基于多重网络下风险与信息耦合传播的供应链韧性分析

周佳美, 吕伟, 汪京辉

清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (6) : 1050-1059.

PDF(5636 KB)
PDF(5636 KB)
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (6) : 1050-1059. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.22.015
公共安全

基于多重网络下风险与信息耦合传播的供应链韧性分析

作者信息 +

Impact of risk and information coupled propagation in multilayer networks on supply chain resilience

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在高度不确定的环境中, 供应链系统易受到突发事件的影响, 引发连锁反应, 如何刻画其风险传播特征并提升系统韧性成为关键问题。该文提出了耦合风险与信息传播的双层网络模型:风险传播层模拟企业间的风险传播情况, 信息传播层刻画风险预警信息的传播机制。通过微观Markov链(MMC)方法分析风险传播过程, 并推导风险传播阈值, 揭示了网络拓扑结构及企业个体的风险应对能力对系统稳定性的影响。构建了多维度韧性评估体系, 分析不同网络结构与信息传播速率对供应链适应性和恢复能力的作用机理。研究结果表明:调整供应链网络结构有助于提高供应链抗风险能力; 增强企业对风险的认知与应对策略可有效提升供应链的韧性, 抑制风险传播; 蓄意攻击节点度大的枢纽节点对网络系统造成的破坏最大。该研究为供应链管理提供了理论支持, 可为提高供应链的抗风险能力和优化管理策略提供决策依据。

Abstract

Objective: With increased globalization, multiple countries are involved in supply chains, forming complex supply networks. Frequent occurrences of natural disasters, geopolitical instability, and global health crises pose unprecedented challenges to traditional supply chain management methods. Local disruptions in the supply chain can spread internally, causing a series of chain reactions. Enhancing supply chain risk resilience and robustness has become a research focus for many scholars. The widespread use of the Internet has led to rapid information exchange between enterprises; an increasing number of scholars have recognized the importance of early warning information in preventing supply chain disruptions. Therefore, understanding how information affects the propagation of risks within the supply chain and maximizing the early warning function of information have significant practical implications. Moreover, the heterogeneity in the responses of enterprises to early warning information also needs attention. Methods: To capture the propagation of early warning information and disruption risks, a two-layer propagation model that couples risk and information is constructed. In this model, the upper layer represents the information layer and the lower layer represents the risk layer. The information of a disruption in a lower-layer enterprise is transmitted to upstream and downstream enterprises with a certain probability. After receiving the early warning information, an enterprise transitions into a conscious node and this transition is reflected in the upper layer network. In this model, there are five possible states for the nodes in the network. A microscopic Markov chain (MMC) method is used to analyze the state transition process between nodes and calculate the risk propagation threshold of the system. Furthermore, the key factors influencing the propagation of disruption risk are analyzed. An agent-based approach is used for case simulation to validate the model's effectiveness. Numerical analysis of the model reveals that the network structure, network size, extent of risk information propagation in the information layer, and the probability of disruption risk propagation are the key factors influencing the propagation of the risk. Financial data from Tesla's supply chain in China are also collected. In case simulation, an agent-based method is used to study the effects of the information layer network structure, information propagation rate, and risk propagation rate on the supply chain resilience. Results: The results show that for a low information propagation rate, the scale-free network structure accelerates information dissemination, allowing more enterprises to quickly obtain early warning information, thereby helping the supply chain resist risks and improve resilience. When the information propagation rate exceeds 0.4, the small-world network structures can propagate risks more efficiently because of their shorter average paths. Additionally, three disruption schemes are used to analyze system resilience, revealing that prioritizing the disruption of nodes with higher degrees has the greatest impact on the network, while deliberately attacking nodes with smaller degrees allows the supply chain to maintain higher operational efficiency. This finding suggests that maintaining the robustness of the key nodes in the supply chain is critical for enhancing the overall network resilience. Conclusions: Adjusting the supply chain network structure can help improve the risk resilience and robustness of the system. Enhancing risk awareness of enterprises and their response strategies can effectively improve supply chain resilience and suppress risk diffusion. Deliberate attacks on hub nodes with high degrees cause the greatest damage to the network system. Thus, this study provides theoretical support for supply chain management and can serve as a basis for decision-making to improve supply chain risk resilience and optimize management strategies.

关键词

供应链中断 / 网络韧性 / 双层网络 / 微观Markov链(MMC)方法 / 系统传播动力学

Key words

supply chain disruption / network resilience / two-layer network / microscopic Markov chain (MMC) method / system propagation dynamics

引用本文

导出引用
周佳美, 吕伟, 汪京辉. 基于多重网络下风险与信息耦合传播的供应链韧性分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 65(6): 1050-1059 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.22.015
Jiamei ZHOU, Wei LÜ, Jinghui WANG. Impact of risk and information coupled propagation in multilayer networks on supply chain resilience[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(6): 1050-1059 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.22.015
中图分类号: N941.3   

参考文献

1
张以彬, 陈俊芳. 供应链的风险识别框架及其柔性控制策略[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2008, 13 (1): 47- 52.
ZHANG Y B , CHEN J F . A framework of identifying supply chain risks and their flexible mitigating polices[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2008, 13 (1): 47- 52.
2
李文川, 李卓娅, 黄影. 基于复杂网络的闭环供应链风险传播模型构建及仿真[J]. 物流技术, 2023, 42 (3): 78- 85.
LI W C , LI Z Y , HUANG Y . Construction and simulation of closed-loop supply chain risk propagation model based on complex network[J]. Logistics Technology, 2023, 42 (3): 78- 85.
3
BRUSSET X , TELLER C . Supply chain capabilities, risks, and resilience[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 184, 59- 68.
4
于瑞峰, 刘岚, 申悦, 等. 成本信息共享下供应链成员收益的影响因素[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 47 (5): 749- 752.
YU R F , LIU L , SHEN Y , et al. Factors influencing supply chain members' profits with cost information sharing[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2007, 47 (5): 749- 752.
5
张圣忠, 杨波. 信息共享对两级供应链风险传染的影响[J]. 长安大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17 (2): 38- 41.
ZHANG S Z , YANG B . Impact of information sharing on two echelon supply chain risk contagion[J]. Journal of Chang'an University (Social Science Edition), 2015, 17 (2): 38- 41.
6
WU J , WANG S Y , CHAO X L , et al. Impact of risk aversion on optimal decisions in supply contracts[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 128 (2): 569- 576.
7
KOCABASOGLU C , PRAHINSKI C , KLASSEN R D . Linking forward and reverse supply chain investments: The role of business uncertainty[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25 (6): 1141- 1160.
8
YAO Q Y , FAN R G , CHEN R K , et al. A model of the enterprise supply chain risk propagation based on partially mapping two-layer complex networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2023, 613, 128506.
9
PAN Y H , YAN Z J . The impact of individual heterogeneity on the coupled awareness-epidemic dynamics in multiplex networks[J]. Chaos, 2018, 28 (6): 063123.
10
WANG Z S , XIA C Y . Co-evolution spreading of multiple information and epidemics on two-layered networks under the influence of mass media[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2020, 102 (4): 3039- 3052.
11
YU Y A , YU Y . The impact of the self-recognition ability and physical quality on coupled negative information- behavior-epidemic dynamics in multiplex networks[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2023, 169, 113229.
12
刘明菲, 李鑫. 农产品供应链中断情景下的响应策略对供应链弹性的影响[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 31 (5): 137- 143.
LIU M F , LI X . Impact of response strategies in supply chain disruption of agricultural products on the resilience of supply chain[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 31 (5): 137- 143.
13
樊雪梅, 卢梦媛. 新冠疫情下汽车企业供应链韧性影响因素及评价[J]. 工业技术经济, 2020, 39 (10): 21- 28.
FAN X M , LU M Y . Influencing factors and evaluation of auto companies' supply chain resilience under the COVID-19[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 2020, 39 (10): 21- 28.
14
盛昭瀚, 王海燕, 胡志华. 供应链韧性: 适应复杂性: 基于复杂系统管理视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30 (11): 1- 7.
SHENG Z H , WANG H Y , HU Z H . Supply chain resilience: Adapting to complexity: Based on the perspective of complex system thinking[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30 (11): 1- 7.
15
TUKAMUHABWA B R , STEVENSON M , BUSBY J , et al. Supply chain resilience: Definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2015, 53 (18): 5592- 5623.
16
NGUYEN H , SHARKEY T C , WHEELER S , et al. Towards the development of quantitative resilience indices for multi-echelon assembly supply chains[J]. Omega, 2021, 99, 102199.
17
TRAN H T , BALCHANOS M , DOMERÇANT J C , et al. A framework for the quantitative assessment of performance-based system resilience[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017, 158, 73- 84.
18
FRANCIS R , BEKERA B . A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2014, 121, 90- 103.
19
IVANOV D. Supply chain resilience: Modelling, management, and control[M]//IVANOV D. Structural dynamics and resilience in supply chain risk management. Cham: Springer, 2018: 45-89.
20
WANG J P , ZHOU H , JIN X D . Risk transmission in complex supply chain network with multi-drivers[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2021, 143, 110259.
21
DEFFUANT G , NEAU D , AMBLARD F , et al. Mixing beliefs among interacting agents[J]. Advances in Complex Systems, 2000, 3 (01n04): 87- 98.
22
ALTMAN E I . Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1968, 23 (4): 589- 609.
23
LI Y H , ZOBEL C W . Exploring supply chain network resilience in the presence of the ripple effect[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 228, 107693.
24
BRANDON-JONES E , SQUIRE B , AUTRY C W , et al. A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness[J]. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2014, 50 (3): 55- 73.
25
NAN C , SANSAVINI G . A quantitative method for assessing resilience of interdependent infrastructures[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017, 157, 35- 53.
26
中国物流与采购联合会. 2022年中国新能源汽车供应链行业概述[EB/OL]. (2023-01-13)[2023-07-05]. http://www.chinawuliu.com.cn/xsyj/202301/13/597476.shtml.
China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing. Overview of China's new energy vehicle supply chain industry in 2022[EB/OL]. (2023-01-13)[2023-07-05]. http://www.chinawuliu.com.cn/xsyj/202301/13/597476.shtml. (in Chinese)

脚注

数据可用性说明

本文所有数据可以在合理的要求下联系第一作者后提供。

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(52072286)

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载。
PDF(5636 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/