PDF(8468 KB)
PDF(8468 KB)
PDF(8468 KB)
滑坡变形监测预警技术研究进展
Research progress on landslide deformation monitoring and early warning technology
中国滑坡灾害数量多、分布广、危害大, 每年约有80%的地质灾害发生在已查明的隐患点范围之外。监测预警是主动防范地质灾害的重要手段。变形是滑坡最为关键的监测参数。该文旨在梳理总结滑坡变形监测技术和预警方法, 评述现有研究进展, 分析未来发展趋势, 为滑坡灾害防控领域的科学研究和工程实践提供借鉴。地表变形监测技术多易受到外界因素干扰, 及时性和可靠性难以得到保障。深部变形监测技术直接获取滑面发展破坏信息, 能够发现灾变前兆, 但现有设备存在成本高、量程小或操作难等问题。滑坡监测为早期预警提供依据, 而早期预警能够减少甚至避免人员伤亡和财产损失, 区域性气象预警和单体滑坡预警两类预警方法正在逐渐发展完善中。单体滑坡预警常见方法是分析滑坡变形趋势和突变特征, 通过速度、加速度等判据的阈值触发不同级别预警。滑坡智能预警模型将机器学习与地质工程交叉融合, 有望提升灾害早期预警的准确性和自动化水平。滑坡高质量监测应综合运用多种技术以克服单一技术的局限, 而预警模型则越来越关注变形趋势的智能分析。滑坡动力学机制复杂、个性特征明显, 广泛适用的预警模型有待进一步探索。
Significance: Landslide hazards are widely distributed in China and are severely harmful. The registered landslide hazards have achieved remarkable benefits in disaster reduction through a comprehensive prevention and control system. However, approximately 80% of all geo-disasters in China still occur outside the scope of identified hazards yearly. Therefore, monitoring and early warning are important means to actively prevent landslide disasters and achieve great success in disaster mitigation owing to promptness, effectiveness, and relatively low-cost advantages. Deformation is the most significant monitoring parameter for landslides and has become a focus and general trend. Landslide deformation monitoring engineering has strict requirements for controlled cost and high reliability to achieve widespread application and accurate early warning. Therefore, the commonly used monitoring instruments focus on surface deformation and rainfall to meet the requirements for easy equipment installation and low implementation cost. However, surface deformation and rainfall are not sufficient conditions to determine the occurrence of landslides. Various challenges exist in the existing monitoring technologies and early warning methods regarding engineering feasibility and performance improvement. Thus, it is important and urgent to summarize the existing research to rationally guide future development. Progress: The deformation monitoring methods are divided into surface and subsurface monitoring. Most surface deformation monitoring technologies are vulnerable to the interference of terrain, environment, and other factors; therefore, their timeliness and reliability are not easily guaranteed. Additionally, slope subsurface deformation monitoring technologies can directly obtain the development and damage information of the sliding surface; thus, they can recognize the disaster precursor. Subsurface monitoring has advanced early warning ability; however, the existing instruments have problems, such as high cost, small measuring range, or difficult operation. Acoustic emission technology has the advantages of low cost, high sensitivity, and continuous real-time monitoring of large deformation, and has gradually developed into an optional method for landslide subsurface deformation monitoring. Thus, efficient landslide monitoring should comprehensively use multiple technologies to overcome the limitations of a single technology, and an integrated monitoring system becomes the state-of-the-art trend. The purpose of landslide monitoring is to provide a basis for decision-making of disaster early warning, thus, avoiding casualties and property losses through effective early warning efforts. In the field of early warning, regional meteorological and individual landslide early warning methods are gradually developed and improved. Deformation monitoring data are the main basis for landslide early warning, and experts analyze the deformation trend and sudden change characteristics. Different early warning levels could be triggered by the threshold values of velocity, acceleration, or other criteria. However, a landslide has complex dynamic mechanisms and individual differences; thus, the generic early warning model needs further exploration. The intelligent early warning model integrates machine learning technology with geological engineering analysis to improve the accuracy and automation level of landslide early warning. Conclusions and Prospects: Deformation monitoring is essential in landslide prevention, and deformation data are the main basis for landslide early warning. Moreover, surface monitoring technologies have been widely used in the perception and decision-making process of landslides. Subsurface monitoring technologies can detect early precursors of landslide evolution to continuously improve early warning accuracy. Analyses show that early warning methods can be improved in the future by integrating machine learning models and geotechnical engineering.
滑坡灾害 / 地表变形 / 深部变形 / 综合监测 / 早期预警
landslide disaster / surface deformation / subsurface deformation / comprehensive monitoring / early warning
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
PERKINS S. Death toll from landslides vastly underestimated[J/OL]. (2012-08-08)[2022-09-03]. Nature, 2012. DOI: 10.1038/nature.2012.11140.
|
| 5 |
汪洋, 牛小静, 余锡平. 水滑坡体产生的涌浪特性[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 53 (1): 42-47, 57.
|
| 6 |
吴树仁, 石菊松, 王涛, 等. 滑坡风险评估理论与技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
刘传正, 陈春利. 中国地质灾害防治成效与问题对策[J]. 工程地质学报, 2020, 28 (2): 375- 383.
|
| 12 |
李媛, 杨旭东, 尹春荣, 等. 中国地质灾害时空分布及防灾减灾[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2020.
|
| 13 |
崔鹏. 中国山地灾害研究进展与未来应关注的科学问题[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33 (2): 145- 152.
|
| 14 |
何朝阳. 滑坡实时监测预警系统关键技术及其应用研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2020.
HE C Y. Research on key technology and application of real-time monitoring and early warning system of landslide[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2020. (in Chinese)
|
| 15 |
徐红. 地质灾害: 由群防到技防: 访自然资源部地质灾害防治技术指导中心首席科学家殷跃平[J]. 中国测绘, 2020 (7): 8- 11.
|
| 16 |
裴强, 雷焕珍, 刘红帅. 滑坡体与抗滑桩间接触应力的影响因素分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 53 (8): 1139-1144, 1154.
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
程刚, 王振雪, 李刚强, 等. 我国滑坡监测文献计量研究的可视化分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32 (7): 172- 179.
|
| 22 |
侯圣山, 李昂, 陈亮, 等. 基于普适型仪器的滑坡监测预警初探: 以甘肃兰州岷县三处滑坡为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2020, 31 (6): 47- 53.
|
| 23 |
SASAHARA K, ITOH K, SAKAI N. Prediction method of the onset of landslides based on the stress-dilatancy relation against shallow landslides[M]//SASSA K, CANUTI P, YIN Y P. Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment. Cham, Germany: Springer, 2014.
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
秦四清, 王思敬. 斜坡滑动失稳演化的非线性机制与过程研究进展[J]. 地球与环境, 2005, 33 (3): 75- 82.
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
许强, 汤明高, 徐开祥, 等. 滑坡时空演化规律及预警预报研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27 (6): 1104- 1112.
|
| 30 |
贺可强, 孙林娜, 王思敬. 滑坡位移分形参数Hurst指数及其在堆积层滑坡预报中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28 (6): 1107- 1115.
|
| 31 |
国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 滑坡防治设计规范: GB/T 38509—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020.
State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Code for the design of landslide stabilization: GB/T 38509—2020[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020. (in Chinese)
|
| 32 |
冯春, 张军, 李世海, 等. 滑坡变形监测技术的最新进展[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2011, 22 (1): 11- 16.
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
SYAHMI M Z, AZIZ W A W, ZULKARNAINI M A, et al. The movement detection on the landslide surface by using terrestrial laser scanning[C]//2011 IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium. Shah Alam, Malaysia, 2011.
|
| 40 |
徐进军, 王海城, 罗喻真, 等. 基于三维激光扫描的滑坡变形监测与数据处理[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31 (7): 2188-2191, 2196.
|
| 41 |
李晓恩, 周亮, 苏奋振, 等. InSAR技术在滑坡灾害中的应用研究进展[J]. 遥感学报, 2021, 25 (2): 614- 629.
|
| 42 |
李振洪, 宋闯, 余琛, 等. 卫星雷达遥感在滑坡灾害探测和监测中的应用: 挑战与对策[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2019, 44 (7): 967- 979.
|
| 43 |
朱建军, 李志伟, 胡俊. InSAR变形监测方法与研究进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46 (10): 1717- 1733.
|
| 44 |
许强, 朱星, 李为乐, 等. "天-空-地"协同滑坡监测技术进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51 (7): 1416- 1436.
|
| 45 |
胡友健, 梁新美, 许成功. 论GPS变形监测技术的现状与发展趋势[J]. 测绘科学, 2006, 31 (5): 155- 157.
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
侯训田, 万毅宏, 张娟秀, 等. 基于声发射技术的山体滑坡灾变预测试验研究[J]. 中外公路, 2014, 34 (1): 36- 39.
|
| 49 |
王恭先. 滑坡防治中的关键技术及其处理方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24 (21): 3818- 3827.
|
| 50 |
翟艳龙. 基于滑体位移的滑坡时间预测分析方法研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2016.
ZHAI Y L. Study on time prediction analysis method for landslides based on landslide displacements[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016. (in Chinese)
|
| 51 |
李世海, 冯春, 周东, 等. 滑坡研究中的力学方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018.
|
| 52 |
何满潮, 李晨, 宫伟力, 等. NPR锚杆/索支护原理及大变形控制技术[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35 (8): 1513- 1529.
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
何满潮. 滑坡地质灾害远程监测预报系统及其工程应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28 (6): 1081- 1090.
|
| 55 |
申屠南瑛. 地下位移测量方法及理论研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2013.
SHENTU N Y. Research on methods and theories for measuring underground displacement[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2013. (in Chinese)
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
SMITH A. Quantification of slope deformation behaviour using acoustic emission monitoring[D]. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University, 2015.
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
李果, 王毅, 吴铸, 等. 基于柔性测斜装置的滑坡大变形误差识别与修正[J]. 人民长江, 2016, 47 (4): 74- 78.
|
| 67 |
唐亚明, 张茂省, 薛强, 等. 滑坡监测预警国内外研究现状及评述[J]. 地质论评, 2012, 58 (3): 533- 541.
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
杨天鸿, 张锋春, 于庆磊, 等. 露天矿高陡边坡稳定性研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32 (5): 1437-1451, 1472.
|
| 71 |
谢和平, 鞠杨, 黎立云. 基于能量耗散与释放原理的岩石强度与整体破坏准则[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24 (17): 3003- 3010.
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
易武, 孟召平. 岩质边坡声发射特征及失稳预报判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28 (12): 2529-2533, 2538.
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
王卫, 汪博浩, 赵运天, 等. 胶结颗粒料力学行为与声发射信号特征[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59 (5): 337- 344.
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
SPRIGGS M P. Quantification of acoustic emission from soils for predicting landslide failure[D]. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University, 2005.
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
徐靓, 程刚, 朱鸿鹄. 基于空天地内一体化的滑坡监测技术研究[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2021, 58 (9): 0900006.
|
| 92 |
赵永红, 王航, 张琼, 等. 滑坡位移监测方法综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33 (6): 2606- 2612.
|
| 93 |
许强, 董秀军, 李为乐. 基于天-空-地一体化的重大地质灾害隐患早期识别与监测预警[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2019, 44 (7): 957- 966.
|
| 94 |
张勤, 白正伟, 黄观文, 等. GNSS滑坡监测预警技术进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51 (10): 1985- 2000.
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
陈杨, 邓李政, 黄丽达, 等. 基于声发射监测的滑坡过程预警模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62 (6): 1052- 1058.
|
| 98 |
|
| 99 |
许强. 对滑坡监测预警相关问题的认识与思考[J]. 工程地质学报, 2020, 28 (2): 360- 374.
|
| 100 |
张海艳, 简文星, 杨涛, 等. 降雨作用下三峡库区秭归谭家湾滑坡监测预警研究[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2022, 29 (4): 129- 138.
|
| 101 |
CRUDEN D M, VARNES D J. Landslide types and processes[R]. Washington DC, USA: National Research Council, 1996: 36-75.
|
| 102 |
徐峰, 汪洋, 杜娟, 等. 基于时间序列分析的滑坡位移预测模型研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30 (4): 746- 751.
|
| 103 |
许强, 彭大雷, 何朝阳, 等. 突发型黄土滑坡监测预警理论方法研究: 以甘肃黑方台为例[J]. 工程地质学报, 2020, 28 (1): 111- 121.
|
| 104 |
马娟, 赵文祎, 齐干, 等. 基于普适型监测的多参数预警研究: 以三峡库区卡门子湾滑坡为例[J]. 西北地质, 2021, 54 (3): 259- 269.
|
| 105 |
王凯, 张少杰, 马娟, 等. 大数据环境下滑坡宏观位移阶段空间分布规律及预警判据研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37 (10): 1054- 1065.
|
| 106 |
李阳春, 刘黔云, 李潇, 等. 基于机器学习的滑坡崩塌地质灾害气象风险预警研究[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2021, 32 (3): 118- 123.
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
陈贺, 李亚军, 房锐, 等. 滑坡深部位移监测新技术及预警预报研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34 (S2): 4063- 4070.
|
| 109 |
辛鹏, 胡乐, 王涛, 等. 位移-应力协同分析在新近纪软岩质滑坡监测中的应用: 以陕西宝鸡市北坡滑坡为例[J]. 地球学报, 2020, 41 (1): 37- 48.
|
| 110 |
胡开颜, 莫淳淯, 张益华, 等. 基于自然电位法的滑坡监测实验研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2021, 64 (12): 4582- 4593.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |