微重力条件下层流多元乙烯扩散火焰的数值模拟

费腾, 沈畅, 游小清

清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (9) : 1684-1694.

PDF(8989 KB)
PDF(8989 KB)
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (9) : 1684-1694. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.27.028
微重力燃烧

微重力条件下层流多元乙烯扩散火焰的数值模拟

作者信息 +

Numerical simulation of laminar multi-element ethylene diffusion flames under microgravity

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

微重力与常重力条件下的燃烧现象存在显著差异。深入研究微重力条件下的扩散火焰结构,对于丰富燃烧理论,促进航天工程等领域的发展具有重要意义。该文采用数值模拟手段,研究了多元扩散燃烧器下的乙烯/氧气/氩气火焰的结构特征,设计了3组计算工况分别研究重力、压力及氧气体积分数对火焰结构的影响机制。结果表明,该多元扩散火焰的形态与燃料当量比和压力相关,在常压及富燃条件下形成双层火焰,内层与外层分别由乙烯和一氧化碳的燃烧产生。随着重力加速度由9.8 m/s2降至0,火焰的高度升高、宽度变宽、温度降低。随着压力由50 kPa升至500 kPa,火焰高度降低且形态发生变化,同时火焰温度在常重力和微重力条件下分别升高了590和80 K。随着氧气体积分数由1.00降至0.50,火焰高度升高,火焰由分离火焰转变为双层火焰,同时火焰温度在常重力和微重力条件下分别降低约250和600 K。

Abstract

Objective: Currently, multi-element diffusion flames find applications in flame synthesis, combustion mechanism studies, and aerospace engine design. Therefore, investigating the characteristics of multi-element diffusion flames under both terrestrial gravity and microgravity conditions is crucial. In this study, numerical simulation methods are used to investigate the structural characteristics of ethylene-oxygen multielement laminar diffusion flames and the effects of pressure and oxygen volume fraction on the flame structure under both terrestrial gravity and microgravity conditions. Methods: This study was conducted using ANSYS Fluent software. First, a geometric model of the multi-element combustion chamber was constructed. The selected computational model included solving flow using a laminar model, diffusion using Fick's law, chemical reactions using a finite rate model, and radiation using a discrete ordinates model. Grid independence verification was performed, with 600, 000 grids chosen for calculations eventually. After the computational model was established, three sets of operating conditions were designed to study variations in flame behavior under different gravitational accelerations (0-9.8 m/s2), pressures (50-500 kPa), and oxygen volume fractions (0.25-1.00). The flame height obtained from the numerical simulation differed by less than 10% from the experimental results; thus, our method was considered to provide reliable results. Results: The results indicated that the flame had a double-layer structure. With decreasing gravity, because of the inhibition of buoyancy, the flame height increased from 7.3 to 12.8 mm, whereas the flame temperature decreased by 300 K. With increasing pressure, both the outer flame height and width decreased. At normal gravity, the temperature increased by 590 K, whereas it increased by only 80 K at microgravity. At 500 kPa pressure, the normal gravity fire separated, changing from a closed-tip flame to an open-tip flame at microgravity. As the volume fraction of oxygen decreased from 1.00, the flame height gradually increased. When it reached 0.50, the flame changed from a single flame to a double-layer one. Under normal gravity conditions, the flame temperature decreased by about 250 K, whereas it decreased by 600 K under microgravity conditions. Conclusions: The multi-element diffusion flame exhibited a double-layer structure under atmospheric pressure and fuel-rich conditions, with the inner and outer flames generated by the combustion of ethylene and CO, respectively. Meanwhile, modifications in pressure or oxygen volume fractions could change the shape from double-layer fire to separate flames or open-tip flame. The microgravity conditions enhanced the role of radiative heat transfer, leading to a significant decrease in flame temperature and eliminating convective mass transfer caused by buoyancy, thus increasing the flame height and width. Increasing pressure accelerated the reaction rate, increased the flame temperature, and reduced the flame height and width. Under microgravity conditions, increasing pressure enhanced the radiative heat transfer and lowered the flame tip temperature. Reducing the oxygen volume fraction reduced the flame temperature, increased the flame height, and converted the flame from separate flames to a double-layer flame, which was more susceptible to radiative effects and had a particularly low flame temperature in microgravity.

关键词

微重力 / 层流扩散火焰 / 多元扩散火焰 / 数值模拟

Key words

microgravity / laminar diffusion flame / multi-element diffusion flame / numerical simulation

引用本文

导出引用
费腾, 沈畅, 游小清. 微重力条件下层流多元乙烯扩散火焰的数值模拟[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 65(9): 1684-1694 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.27.028
Teng FEI, Chang SHEN, Xiaoqing YOU. Numerical simulation of laminar multi-element ethylene diffusion flames under microgravity[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(9): 1684-1694 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.27.028
中图分类号: TK16   

参考文献

1
BILGER R W . Reaction rates in diffusion flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1977, 30, 277- 284.
2
ROSS H D . Microgravity combustion[M]. London: Academic Press, 2001.
3
王双峰, 朱凤, 卢占斌. 热厚材料表面的近极限火焰传播特性[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2016, 22 (5): 402- 407.
WANG S F , ZHU F , LU Z B . Near-limit flame spread over thick solid fuels[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2016, 22 (5): 402- 407.
4
YE S H , HAO M M , GUO H R , et al. A review of motivations, methods, and achievements on microgravity combustion research[J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 2021, 300, 01021.
5
孔文俊, 赵若霖, 袁志伟. 小尺度弱强度湍流燃烧地面匹配实验研究[J]. 中国空间科学技术, 2023, 43 (6): 51- 57.
KONG W J , ZHAO R L , YUAN Z W . Study on ground matching experiments for small-scale weak intensity turbulent combustion[J]. Chinese Space Science and Technology, 2023, 43 (6): 51- 57.
6
KAPLAN C R , ORAN E S , KAILASANATH K , et al. Gravitational effects on sooting diffusion flames[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1996, 26 (1): 1301- 1309.
7
SUNDERLAND P , MENDELSON B , YUAN Z , et al. Shapes of buoyant and nonbuoyant laminar jet diffusion flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1999, 116 (3): 376- 386.
8
LIN K , FAETH G , SUNDERLAND P , et al. Shapes of nonbuoyant round luminous hydrocarbon/air laminar jet diffusion flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1999, 116 (3): 415- 431.
9
CONTRERAS J , CONSALVI J L , FUENTES A . Oxygen index effect on the structure of a laminar boundary layer diffusion flame in a reduced gravity environment[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36 (2): 3237- 3245.
10
LAW C K , FAETH G M . Opportunities and challenges of combustion in microgravity[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1994, 20 (1): 65- 113.
11
CHAREST M R J , GROTH C P T , GÜLDER Ö L . Effects of gravity and pressure on laminar coflow methane-air diffusion flames at pressures from 1 to 60 atmospheres[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158 (5): 860- 875.
12
CHAREST M R J , GROTH C P T , GÜLDER Ö L . A numerical study on the effects of pressure and gravity in laminar ethylene diffusion flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158 (10): 1933- 1945.
13
YUAN H L , KONG W J . Soot formation in laminar diffusion flame under microgravityormalsize[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2018, 38 (4): 517- 523.
14
BHOWAL A J , MANDAL B K . A transient study on the development of temperature field and soot under reduced gravity in a methane air diffusion flame[J]. Microgravity Science and Technology, 2019, 31 (1): 13- 29.
15
DOBBINS R R , TINJERO J , SQUEO J , et al. A combined experimental and computational study of soot formation in normal and microgravity conditions[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2023, 195 (15): 3882- 3907.
16
WOOLDRIDGE M S , TOREK P V , DONOVAN M T , et al. An experimental investigation of gas-phase combustion synthesis of SiO2 nanoparticles using a multi-element diffusion flame burner[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2002, 131 (1-2): 98- 109.
17
PINCHAK M, OMBRELLO T, CARTER C, et al. Flame propagation enhancement of ethylene by addition of ozone[C]// Proceedings of the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013.
18
ADEOSUN A , HUANG Q , LI T X , et al. Characterization of a new Hencken burner with a transition from a reducing- to-oxidizing environment for fundamental coal studies[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2018, 89 (2): 025109.
19
MENG Q H , BANYON C , KASTENGREN A L , et al. Experimental measurement of the rapid mixing of fuel and air in a multi-element diffusion (Hencken) burner[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2023, 251, 112686.
20
沈畅, 邵森, 郭祺峰, 等. 火焰合成凝聚相纳米材料调控技术的研究进展[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (4): 546- 559.
SHEN C , SHAO S , GUO Q F , et al. Research progress on control technologies for flame synthesis of condensed-phase nanomaterials[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2023, 63 (4): 546- 559.
21
SILVESTRI S, CELANO M P, SCHLIEBEN G, et al. Characterization of a multi-injector GOx/CH4 combustion chamber[C]// Proceedings of the 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. Salt Lake City, UT, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.
22
PERAKIS N , STRAUSS J , HAIDN O J . Heat flux evaluation in a multi-element CH4/O2 rocket combustor using an inverse heat transfer method[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 142, 118425.
23
RAITHBY G D , CHUI E H . A finite-volume method for predicting a radiant heat transfer in enclosures with participating media[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1990, 112 (2): 415- 423.
24
COPPALLE A , VERVISCH P . The total emissivities of high-temperature flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1983, 49 (1-3): 101- 108.
25
SMITH T F , SHEN Z F , FRIEDMAN J N . Evaluation of coefficients for the weighted sum of gray gases model[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1982, 104 (4): 602- 608.
26
ZETTERVALL N , FUREBY C , NILSSON E J K . Small skeletal kinetic reaction mechanism for ethylene-air combustion[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31 (12): 14138- 14149.
27
METCALFE W K , BURKE S M , AHMED S S , et al. A hierarchical and comparative kinetic modeling study of c1-c2 hydrocarbon and oxygenated fuels[J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2013, 45 (10): 638- 675.
28
BILGER R W . The structure of turbulent nonpremixed flames[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1989, 22 (1): 475- 488.
29
CAO S , MA B , BENNETT B A V , et al. A computational and experimental study of coflow laminar methane/air diffusion flames: Effects of fuel dilution, inlet velocity, and gravity[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2015, 35 (1): 897- 903.
30
KARATAŞA E , GÜLDER Ö L . Dependence of sooting characteristics and temperature field of co-flow laminar pure and nitrogen-diluted ethylene-air diffusion flames on pressure[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162 (4): 1566- 1574.
31
覃建果, 魏小林, 郭啸峰, 等. 甲烷高压富氧燃烧层流扩散火焰的数值研究[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2013, 19 (5): 425- 433.
QIN J G , WEI X L , GUO X F , et al. Numerical study on oxygen-enhanced axisymmetric laminar methane diffusion flames at high pressures[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2013, 19 (5): 425- 433.

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFA0716204)

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载。
PDF(8989 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/