Contact calculation method for low-elastic-modulus polymer materials considering surface force

Mingbo ZHAO, Chenhui ZHANG, Dan GUO

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (2) : 392-403.

PDF(10326 KB)
PDF(10326 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (2) : 392-403. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.009

Contact calculation method for low-elastic-modulus polymer materials considering surface force

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Polymer materials exhibit promising prospects in various applications, such as ship bearings and artificial joints, due to their low density as well as high toughness, corrosion resistance, and foreign-matter tolerance. However, in engineering applications, there is often a need to reduce friction. Modifying polymers to enhance their surface binding capacity with hydrated ions and utilizing the hydration effect to reduce friction, represents an important strategy in the tribological design of polymer friction pairs. Polymer materials typically possess a low elastic modulus, and the hydration effect introduces nonlinearity into iterative algorithms. Consequently, a robust numerical model for simulating the contact behavior of such low-elastic-modulus materials under the hydration effect remains elusive. Methods: This paper presents a numerical model for simulating the contact behavior of low-elastic-modulus polymer materials under the hydration effect. Taking ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and sapphire as an example, a rough surface with a Gaussian-distributed topography is constructed to analyze the influence of surface forces and material elastic modulus on material contact behavior. Results: The findings reveal that low-elastic-modulus materials exhibit low contact pressures, with pressure distribution across the contact area potentially fully supported by the hydration layer, resulting in the formation of nanoscale gaps. Calculations indicate that when the maximum pressure in the contact area is less than the maximum repulsive pressure provided by surface forces, the two surfaces can be completely separated. Conversely, when a part of the pressure in the contact area exceeds the maximum repulsive force, partial separation occurs, with regions where the contact pressure is less than the maximum surface force remaining fully separated. A low elastic modulus promotes the reduction of pressure in the contact area, facilitating surface separation and friction reduction. This study shows that surface topography has a minor effect on contact calculations considering the surface forces of low-elastic-modulus materials but has a significant effect in the case of high-elastic-modulus materials. Furthermore, the elastic modulus significantly affects model convergence: model convergence becomes challenging at low elastic moduli. Conclusions: First, under static contact conditions, the surfaces of low-elastic-modulus materials can be completely separated by surface forces. Calculations demonstrate that contact pressures in low-elastic-modulus materials are sufficiently low and smaller than the maximum inter-surface force, resulting in complete separation of the surfaces and the entire load being borne by the hydration layer, forming a continuous nanoscale gap between the surfaces. In addition, due to a large contact area and low elastic modulus, polymer materials are less prone to plastic deformation. Second, the surface topography of low-elastic-modulus polymer materials has a limited influence on the effect of surface forces and the distribution of contact pressure. Contrasting results are obtained for high-elastic-modulus materials. Therefore, for friction pairs based on the hydration effect used in hard materials, attention must be paid to surface finishing; this requirement is less critical for soft materials. For low-elastic-modulus materials, rough secondary surfaces can enhance the load-bearing capacity of the hydration layer. Finally, low elastic moduli significantly increased the difficulty of convergence in iterative algorithms. This study found that secondary details on the surface of low-elastic-modulus polymer materials do not significantly affect the contact calculation results, enabling the use of low computational mesh densities. However, material elastic modulus significantly affects the convergence of iterative algorithms used for calculating surface forces, with low elastic moduli leading to great convergence challenges and necessitating strict parameter constraints to achieve convergence. This study lays the foundation for subsequent numerical studies on mixed lubrication in polymers under the action of surface forces.

Key words

polymer materials / hydration effect / elastic modulus / surface force / contact calculation model

Cite this article

Download Citations
Mingbo ZHAO , Chenhui ZHANG , Dan GUO. Contact calculation method for low-elastic-modulus polymer materials considering surface force[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(2): 392-403 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.009

References

1
WANG C P , WANG S H , WANG H Z , et al. Research status and prospects of tribological behaviors of key friction pairs of materials in marine equipment[J]. Materials Science, 2021, 27 (2): 148- 154.
2
SAMYN P , VAN SCHEPDAEL L , LEENDERTZ J S , et al. Large-scale friction and wear tests on a hybrid UHMWPE-pad/primer coating combination used as bearing element in an extremely high-loaded ball-joint[J]. Tribology International, 2006, 39 (8): 796- 811.
3
PATIL N A , NJUGUNA J , KANDASUBRAMANIAN B . UHMWPE for biomedical applications: Performance and functionalization[J]. European Polymer Journal, 2020, 125, 109529.
4
LIU H , WANG J Z , JIANG P F , et al. Hydrostatic pressure-dependent wear behavior of thermoplastic polymers in deep sea[J]. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 2018, 29 (8): 2410- 2415.
5
WANG J Z , YAN F Y , XUE Q J . Tribological behavior of PTFE sliding against steel in sea water[J]. Wear, 2009, 267 (9-10): 1634- 1641.
6
YU S R , HU H X , YIN J . Effect of rubber on tribological behaviors of polyamide 66 under dry and water lubricated sliding[J]. Wear, 2008, 265 (3-4): 361- 366.
7
BRINSON H F , CATHERINE BRINSON L . Polymer engineering science and viscoelasticity: An Introduction[M]. New York: Springer, 2015.
8
PERSSON B N J . Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2001, 115 (8): 3840- 3861.
9
HAN T Y , ZHAO M B , SUN C , et al. Macroscale superlubricity of hydrated anions in the boundary lubrication regime[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2023, 15 (35): 42094- 42103.
10
HAN T Y , ZHANG C H , LI J J , et al. Origins of superlubricity promoted by hydrated multivalent ions[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2020, 11 (1): 184- 190.
11
CHEN L , QIAN L M . Role of interfacial water in adhesion, friction, and wear-A critical review[J]. Friction, 2021, 9 (1): 1- 28.
12
ISRAELACHVILI J N . Intermolecular and surface forces[M]. London: Academic Press Ltd, 1985.
13
RAND R P , PARSEGIAN V A . Hydration forces between phospholipid bilayers[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Reviews on Biomembranes, 1989, 988 (3): 351- 376.
14
LEIKIN S , PARSEGIAN V A , RAU D C , et al. Hydration forces[J]. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 1993, 44 (1): 369- 395.
15
BRISCOE W H , TITMUSS S , TIBERG F , et al. Boundary lubrication under water[J]. Nature, 2006, 444 (7116): 191- 194.
16
XU J N , ZHANG C H , LUO J B . Hydration lubrication applicable to artificial joints through polyelectrolyte-embedded modification on UHMWPE[J]. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2022, 4 (10): 7487- 7497.
17
YUAN S H , ZHANG C H . A sulfonated modification of PEEK for ultralow friction[J]. Friction, 2023, 11 (6): 881- 893.
18
ZHANG S W , ZHANG C H , HU Y Z , et al. Numerical simulation of mixed lubrication considering surface forces[J]. Tribology International, 2019, 140, 105878.
19
FANG Y F , MA L R . Mechanic model of water-based boundary lubricated contact based on surface force effects[J]. Friction, 2023, 11 (1): 93- 108.
20
ZHANG S W , ZHAO M B , ZHANG C H . Plastic-elastic model for water-based lubrication considering surface force[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 35 (1): 117.
21
ZHANG S W , ZHANG C H . A new deterministic model for mixed lubricated point contact with high accuracy[J]. Journal of Tribology, 2021, 143 (10): 102201.
22
MA L R , GAISINSKAYA-KIPNIS A , KAMPF N , et al. Origins of hydration lubrication[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6 (1): 6060.
23
KLEIN J . Hydration lubrication[J]. Friction, 2013, 1 (1): 1- 23.
24
PENG W , BHUSHAN B . A numerical three-dimensional model for the contact of layered elastic/plastic solids with rough surfaces by a variational principle[J]. Journal of Tribology, 2001, 123 (2): 330- 342.
25
LIU S B , WANG Q . Studying contact stress fields caused by surface tractions with a discrete convolution and fast Fourier transform algorithm[J]. Journal of Tribology, 2002, 124 (1): 36- 45.
26
HU Y Z , TONDER K . Simulation of 3-D random rough surface by 2-D digital filter and Fourier analysis[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 1992, 32 (1-2): 83- 90.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(10326 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/