Risk prediction of thermal radiation from jet fire of onboard hydrogen storage tanks

Linzhi ZOU, Bei LI, Bing HAN, Yan LIU, Chen SONG, Xin JIN

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (11) : 2149-2156.

PDF(8908 KB)
PDF(8908 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (11) : 2149-2156. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.27.001
Combustion and Fire Analysis in Confined Space

Risk prediction of thermal radiation from jet fire of onboard hydrogen storage tanks

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: As the thermal pressure relief device of an onboard hydrogen storage tank is activated by a fire, the released high-pressure hydrogen gas will be ignited to form a jet flame. The large scale and high temperature of the jet flame lead to a potential risk of thermal radiation injury to individuals nearby, including firefighters. This study was based on the bonfire test of a full-size vehicle-mounted hydrogen storage tank, combined with a theoretical system to predict the external thermal radiation of the jet flame and evaluate the danger distance to personnel. Methods: Based on the development process of vehicle fires, the test was structured to include localized and engulfing stages of a bonfire. A Type III hydrogen storage tank with the specifications of 48 L and 70 MPa was used in the test. A pressure sensor and camera were installed to record the internal pressure of the tank and the shape of the jet flame. Based on the real gas state equation and the thermodynamic and fluid characteristics of high-pressure hydrogen, a theoretical calculation framework, which contained the changes to the gas parameters, such as temperature, density, and flow velocity, was obtained. Then, the mass flow rate of hydrogen was estimated by the framework. The heat release rate of the jet flame can be estimated from the combustion heat and mass flow rate. To further determine the radiation flux distribution of the jet flame, this study used the classic single-point-source model. In addition, the prediction accuracy of the model for the external radiation of the jet flame in the near-field (within 3.0 m) has been verified. Finally, the release scenario of the 48 L-70 MPa hydrogen storage tank was cited as an example, and the evolution of the external radiation and thermal dose unit of the jet flame over time at different distances (1.5-5.0 m) was analyzed. The danger distance to personnel was also evaluated in compliance with the injury threshold of the human body under thermal radiation. Results: According to the bonfire test and theoretical calculation of the 48 L-70 MPa hydrogen storage tank: (1) The maximum internal pressure of the tank under full load hydrogen charging conditions in a fire was 77.4 MPa. The maximum flow rate was approximately 0.1 kg/s, with a maximum jet flame length of 4.93 m. (2) The maximum radiation flux of the jet flame at 1.5 m was approximately 13 kW/m2, which decayed to 10.2 kW/m2 after 20 s. (3) At a distance of 2.0-3.0 m from the flame, it would take approximately 5.0 s to cause first-degree burns to personnel, and at a distance of 5.0 m, it would take more than 20 s. (4) A “risk-free” distance of at least 10.0 m was required to ensure that personnel are exposed to thermal radiation of less than 1.6 kW/m2. Conclusions: The results of this study could further improve the theoretical system of jet flame external radiation risk assessment for the emergency release of onboard hydrogen storage tanks that could provide a reference for emergency response in related accident scenarios.

Key words

onboard hydrogen storage tank / jet flame / thermal radiation / risk assessment

Cite this article

Download Citations
Linzhi ZOU , Bei LI , Bing HAN , et al . Risk prediction of thermal radiation from jet fire of onboard hydrogen storage tanks[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(11): 2149-2156 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.27.001

References

1
中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会. 氢能产业发展中长期规划(2021—2035年) [EB/OL]. (2022-03-24) [2024- 10-30]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/ghwb/202203/t20220323_1320038.html.
National Development and Reform Commission. The development of hydrogen energy for the 2021—2035 period[EB/OL]. (2022-03-24)[2024-10-30]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/ghwb/202203/t20220323_1320038.html. (in Chinese)
2
PARK B , KIM Y . Reenacting the hydrogen tank explosion of a fuel-cell electric vehicle: An experimental study[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48 (89): 34987- 35003.
3
SWAIN M . Fuel leak simulation[M]. London, UK: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2004.
4
WANG X Y , LI B , JIN X , et al. Ultimate pressure-bearing capacity of Type Ⅲ onboard high-pressure hydrogen storage tanks under typical accident scenarios[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 63, 107135.
5
BOUIX D, SAUZEDDE F, MANICARDI P, et al. Full-scale tunnel experiments for fuel cell hydrogen vehicles: Fire-jet and explosions[C]//Proceedings of the ICHS 2021: International Conference on Hydrogen Safety. Edinburg, UK: CEA, 2021: 1-14.
6
SCHEFER R W , HOUF W G , BOURNE B , et al. Spatial and radiative properties of an open-flame hydrogen plume[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31 (10): 1332- 1340.
7
SIVATHANU Y R , GORE J P . Total radiative heat loss in jet flames from single point radiative flux measurements[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1993, 94 (3): 265- 270.
8
ZHANG A J , ZOU X , SHEN J H , et al. Experimental investigation on hydrogen jet flame behavior and temperature distribution with different shapes of outlet[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 63, 844- 856.
9
伍庆龙, 张天强. 丰田燃料电池汽车Mirai技术分析[J]. 汽车文摘, 2020 (4): 18- 21.
WU Q L , ZHANG T Q . Analysis on Mirai fuel cell vehicle technologies of Toyota[J]. Automotive Digest, 2020 (4): 18- 21.
10
LI D Y , ZHU G Q , ZHU H , et al. Flame spread and smoke temperature of full-scale fire test of car fire[J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2017, 10, 315- 324.
11
ZOU L Z , LI B , HAN B , et al. Release of high-pressure hydrogen from type Ⅲ tank in a fire scenario: Analysis and prediction of jet flame length and thermal response characteristics[J]. Fuel, 2024, 372, 132153.
12
ZHOU K B , LIU J Y , WANG Y Z , et al. Prediction of state property, flow parameter and jet flame size during transient releases from hydrogen storage systems[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43 (27): 12565- 12573.
13
HANKINSON G , LOWESMITH B J . A consideration of methods of determining the radiative characteristics of jet fires[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159 (3): 1165- 1177.
14
MOLINA A , SCHEFER R W , HOUF W G . Radiative fraction and optical thickness in large-scale hydrogen-jet fires[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31 (2): 2565- 2572.
15
EKOTO I W , RUGGLES A J , CREITZ L W , et al. Updated jet flame radiation modeling with buoyancy corrections[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39 (35): 20570- 20577.
16
TURNS S R , MYHR F H . Oxides of nitrogen emissions from turbulent jet flames: Part Ⅰ—Fuel effects and flame radiation[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1991, 87 (3-4): 319- 335.
17
PROUST C , JAMOIS D , STUDER E . High pressure hydrogen fires[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36 (3): 2367- 2373.
18
LACHANCE J , TCHOUVELEV A , ENGEBO A . Development of uniform harm criteria for use in quantitative risk analysis of the hydrogen infrastructure[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36 (3): 2381- 2388.
19
MOGI T , HORIGUCHI S . Experimental study on the hazards of high-pressure hydrogen jet diffusion flames[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22 (1): 45- 51.
20
ROSSI J L , SIMEONI A , MORETTI B , et al. An analytical model based on radiative heating for the determination of safety distances for wildland fires[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2011, 46 (8): 520- 527.
21
GENTILHOMME O , PROUST C , JAMOIS D , et al. Data for the evaluation of hydrogen risks onboard vehicles: Outcomes from the French project drive[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37 (22): 17645- 17654.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(8908 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/