Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 联系我们 横山亮次奖 百年刊庆
 
最新录用  |  预出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行  |  横山亮次奖  |  百年刊庆
清华大学学报(自然科学版)  2022, Vol. 62 Issue (2): 242-249    DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2022.22.008
  专题:建设管理 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于伙伴关系的国际EPC项目风险管理
王腾飞1, 王运宏2, 沈文欣2,3, 唐文哲2
1. 清华大学 学生处, 北京 100084;
2. 清华大学 土木水利学院, 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室, 北京 100084;
3. 北京交通大学 经济管理学院, 北京 100044
Risk management of international EPCprojects through partnering
WANG Tengfei1, WANG Yunhong2, SHEN Wenxin2,3, TANG Wenzhe2
1. Division of Student Affairs, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
全文: PDF(1193 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在“一带一路”倡议的推动下,中国企业积极参与国际工程设计-采购-施工(EPC)市场竞争。风险管理是决定国际EPC项目成败的关键,然而已有研究仅从概念层面提出伙伴关系在风险管理中的应用,缺乏对其内在机理的分析和系统性实证。该文提出基于伙伴关系的风险管理理论模型,并通过问卷数据和偏最小平方法结构方程对模型进行验证。该研究结果揭示了国际EPC项目伙伴关系、风险管理与项目绩效之间的作用机理;验证了总承包商与利益相关方的伙伴关系有助于加强接口管理、组织能力与合同管理,进而实现风险的有效控制和项目绩效的持续提升;并强调了伙伴关系和风险管理对于项目绩效具有重要作用。该研究结果有助于指导中国EPC总承包商有针对性地提高风险管理水平。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王腾飞
王运宏
沈文欣
唐文哲
关键词 风险管理伙伴关系设计-采购-施工(EPC)国际工程    
Abstract:The Belt and Road Initiative has lead to many Chinese enterprises actively participating in the international engineering- procurement-construction (EPC) market. Risk management is essential for EPC project delivery. However, existing research has mostly used only conceptual studies to explore the use of partnering strategies in risk management without mechanism analyses and validation using empirical data. This paper presents a risk management model based on partnering theory that is evaluated using questionnaire data and the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method. The results show the relationships among partnering, risk management and project performance and verify that partnerships between the contractor and various stakeholders improve interface management, organizational capacity and contract management to achieve effective risk management and continuous improvement of project performance. The results highlight the importance of partnering and risk management for EPC project performance and contribute to improving risk management of Chinese EPC contractors.
Key wordsrisk management    partnering    engineering-procurement-construction (EPC)    international project
收稿日期: 2021-08-06      出版日期: 2022-01-22
基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目(72171128,51579135,51779124);中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(2021T140047);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2020M680333)
通讯作者: 唐文哲,教授,E-mail:twz@tsinghua.edu.cn      E-mail: twz@tsinghua.edu.cn
作者简介: 王腾飞(1991-),男,讲师
引用本文:   
王腾飞, 王运宏, 沈文欣, 唐文哲. 基于伙伴关系的国际EPC项目风险管理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(2): 242-249.
WANG Tengfei, WANG Yunhong, SHEN Wenxin, TANG Wenzhe. Risk management of international EPCprojects through partnering. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2022, 62(2): 242-249.
链接本文:  
http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2022.22.008  或          http://jst.tsinghuajournals.com/CN/Y2022/V62/I2/242
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
[1] LIU J Y. Risk management of international EPC projects[M]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2017. (in Chinese)刘俊颖. 国际工程EPC项目风险管理[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.
[2] TAROUN A. Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk:Insights from a literature review[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2014, 32(1):101-115.
[3] CHANG A S, SHEN F Y, IBBS W. Design and construction coordination problems and planning for design-build project new users[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2010, 37(12):1525-1534.
[4] TANG W Z, LI Z Y, QIANG M S, et al. Risk management of hydropower development in China[J]. Energy, 2013, 60:316-324.
[5] WANG T F, TANG W Z, QI D S, et al. Enhancing design management by partnering in delivery of international EPC projects:Evidence from Chinese construction companies[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2016, 142(4):04015099.
[6] YANG J, SHEN G Q, DREW D S, et al. Critical success factors for stakeholder management:Construction practitioners' perspectives[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010, 136(7):778-786.
[7] DAVIS P R, WALKER D H T. Building capability in construction projects:A relationship-based approach[J]. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2009, 16(5):475-489.
[8] ANVUUR A M, KUMARASWAMY M M. Conceptual model of partnering and alliancing[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2007, 133(3):225-234.
[9] TANG W Z, DUFFIELD C F, YOUNG D M. Partnering mechanism in construction:An empirical study on the Chinese construction industry[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2006, 132(3):217-229.
[10] BLACK C, AKINTOYE A, FITZGERALD E. An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2000, 18(6):423-434.
[11] KADEFORS A. Trust in project relationships:Inside the black box[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2004, 22:175-182.
[12] NG S T, ROSE T M, MAK M, et al. Problematic issues associated with project partnering:The contractor perspective[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2002, 20(6):437-449.
[13] LOVE P E D, DAVIS P R, CHEVIS R, et al. Risk/reward compensation model for civil engineering infrastructure alliance projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2011, 137(2):127-136.
[14] ZHAO Z Y, LIU Y S, WU Y N. A study on partnering in construction project management[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2005, 38(8):123-127. (in Chinese)赵振宇, 刘伊生, 乌云娜. 建设工程项目Partnering管理方式探究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2005, 38(8):123-127.
[15] KLIEM R L, LUDIN I S. Reducing project risk[M]. Brookfield, USA:Gower, 1997.
[16] DAFT R L. Organization theory and design[M]. 11th ed. Mason, USA:South-Western Cengage Learning, 2010.
[17] ZOU P X W, CHEN Y, CHAN T Y. Understanding and improving your risk management capability:Assessment model for construction organizations[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010, 136(8):854-863.
[18] Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Enterprise risk management:Integrated framework[Z]. New York, USA:COSO, 2004.
[19] Construction Industry Institute (CⅡ). Interface management implementation guideline (IMIGe)[M]. Austin, USA:University of Texas at Austin, 2014.
[20] GALLOWAY P. Design-build/EPC contractor's heightened risk:Changes in a changing world[J]. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 2009, 1(1):7-15.
[21] ZHAO Z Y, SHEN L Y, ZUO J. Performance and strategy of Chinese contractors in the international market[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2009, 135(2):108-118.
[22] WANG S L, TANG W Z, LI Y X. Relationship between owners' capabilities and project performance on development of hydropower projects in China[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013, 139(9):1168-1178.
[23] WANG T F, TANG W Z, DU L, et al. Relationships among risk management, partnering, and contractor capability in international EPC project delivery[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2016, 32(6):04016017.
[24] DU L, TANG W Z, LIU C N, et al. Enhancing engineer-procure-construct project performance by partnering in international markets:Perspective from Chinese construction companies[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2016, 34(1):30-43.
[25] ZHANG S B, CHEN Y Q. Contract management for international EPC/turnkey projects[M]. Beijing:China Electric Power Press, 2008. (in Chinese)张水波, 陈勇强. 国际工程总承包EPC交钥匙合同与管理[M]. 北京:中国电力出版社, 2008.
[26] BABIN B J, HAIR J F, BOLES J S. Publishing research in marketing journals using structural equations modeling[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2008, 16(4):279-285.
[27] HAIR JR J F, HULT G T M, RINGLE C M, et al. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)[M]. London, UK:Sage Publications, 2014.
[28] CALVO-MORA A, NAVARRO-GARCÍA A, PERIAÑEZ-CRISTOBAL R. Project to improve knowledge management and key business results through the EFQM excellence model[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2015, 33(8):1638-1651.
[1] 彭颖政, 李芍毅, 胡森昶, 吴泽昆, 唐文哲, 王忠静. 伙伴关系视角下“互联网+城乡供水”工程管理——以宁夏供水系统为例[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(2): 250-258.
[2] 娄长圣, 唐文哲, 王腾飞. 水利工程风险管理:以宁夏水利工程为例[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63(2): 233-241.
[3] 娄长圣, 唐文哲, 王忠静. 雄安新区涉水事务一体化风险管理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63(2): 264-271.
[4] 吴泽昆, 张亚坤, 张旭腾, 唐文哲, 强茂山. 基于伙伴关系的水利工程建设信息化管理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(8): 1351-1356.
[5] 孙洪昕, 尤日淳, 唐文哲. 国际工程HSE管理和项目绩效影响因素分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(2): 230-241.
[6] 唐文哲, 雷振, 王姝力, 谢坤, 张清振. 国际工程EPC项目采购集成管理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(8): 838-844.
[7] 沈文欣, 唐文哲, 张清振, 王姝力. 基于伙伴关系的国际EPC项目接口管理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(6): 644-650.
[8] 唐文哲, 王腾飞, 孙洪昕, 漆大山. 国际EPC水电项目设计激励机理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(4): 354-359.
[9] 王腾飞, 唐文哲, 漆大山, 杜蕾. 基于伙伴关系的国际EPC水电项目设计管理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 56(4): 360-364,372.
[10] 林正航, 强茂山, 袁尚南. 大型国际工程承包商核心能力模型评价[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(12): 1309-1314,1323.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn