kPa to 40 kPa, the peak heat release rate of glass fiber/phenolic resin sandwich and glass fiber/phenolic resin sandwich decreased by about 40.97% and 43.85%, Similarly, compared with atmospheric-pressure environments total heat release significantly decreases under low pressure by 14.20% and 24.71%, respectively. The flame color of aircraft interior wall panel materials shifts from bright yellow at atmospheric pressure to a lower degree of brightness under low pressure. Additionally, the flame height significantly decreases under low pressure compared with the height under atmospheric pressure, with glass fiber/phenolic resin sandwich panels and glass fiber/phenolic resin laminated panels experiencing a reduction of approximately 10.9% and 11.6%, respectively, compared with atmospheric pressure. Research on the fire penetration resistance of aircraft cabin interior wall panels reveals that the char layer of sandwich panel materials becomes more pronounced under low pressure than under atmospheric pressure, indicating increased fire resistance. Conversely, laminated panel materials are minimally affected by pressure. Conclusions: According to the above research findings, pressure significantly affects the fire characteristics of cabin wall panel materials. This study provides direct relevance to the practical needs of aircraft fire prevention and control, offering data support for aircraft fire prevention efforts.

Key words

low pressure / aircraft wall panels / glass fiber/phenolic resin / combustion characteristics

Cite this article

Download Citations
Xuhong JIA , Xiaoyu ZHANG , Shangpei DAI , et al . Research on the combustion rate of typical civil aircraft cabin interior wall materials at low ambient pressures[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(4): 795-804 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.27.022

References

1
RIGHI H, MADABHUSHI A, Ouidadi H, et al. Post-Crash Fire Forensic Analysis on Aerospace Composites-Literature Review[R]. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 2020.
2
WANG J , TAO Z , YANG R , et al. A review of aircraft fire accident investigation techniques: Research, process, and cases[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2023, 153, 107558.
3
杨雪梅. 酚醛阻燃复合材料在民用飞机上的应用[J]. 工程与试验, 2015, 55 (3): 30-34, 103.
YANG X M . Application of flame retardant phenolic composite to civil aircraft[J]. Engineering & Test, 2015, 55 (3): 30-34, 103.
4
Federal Aviation Administration. Department of transportation federal aviation administration regulations with fire: FAR 25.855[S]. Washington: Federal Aviation Administration, 2014.
5
中国民用航空局政策法规司. 中国民用航空规章第25部运输类飞机适航标准: CCAR 25-R4[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2011.
Department of Policies and Regulations, Civil Aviation Administration of China. Civil aviation regulations of China: Part 25: Airworthiness standards for transport aircraft: CCAR 25-R4[S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2011(in Chinese).
6
BABRAUSKAS V . Estimating large pool fire burning rates[J]. Fire Technology, 1983, 19 (4): 251- 261.
7
IQBAL N, SALLEY M H. Fire dynamics tools (FDTs) quantitative fire hazard analysis methods for the U.S. nuclear regulatory commission fire protection inspection program[S]. Washington: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2004.
8
任细运. 阻燃环氧树脂的燃烧特性及其潜在火灾危险性评价的研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2021.
REN X Y. Study on combustion behaviors and potential fire hazards assessment of flame retardant epoxy resins[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2021. (in Chinese)
9
陈少杰, 徐艳英, 王志, 等. 低热通量下碳纤维/环氧树脂层合板的燃烧特性[J]. 材料研究学报, 2020, 34 (12): 933- 938.
CHEN S J , XU Y Y , WANG Z , et al. Combustion characteristics of carbon fiber/epoxy laminates at low heat flux[J]. Chinese Journal of Materials Research, 2020, 34 (12): 933- 938.
10
WIESER D , JAUCH P , WILLI U . The influence of high altitude on fire detector test fires[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 1997, 29 (2-3): 195- 204.
11
DE RIS J , KANURY A M , YUEN M C . Pressure modeling of fires[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1973, 14 (1): 1033- 1044.
12
DE RIS J L , WU P K , HESKESTAD G . Radiation fire modeling[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2000, 28 (2): 2751- 2759.
13
KANURY A M . Modeling of pool fires with a variety of polymers[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1975, 15 (1): 193- 202.
14
ALPERT R L . Pressure modeling of transient crib fires[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1977, 15 (1-2): 11- 20.
15
ALPERT R L . Pressure modeling of fires controlled by radiation[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1977, 16 (1): 1489- 1500.
16
ZARZECKI M , QUINTIERE J G , LYON R E , et al. The effect of pressure and oxygen concentration on the combustion of PMMA[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160 (8): 1519- 1530.
17
冯瑞, 田润和, 陈科位, 等. 低气压环境对固体燃烧特性影响的实验研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59 (2): 111- 121.
FENG R , TIAN R H , CHEN K W , et al. Experimental study of the effect of low pressures on solid fuel combustion characteristics[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2019, 59 (2): 111- 121.
18
冯瑞, 田润和, 陈科位, 等. 低气压环境对瓦楞纸箱燃烧速率的影响[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2019, 38 (2): 165- 168.
FENG R , TIAN R H , CHEN K W , et al. An experimental study on the effect of low pressure on the burning rate of corrugated carton[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2019, 38 (2): 165- 168.
19
JIA X H , MA J H , TANG J , et al. Experimental study on the fire behavior of the corrugated cartons under low-pressure environment with oxygen-enriched[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2023, 193, 108450.
20
张晓宇, 贾旭宏, 代尚沛, 等. 低压环境下玻璃纤维/酚醛树脂燃烧特性[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (10): 1520- 1528.
ZHANG X Y , JIA X H , DAI S P , et al. Combustion properties of glass fiber/phenolic resin at low ambient pressures[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2023, 63 (10): 1520- 1528.
21
The British Standards Institution. Reaction-to-fire tests-heat release, smoke production and mass loss ratepart l: Heat release rate (cone calorimeter method) and smoke production rate (dynamic measurement): ISO5660-1: 2015[S]. London: The British Standards Institution, 2015.
22
中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. 中华人民共和国民用航空行业标准飞机货舱衬板耐烧穿实验: MH/T 6086-2012[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2012.
Aircraft airworthiness Certification Department Civil Aviation Administration of China. Flame burnthrough test for aircraft cargo liners[S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2012. (in Chinese)
23
QUINTIERE J G . Fundamentals of fire phenomena[M]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
24
LAUTENBERGER C W , DE RIS J L , DEMBSEY N A , et al. A simplified model for soot formation and oxidation in CFD simulation of non-premixed hydrocarbon flames[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2005, 40 (2): 141- 176.
25
INCROPERA F P , DEWITT D P , BERGMAN T L , et al. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer[M]. 6th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
26
MA Q J , SHAO J C , WAN M S , et al. Experimental study on the burning behavior of cardboard box fire under low air pressure[J]. Fire and Materials, 2021, 45 (2): 273- 282.
27
FENG R , TIAN R H , ZHANG H , et al. Experimental study on the burning behavior and combustion toxicity of corrugated cartons under varying sub-atmospheric pressure[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 379, 120785.
28
程远平, 陈亮, 张孟君. 火灾过程中火源热释放速率模型及其实验测试方法[J]. 火灾科学, 2002 (02): 70-125+71-74+62.
CHENG Y P , CHEN L , ZHANG M J . The Models and Experimental Testing Method of Heat Release Rate of Fuel During the Development of Fire[J]. Fire Safety Science, 2002 (02): 70-125+71-74+62.
29
罗笛书. 民用飞机客舱火灾燃烧特性及烟气蔓延规律研究[D]. 成都: 四川师范大学, 2021.
LUO D S. Research on combustion characteristics and smoke spread law of civil aircraft cabin fire[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Normal University, 2021. (in Chinese)
30
SHEPHERD I G. Flame surface density and burning rate in premixed turbulent flames[C]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, Elsevier, 1996, 26(1): 373-379.
31
MOST J M , MANDIN P , CHEN J , et al. Influence of gravity and pressure on pool fire-type diffusion flames[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1996, 26 (1): 1311- 1317.
32
吴大方, 郑力铭, 潘兵, 等. 非线性热环境下高温合金蜂窝板隔热性能研究[J]. 力学学报, 2012, 44 (2): 297- 307.
WU D F , ZHENG L M , PAN B , et al. Research on heat-shielding properties of superalloy honeycomb panel for non-linear high temperature environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2012, 44 (2): 297- 307.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(9202 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/