PDF(6634 KB)
Effect of high altitude on the temperature propagation of typical explosives in tunnel wave fronts
Hongyu LUO, Yupeng HU, Xiaowei FENG, Fengjun WANG, Minghai LI
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (4) : 721-731.
PDF(6634 KB)
PDF(6634 KB)
Effect of high altitude on the temperature propagation of typical explosives in tunnel wave fronts
Objective: Thermal effects are the primary means of damaging ammunition targets, and their impacts are particularly pronounced in enclosed environments. With the ongoing advancement of efficient damage technologies and the increasing complexity of future combat scenarios, it is crucial to evaluate weapon damage performance in high-altitude environments. Therefore, studying the propagation characteristics of explosion temperatures in high-altitude tunnels and developing a corresponding theoretical calculation model are of great significance for comprehensively assessing explosion damage under such conditions. Methods: This study aimed to effectively characterize the propagation characteristics of the temperature at the blast wave front in long, straight tunnels with different types of condensed explosives at high altitudes. A multimaterial numerical calculation method was employed to investigate the propagation behavior of the blast wave front temperature in such tunnels. First, the two-dimensional axisymmetric numerical calculation method was validated by comparing the peak temperature data with the results of the existing explosion temperature field tests. Afterward, based on the above-described numerical calculation method, standard atmospheric parameters, and the existing explosive Jones-Wilkins-Lee(JWL) equation of state parameters, a numerical model is developed to simulate the explosion of different types of condensed explosives at high altitudes in a long straight tunnel. The model analyzes the explosion temperature field parameters, including the plane wave formation distance, peak temperature, shock wave front propagation velocity, and standard deviation of shock wave front arrival times. Finally, using the Hugoniot principle and Sachs dimensionless correction method, a mapping calculation model of the peak temperature and peak overpressure of the shock wave front in a typical high-altitude tunnel with condensed explosives is established, and the accuracy of the model is verified through numerical calculation results. Results: The results indicate that the plane wave formation distance increases gradually with both the elevation and internal energy per unit volume of the explosive. At an altitude of 4 000 m, the plane wave formation distance for the different types of condensed explosives increases by an average of 24.8% compared with that in a flat environment. At the same altitude, the plane wave formation distance increases by an average of 0.89 m/GPa with a rise in internal energy per unit volume of the explosive. As a result, the propagation velocity and average deviation of the shock wave front arrival time increases with the elevation and internal energy. This result reflects the complexity of the interaction between the shock wave front and tunnel wall, leading to a decrease in the flatness of the shock wave front. At an altitude of 4 000 m, the peak temperature of the shock wave front for different condensed explosives increases by an average of 27%. At the same altitude, the peak temperature of the shock wave front increases by an average of 0.013 k℃/GPa with the rise in internal energy per unit volume of the explosive. The peak temperature for different altitudes and explosive types exhibits a decreasing trend with the increase in propagation distance, with the rate of decrease also reducing. Under various altitude and explosive-type conditions, the deviation between the theoretical analysis model and numerical calculation results is < 10%, indicating good accuracy. Conclusions: The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for understanding the temperature propagation of shock wave front explosions in condensed explosive tunnels under high-altitude conditions. They also offer guidance for weapon damage assessment and protection engineering design in high-altitude extreme combat environments.
explosion temperature / long straight tunnel / propagation characteristics / altitude / condensed explosive
| 1 |
刘泉, 姚箭, 宋先钊, 等. 初始环境压力对RDX基温压炸药冲击波超压和温度的影响[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2024, 44 (9): 913- 922.
|
| 2 |
纪玉国, 张国凯, 李干, 等. 坑道口部温压炸药爆炸热效应与冲击波传播规律实验研究[J]. 南京理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46 (6): 649- 658.
|
| 3 |
李瑞, 杨耀勇, 汪泉, 等. 高海拔环境下运动装药的爆炸冲击波特性[J]. 火炸药学报, 2024, 47 (2): 159- 171.
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
纪玉国, 张国凯, 李干, 等. 坑道内爆炸条件下温压炸药的爆炸特性及其影响因素[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2024, 44 (3): 118- 132.
|
| 9 |
张玉磊, 李芝绒, 张俊锋, 等. TNT坑道内爆炸热作用规律的试验研究[J]. 火炸药学报, 2019, 42 (5): 526- 530.
|
| 10 |
闫潇敏, 苏健军, 李芝绒, 等. 坑道内温压炸药的爆炸热效应研究[J]. 火工品, 2015 (1): 22- 25.
|
| 11 |
张洪铭, 陈先锋, 张英, 等. 坑道内典型工业炸药爆炸灾害效应的数值模拟[J]. 工程爆破, 2015, 21 (4): 11-16, 57.
|
| 12 |
李凌峰, 韩秀凤, 沈飞, 等. 典型约束环境下HMX基温压炸药内爆释能特性[J]. 火工品, 2022 (2): 48- 53.
|
| 13 |
苟兵旺, 李芝绒, 闫潇敏, 等. 复杂坑道内温压炸药冲击波效应试验研究[J]. 火工品, 2014 (2): 41- 45.
|
| 14 |
王洪海, 张卫华, 王胜强, 等. 复合炸药在爆炸坑道内的冲击波效应研究[J]. 应用化工, 2020, 49 (S1): 374-376, 381.
|
| 15 |
耿振刚, 李秀地, 苗朝阳, 等. 温压炸药爆炸冲击波在坑道内的传播规律研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36 (5): 23- 29.
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
陈龙明, 李志斌, 陈荣, 等. 高原环境爆炸冲击波传播特性的实验研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42 (5): 114- 124.
|
| 21 |
陈龙明. 高原爆炸冲击波传播特性研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2020.
CHEN L M. Propagation characteristics of blast shock waves in pleateau environment[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2020. (in Chinese)
|
| 22 |
SACHS R G. The dependence of blast on ambient pressure and temperature: BRL Report 466[R]. Aberdeen Proving Ground: Ballistic Research Laboratories, 1944.
|
| 23 |
李瑞, 李孝臣, 汪泉, 等. 低温和低压环境下炸药爆炸冲击波的传播特性[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43 (2): 18- 28.
|
| 24 |
李子涵, 程扬帆, 王浩, 等. 负压环境对乳化炸药爆炸温度场和有害效应的影响[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43 (8): 30- 42.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
李芝绒, 王胜强, 殷俊兰. 不同气体环境中温压炸药爆炸特性的试验研究[J]. 火炸药学报, 2013, 36 (3): 59- 61.
|
| 27 |
段晓瑜. 含铝炸药空气中爆炸冲击波特性研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2017.
DUAN X Y. Study on the properties of shock wave from aluminized explosives blast in air[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017. (in Chinese)
|
| 28 |
LEE E L, HORNIG H C, KURY J W. Adiabatic expansion of high explosive detonation products: UCRL-50422[R]. Livermore: Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California, 1968.
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
张军, 黄含军, 王军评, 等. 炸药驱动式爆炸管的载荷计算[J]. 装备环境工程, 2021, 18 (5): 21- 27.
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
陈皓, 李文彬, 宋平, 等. 典型复合温压炸药爆炸特性试验研究[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2023, 44 (10): 1841- 1848.
|
| 37 |
李勇, 雒泓宇, 冯晓伟, 等. 海拔高度对长直坑道内爆炸冲击波传播的影响[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2024, 44 (3): 105- 117.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |