Evolution trend of global flood events and risk analysis from 1965 to 2023

Jiahong LIU, Mengxue ZHANG, Jia WANG, Chao MEI

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (10) : 1853-1867.

PDF(34450 KB)
PDF(34450 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (10) : 1853-1867. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.038
Hydraulic Engineering

Evolution trend of global flood events and risk analysis from 1965 to 2023

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: The frequency and intensity of global flood events are increasing, which is deeply driven by climate change and human activities. The key risk factors of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability are interconnected and collectively influence the occurrence and progression of flood disasters. Therefore, the relationships between these three factors need to be understood, and a comprehensive indicator system for the integrated assessment of flood risk needs to be developed. This study aims to analyze the spatiotemporal trends of global flood events from 1965 to 2023. Moreover, based on the key risk factors of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, the spatiotemporal characteristics of the flood risk were revealed, which could provide a scientific basis for flood prevention and disaster mitigation decision-making. Methods: This study uses the Emergency Events Database, which includes global flood data, to analyze flood events from 1965 to 2023. This study conducts a trend analysis of the global flood occurrence, affected population, and mortality per unit area from 1965 to 2023. Based on the affected population and mortality per unit area, floods in six continents are classified into light, moderate, and severe categories using the percentage method. Spatial analysis of the flood occurrence, affected population, and mortality per unit area was performed for each country. The results showed the spatial distribution and impact intensity of flood disasters in different regions. In addition, key risk indicators, such as geographic elevation, precipitation, population density, and urbanization rate, are selected to analyze the characteristics of flood risk. Elevation and precipitation represent hazards. Population density indicates exposure, and urbanization rate reflects vulnerability. Trend analysis of these indicators was performed for three distinct periods, i.e., 1965-1984, 1985-2004, and 2005-2023. To examine the spatial trends of these indicators across countries over the entire study period, the Theil-Sen slope estimation method was employed. The entropy weight method was applied to calculate the weight of each risk indicator, and the flood risk values of six continents from 1965 to 2023 were calculated. Results: The main results are as follows: (1) From 1965 to 2023, global flood events show a fluctuating upward trend, although the affected population and number of deaths have shown a downward trend since the 1990s. At the continental level, floods occur most frequently in Asia, Africa, and South America, with a total of 2 322, 1 266, and 1 084 events, respectively. At the national level, Haiti experiences the highest frequency of flood events per unit area, with 23 events per 104 km2. Bangladesh has the highest total number of flood-affected people per unit area, with 27.1 million people per 104 km2, and the highest record of cumulative deaths, with 3 313 deaths per 104 km2. (2) Flood hazard, exposure, and vulnerability vary significantly across six continents. Among the indicators, population density and precipitation show the greatest influence on flood risk, with weights of 0.33 and 0.30, respectively. From 1965 to 2023, an obvious regional variation in flood risk across six continents is detected. The flood risk in Asia is significantly higher than that in other continents, with the flood risk values of both Asia and Africa showing a significant increase. By contrast, the flood risk value of South America decreased after 2010. Europe and North America show relatively low and stable flood risk values. Oceania exhibits the lowest flood risk values with significant fluctuations. Conclusions: This study conducts not only a systematic analysis of global flood events over a long time series but also an analysis of the changes in risk indicators, such as precipitation, geographic elevation, population density, and urbanization rate, from 1965 to 2023. Moreover, the relative impact of different indicators is quantified, which clarifies their respective contributions to flood risk. The results further revealed the comprehensively changing characteristics of flood risk. The findings provide guidance and evidence to inform flood prevention planning and disaster response strategies. In the future, exposure change based on population mobility and integrated adaptive capacity should be considered to reveal the dynamic characteristics of flood risk.

Key words

global flood / spatiotemporal characteristics / flood risk / risk factors / Emergency Events Database

Cite this article

Download Citations
Jiahong LIU , Mengxue ZHANG , Jia WANG , et al. Evolution trend of global flood events and risk analysis from 1965 to 2023[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(10): 1853-1867 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.038

References

1
GARCÍA-VALDECASAS OJEDA M , DI SANTE F , COPPOLA E , et al. Climate change impact on flood hazard over Italy[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 615, 128628.
2
刘家宏, 宋天旭, 梅超, 等. 利比亚德尔纳2023年极端洪水模拟复盘分析[J]. 水利学报, 2024, 55 (6): 723- 734.
LIU J H , SONG T X , MEI C , et al. Retrospective simulation and analysis of 2023 extreme flood in Derna, Libya[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2024, 55 (6): 723- 734.
3
UNDDR. The human cost of disasters: An overview of the last 20 years (2000—2019)[R]. Geneva: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020.
4
应急管理部—教育部减灾与应急管理研究院, 北京师范大学国家安全与应急管理学院, 应急管理部国家减灾中心, 等. 2022年全球自然灾害评估报告[R]. 日内瓦: 联合国减少灾害署, 2023.
Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Ministry of Emergency Management, Ministry of Education School of National Safety and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, National Disaster Reduction Center of China, et al. The global natural disaster assessment report 2022[R]. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2023. (in Chinese)
5
MASSON-DELMOTTE V, ZHAI P, PÖRTNER H O, et al. Global warming of 1.5 ℃[R]. Geneva: IPCC, 2018.
6
KONAPALA G , MISHRA A K , WADA Y , et al. Climate change will affect global water availability through compounding changes in seasonal precipitation and evaporation[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11 (1): 3044.
7
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World population prospects 2024: Summary of results[R]. New York: United Nations, 2024.
8
王浩, 秦巍, 刘福瑶, 等. 金华江流域土地利用变化对洪水特征的影响分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2022, 40 (11): 82-84, 34.
WANG H , QIN W , LIU F Y , et al. Effects of land-use change on flood characteristics in the Jinhua River Basin[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2022, 40 (11): 82-84, 34.
9
程晓陶, 刘昌军, 李昌志, 等. 变化环境下洪涝风险演变特征与城市韧性提升策略[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53 (7): 757-768, 778.
CHENG X T , LIU C J , LI C Z , et al. Theoretical framework and application of urban rainstorm flood control in high-density cities[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53 (7): 757-768, 778.
10
方秀琴, 蒋心远, 廖美玉, 等. 1980—2020年全球重大洪灾时空特征探析[J]. 水科学进展, 2024, 35 (2): 197- 207.
FANG X Q , JIANG X Y , LIAO M Y , et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics of global flood disasters during 1980—2020[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2024, 35 (2): 197- 207.
11
HALTAS I , YILDIRIM E , OZTAS F , et al. A comprehensive flood event specification and inventory: 1930—2020 Turkey case study[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2021, 56, 102086.
12
万新宇, 王光谦. 近60年中国典型洪水灾害与防洪减灾对策[J]. 人民黄河, 2011, 33 (8): 1- 4.
WAN X Y , WANG G Q . Typical flood disasters during last sixty years and strategies of flood control and disaster mitigation in China[J]. Yellow River, 2011, 33 (8): 1- 4.
13
NAJIBI N , DEVINENI N . Recent trends in the frequency and duration of global floods[J]. Earth System Dynamics, 2018, 9 (2): 757- 783.
14
TELLMAN B , SULLIVAN J A , KUHN C , et al. Satellite imaging reveals increased proportion of population exposed to floods[J]. Nature, 2021, 596 (7870): 80- 86.
15
王栋, 潘少明, 吴吉春, 等. 洪水风险分析的研究进展与展望[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2006, 15 (1): 103- 109.
WANG D , PAN S M , WU J C , et al. Review of risk analysis on flood[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2006, 15 (1): 103- 109.
16
HELM P . Integrated risk management for natural and technological disasters[J]. Tephra, 1996, 15 (1): 4- 13.
17
DEYLE R E, FRENCH S P, OLSHANSKY R B, et al. Hazard assessment: The factual basis for planning and mitigation[M]//BURBY R J. Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press, 1998.
18
KITTIPONGVISES S , PHETRAK A , RATTANAPUN P , et al. AHP-GIS analysis for flood hazard assessment of the communities nearby the world heritage site on Ayutthaya Island, Thailand[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 48, 101612.
19
KOKS E E , JONGMAN B , HUSBY T G , et al. Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2015, 47, 42- 52.
20
孙章丽, 朱秀芳, 潘耀忠, 等. 洪水灾害风险分析进展与展望[J]. 灾害学, 2017, 32 (3): 125-130, 136.
SUN Z L , ZHU X F , PAN Y Z , et al. Flood risk analysis: Progress, challenges and prospect[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2017, 32 (3): 125-130, 136.
21
LI C L , SUN N , LU Y H , et al. Review on urban flood risk assessment[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15 (1): 765.
22
HSIAO S C , CHIANG W S , JANG J H , et al. Flood risk influenced by the compound effect of storm surge and rainfall under climate change for low-lying coastal areas[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 764, 144439.
23
BIN L L , XU K , PAN H , et al. Urban flood risk assessment characterizing the relationship among hazard, exposure, and vulnerability[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 (36): 86463- 86477.
24
DE BRITO M M , EVERS M . Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: A survey of the current state of the art[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2016, 16 (4): 1019- 1033.
25
MALEKINEZHAD H , SEPEHRI M , PHAM Q B , et al. Application of entropy weighting method for urban flood hazard mapping[J]. Acta Geophysica, 2021, 69 (3): 841- 854.
26
H , GUAN X J , MENG Y . Comprehensive evaluation of urban flood-bearing risks based on combined compound fuzzy matter-element and entropy weight model[J]. Natural Hazards, 2020, 103 (2): 1823- 1841.
27
WU J R , CHEN X L , LU J Z . Assessment of long and short-term flood risk using the multi-criteria analysis model with the AHP-Entropy method in Poyang Lake basin[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 75, 102968.
28
MOREIRA L L , DE BRITO M M , KOBIYAMA M . Review article: A systematic review and future prospects of flood vulnerability indices[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2021, 21 (5): 1513- 1530.
29
GHANEM M A N , ZAIFOGLU H . A geospatial analysis of flood risk zones in Cyprus: Insights from statistical and multi-criteria decision analysis methods[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (22): 32875- 32900.
30
MUDASHIRU R B , SABTU N , ABUSTAN I , et al. Flood hazard mapping methods: A review[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 603, 126846.
31
付平凡, 孙洪泉, 苏志诚, 等. 基于EM-DAT数据的全球干旱灾害链分析研究[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报(中英文), 2023, 21 (3): 287-294, 306.
FU P F , SUN H Q , SU Z C , et al. Analysis of global drought disaster chains based on EM-DAT data[J]. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2023, 21 (3): 287-294, 306.
32
SEENU P Z , JAYAKUMAR K V . Comparative study of innovative trend analysis technique with Mann-Kendall tests for extreme rainfall[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (7): 536.
33
KANANI-SADAT Y , ARABSHEIBANI R , KARIMIPOUR F , et al. A new approach to flood susceptibility assessment in data-scarce and ungauged regions based on GIS-based hybrid multi criteria decision-making method[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 572, 17- 31.
34
MUDASHIRU R B , SABTU N , ABUSTAN I . Quantitative and semi-quantitative methods in flood hazard/susceptibility mapping: A review[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (11): 941.
35
郑彦辰, 李建柱, 荣佑同, 等. 降雨时空分布量化及其在洪水过程分类中的应用[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53 (5): 560- 573.
ZHENG Y C , LI J Z , RONG Y T , et al. Research progress on ice flood disasters risk assessment and prevention and control of the river channel-dike-flood plain in cold region[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53 (5): 560- 573.
36
SMITH A , BATES P D , WING O , et al. New estimates of flood exposure in developing countries using high-resolution population data[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10 (1): 1814.
37
BERNHOFEN M V , TRIGG M A , SLEIGH P A , et al. Global flood exposure from different sized rivers[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2021, 21 (9): 2829- 2847.
38
MOHANTY M P , SIMONOVIC S P . Understanding dynamics of population flood exposure in Canada with multiple high-resolution population datasets[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 759, 143559.
39
CHAN S W , ABID S K , SULAIMAN N , et al. A systematic review of the flood vulnerability using geographic information system[J]. Heliyon, 2022, 8 (3): e09075.
40
褚江东, 粟晓玲, 吴海江, 等. 2002—2021年中国陆地水储量及其组分变化分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2023, 39 (3): 170- 178.
CHU J D , SU X L , WU H J , et al. Analysis of terrestrial water storage and its component changes in China from 2002 to 2021[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2023, 39 (3): 170- 178.
41
FICK S E , HIJMANS R J . WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2017, 37 (12): 4302- 4315.
42
ABATZOGLOU J T , DOBROWSKI S Z , PARKS S A , et al. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958—2015[J]. Scientific Data, 2018, 5 (1): 170191.
43
元媛, 韩剑桥, 金中武, 等. 近30年四川省山洪灾害风险时空变化及其成因分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2023, 41 (10): 62- 66.
YUAN Y , HAN J Q , JIN Z W , et al. Analysis of changes and causes of mountain torrent disaster risk in Sichuan province in the past 30 years[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2023, 41 (10): 62- 66.
44
HU P , ZHANG Q , SHI P J , et al. Flood-induced mortality across the globe: Spatiotemporal pattern and influencing factors[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 643, 171- 182.
45
任远. 南方国家特大城市的治理现代化: 现状、挑战和实践[R]. 上海: 复旦-拉美大学联盟, 2022.
REN Y. Better megacity governance in the global south: Local responses and adaptive modernity[R]. Shanghai: Fudan-Latin America University Consortium, 2022. (in Chinese)
46
TATE E , RAHMAN M A , EMRICH C T , et al. Flood exposure and social vulnerability in the United States[J]. Natural Hazards, 2021, 106 (1): 435- 457.
47
HAMIDI A R , WANG J W , GUO S Y , et al. Flood vulnerability assessment using MOVE framework: A case study of the northern part of district Peshawar, Pakistan[J]. Natural Hazards, 2020, 101 (2): 385- 408.
48
PATHAK S , PANTA H K , BHANDARI T , et al. Flood vulnerability and its influencing factors[J]. Natural Hazards, 2020, 104 (3): 2175- 2196.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(34450 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/