PDF(1716 KB)
Consumption-driven demand in global value chains and the green innovation transformation of enterprises
Xinming XIA, Qingchun WANG, Yuning GAO
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (11) : 2180-2194.
PDF(1716 KB)
PDF(1716 KB)
Consumption-driven demand in global value chains and the green innovation transformation of enterprises
Objective: Stimulating the vitality of green and low-carbon science and technology innovations and realizing the goal of "dual-carbon" are inherent requirements for implementing a new development concept, building a new development pattern, and promoting high-quality development. Currently, the development of green innovation and transformation is at a critical stage, and the dynamics of green innovation and transformation is still an important research object worth exploring. China is participating in a vertical division of the labor system with greater depth, breadth, and efficiency through global value chains. However, most existing studies have simply attributed low-carbon innovation outcomes to a single policy or an element. Under the guidance of dual circulation and dual carbon goals, exploring key links between the value chain consumer demand and green innovation in economic activities is significant. When studying the dynamics of corporate green innovation, attention should be paid to the huge demand-side impacts and transmission of the value chain. Methods: Based on the division of labor and connection of product value chains, this study matches and integrates the green innovation database of the A-share listed companies from 2002 to 2020. Then, this paper constructs a time series of multiregional input-output tables based on the interprovincial multi-regional input-output tables compiled by the Development Research Center of The State Council in 2002, 2007, 2012 and 2017. To more clearly describe how demand-side shocks affect the behavioral decisions of enterprises under green and low-carbon transformation through input-output networks, this paper starts with analyzing the consumption-side demand of the value chain. Using a multiregional input-output model, this paper quantifies the direct and indirect impacts on the consumption-side demand caused by the interprovincial division of labor in each province and estimates the demand impact of the interprovincial trade in China. Further, it decomposes the consumption-side demand of the value chain into the local consumption-side demand and foreign consumption-side demand of the value chain. Results: The research findings are as follows: Consumer demand, transmitted through the value chain, contributes to improving local firms' green innovation levels, particularly in terms of original green invention patents. The value chain amplifies the impact of the market demand from other regions on the local market. Local firms participating in the dual circulation strategy and constructing a unified domestic market will benefit from the broader dynamics of the external market. State-owned enterprises bear greater social responsibility in low-carbon emissions, and the consumer demand in the value chain guides subsidies to enter the domain of invention patents more effectively. This effect exhibits specific spatial and temporal heterogeneity, stimulating high-tech sectors and enterprises to invest in green innovation, while large-scale enterprises and startups face limitations in green innovation. Conclusions: This paper connects the value chain and innovation chain under the connotation of the global value chain division of labor linkage. By quantifying the direct and indirect impacts on the consumption-side demand, the paper examines the impact of demand-side shocks on the level of green innovation on the supply side by adopting the multiregional input-output model to measure the effect of demand-side shocks on China's interprovincial trade. The research results provide policy implications for creating a unified domestic market under sustainable development, effectively integrating value and innovation chains, and fostering green innovation in enterprises.
green innovation / value chain / demand on the consumer side / multi-regional input-output model / low-carbon transition
| 1 |
武汉大学国家发展战略研究院课题组. 中国实施绿色低碳转型和实现碳中和目标的路径选择[J]. 中国软科学, 2022 (10): 1- 12.
|
| 2 |
新华社. 习近平主持中共中央政治局第三十六次集体学习[EB/OL]. (2022-01-25). [2024-01-15]. http://www.qstheory.cn/yaowen/2022-01/25/c_1128299594.htm.
Xinhua News Agency. President Xi Jinping presides over the 36th collective study session of the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) [EB/OL]. (2022-01-15). [2024-01-15]. http://www.qstheory.cn/yaowen/2022-01/25/c_1128299594.htm. (in Chinese)
|
| 3 |
唐云霓, 闫如雪, 周艳玲. 碳中和愿景下能源政策的结构表征与优化路径[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (1): 1- 14.
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
徐佳, 崔静波. 低碳城市和企业绿色技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020 (12): 178- 196.
|
| 6 |
齐绍洲, 林屾, 崔静波. 环境权益交易市场能否诱发绿色创新?——基于我国上市公司绿色专利数据的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53 (12): 129- 143.
|
| 7 |
金环, 于立宏, 徐远彬. 绿色产业政策与制造业绿色技术创新[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2022, 32 (6): 136- 146.
|
| 8 |
伊志宏, 陈欣, 田柳. 公众环境关注对企业绿色创新的影响[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2022, 42 (7): 32- 48.
|
| 9 |
刘保留, 张莹, 李雨珊. 互联网发展对城市绿色创新的影响机理——基于专利视角的分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2022, 32 (6): 104- 112.
|
| 10 |
张意翔, 成金华, 徐卓程, 等. 绿色创新是否适应气候变化: 中国专利和GHG排放数据的实证[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31 (1): 48- 56.
|
| 11 |
王乾宇, 彭坚. CEO绿色变革型领导与企业绿色行为: 环境责任文化和环保激情气氛的作用[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2018, 35 (1): 83- 93.
|
| 12 |
张琦, 郑瑶, 孔东民. 地区环境治理压力、高管经历与企业环保投资——一项基于《环境空气质量标准(2012)》的准自然实验[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54 (6): 183- 198.
|
| 13 |
杨梅, 王有强, 夏昕鸣. 技术专家型高管与上市企业绿色创新[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2023, 43 (6): 27- 41.
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
储德银, 李媛, 张同斌. 产业关联视角下增值税行业税负差异的成因研究[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58 (7): 174- 190.
|
| 17 |
彭水军, 李之旭. 外部需求与企业上游供应链调整: 稳链保供还是扩链强链[J]. 世界经济, 2024, 47 (2): 64- 92.
|
| 18 |
范子英, 彭飞. "营改增"的减税效应和分工效应: 基于产业互联的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52 (2): 82- 95.
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
GANGNES B, MA A C, VAN ASSCHE A. Global value chains and the transmission of business cycle shocks[R]. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank, 2012.
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
侯欣裕, 孙浦阳. 外部市场需求冲击与企业工资调整[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019 (10): 53- 66.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
周黎安, 罗凯. 企业规模与创新: 来自中国省级水平的经验证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2005, 4 (3): 623- 638.
|
| 30 |
李春涛, 宋敏. 中国制造业企业的创新活动: 所有制和CEO激励的作用[J]. 经济研究, 2010, 45 (5): 55- 67.
|
| 31 |
温军, 冯根福. 异质机构、企业性质与自主创新[J]. 经济研究, 2012, 47 (3): 53- 64.
|
| 32 |
解维敏, 唐清泉, 陆姗姗. 政府R&D资助, 企业R&D支出与自主创新——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2009 (6): 86- 99.
|
| 33 |
张杰, 陈志远, 杨连星, 等. 中国创新补贴政策的绩效评估: 理论与证据[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50 (10): 4-17, 33.
|
| 34 |
安同良, 周绍东, 皮建才. R&D补贴对中国企业自主创新的激励效应[J]. 经济研究, 2009, 44 (10): 87-98, 120.
|
| 35 |
孙早, 宋炜. 企业R&D投入对产业创新绩效的影响——来自中国制造业的经验证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2012, 29 (4): 49-63, 122.
|
| 36 |
和雅娴, 曹芳萍. 研发投入、治理结构与环保上市企业绿色技术创新绩效研究[J]. 新经济, 2019 (10): 35- 42.
|
| 37 |
钟腾龙, 余淼杰. 外部需求、竞争策略与多产品企业出口行为[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020 (10): 119- 137.
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
文芳. 董事长特征、债务约束与企业R&D投资——基于广东战略性新兴企业的研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2015 (9): 21- 26.
|
| 41 |
蔡卫星, 倪骁然, 赵盼, 等. 企业集团对创新产出的影响: 来自制造业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019 (1): 137- 155.
|
| 42 |
张璇, 刘贝贝, 汪婷, 等. 信贷寻租、融资约束与企业创新[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52 (5): 161- 174.
|
| 43 |
李善同, 何建武, 祝坤福, 等. 中国多区域投入产出模型: 1987—2017年[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2023.
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
虞义华, 赵奇锋, 鞠晓生. 发明家高管与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018 (3): 136- 154.
|
| 46 |
陈旭, 纪展鹏, 邢孝兵. 城市价值链功能分工与企业创新: 来自企业专利的证据[J]. 世界经济, 2024 (3): 94- 123.
|
| 47 |
李思齐, 冯宇佳. 产权性质与企业绿色创新: 基于决策权配置的异质性分析[J]. 生态经济, 2023, 39 (5): 95- 102.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |